🎨 Artcow Iconoclast / Jonathan Mack Sweet - The Chris-Chan of Arkansas

[Ca Ira]

It's ironic that someone obsessed with restoring the status quo of his early adulthood, who is more or less frank about his unwillingness to tolerate any change, should call himself "Iconoclast."

 

[He Sets Me On Fire]

You know what, folks? I'm a big enough guy to admit when I'm wrong, particularly when it comes to interpreting the words of a delusional scat fetishist .

I'd like to post a correction.

Waaaay back in February 2 of this year, I had quoted the following from Fekul the Baby:

Trying to get a handle on this insanity, I posted the following commentary:

Couple problems with this.

1. Jon acknowledges that the staff at the Herald won't talk to him. Torpedo.

2. It is unlikely that the Herald would slip up and threaten him openly, as all evidence indicates that the Herald wants nothing to do with him (such as point number 1).

I stand behind this, no problem. But then we get to point number three, which I think may not have been a correct interpretation of what Jon was saying:

3. Using the exact same tactical brilliance he displayed when he openly admitted he was going to troll this thread, Jon blatantly announces that he intends to trick someone into acknowledging something that doesn't exist in order to win a court case. Winning a case on evidence you know doesn't exist is dumb enough, but no - he had to go further and tell his plan to the internet.

(Emphasis added)

Now, to be sure, the bit about Jon once again blowing his plan wide open for the world to see is rock-solid. It's the bit about "acknowledging something that doesn't exist" that's the issue.

When I first read Sweet's entry (it was a hate-filled response to someone), there were two aspects that caught my eye:

"I can't work in a newsroom, get a reporter to talk to me, or even buy ad space. It's called the journalism blacklist. I might be able to get (The Herald) on new charges if ... I can get my hands on concrete evidence--an e-mail, an internal memo, a phone log--documenting The Herald's efforts to derail my success in life. In other words, if I can fool someone into acknowledging the existence of the blacklist, I can use their confession as a peg to hang the faculty advisor on."

What I had initially thought was that Sweet didn't believe in the blacklist, and intended to win his court case by tricking an enemy into believing, then admitting, it's existence. But I was wrong about that. I was wrong, and I admit it, because, sadly, I seemed to have given him too much credit.

What tripped me up was the concept of "fooling" someone in order to win a court case. You know, trickery and deception over evidence. That would have been crazy enough, but par for the course for Jon "No Idea How the World Works" Sweet. We saw such incompetence with his photoshopped CP plan: Jon uses his highly overrated technical and people-reading skills to bring down a lesser enemy. The truth, however, is far dumber: Jon honestly believed in this so-called journalism blacklist, and thought he could manipulate someone into revealing it.

The stupidity leaks from this concept from at least two major holes. First, any list circulated between major publications letting them know that Jon was a poor candidate for employment would not be illegal, nor would it have much of a chance in a civil case. Heck, if Jon could sue over that, he'd have to sue himself for presenting an extremely light CV, his criminal record, and very few published pieces. More boneheaded, however, is Jon's insistence that such a blacklist exists. See, in his own post, he makes it clear that he has absolutely no evidence that the blacklist is real. However, if he's sent the actual for real 100 per cent jin-u-whyne Saturday Night Life TV ratings sketch itself - well, hey, he hasn't watched it, so it doesn't exist. The lack of basic logic is stunning.

And so you have it. I made the error. I misconstrued his words. And yet, for it all, Jon comes out even more wrong in the end.

 

[Holdek]

You know what, folks? I'm a big enough guy to admit when I'm wrong, particularly when it comes to interpreting the words of a delusional scat fetishist .

I'd like to post a correction.

Waaaay back in February 2 of this year, I had quoted the following from Fekul the Baby:

View attachment 16193

Trying to get a handle on this insanity, I posted the following commentary:



I stand behind this, no problem. But then we get to point number three, which I think may not have been a correct interpretation of what Jon was saying:

(Emphasis added)

Now, to be sure, the bit about Jon once again blowing his plan wide open for the world to see is rock-solid. It's the bit about "acknowledging something that doesn't exist" that's the issue.

When I first read Sweet's entry (it was a hate-filled response to someone), there were two aspects that caught my eye:

"I can't work in a newsroom, get a reporter to talk to me, or even buy ad space. It's called the journalism blacklist. I might be able to get (The Herald) on new charges if ... I can get my hands on concrete evidence--an e-mail, an internal memo, a phone log--documenting The Herald's efforts to derail my success in life. In other words, if I can fool someone into acknowledging the existence of the blacklist, I can use their confession as a peg to hang the faculty advisor on."

What I had initially thought was that Sweet didn't believe in the blacklist, and intended to win his court case by tricking an enemy into believing, then admitting, it's existence. But I was wrong about that. I was wrong, and I admit it, because, sadly, I seemed to have given him too much credit.

What tripped me up was the concept of "fooling" someone in order to win a court case. You know, trickery and deception over evidence. That would have been crazy enough, but par for the course for Jon "No Idea How the World Works" Sweet. We saw such incompetence with his photoshopped CP plan: Jon uses his highly overrated technical and people-reading skills to bring down a lesser enemy. The truth, however, is far dumber: Jon honestly believed in this so-called journalism blacklist, and thought he could manipulate someone into revealing it.

The stupidity leaks from this concept from at least two major holes. First, any list circulated between major publications letting them know that Jon was a poor candidate for employment would not be illegal, nor would it have much of a chance in a civil case. Heck, if Jon could sue over that, he'd have to sue himself for presenting an extremely light CV, his criminal record, and very few published pieces. More boneheaded, however, is Jon's insistence that such a blacklist exists. See, in his own post, he makes it clear that he has absolutely no evidence that the blacklist is real. However, if he's sent the actual for real 100 per cent jin-u-whyne Saturday Night Life TV ratings sketch itself - well, hey, he hasn't watched it, so it doesn't exist. The lack of basic logic is stunning.

And so you have it. I made the error. I misconstrued his words. And yet, for it all, Jon comes out even more wrong in the end.

It's okay. I've made mistakes with Jon's ramblings too. As any veteran Christorian knows, trying to interpret crazy can be a minefield. What's important is that you make it to the other side with your own sanity intact .

 

[Holdek]

And, I would add: you published a correction like a true newspaperman would.

 

[Le Bateleur]

I've seen Sweet frequently mention that "Ashleigh" objected to the colour of trousers he wore to their one meeting. It turns out they were purple, and paired with a "loud shirt". He also wore his trademark cap decorated with buttons. (Backup) It is perhaps not coincidental that purple is Sweet's mother's favourite colour. (Backup)

The Sweet in 2008 has some decent advice for the Sweet in 2015.

I think the problem is, some folks (and you know who you are) see happiness as being selfish. They actually embrace their misery. Have you ever talked to someone who turns thinks into a bizarre game of ones-upsmanship? If you've got a splinter in your thumb, they've got gangrene in nine fingers, plus a hemorrhoid, and six of their seven kids have got the ebola virus. And if you ask them, "Well, what are you doing about it?", they look at you like you're a monster for even suggesting such a thing. They feel not only is their pain and suffering noble, but everybody should share equally in their misery.

Now I may not be as happy as I'd like to be now (to be honest, I think 1996 was my last real good year-- ), but that doesn't mean I can't work to have what I want. I know it won't be easy. It might take a month, three months, a year, or 18 months of effort before my efforts substantively pay off, but eventually I will prove myself worthy to know joy.

(Source, backup)

Sweet is some kind of auto-Cassandra. He has in the past identified exactly what his problems are (Ashleigh was a troll, his own personality flaws got him fired from the Herald), and what it would take to solve them - but he also has a perfect record of ignoring himself.

Finally, animals seem to generally dislike Sweet.

The birds around here are crazy anyway. They've built a nest directly over the porch light, and when I step out in my yard, they dive-bomb me. I've nearly lost an ear to those swooping buggers. It's like a remake of The Birds here.

(Source, backup)

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Thank you, Shadow Fox!

Man, this is sweet. This is Jon Thumb to a T. He comes to this thread a year (or a little less) after it's been up, throws around a bunch of insults, says some abZURD stuff about us, liberals, conservatives, blacks, women, and whatever else flies under his nail, acts as if he's the smartest guy in the room, and then runs off after he's been served the responses he richly deserved, most of which were comprised of logical, politely-worded arguments to several highly-dubious claims (especially from Holdek) - and yet he's been abused.

Oh, sure, it's not as if there weren't a couple of nasty names tossed his way (I consider "knuckle neck" a crowning achievement), but all of them were preceded by Jon's utter vitriol here on these forums, and in several of his blogs and comics from way back. The difference between those sites and here was that here, he wouldn't be able to control the responses as well. Oh, that and people were actually paying attention to him here. He can dish it out, but he sure can't take it.

Remember this nugget from way back?


View attachment 15967


Well, now, hold on, Sweets, I thought this was fun! Now it's abuse? What's going on?

Very simple. Jon Sweet is an ass. A cowardly, ignorant, obviously mentally challenged, incompetent ass of the lowest degree. He's lazy, selfish, seemingly sociopathic, leech-like, entitled, bigoted, paranoid, and only engages in any kind of intellectual curiosity if it thinks it will gain him entrance into the pants of his fictional girlfriend, regardless of how she may feel about the situation (which she doesn't, because she's fictional). If his assery just ended at him exposing his crooked posterior at society and demanding they give him a big smooch, CWC-style, that would be one thing. But no, Sweet has engaged in both highly anti-social behavior, as well as criminal behavior, in order to get his way, only to fail pathetically, with a stint in the hoosegow being his only reward.

One of Jon's most overused defenses is his ability to make stuff up in order to justify his actions and demonize others, a trait that I rather stuffily have come to call "invents a narrative". Like I said before, this habit differs from lying. What Jon does is take fact and pervert it with false theory and perspective. "She lives with me," he once insisted about his living situation with his mother. This is essentially true, insofar as it's factual information presented subjectively. If NobleGreyHorse were to insist that Absinthe was "sitting next to me!" when I mentioned she was sitting next to him, she'd be making a subjectively true statement, but Noble is sitting next to the aisle while Absinthe is sitting next to the window can be objectively proven. Likewise, Mrs. Sweet is the head of the household, whereas Jon makes zero income, therefor, Jon lives with her, as in 'on her dime'. Generally speaking, Jon plays with perspective enough to get away with what he says, until his lips flap so much that he admits that he's on welfare, never had a paying job, etc.

Of course, Jon doesn't really admit things as much as he blatantly states them. This thread and his blogs have been inundated with his unvarnished declaration of his anti-social, disruptive behavior, which the reader is apparently supposed to ignore while buying Jon's whining completely. In the short six months of Jon's time at the ASU Herald, he repeatedly made a nuisance of himself, and not the cute and whimsical Dennis the Menace kind, either. He was just as much of dumb, hateful child there as he was here. And what happened? He was booted out, and went on to claim that the very people whom he wronged were the ones that "ruined his life".

Jon would go on to do the exact same thing here, treating others as if they were beneath him. We responded just as anyone would, and now, Jon has been subject to abuse. My friends and fellow Koalas, We Are All the ASU Herald.

The biggest problem that I can see is that when Jon invents his stories, he believes in them. This is dangerous, as he expects things to follow through as if he knows reality. There was no way that that guy at the Herald would've published Jon's shooped CP picture, but Jon bought into his own narrative that he would. He only burned the pic out of fear of being caught. This kind of inconceivable stupidity (or mental retardation, who knows) could get - and may have gotten - Sweet into a lot of trouble.

I have to honestly wonder if Jon isn't the ward of a conservatorship, maybe with his mother as his guardian (EDIT: I believe Holdek was the first to suggest something like this. Props, man!). That he doesn't control his own money is one thing, but then you have the inanity of the above quote. If we've been abusing Jon, it's abuse that he sought out, whether intentionally or not. He brought on his troubles himself, and blames them on others. We have seen that his entire adult life has been riddled with severe social problems. The guy can't go through any stretch of his life without either getting in trouble, or being stuck in some kind of situation that he can't get himself out of (getting home from a hospital, figuring out google, etc). Whether legally recognized or not, it's a given than someone other than Jon is making decisions for him in the Sweet household.

DAMN

 

[ToroidalBoat]

Finally, animals seem to generally dislike Sweet.

First the dogs screwing up his driving education, and then birds turn on him?

(If tribbles were real, I wouldn't be surprised if they made that shrill noise at him instead of the purring noise.)

 

[Meowthkip]

(If tribbles were real, I wouldn't be surprised if they made that shrill noise at him instead of the purring noise.)

... You think Sweets is a Klingon?

 

[Ti-99/4A]

... You think Sweets is a Klingon?

Klingons are brave honorable warriors who would have killed those thugs attacking his mother. Sweet is a spineless coward.
That being said, a tribble still probably wouldn't like him.

 

[Holdek]

It turns out they were purple...

He seems to always want to shoehorn in his personal problems into any unrelated conversation. It's quite Chris-like.

And, like Chris, you'd think his rantings were those of a 12-year-old girl. I mean, what kind of 40-year-old man whines ad nauseam about his brother online? A man-child.

 

[Le Bateleur]

The AJM shoutbox hosts the continuing dialogue between Sweet, some anons, and our very own @Holdek - whose crushing riposte to Belch's bitching about Clinton was the epitome of polite devastation. Kudos as well to Holdek for his unfailing politeless tempered with an investigative reporter's thirst for the truth. Real newspapermanship on display.

In other news, Sweet continues to avoid all questions about his SSI. Enquiring minds want to know, Dr Belch!

Spoiler: In case PasteBin is kill

derper: if the republican's weren't a bunch of lying assholes I would agree with you Feb 14, 2015 11:19:48 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: People suspected Clinton was little more than a bumbling boob, but he at least made a show of reaching out to the Republicans. Obama makes no such showing, and everyone knows he's just a bumbling boob. Feb 14, 2015 12:04:16 GMT -8
Holdek: Nah, Obama has one of the lowest veto records of any president: two. The same number as George Washington. For contrast, George W. Bush had 12. Feb 14, 2015 17:18:56 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: Only because Obama does everything in his power to crush any opposition. No one wants to go against the will of the first black gay Prez. Feb 15, 2015 12:43:43 GMT -8
Holdek: So first it's Obama's fault for "vetoing" everything. Now it's his fault for being black. Nice, Belch, nice. Feb 15, 2015 21:48:43 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: Hey, why do you think they picked him as a candidate? It certainly wasn't for any great accomplishment as a Senator or "community organizer"-- they threw Hillary under the bus because they found a "clean", "articulate" little black Ken doll that they Feb 16, 2015 4:59:47 GMT -8 *
Dr. Belch: could dress up any way they liked. Let's be honest. Obama is the Maximillian of our age. Soon the public will scream for his head. Feb 16, 2015 5:05:46 GMT -8
Holdek: No they won't. You may have lynching fantasies, but thankfully the public is more evolved than you. Feb 16, 2015 15:24:08 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: Not literally, you moron. We aren't ISIS...or "ISIL", as Barry-Boy likes to say. You know, the j.v. league of terrorism? The ones who just released a video of themselves beheading 21 Christians? Feb 17, 2015 10:28:26 GMT -8
Anon: I'm sorry, but what does it have to do with anything that Obama supports gay marriage? Feb 17, 2015 15:26:32 GMT -8
Anon: And why are you equating him being black with his support of gay marriage in the first place? Neither is a bad thing, and neither should be cause to judge his capabilities as president. Feb 17, 2015 15:27:10 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: He was only on board with it after Biden stupidly shot off his mouth on the issue; during his campaign he said marriage was about "one man...one woman". And since Clinton was the first black President, Obama couldn't settle for second-best. Feb 17, 2015 18:27:05 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: So they had to have him be first something. And it has nothing to do with race; I despised Clinton too, remember? They said ol' Billy-Boy was a friend of the working man. He was no friend of mine when he passed the TV ratings system bill back in 97. Feb 17, 2015 18:29:51 GMT -8
Holdek: But Dr. Belch, you were never a working man. Feb 17, 2015 21:26:12 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: I was a newspaperman. My bosses were grooming me to be the new "bad boy" of college journalism-- until their jealousy and resentment over my success began poisoning the waters, and they started plotting to get rid of me. Feb 18, 2015 3:04:30 GMT -8 *
Dr. Belch: But since you're going to just start in with your usual line of blah-blah about how I'm either lying or "misreading" the situation...why don't you go talk to them, hmm? Feb 18, 2015 3:29:10 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: I'll give you links to the Facebook accounts of all the old Herald ed board members, and you can get their side of the story. Feb 18, 2015 3:30:37 GMT -8
Anon: No, stop stalking your former "employers". It serves no purpose. Just let it go. Move forward. Feb 18, 2015 10:40:46 GMT -8
Dr. Belch: No. Wrong. Moving on is a ploy. I've learned that the hard way. Feb 18, 2015 12:27:55 GMT -8
Holdek: You were a college kid, though. I mean, it was a student paper, right?

 

[MrsFrizzle]

Holdek, you are a gentleman and a scholar. Mr. Sweet is...not.

And James Buchanan was the first gay President. He was routinely called "Miss Nancy" in the papers, and his longtime housemate and friend/ probably romantic partner Rufus King was jokingly called "The First Lady."

I mean, apart from Obama being as gay as Bill Clinton is black, which is not.

 

[autism420]

I am glad that Sweets will never reproduce. I don't understand how someone can be so ignorant.

 

[Bound2]

Continued drama from the chatbox

Dr. Belch

: I'll give you links to the Facebook accounts of all the old Herald ed board members, and you can get their side of the story.
Anon: No, stop stalking your former "employers". It serves no purpose. Just let it go. Move forward.
Dr. Belch: No. Wrong. Moving on is a ploy. I've learned that the hard way.
Holdek: You were a college kid, though. I mean, it was a student paper, right?
Dr. Belch: It wasn't just that. I tried it with the small engine repair shop, I tried it with the doll shop-- my life would start to improve at first, then as time went by things changed, and it got progressively worse. My bosses have all been horrible.
Dr. Belch: To say nothing of the valuable friends I lost over my dispute with The Herald... friends who could help my out on my book project, who could get me access to the computer equipment I need at A-State. I don't get this fancy new tech they have now.
Dr. Belch: I only understand 1998 technology, and where better to find that than a slightly backwater Southern university campus? And of course, there's you.
Dr. Belch: I'm coping with some pretty serious issues, and what you doing? Comparing me to a whiny preteen girl"]https://kiwifarms.net/threads/iconoclast.860/page-96#post-551875]preteen girl when I talk honestly about the years of abuse I've endured. That is sick.
Holdek: You know the slogan, "Don't vote? Then don't complain!" This concept applies here, too. You have no sympathy from me for your complaints about how your life sucks if you're not doing anything to improve it.
_: I sympathize with your struggles with technology, but no educational establishment in the country still uses stuff from 1998. You just can't run machines that old connected to the internet. Too many security flaws.
Dr. Belch: Let's stick you in a house with an abusive psychopath who constantly screams at, hits you, starves you, steals your money, and won't let you have any freedom. I don't think you'd last a year. Probably less without your precious antidepressant meds.
Holdek: But you're not coping with your serious issues. You're just complaining about them.
_: Why not take your SSI checks and move out?
Holdek: Who's stuck you in that house? Are you being kept there against your will? Are you an adult?
Dr. Belch: I wager you'd be a broken, sniveling wreck inside of two months--three, tops. And I've lived that way for ten years now. So don't go telling me who is weak and who is strong, Holly-berry.
_: Your brother was in prison for several of those years. Why did you not save up your SSI money and move out?
Holdek: I wouldn't stay there for ten years, is the point. How strong are you really if you're too afraid to move out?
Holdek: I mean, come on man, you're nearly 40 and you still live in your mom's house. That's not noble suffering for a cause, that's just being a man-child.
Dr. Belch: And go where? They won't let me go back to A-State, I don't have enough saved up yet to rebuild my own little ASU on the outside, and when my brother was really acting out, no one helped me.
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, if you have trouble understanding modern technology, have you considered looking for a class to help you, or some books? Because as the underscore above me pointed out, it is very unlikely that any college will still be using equipment from 1998.

I have to say that it's pretty scummy to keep trying to throw the whole "you're on anti-depressants" back on Holdek all the time. Real low class.

Dr. Belch

: No one would hold his arms down while I tried to smash his skull with an iron bar three years ago when I caught him stealing from me. No one offered to help me chloroform him, throw him into the trunk of the car,
_: Because that isn't helping you. You really don't need another criminal conviction, do you?
_: Hang on. Wait a minute. Are you saying you actually tried to smash his head with an iron bar, but you failed because nobody was holding his arms?
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, to be honest, I don't think very many people would offer to help you murder someone in cold blood....
Dr. Belch: drive him out to the middle of nowhere, and dump him off like a bag of garbage on the side of the highway. They protected him.
_: If they were protecting him from you literally doing those things to him, then well done to them. Nobody deserves to be vigilante murdered. Also, you can't drive.

Yes, why wouldn't these awful people let me murder a man in cold-blood? Must be a conspiracy.

 

[Le Bateleur]

Chimping intensifies. He's complaining that nobody helped him kill his brother. Also, he's writing a letter to the guy who used to date his mother. Moar to follow...

 

[DrChristianTroy]

Dr. Belch: Only because Obama does everything in his power to crush any opposition. No one wants to go against the will of the first black gay Prez. Feb 15, 2015 12:43:43 GMT -8

Does he realize Obama isn't gay?

And since Clinton was the first black President,

Still pulling old, racist stand up bits I see.

Billy-Boy was a friend of the working man. He was no friend of mine when he passed the TV ratings system bill back in 97.

His arguments really are circular.

I'll give you links to the Facebook accounts of all the old Herald ed board members, and you can get their side of the story.

Fucking creepy ass stalker shit right here.

I was a newspaperman. My bosses were grooming me to be the new "bad boy" of college journalism

Props to Holodek for handling this shit like a pro.

 

[DrChristianTroy]

I only understand 1998 technology, and where better to find that than a slightly backwater Southern university campus? And of course, there's you.

Someone page @ILoveMylarBalloons

No one would hold his arms down while I tried to smash his skull with an iron bar three years ago when I caught him stealing from me. No one offered to help me chloroform him, throw him into the trunk of the car,

Well... did he ask politely?

 

[Holdek]

Holdek, you are a gentleman and a scholar. Mr. Sweet is...not.

And James Buchanan was the first gay President. He was routinely called "Miss Nancy" in the papers, and his longtime housemate and friend/ probably romantic partner Rufus King was jokingly called "The First Lady."

Spoiler: Off Topic

I'd read that Abe Lincoln was. I think there's compelling evidence that goes either way on Honest Abe, but since Miss Nancy proceeded him I might have to reconsider to whom the honor goes!

I have to say that it's pretty scummy to keep trying to throw the whole "you're on anti-depressants" back on Holdek all the time. Real low class.

I agree, and I think it adds to the stigma of clinical depression in general.

Personally, though, I view the anti-depressants as a tool that I'm availing myself of. Not taking that initiative and instead just ranting against society and people on a 20-year-old enemies list would be the weaker course of action.

 

[Le Bateleur]

The dust has settled for now. Thus, I can present the inaugural Dr Belch and the CWCki Koalas Fun and Felonies Shoutbox Power Hour:

Spoiler: Le Backup

Dr. Belch: It wasn't just that. I tried it with the small engine repair shop, I tried it with the doll shop-- my life would start to improve at first, then as time went by things changed, and it got progressively worse. My bosses have all been horrible. 59 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: To say nothing of the valuable friends I lost over my dispute with The Herald... friends who could help my out on my book project, who could get me access to the computer equipment I need at A-State. I don't get this fancy new tech they have now. 56 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: I only understand 1998 technology, and where better to find that than a slightly backwater Southern university campus? And of course, there's you. 54 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: I'm coping with some pretty serious issues, and what you doing? Comparing me to a whiny preteen girl"]https://kiwifarms.net/threads/iconoclast.860/page-96#post-551875]preteen girl when I talk honestly about the years of abuse I've endured. That is sick. 51 minutes ago
Holdek: You know the slogan, "Don't vote? Then don't complain!" This concept applies here, too. You have no sympathy from me for your complaints about how your life sucks if you're not doing anything to improve it. 50 minutes ago
_: I sympathize with your struggles with technology, but no educational establishment in the country still uses stuff from 1998. You just can't run machines that old connected to the internet. Too many security flaws. 50 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: Let's stick you in a house with an abusive psychopath who constantly screams at, hits you, starves you, steals your money, and won't let you have any freedom. I don't think you'd last a year. Probably less without your precious antidepressant meds. 49 minutes ago
Holdek: But you're not coping with your serious issues. You're just complaining about them. 49 minutes ago
_: Why not take your SSI checks and move out? 49 minutes ago
Holdek: Who's stuck you in that house? Are you being kept there against your will? Are you an adult? 48 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: I wager you'd be a broken, sniveling wreck inside of two months--three, tops. And I've lived that way for ten years now. So don't go telling me who is weak and who is strong, Holly-berry. 47 minutes ago
_: Your brother was in prison for several of those years. Why did you not save up your SSI money and move out? 46 minutes ago
Holdek: I wouldn't stay there for ten years, is the point. How strong are you really if you're too afraid to move out? 47 minutes ago
Holdek: I mean, come on man, you're nearly 40 and you still live in your mom's house. That's not noble suffering for a cause, that's just being a man-child. 46 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: And go where? They won't let me go back to A-State, I don't have enough saved up yet to rebuild my own little ASU on the outside, and when my brother was really acting out, no one helped me. 44 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, if you have trouble understanding modern technology, have you considered looking for a class to help you, or some books? Because as the underscore above me pointed out, it is very unlikely that any college will still be using equipment from 1998. 44 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: No one would hold his arms down while I tried to smash his skull with an iron bar three years ago when I caught him stealing from me. No one offered to help me chloroform him, throw him into the trunk of the car, 43 minutes ago
_: Because that isn't helping you. You really don't need another criminal conviction, do you? 42 minutes ago
_: Hang on. Wait a minute. Are you saying you actually tried to smash his head with an iron bar, but you failed because nobody was holding his arms? Feb 18, 2015 at 10:35pm
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, to be honest, I don't think very many people would offer to help you murder someone in cold blood.... 40 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: drive him out to the middle of nowhere, and dump him off like a bag of garbage on the side of the highway. They protected him. 40 minutes ago
_: If they were protecting him from you literally doing those things to him, then well done to them. Nobody deserves to be vigilante murdered. Also, you can't drive. 39 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: When https://fbcdn-profile-a.akamaihd.ne...1557324_ddf5f733b173ac2524deb543a203954c]Dale left 39 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: When Dale left, it caused a power vacuum here. I've found his address and I am drafting a letter as we speak. 35 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: I have to set things right. If I understood better why he skipped town and abandoned the shop, maybe my family could finally heal. 34 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: What points are you addressing in the letter? 32 minutes ago
Holdek: Belch you're such a wimp. Your whole life is going to pass you by. Your tombstone will read: Well, he whined a lot. 31 minutes ago
_: You seem to be in an agitated state. Please don't send the letter now. Give it a couple of days. Maybe talk it over with a friend, or a pastor from church? Don't do anything rash. 31 minutes ago
Holdek: LOL he won't send the letter now. He's had years to take action and he's done basically nothing. 30 minutes ago
Holdek: He's essentially an adult-autistic-child, like Chris-Chan. 27 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: Are you kidding? A couple of days? I've waited twelve years to find that worm and send this letter. I want him to know what a horrible boss he was, what happened when he skipped town, and that I will see to it that everyone knows the truth about him 27 minutes ago
Holdek: Nobody cares, Belch. 26 minutes ago
truth teller: You're a loser. Get a job. 26 minutes ago
Holdek: All your grievances against your college paper, your brother, Dale, Bill Clinton, etc, have been aired. Many many times. 25 minutes ago
_: What are you going to say to him? 25 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: I will make them care. The people will embrace me, just as they did back in my journalism days. Truth Teller-- You're a moron. Die. You two, Holly-berry. 25 minutes ago
_: Are you drunk? 25 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, if you are seeking answers from this man, it might be better to hold back some of your anger for now. More flies with honey and all that. If you are confrontational right away, he might ignore you rather than answer your questions. 25 minutes ago
Holdek: They haven't embraced you in 18 years. 24 minutes ago
truth teller: No one will embrace you. You are nothing. You have never worked a day in your life. Stop dwelling in the past and do something with your life. How can you be so ignorant? Are you actually mentally disabled? 24 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, when you refer to "the people", whom are you referring to specifically? 23 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: Anyone who wish to do business with the new Dale's Small Engine Repair. Once I confirm that it's his shop, and that's it's still open, I plan to post reviews so negative online they will be guaranteed 21 minutes ago
Dr. Belch: to frighten off any potential customers, and ruin the old chiseler's business. 20 minutes ago
_: You're basically an internet troll and cyberbully then? 19 minutes ago
_: You'd fit right in over at /baph/ 19 minutes ago
Holdek: So you're going to post a negative review of his business online? That's your big plan to get your life back in order? 19 minutes ago
_: Also, it is incredibly easy to get negative troll reviews removed. Plus, small shops like his probably work on real-life word of mouth. You won't achieve anything. You've also pretty much just confessed to your scheme here :^) 17 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, I would advise you to let go of your old grudges and find a new purpose for your life. Being so angry at the people in your past cannot be healthy for you, and it is certainly not making you happy. 14 minutes ago
truth teller: FYI Belch I have taken screen caps of you saying you wanted to murder your brother and sent them to your local police department. Hope that goes over well with you. 14 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: I know you believe things seem hopeless and like you will never get where you want to be in life, but I believe you can achieve these things if you keep trying. 13 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: Take the time and energy you are spending being angry, and focus them on making the life for yourself that you know you deserve! 12 minutes ago
_: Is your SSI portable? Can you go and live in another state, or another country, with cheaper cost of living? Maybe get an RV or something? Feb 18, 2015 at 11:05pm
Holdek: I agree with Nonnymouse. You don't want to end up like Chris in his battle with Mike Snyder. Eventually Snyder went out of business (most likely for reasons unrelated), but in no way did Chris end up the better for it. 11 minutes ago
_: Do you think Dale might have left because you were the type of person who was likely to hold a grudge for 12 years and attempt to commit violent crimes? 8 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: Dr Belch, I believe there are many options open to you to help you improve your life, if you just use a little of your journalistic skills to seek them out! 8 minutes ago
_: Ok, different tack: what did you do for Birthentine's Day? 7 minutes ago
Nonnymouse: You found contact information for a man you have not seen in 12 years, surely it would be no trouble at all to find more information on some of the things _ suggested, moving out of state or getting an RV, or exploring other options. 6 minutes ago
Holdek: True. It's a matter of where you want to direct your energy. Also, as I've said before, it's not necessarily either or. You can send the letter while still in the meantime exploring other options to better your life so that you aren't at the mercy of 2 minutes ago

 

[MarineTrainedTard]

Jesus Christ, it's a good thing I'm not interested in speaking with Sweet, there's no way I could keep a civil tongue.

Just when I think he couldn't possibly be more ignorant, incorrect, and delusional, he goes ahead and surprises me.

Well done, Holdek.