I Can Only Look Back in Anger - Five years later, the architects of the Covid Era’s lockdown insanity deserve only our contempt.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
article/archive

It occurs to me, reading Jack Butler’s reminiscences on the five-year anniversary of the Covid Era’s kickoff, that I’ve never written a single word here about my own experience with Covid. One reason for that is I’m not paid to write about my personal life. Another is that, in many ways, I already did so once — on Twitter/X, where I’ve been typing in an unceasing (and suicidally undeleted) whirlwind for over a decade now.

Day by day, event by event, my experience of lockdown has been captured there forever, frozen in the amber of the moment when it happened, recorded for posterity. Memory can often be a tricky thing — just ask any lawyer who has cross-examined an eyewitness — so it’s interesting for me to review, as I just now have, my thoughts from that era when news of the pandemic spiraled into utter chaos, as lockdowns went into effect, Trump went out to give daily briefings alongside Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx, and our world irrevocably changed. (For one thing, I am reminded that I watched a lot of movies during lockdown — both the entire Bond and Mission: Impossible franchises start to finish.)
I well remember reading news about an ominous new infection out of China from the internet back in December of 2019, but near as I can tell I only officially lowered the boom on February 25, 2020, half a month before U.S. authorities did:
There is every reason to think this will become a truly global pandemic. And the idiots comparing it to seasonal flu will look stupid when the reality that it’s 20x more fatal than typical flu becomes apparent. It’s also a huge black eye for China, deservedly so.
Well said, earlier me! (This is why you preserve your tweets, incidentally; it obviates the need for a diary or daybook.) Reading further, I am reminded that my initial attitude was bemusedly and mulishly obedient, a grudging “whatever, let’s just try to make the best of a bad situation.” But this is when I start to feel an acute twinge of pain, and it becomes hard to go beyond that without pausing for a deep breath. Because I remember what happened next. I remember what was taken from me. I remember what they took from my son. And I am once again painfully overwhelmed by the lone true emotion that dominates my memories of the Covid Era: rage.

This is the real reason I haven’t written about Covid. I cannot summon memories of that era without becoming furious at what I suffered through, without reliving the sense of utter betrayal from all authority we experienced during that period. I have never felt more despairingly abandoned, and in fact actively oppressed, by every level of government than in those dark years. For some people — say, those lucky enough to live in Florida — this matter is largely one of political principle. For me it is deeply personal.

Understand that I live in Chicago. (Moving is not an option.) Life here during the pandemic years — and the closely related Floyd riots, which unmoored my city into a free-floating existential despair it has yet to recover from — left deep psychological scars on me and my family alike. Most of the time my wife and I treat it as a dark, black cloud of madness and sorrow whose details we no longer wish to remember. It’s in the distant past now. It’s over. I don’t want to talk about it. I don’t need to talk about it.

But I must talk about it, at least once, if only to exorcise it. I have a son. He has special needs — a genetic disorder so rare there are only 25 clinically documented cases — and in particular he suffers from severe speech delays and articulation issues. When lockdown went into effect back in March 2020, he was a year and three-quarters old. Our awareness of the magnitude of his challenge was only just dawning upon us at that point, and my wife and I made a sober calculation that since he would not be entering preschool until at least the fall of 2021, we could probably tough it out until then.

“Until then.”

What we hadn’t counted on was progressive-driven Covid insanity actively interfering with our son’s development, to the point where it felt like the entire city was perversely conspiring against us and all other parents who live here. My boy was enrolled in a slate of therapy services at the time — physical, speech, etc. — and I cannot properly articulate the agony I felt, as a father, at the way therapy providers here inevitably followed official city/state government policy (as “best practice”): I want you to imagine the value of “speech therapy” given while wearing a mask, to a child who desperately needs to be able to see lips move in order to learn to articulate sounds. I want you to ponder the quality of “remote” physical therapy for a child who cannot yet walk. (I ask you to do these things because it hurts too much for me to dwell upon them any longer.)

I want you to imagine a city with all of its public parks bolted or zip-tied shut for over a calendar year. My memory is that the spring and summer of 2020 were unusually gorgeous and temperate. That memory is tinged with fury — because my son never got to experience it. Only then just beginning to walk, and suddenly desperate to run around and experience the world, his near horizons were arbitrarily limited to the world of our own apartment. (We did not have a car yet.) The best we could do was take him to an open field and let him toddle around. The joylessness of those experiences — with two beautiful parks that he loved, complete with slides and swings and jungle gyms, bolted shut right nearby — has remained with me ever since.

Chicago instituted lockdown protocols along with most of the rest of the nation in mid-March 2020; Chicago exited lockdown completely only in the summer of 2021. And public schools remained in quasi-lockdown status for far longer: The implacably powerful Chicago Teachers’ Union staged a successful wildcat strike as late as January of 2022 to prevent the city from eliminating masking requirements for schoolchildren “without it being bargained for.” (Translation: “Give us more money and we’ll drop this gun.”)

This time Mayor Lightfoot ignored the union’s demands but granted them a delay (during Omicron season). When March 2022 — a full two years after the anniversary of the first lockdown — rolled around, I was so grateful that I could finally send my son back to school without a mask that I tweeted about it. Because my son could not wear a mask — you literally could not get him to keep one on, in any event. Sure, the teachers were still screaming about it (I remember hearing their side of the story every morning on NPR), but I was just thrilled that my little buddy was going to be able to get back to work on his speech handicap without being gratuitously supplied with the verbal equivalent of cement shoes.

A week later my son was returned home to me one day from school by his teachers, weeping disconsolately. A mask had been forcibly tied to his face, and he was clawing desperately at it to try to get it off. He did not stop crying for an hour.

There is a line in Hamlet that, although I had read it countless times before, I never properly understood until that exact moment: “Now could I drink hot blood.” I hope to God that none of you ever feel the sort of spasm of rage that actually makes a man briefly contemplate Shakespearean violence, because when it comes in the context of people who have harmed your helpless special needs son, you begin to think mad thoughts. Needless to say, my son no longer attends that school. But this was also the part of my Twitter history I least enjoyed revisiting; it’s no fun reliving the victimization of your child.

People without children quite reasonably think of the Covid Era in terms of personally lost time and opportunity — bad for most people, but surprisingly tolerable for a minority. Parents understand the world differently. I rage over the Covid Era as time stolen not from me but from my son — arbitrarily and with no scientific reason, for the sake of mere blue-state politics — when he needed it the most. He can never get that back. The pain of it will haunt me until the day I die.

n anecdote to conclude. During an unseasonably pleasant stretch of weather in the fall of 2020, I finally had enough, and started hopping the fence with my son at my local (still-locked) park, just so I could get him on the swing set for a few minutes. The next day a fellow dad joined me with his small child. The day after that, a cop walked by us outside the gates as I was swinging my boy, and I knew I was dead-to-rights, expecting a citation.

Instead, he asked me how my day was going, and laughingly dismissed my being inside the park. “This is total bulls***,” is all he said, as he walked along. Everybody knew it was a joke. And yet most of us played along. (I didn’t, but I’m a Republican in Chicago.)

I will never forgive the people who did this. I will never know all of their names — I do know the names of Chicago city politicians, Randi Weingarten, the Chicago Teachers’ Union, and the CTU’s handpicked mayor Brandon Johnson, however. (I treat them accordingly.) I will not let go of my hatred for these people. I could do it if only my own vanity or interest were at stake — I actually have a very difficult time holding a grudge — but never on behalf of my son, who has no voice to speak in his own defense. I want only to remember who caused this, who allowed this, and to insist these people be blotted out of public life and civic responsibility for all eternity. I have said my piece on the Covid Era, and it will be the last time I speak of it.
 
>national review

These faggots did nothing while it happened now they thump their chest in outrage when it is safe to do so.
 
20250313_183325.jpg
Yes, Mr. Blehar, your twitter does obviate the need for a diary or daybook, and those of us who were skeptical of lockdowns in April 2020 appreciate you putting evidence out in your own name as to how much of a coward you were then, and how much of a hypocritical stooge you are now.
 
View attachment 7089649
Yes, Mr. Blehar, your twitter does obviate the need for a diary or daybook, and those of us who were skeptical of lockdowns in April 2020 appreciate you putting evidence out in your own name as to how much of a coward you were then, and how much of a hypocritical stooge you are now.
If I'm being charitable, it wouldn't be until Floyd overloaded his fent reactor in late May and all hell broke loose that I'd hold it against people for not noticing, because that was the first time we had completely irrefutable evidence that this was 100% political and 0% science on live TV for anyone to see.

Shoutout to anyone who realized the instant the Dems changed their tune from "hug a chinese" to "LOCK ALL THINGS DOWN NOOOOOOOW" seemingly in a matter of 24 hours that this was a complete scam, but I don't think most people were that paranoid before COVID even if they were after.
 
The problem with lockdowns is that idiots on both sides didn't understand the point of lockdowns. Everyone looks at issues from a bottom up perspective, meaning some people were extremely confident when the government acted with the lockdowns because it gave them the sense that structure and safety was being implemented to prevent the disease from spreading, this was never going to happen. Others looked at lockdowns like a deliberate attack on their individual freedoms, a direct plan to issue in a dystopia where a people's commisar will sit and manage how you take a shit on the toilet. Unfortunately the idiots from both sides were completely through every insitution (like teachers and government) and acted much as idiots do, without thought and purely emotionally.

My big issue is (given what I do for work being security, safety and risk assessment) I look at COVID and the lockdowns from a top down perspective, the risks that were involved. The death rate was never really an issue, it was the hospitilization rate of the early waves that scared the shit out of governments, and rightly so. The disease hit hard for people with pre-existing conditions (diabetes, heart-disease, pulmanary disease, auto-immune disorders) and the vast majority of people who died worldwide had these pre-existing conditions. What this meant that if a large enough number of people got COVID at the same time, a percentage of those people would require hospitalization. That estimated percentage was over what any country could feasibly handle in their hospital system, no country had enough beds, doctors, nurses, cleaners, cooks, supplies (like oxygen and bedsheets) to handle that number, which would lead to system failure. Suddenly cancer patients couldn't get chemo, resources would have had to be put elsewhere to deal with people hospitalized with COVID because of pre-existing condtions. Same goes for thing like a burst appendix, car accidents, treatment of sepsis where someone gets a cut that gets infected. There is the 2 or 3 strains of influenza that are always around. All of these things are easily treated under the current system, however, overload that system with the obese and sickly dealing with a new virus ontop of pre-existing conditions, all of those currently treatable conditions become impossible to treat, and those conditions not treated are fatal. Those extra deaths then lead to less labor in the workforce, lost revenues etc. It is a point in our system of society where we cannot afford a failure because the flow on effects are damaging in both the long term and the short term to how everything runs.

The truth is once the virus was out (because the Chinese fucked up lab security protocols, lets not pretend the cause was otherwise) there was no stopping it, it was going global, everyone was going to get COVID, most people would get something like the flu, recover and move on with their lives. A percentage would need to go to hospital due to pre-existing health conditions. The surest way to stop that systematic failure of hospitals, was to slow the rate of infection, which was the purpose of lockdowns. Monitor how quickly it was spreading and lockdown if it approached what was estimated to be approaching that rate which would impact the health system. It was never about making people safe, or taking away rights, it was about trying to stop things from overwhelming something that is a critical vulnerability in our societies.

That is where the idiots come in. And I'll talk about the pro-lockdown idiots to help people understand. For them, the lockdowns were a safety blanket, a new set of rules to cling to. It is why you saw the panic about it was 20x more lethal than the flu, for them, with that bottom down perspective, it became about clinging to and over-enforcing those rules for the sake of their own anxieties. If you didn't tow the line, then they're not only going to try and make you, they're going to seek to punish you. And people like this are in every institution, always have been, they over reach, act excessively not understanding the point, which actually make the job of achieving the point harder. They piss everyone off and that anxiety they exude is socially contagious, more people get antsy and act irrationally, which from a top down perspective, makes the job a lot fucking harder.

Then you have the idiots who really won't follow instruction, and act in ways to spite what is trying to be achieved because they think it is personal. You might have one area locked down to contain rate of infection in that area. Fine, things are manageable. Still it is a lot of work, but it is still keeping the health system functional in that area. Well people upset at being locked down in one area fuck off to other areas, suddenly instead of just keeping the rate of infection managable in one area, you're now having to do it in 4, 6 then 12 different areas. More work, meaning higher potential for mistakes, higher likelyhood of meeting that system collapse.

The lockdowns really did go on too long. They did achieve their purpose, for the most part we didn't get that failure, shit was really well done. But by late 2021 and early 2022, the percentage of population being hospitalized had shrunk significantly as herd immunity kicked in and the virus quite frankly lessened in sympton severity compared to the early days. The problem then became for politicians and administrators, do you remove them and risk upsetting that significant enough percentage of people who have "Chicken Little syndrome" and want the lockdowns to continue? Or do you keep them in place because removing them might spark in them an anxiety to vote against you whereas by keeping them in place and acting as if you're taking action on an issue (that for the system is no longer an issue) and keep/gain those votes. That was the stage where the decision making process became less about logic and pragmatism, and more about personal gain and political alignment.

I hope this at least helps people understand the hows and whys. I don't have inside knowledge, I just work in the area I do. I can see the logic, I did, and still do look at the numbers, because of what I do you can't help but analyze and look at things that way. Ultimately safety and security aren't about protecting you it is about protecting the system in place, keeping it running. My default is top down. You look at the failures and you look at them with detachment, working out what went wrong and how to do it better next time.

Ultimately with the whole COVID thing, I don't think it will be any different with another pandemic, I think shit will go exactly the same way. And it goes back to my point, most people only see things from bottom up, from their own perspective. At the same time there are people who are only capable of looking at things from top down as that is the only thing they can see from their perspective. I suppose all I can do in closing my TL;DR is urge people to be able to analyze in both ways, because the right decision isn't always rational and it isn't always emotional either. The right decision is the right decision, and the best way to make it is too consider all approaches, deal with the information you've got on hand and make a call.
 
The surest way to stop that systematic failure of hospitals, was to slow the rate of infection, which was the purpose of lockdowns. Monitor how quickly it was spreading and lockdown if it approached what was estimated to be approaching that rate which would impact the health system. It was never about making people safe, or taking away rights, it was about trying to stop things from overwhelming something that is a critical vulnerability in our societies.
Get in the sea.
 
Get in the sea.
Truth is no matter what system of government or business is in place the system will act to keep the system going. It has always been this way, it will always be this way. If your feelings are hurt by this fact, I am sorry, I guess not everyone in the US is that resilient, rugged person who can weather 7 storms of shit and still cope with life. But hey, pharmaceuticals help with that I guess.
 
View attachment 7089649
Yes, Mr. Blehar, your twitter does obviate the need for a diary or daybook, and those of us who were skeptical of lockdowns in April 2020 appreciate you putting evidence out in your own name as to how much of a coward you were then, and how much of a hypocritical stooge you are now.
Thank fuck we have the receipts.
 
(Sea of fag text)
In no capacity was it about preventing hospitals being overrun when they were so empty and avoided it was hurting them as a business and nurses were left dancing like tards on tiktok. Here they literally lost millions because no one was coming in and they couldn't do any surgeries.

Up north in states like NY, NJ, and PA they were forcing admission of CONFIRMED sick into retirement homes KILLING the elderly by order OF THOSE STATES. They knew this would happen and dregs like Cuomo promoting it pulled his mother from the retirement home she was in during covid because he knew damn well it'd kill people there.

Statistics were wildly inflated and maliciously so, shit was straight up being fabricated. People's lives have been ended and ruined as a result of this so these scum can power grab or make a quick buck.

If you want to downplay it please go swallow some burning coals.
 
In no capacity was it about preventing hospitals being overrun when they were so empty and avoided it was hurting them as a business and nurses were left dancing like tards on tiktok. Here they literally lost millions because no one was coming in and they couldn't do any surgeries.

Up north in states like NY, NJ, and PA they were forcing admission of CONFIRMED sick into retirement homes KILLING the elderly by order OF THOSE STATES. They knew this would happen and dregs like Cuomo promoting it pulled his mother from the retirement home she was in during covid because he knew damn well it'd kill people there.

Statistics were wildly inflated and maliciously so, shit was straight up being fabricated. People's lives have been ended and ruined as a result of this so these scum can power grab or make a quick buck.

If you want to downplay it please go swallow some burning coals.
You saw a nurse on tik tok dance......

Great point there. Top tier reasoning.
 
My favorite Covid story is how I got locked in a hospital waiting room for hours because they misplaced me. At least there was a water cooler and a coffee pot inside the waiting room where I was trapped.

I needed a minor outpatient surgery in summer of 2020, and I had to get a series of X-rays and other tests before it could be done. Due to Covid, they scattered the patients between several small waiting rooms instead of concentrating them in 1 waiting room where they might cough on each other. The staff forgot what waiting room they'd left me in, looked for me in the wrong waiting room when it was time to do the test, and figured I'd went home.

All the doors in and out of this waiting room were locked. The only way out was through an employees-only door. The first hour, I figured was genuine wait time, so I didn't try to get out. Some time during the second hour, I realized something was wrong, so I started trying all the doors. Right around the 2 hour mark I went through the employees-only door, wandering through a maze of empty exam rooms, a shower and locker room, and then finally found some employees (janitors) in a lounge far, far away from the waiting room where I'd been left. These janitors called security because they didn't really have any other instructions on what to do. Security finally found a functionary to come read my paperwork, the functionary figured out where I was supposed to be, and some time during hour 3, a nurse came and took me for the tests I needed on the other side of the hospital. And that's how I learned that the hospitals were 75% closed down all during Covid. There was literally nobody there in most of the hospital in spite of all the "essential worker" and "heroes in scrubs" shit we'd all been fed.
 
View attachment 7089649
Yes, Mr. Blehar, your twitter does obviate the need for a diary or daybook, and those of us who were skeptical of lockdowns in April 2020 appreciate you putting evidence out in your own name as to how much of a coward you were then, and how much of a hypocritical stooge you are now.
I am not surprised. I wonder when someone actually influential will cover the truth of Liz Dong-Gone and the translifline shit. And in turn their tweets/blog will be 'i suck the girl cock trannies can do no wrong'.

Covering covid from the not woke perspective would mean something if they actually spoke with their chest (to borrow an ebonics-ism).

I was part of the forced work from home. What do manual laborers and blue collars do from home? Jack SHIT. I sent the same email with "videos i watched for an 8hr shift" to my boss like 20 fucking times. there was no reason for the lockdowns. They didnt do that shit for actual spanish flu. No goverment has ever done it for a disease or virus EVER. Not for flu, aids, bad medicine being put on the shelves, not for bad hospital training (disentary or typhoid), TB. Nothing

if im wrong, please tell me so. But ive never read about a government making people homeless, jobless, and unable to access healthcare (because of job/homelessness) because of a public borne illness.
 
My big issue is (given what I do for work being security, safety and risk assessment) I look at COVID and the lockdowns from a top down perspective, the risks that were involved. The death rate was never really an issue, it was the hospitilization rate of the early waves that scared the shit out of governments, and rightly so.
That's a lot of text, and I do see what you are trying to say, but...

I won't speak to the situation outside the USA, but within the USA this justification simply does not fly post Floyd. The Floyd fallout showed the the very government that was supposedly scared shitless of hospitalizations simultaneously was encouraging mass gatherings with close contact for thousands of people, which would, according to the other words coming out of their mouths, supposedly cause mass hospitalizations they were supposedly scared shitless of.

This isn't a matter of years, 2021/22, this is June 2020, not 6 months after the first case and the top is just showing their whole ass.
 
No goverment has ever done it for a disease or virus EVER. Not for flu, aids, bad medicine being put on the shelves, not for bad hospital training (disentary or typhoid), TB. Nothing

if im wrong, please tell me so. But ive never read about a government making people homeless, jobless, and unable to access healthcare (because of job/homelessness) because of a public borne illness.
Again, don't really care if I get negrated but, it does come back to what I said about system failure. A lot of shit has been stripped back, white anted, over burdened with red tape, run on a bare minimum. It's been done for profit and benefit of both the political class and private business, and it was done slowly over decades. It hasn't just done to the health system, look at utilities or railways in most countries they are a barely functional shit fight. A lot of people in positions of power over an extended period of time are extremely short sighted and so gut the shit out of things in place believing that nothing will ever happen beyond what the person making the decision considers is normal.

Great example of this was the levees in New Orleans, got argued for years that raising them would cost too much, successive state and local governments slashed maintenance. This is despite being told for years that they needed raising and maintaining. Before Hurricane Katrina it hadn't occurred to most administrators that by not raising or maintaining the levee would result in it collapsing. It only occurred to them when New Orleans was waste deep in water and people were shooting each other over packets of chips.

There seems to be an assumption that corruption and this type of thing is done by smart people with a plan and that the effects of that corruption are immediate. It's extremely rare that either is the case. Most corruption is done by the stupid and incompetent, they make short term decisions to benefit themselves and potential long term consequences are never considered. Things can be wrong or broken for years, and not have an effect or impact until something happens. Most of the time the problems with corruption aren't felt or even dealt with til years after the fact and a lot of damage as already been done to the way things are running.

It is only when the levee breaks and those in power start to feel the carp swim around their ankles do they actually start to listen to people in risk management, and because it is so late in the process often drastic actions have to be undertaken. And those in power only will listen as long as it keeps the system running and their asses in comfortable seats collecting on the book and off the book paychecks.

The system would have failed if nothing was done because it had been run for years by politicians and bureaucrats acting purely in self interest. When it looked like something was coming along that would break the system unless managed they hit the panic button and finally listened to those in risk management at the 11th hour meaning drastic shit had to be done to keep things running. Again this isn't a defense of the system we have, just trying to explain the hows and whys.
 
Back
Top Bottom