Human Intelligence Sharply Declining - Least surprising headline I've ever read

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article
Archive
No, it's not just you — people really are less smart than they used to be.

As the Financial Times reports, assessments show that people across age groups are having trouble concentrating and losing reasoning, problem-solving, and information-processing skills — all facets of the hard-to-measure metric that "intelligence" is supposed to measure.

These results, the FT reports, are gleaned from benchmarking tests that track cognitive skills in teens and young adults. From the University of Michigan's Monitoring the Future study documenting concentration difficulties of 18-year-old Americans to the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) that measures the learning skills of 15-year-olds around the world, years of research suggest that young people are struggling with reduced attention spans and weakening critical thinking skills.

Though there has been a demonstrably steep decline in cognitive skills since the COVID-19 pandemic due to the educational disruption it presented, these trends have been in evidence since at least the mid-2010s, suggesting that whatever is going on runs much deeper and has lasted far longer than the pandemic.

Obviously, there's no single answer as to why people seem to be struggling with cognitive skills, but one key indicator is the sharp decline in reading and the world's changing relationship to the way we consume information and media. In 2022, for example, the National Endowment for the Arts found that just 37.6 percent of Americans said they'd read a novel or short story in the year prior — a share down from 41.5 percent in 2017 and 45.2 percent in 2012.

It would be easy enough to blame this decline on people reading less (and, presumably, scrolling online brainrot more). But according to 2023 results from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, the same international consortium that puts out the PISA survey, 34 percent of adults in the United States scored at the lowest levels of numeracy, which essentially means that they lack the ability to work with numbers. A year prior, that share was just 29 percent.

Beyond changes in media consumption and the mediums in which we take it, it appears, as the FT notes, our relationship to information generally is shifting too. While there certainly are ways to use tech that don't cause harm to cognition, studies show that "screen time" as we know it today hurts verbal functioning in children and makes it harder for college-age adults to concentrate and retain information.

There isn't any reason to suggest that human intellect has been harmed, the publication counters — but in "both potential and execution," our intelligence is definitely on the downturn.

More on intelligence: People With This Level of Education Use AI the Most at Work
 
I’m curious to see the raw data. I wonder if they recorded ethnic origin?
Data on race should be available considering that it is included for other datasets which can be accessed through links on this page. Some are restricted access and require logging in. Looking at variables for the 2023 surveys on drug use, the variables for race are: Black, Chicano, Puerto, other Hispanic, Asian, White, Indian/Alaskan, and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. I am unsure where the raw dataset on cognitive skills can be accessed.
 
Humanity's been dumb before. We used to not know how to make fire.
I'm pretty sure if you picked a hundred people at random and dropped them in a forest with no lighter or matches, you'd find that they still don't know.
It must be that dang phone
My money's on a combo of shitty food, a culture of nigger worship, and the magic idiot boxes we all carry in our pockets.
Reject modernity, return to kids climbing trees for apples (broken arms build character).
 
Smart phones and other handheld devices have been and continue to be a disaster for humanity and especially minors.. not just the net and online culture. We are finding new ways it is seemingly daily at this point.

Social media and the state of modern education isn't helping either. Which seems more obsessed with turning out activists (who can't read) than anything else. We need a complete education system reset, not just higher edu but lower as well. A refocus onto core subjects first and exclusively until a certain level is reached. Then moving onto secondary objectives and beyond. With a general increased focus on science and practical secondary skills needed to live. (shop, HE, paperwork and bills etc)

The unions need to be stripped of all power and influence on the process and education itself. It's role is pay and fair treatment.. not helping dictate what they do and how they do it. Political pov pushing, indoctrination and activist bullshit should lead to insta firing.
 
Last edited:
Not helping. Giving ipads and smartphones to kids thus killing their ability to hold attention let alone look for solutions that doesn't involve a Google search further killing their ability to question stuff.

>tfw you thought you be living in the Star Trek timeline but you're actually trapped in the Idiocracy timeline
Idiocracy soon going into Kenshi.
 
And people still say "I don't know how you do it" when I tell them we're homeschooling. I don't know how you don't.

Remember these studies when you see people bitch and moan about cuts to the Department of Education (which has only existed since the 80s). Nothing the educationists have done to education in the last ~60 years has yielded results. The last time education was notably improved in the US was when many more math and science classes were added post-Sputnik due to massive federal funding. That happened pre-DoE, and was all handled by Defense because the education of kids was seen as vital to winning the Space Race and the Cold War.

Pre-NDEA of 1958, most schools topped out their math education around algebra, and typically had one year of science education required for high schools. If you ever took a calculus class or lab science in your education and appreciated it, thank the NDEA and how surprised/terrified the US was in the time immediately following Sputnik. Pre-NDEA, also, it was really seen as a bit of an embarrassment to go into a quantitative field. There was little or no prestige in it, and if you wanted intellectual renown you'd head into philosophy and humanities.

Math and science entered the curriculum because Eisenhower's government of people who had actually worked for a living realized we would be lost in a world where the Anglosphere was still sending its best and brightest to philosophy and religion departments to have inconsequential academic debates their whole lives.

What seemed like a push for political correctness in the 1980s , which has gone on until today, could be better understood as a push by the ruling classes to once again return to the tradition of giving cushy sinecures to scions of the wealthy who couldn't be trusted to manage an account or balance an equation. They invaded even the "nerd hobbies" beloved by the quantitative-minded and turned it all into status-seeking bullshit where the winners and losers are decided by social prowess and connections rather than by any objective standard of right and wrong answers. In this view, the creation of the federal Department of Education, which exists just to educate without any underlying practical purpose but only as a nebulous "social good" that could be judged only by the most sensitive souls, was a slow-burn restoration of power to social elites and away from meritocratic values that drive social mobility (which is anathema to elites).

The political "realignment" we now see is actually an acknowledgement of something that has been true for 40+ years: supposed "Marxists" in our academic institutions are actually the representatives of the social elites. "Trust-fund socialists" were seen as rank hypocrisy but their communist costuming was the perfect sheep's clothing to stop anyone from realizing what they really were.

Propping up token minorities, disabled people, and others that they could show off as "non-elite" was part of this, as well...but the sleight of hand is this: none of those diversity hires were brought on because of any kind of objective merit even within their racial/disability/gender preference group. They were brought in because elite WASPs and Jews, the old guard watching over old money, approved of them. Their job was to disguise the old money roots of the new dominant themes of education, and to provide a sort of "parallel construction" by which pro-old money rules and regulations could be seen as actually benefitting the downtrodden.

Meritocracy comes out of times when it is needed badly. The nuclear era gave us an impetus to care about which people were actually good at stuff. As the Cold War ended, elites got the control back because the fear went away, allowing everyone to say that there were more important things than getting the right answer. Meritocracy is a middle-class-promoting philosophy, because it is the middle class where most of the meritocratic striving occurs. When you see the kind of intelligence that can actually get an objective problem correct denigrated (see: all the "young white male nerds are very very bad" articles) while nebulous other intelligences are promoted that mostly seem to revolve around reading the minds of elites and poorwashing their opinions to be palatable to the hoi polloi, that's going to have an impact.

Schools will only educate children to achieve objectively amazing things when they are funded via a mandate to do just that. When schools are nannies and providers of institutional meals, social/class mobility stagnates and the only people who make it to the top either started out there, or were picked to be willing stooges in exchange for a steady paycheck.
 
Last edited:
I’m curious to see the raw data. I wonder if they recorded ethnic origin?
I'm curious to see if this would reverse if we actually get the promised mass deportations. I have a hunch that the millions of Pedros, Ngubus, and Rajeshes we got in the last decade are driving the numbers down.
I'm curious but not willing to land on the ground from my tree branch, chirp. Must survive to sire smarter chicks, tweet.
 
Fiver percent of the population dropping into the box that means they’re unable to work with numbers in one year seems like a very high rate of change.
What’s going on here? Demographic changes alone? Or brain rot?
Probably just procedural or selection fuckery: less rigorous criteria and more volunteers in the first year. PISA has quality test material but it's always been vulnerable to accidentally bad or deliberately manipulated selection, and "adults anywhere in the country" are much harder to properly survey than "15-y.o. students in schools".
 
Fiver percent of the population dropping into the box that means they’re unable to work with numbers in one year seems like a very high rate of change.
What’s going on here? Demographic changes alone? Or brain rot?


nearly five percent of the entire population of haiti was imported into the united states in the last four years, the majority of it over the last year. I think it was three or four percent of the entire population of venezuela came in as well. Such an influx of extremely low IQ people is unprecedented, if there is another factor we have to strain out all the foreigners to figure it out.
 
Yeah, a society just like in the movie Idiocracy.
I really think Idiocracy along with Farenheit 451 really nailed their predictions for society, minus the literal book burnings in Farenheit 451. I still remember reading the part where the dude comes home and his wife was staring at the giant tv screen with basically the equivalent of iPod earbuds and her, along with society in general, are just dumb as fuck and don't care about anything but vapid bullshit and I just remember having the biggest 'holy shit that's just like today' moment.' It's like the Idiocracy of the 1950's.
 
Yeah, a society just like in the movie Idiocracy.
I'm such a big Mike Judge fan.

Beavis and Butthead, Office Space, the under appreciated Extract, Silicon Valley, Idiocracy. All fantastic works.

America churns out tons of terrible bullshit that I'm embarrassed about. But let's not forget all the amazing stuff we've put out either.

Matt and Trey are brilliant too btw.

I guess you could say that all the media I'm praising exists only because they're satirical works criticizing dysfunctional American institutions, thus we essentially create our own market for the need for such works. And that is somewhat of a fair point.

Still, I think there's a unique supply of irreverence here. We can't ever let it die.

Edit: King of the Hill is the shit.
 
Last edited:
Beavis and Butthead, Office Space, the under appreciated Extract, Silicon Valley, Idiocracy. All fantastic works.
no King of the Hill...
FINITA EST.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom