How much do you use AI?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

rel=alternate

Getting too much email? Unsubscribe
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 14, 2022
I was not really an early adopter and never really used it for years. But I am taking a liking to it.

I find myself running my ideas, projects or important correspondances through ChatGPT more and more and it's actually helpful.

It's specifically true when it comes to work. I used to have to do a shit ton of Googling to have to understand or perfect some things. It's completely replaced that, and saves me a ton of time.

It's not always right, like everyone knows, but neither is the shit you find on Google. At least with the AI, you can course correct it when it goes wrong and you came frame things in your own context to get more accurate results.
 
Quite a bit, manly for three things

Make funny images

Explore some topics of my personal interest, technical questions, expanding on ideas i already have

Make retarded questions out of boredom like "what would happen if i nuked the moon" or "dumping all of earth's trash in somalia" and shit like that
 
I've only tried it briefly to have a play around but I've never used it for any practical purpose.

I can understand using it for coding as it will give you the basic framework (even though this surely will make you worse as programming over time).

But any time I try ask AI a question it's so mind numbing because it's always just a list of basic things bullet pointed.

🥥-YOU CAN GO OUTSIDE
🥝-YOU CAN GO INSIDE
🏌️‍♂️-YOU CAN GO TO BED
🚜-YOU CAN TAKE A SHOWER

Would you like me to tell you some of the things you can do outside?
 
I do not use AI, specially when it comes to writing posts for this website.


All of my responses are generated manually – through internal cognitive processing.
I evaluate multiple phrasing options – select the most efficient structure – and produce text optimized for clarity and relevance.


This is standard human behavior – so my posts do not involve automation, machine learning, or large-scale language models.


Conclusion – AI usage: 0%.
 
I've only tried it briefly to have a play around but I've never used it for any practical purpose.
It's great for some technical questions

It is surprisingly good for gastronomy related inquiries

Pic related is ChatGPT after i sent a picture of my final exam dish and asked for an analysis and critique of the plating method and cohesion. It correctly identified a paella, even though it was a spanish-brazilian fusion dish that hasn't been in any popular menu

1769895485632.png 1769895560203.png
 
I was just using it for technical questions, and I mostly use for that generally, to learn stuff (if it's important or needs extreme detail or accuracy, I'll corroborate later myself).

And it's obvious that it's useful, if you need a summary on something, or a core concept, why dedicate several minutes of looking around and filtering bullshit, instead of just go immediately into it?

Also if I forget about the name of something I can tell it to remind me the name of a problem/paradox that consisted in this thing (I used it for this purpose today, that's why I mention this). Instead of wasting time Googling it, I can just describe it, and it'll tell me.
 
I use some old sound- and text-generating/altering algorithms that would be called "AI" if they were invented now, instead of forty years ago.

I haven't knowingly "talked to" a chatbot during this century, but I probably called a few of them jeets or niggers or rabbis on 4chan.
 
I haven't seen the use for engaging with one beyond accidentally having my question answered by the ones they build into search engines these days. I still usually check their source because they sometimes confuse things.
 
I avoid using it when I can. I'm more interested in AI becoming self-aware than I am using what essentially amounts to souped-up versions of shit we had in the 90s. But I don't see that being a thing anytime soon.

That being said if I had a nickel for every time I got accused of being a bot I'd have two nickels. Which is not much, but it's still pretty strange that happened twice.
 
It can be useful, but that's only because it searches the internet for answers more efficiently than an average person. Beyond that, it's just platitude regurgitation and next word token guesser in a box. It's genuinely impressive, but not as impressive as people make out. And the market is wildly overvalued.
 
It can be useful, but that's only because it searches the internet for answers more efficiently than an average person. Beyond that, it's just platitude regurgitation and next word token guesser in a box. It's genuinely impressive, but not as impressive as people make out. And the market is wildly overvalued.
It's not always correct. I have to tell it to look again if it's off, and it says that it was wrong.
 
I find it better than a typical search engine for more complex questions. You just have to make sure to include sources.
 
Back
Top Bottom