🐱 How ‘Friends’ failed me

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
CatParty


It’s my schtick to say “there’s too many white/straight/skinny/gentile/neurotypical etc. people” in almost every TV review I write because, well, it’s often true. Despite watching more than my fair share of TV, there’s no character or show I can think of, off the top of my head, that makes me feel seen. There’s nobody that I can point to and say “that’s me,” even if we look alike on the outside. If I don’t feel seen up there, I know hardly anybody else does.

The problem isn’t just that representation eludes minorities and marginalized people. Sometimes there are people that look like us on screen, but they aren’t people we are proud of. So I don’t actively seek out shows when I hear there might be a character whose identity overlaps with mine; if anything, I run from them. Often, this representation hurts more than no representation at all.

It’s often the most iconic shows, loved and rewatched by the masses long after the series finale airs, that have the worst representation. Some argue they’re a product of their time, but regardless, they have an impact on the present. Take “Friends” — while it may be a funny, familiar place to come home to for many TV watchers, it is problematic representations galore, especially with representations of any non-white, straight or skinny characters that appear.

There is a missed opportunity every time the younger version of Monica (Courteney Cox, “Cougar Town”) is shown in a fat suit. This version of the character subverts what could have been body-positive representation into an extremely damaging caricature. When Joey (Matt LeBlanc, “Man with a Plan”) first sees younger Monica on video, he asks who “ate Monica.” Young Monica is a punchline, nothing more, and the Monica represented in the present constantly sees her worth tied to her “new and improved” body. Unless plus-sized characters are played by plus-sized actors and treated appropriately and respectfully, they do more harm than good — that is certainly not the case with “Friends” and Young Monica.

There’s another aspect of Monica’s character that’s deeply upsetting to me — her OCD. “Friends” reduces her disorder to her 17 towel categories, her dislike of crumbs and stains and a penchant for cleaning. Meanwhile, OCD comes in many forms — most of which have absolutely nothing to do with cleaning. Although it’s never named in official terms, much less dealt with that way, Monica’s OCD is the butt of the joke, and simultaneously framed as a characteristic that makes her unbearable.

“Friends” makes the same argument that I hear repeated so often in my own life — that Monica’s OCD is a burden for those around her. As someone with contamination OCD living through a pandemic, I can break this down for you firsthand. Waking up in the morning means constant conflicts with my ritual; I am always faced with the dilemma of submitting to my OCD’s desires or fighting them. Somehow, either way, I feel like I’m losing. I promise you, whatever inconvenience or discomfort OCD brings the people around me is nothing in comparison to my torment.

I do see myself in Monica, and I hate it. The writers of “Friends” made sure of that. So when people tell me they hate Monica, even though they know nothing of my struggle and certainly don’t mean to hurt me, it’s hard not to take it personally. It’s even harder not to blame “Friends” for my pain.

The “Friends” treatment of the LGBTQ+ community is also deeply embarrassing at best and horrifying at worst. Carol (Jane Sibbett, “Winter Wedding”) and Susan (Jessica Hecht, “Special”) are high on my list of favorite characters on the show, but Carol’s sexual orientation is used most often to undermine Ross’s (David Schwimmer, “Intelligence”) masculinity. When Carol comes up in conversation amongst the tight group of friends, it’s not because she’s the mother of Ross’s child but because she’s an easy target for their lazy, homophobic jokes. Ross further belittles their relationship by refusing to accept that the two are lovers and life partners, deigning to refer to them only as “friends.”

The casual homophobia of “Friends” goes further than Carol and Susan. In a later season of the show, Ross and Rachel (Jennifer Aniston, “The Morning Show”) hire a male nanny, something Ross never becomes comfortable with. Ross insists that due to his occupation and sensitive nature, their nanny MUST be gay — which is unacceptable to the point that he insists Rachel fire him. When Carol and Susan are eventually allowed to marry, they’re robbed of the quintessential post-vows kiss that all the straight couples on “Friends” get to enjoy. When homophobia isn’t part of the plot, it’s part of the mundane conversation: Chandler (Matthew Perry, “ReMastered: The Lion’s Share”) is constantly made fun of because people often assume he’s gay. I spent most of my life in the closet, and all of the various jabs about queer people in “Friends” and media in general played for laughs had a hand in that. These kinds of jokes are certainly part of the reason that the first reaction I ever got to coming out was “Are you sure? I wish you would reconsider.”

Worse still is how Chandler’s parent, who goes by the stage name Helena Handbasket (Kathleen Turner, “The Kominsky Method”) is represented. For one thing, people complain that the character caused confusion outside the trans community by blurring the line so strongly between drag queens and trans women, when the two are incredibly distinct. For another, the character (a trans woman, though “Friends” never admitted it while it was on the air) is played by a cis woman. For the record, Turner says she wouldn’t take the role now, but to Turner and to “Friends” I say: too little, too late. The character is constantly deadnamed and misgendered by all, but most often by Chandler. Moreover, Chandler frequently channels his frustration around the divorce and the rough parts of his childhood into transphobic digs at Helena. Dear Chandler: Come for the person’s actions that harmed you, but don’t come for their identity. It’s uncalled for and you hurt more than your target — you do immeasurable damage to the many others who share that identity. The comments ensure that trans people are never part of the group that gets to watch “Friends” for comfort, damage their self-image if they dare to watch and shape the behavior of everyone who interacts with them.

Accordingly, Chandler’s attitude towards Helena sets the tone for other characters in the show. At Chandler and Monica’s wedding, Chandler’s mother Nora Bing (Morgan Fairchild, “My Perfect Romance”) remarks to her ex, “Don’t you have a little too much penis to wear a dress like that?” Genitalia does not equal gender, but the suggestion that it does is part of the dangerous ideologies that “Friends” buys into. The trans community is constantly under attack, especially now, and media representations such as that of Helena are complicit in the harm that trans people, particularly trans women of color, suffer every day.

Media representation fails us and the people we love, time and time again. These characters and plotlines may be created in the name of visibility, but they perpetuate harm regardless of intention — and the intention, too, is often lacking. We’ve been burned so many times that I often wish we had been left out of the picture entirely; because bad representation is worse than no representation.
 
There is a missed opportunity every time the younger version of Monica (Courteney Cox, “Cougar Town”) is shown in a fat suit. This version of the character subverts what could have been body-positive representation into an extremely damaging caricature.
Translation: "I am mad because the portrayal was accurate"
Also fuck you it was a bland 90s sitcom full of neurotic dipshits. How far up their own ass does someone need to be to get butthurt about a show that aired before they were born? At least I assume Friends was aired before they were born.
 
Yeah, a starved and humiliated people in a failed state and an idiot crying about Friends are pretty much the same.
It's not just this dumb article and irrelevant idiot tranny who wrote it, it's not even whole trans nonsense that is happening right now. It's the whole culture, it's economy colapsing, it's migrant crisis, it's BLM bullshit, it's CRT... Normal people have breaking point and shit just keeps pilling up.
 
It's not just this dumb article and irrelevant idiot tranny who wrote it, it's not even whole trans nonsense that is happening right now. It's the whole culture, it's economy colapsing, it's migrant crisis, it's BLM bullshit, it's CRT... Normal people have breaking point and shit just keeps pilling up.
Come back when people rob farms en masse just to have something to eat.
 
Young Monica is a punchline, nothing more, and the Monica represented in the present constantly sees her worth tied to her “new and improved” body.
Being fat is objectively bad. Not only that, but it's something that can be fixed rather easily. So get the hell over it.

There’s another aspect of Monica’s character that’s deeply upsetting to me — her OCD.
Monica does not have OCD. Her obsessive cleanliness is reduced to obsessive cleanliness because that is what it is. She likes her house to be clean. That doesn't make her disordered or mentally ill. You're projecting and, ironically, stereotyping OCD people in the process.

Ross further belittles their relationship by refusing to accept that the two are lovers and life partners, deigning to refer to them only as “friends.”
Ross is in denial that his wife is a lesbian and resents her for cheating on him, so he lashes out at her. Why are you blaming a victim of infidelity and gaslighting? Why do you hate victims?

When Carol and Susan are eventually allowed to marry, they’re robbed of the quintessential post-vows kiss that all the straight couples on “Friends” get to enjoy.
Carol and Susan are tertiary characters. The only reason they exist is to expand upon Ross's tragicomic backstory. Nobody cares about their wedding, and having a post-vow kiss would put the focus on them as characters, when the real focus is on the main cast.

Moreover, Chandler frequently channels his frustration around the divorce and the rough parts of his childhood into transphobic digs at Helena. Dear Chandler: Come for the person’s actions that harmed you, but don’t come for their identity. It’s uncalled for and you hurt more than your target — you do immeasurable damage to the many others who share that identity.
Chandler had a fucked up childhood and a barely functional adulthood thanks to his dad becoming a tranny while Chandler was still young. He's allowed to hate trannies because they ruined his life by taking away his father and exposing him to paraphilia at a very young age. A lot of female domestic abuse victims hate men, and while I don't appreciate it, I at least understand it. Maybe you could extend that same level of empathy to all the families that the troon mind virus has destroyed?
 
Monica and Ross are Jewish, btw. And the episode when Ross is worried about his son losing his traditions over Christmas was much, much better handled than Seth Rogen's new Christmas movie.

About Chandler, I keep reading the same complain and @Unassuming Local Guy is correct: the show is a comedy so they treat all aspects as comedy. They make fun of everything, even themselves. That's why they show his father being a troon as a joke, but the context behind is that he's severely traumatised and, as an adult, he's unable to maintain a relationship.

You can say the same about Monica being fat: her mother is a very dominant person who showed preference over Ross and that's why she ate her feelings.
 
It's funny how these articles are always about innocuous shows like Friends, and never media that is actually crazy racist like "Song of the South." It's because they're giving up something they love on a Lent-like altar to their new religion, "I've been trained to feel bad about being white." I'm not sure if things are better or worse without church, these people would be crazy no matter what they're worshipping. The Satanic Panic of the 70-s and 80's was bad, but is this truly worse? I genuinely can't tell.
 
I thought from the title this would be about how some friends betrayed the author because of politics or differing opinions on the vax or something like that, which is pretty sad to write about. This is somehow worse.
 
It's funny how these articles are always about innocuous shows like Friends, and never media that is actually crazy racist like "Song of the South." It's because they're giving up something they love on a Lent-like altar to their new religion, "I've been trained to feel bad about being white." I'm not sure if things are better or worse without church, these people would be crazy no matter what they're worshipping. The Satanic Panic of the 70-s and 80's was bad, but is this truly worse? I genuinely can't tell.
I'd say this is worse just because of the scale that it infects society on. Evangelical nutters could try to strongarm culture through politics but they never controlled it and you never had Bank of America having mandatory employee seminars for how to be a good, God-fearing Christians.
 
This version of the character subverts what could have been body-positive representation into an extremely damaging caricature.

Yes, media must turn every little plot line turn into some kind of social message.

The trans community is constantly under attack, especially now, and media representations such as that of Helena are complicit in the harm that trans people, particularly trans women of color, suffer every day.

How? Please, tell me how this sitcom is complicit in violence towards trans people. I would love to see this study.
 
" Despite watching more than my fair share of TV, there’s no character or show I can think of, off the top of my head, that makes me feel seen."

This is perhaps the stupidest and most narcissistic comment I've ever seen about any film, TV show, book, ,or painting. Tonight I watched the movie War Horse, and there was no character in that movie that made me "feel seen." Same for my viewing of Saving Private Ryan. Same for reruns of Gilligan's Island, for crying out loud. Hell, I watched the Patriots-Bills game tonight, and nobody there made me feel seen either. And I've seen prints of Guernica, and that painting didn't make me feel seen. And when I read Lord of the Rings I didn't feel seen. Same with when I read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.

It never occurred to me to either feel seen or not seen in any tv show I've ever watched.

What sort of narcissistic fuckery is this?
 
I will actually grant them this minor boon - a lot of people do act like people with compulsive behavior or other mental issues do it to irritate people and ignore the fact that it’s as bad or worse for the sufferer. And that can be fucking annoying sometimes.

But that’s also WHY people make jokes about it, because it’s a way to acknowledge the frustrations without just yelling at them for being frustrating, because they do try to understand. So be a big boy and shut up.
Plus it's important for people with compolsive behavior and other mental issues to stay aware that they are indeed annoying. Some are very aware and overly concerned with it, but many can get so wrapped up with their own faulty logic that their compassion to others goes out the window. Seeing a situation that isn't your own but kinda like it can keep them grounded even if the potray isn't the most flattering.
 
" Despite watching more than my fair share of TV, there’s no character or show I can think of, off the top of my head, that makes me feel seen."

This is perhaps the stupidest and most narcissistic comment I've ever seen about any film, TV show, book, ,or painting. Tonight I watched the movie War Horse, and there was no character in that movie that made me "feel seen." Same for my viewing of Saving Private Ryan. Same for reruns of Gilligan's Island, for crying out loud. Hell, I watched the Patriots-Bills game tonight, and nobody there made me feel seen either. And I've seen prints of Guernica, and that painting didn't make me feel seen. And when I read Lord of the Rings I didn't feel seen. Same with when I read The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.

It never occurred to me to either feel seen or not seen in any tv show I've ever watched.

What sort of narcissistic fuckery is this?
autists have difficulty understanding the nuances of fantasy.
 
It never occurred to me to either feel seen or not seen in any tv show I've ever watched.

What sort of narcissistic fuckery is this?
To be fair, I think we all enjoy more a show or a book or anything when the characters have things in common with us. In Friend's case, you have a lot to choose from: divorced parents, science nerd, emotionally neglected child, lived on the streets, etc. I know I feel more connected to any media when I can see parts of me in a character.

The difference is that many of these characters don't look like me: many characters I feel identified with have been men, white, or even gay. And I'm not any of those. That's real empathy.
 
It’s because the series got dumped onto streaming. It’s like when they watch Seinfeld and complain
Did they miss the point about Seinfeld? Did the author of that literally have autism? Jesus Christ, is the whole PC and SJW because of autists who can't get jokes and power hungry sociopaths? All of those episodes are gold! GOLD! George isn't supposed to be some exemplar of human behavior, he's basically an incel that can score women, but is too lazy to put in any work to keep the relationship.
 
The problem isn’t just that representation eludes minorities and marginalized people. Sometimes there are people that look like us on screen, but they aren’t people we are proud of. So I don’t actively seek out shows when I hear there might be a character whose identity overlaps with mine; if anything, I run from them.

So you can't enjoy characters unless they are 100% clones of your color, orientation and personality? Holy ego, Batman!

Genitalia does not equal gender

Yes it does.

Anyway, Here's her other articles. The ones I looked through were hilariously bad: https://www.michigandaily.com/author/emmys/

And while I thought it was some black troon apparently I'm wrong. This seems to be our author because the emails and university match up:

https://lsa.umich.edu/rc/prospective-students/rc-ambassadors.html

image.jpg

I don't think it's a troon but dat hairline is very sus. Her hair is running away from her scalp as if its life depended on it. And if it's a man then that's likely a comb over going on. She likes watching Queer Eye with her friends on Netflix.

Whatever this horrifying mix of alien and balding horse is I think I now understand why she feels so strongly about having no representation on TV. Whatever the fuck else that would look like this just isn't camera friendly enough for prime time.
 
Back
Top Bottom