How do ugly organisms reproduce?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Meat Target

Chief Meateorogist at 1776 CWCF
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 24, 2020
07deac35c5345ce92fd57e6ffcfddd5c (1).jpg

Calvin's question. How did Grug and Grugina or shit-covered medieval peasants ever find each other sexy?
 
Different standards and incentives. You biologically gain nothing from fucking octopi so in theory nothing in your neurology preliminarily compels you towards finding attractive traits in octopi, so you are not compelled to fuck them either. Octopi, on the other hand, need to fuck other octopi to proliferate their DNA or not only do they die, the rest of the octopi die out.

Similarly, an ugly caveman's standards of attractiveness are based on a cross-section of innately useful biological traits (wide hips make bigger and stronger kids) and pre-established brainwashing (finding specific body odor scents attractive - it indicates cross-compatibility of immune systems typically), and those standards lower as the need to proliferate rises. So to you, Grug might be fucking an ugly she-hag of a cavewoman - but to him she's as good as it gets and he's up for that.

If anything, the modern standards of attractiveness and beauty (in regards to the human form) are a product of active manipulation of those biological necessities - bodily augmentation for the breasts and buttocks, perfumes to mask scents to de facto "pleasant" ones, makeup to utilize eye-drawing and attention grabbing colors (Why do you think lipstick is archetypically bright red and shiny like the berries humans learned to find edible and appealing?), and so on.

So the best answer for the question "How do ugly things fuck" is best summed up as "They either don't know better or know they won't get better." That's why your mother was able to have you.
 
Don't slugs have genitals on the side of their head? So not only do they have to look at each other, they're forced to do it much more than average.

If that isn't proof that nature is malicious I don't know what is.
 
When you have kids, genetics is like a gumball dispenser. If everyone had the ability to determine their genetic makeup of their offspring, everyone would then be pretty and perfect.

Plus, thanks to our complexities as social and cognizant creatures, as well as more important genetic factors (thank you @I've Seen Some More Shit), it gets even more complicated. Admittedly, being pretty is a big plus, but at the same time it's why we seek to kill and disfigure handsome tyrants and sociopathic charismatic rulers/"alphas". IMO, raising your kids in such a way to make them serial killers is a great way to kill your genetic lineage. I also read a story about how a beautiful rich couple got divorced and the husband sued his wife and her family because they got ugly kids. Plus, if you have gotten the short end of the stick in human society yet not realize to be better than its monsters, that's indicative of actual cognitive "miswiring". Nietzsche is right you know.

for the tl;dr version: You're Mum
 
Don't know about animals, guess it's just instinct.

Funnily enough, when it comes to humans, ugly ones still have standards. You might be inclined to pair two uglies together, but they don't want that. Even ugly people have dreams.

Only later in life do they realize that they need to go for what they can get.
 
What we call "consent" is pretty much a human concept.

In the big bad wild, animals do sexy dances for each other or showcase something aesthetic like peacock feathers. If that works, great, if it doesn't the male tends to just chase the female down and proceed with what humans would call rape.

It gets weird with ducks, those cute little quacking things you see floating innocently on the park pond. The male has a long corkscrew penis which evolved for having sex with female who don't want sex, and the female's vagina is a maze with dead ends to avoid being impregnated by a male during unwanted sex.

In other words, the duck penis evolved to be good at rape.
 
How do you explain Japanese people then?
Nothing in their neurology dictates a sexual predisposition towards octopi. One person (Hokusai) had something in his psychology that precluded towards the idea of sexual interpretations of octopi. It wasn't a wrinkle in his brain, it was a synapse firing weird. And as more people saw it, they themselves got weird synapses in their brain. Top that with the fact tentacles aren't penises and therefore aren't subject to the same censorship guidelines, and not only do you have a cheap bypass for porn censors, you have a mass psychosis.
 
Back
Top Bottom