How did snailslime get banned?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm actually upset about this, I'm going to miss the token negrating; I sincerely doubt an overload of faggots angry about her negrating is the reason though.
 
There is an obvious answer to this.

But the way that I think I should phrase it is autistic and I don't know how to phrase it otherwise.
 
People who I find annoying on this forum tend to get banned unexpectedly. I have absolutely nothing to do with this directly, but it's happened to so many people shortly after I've started reading their content and found it unpleasant to experience that I'm starting to wonder if I'm not somehow unknowingly psychic.
 
Did she piss off the untouchable janny?

tkp6zp.PNG
 
SIGSEGV said:
Personally, I understand both sides of the sticker issue.

On the one hand, you have those who give out neg-rates, and then they don't contribute in any real discussion. They believe as if the sticker should be the signifier of their opinions and viewpoints and nothing more. They don't feel the need to add to the discussion to make it more autistic or to get validation for their opinion. Their sticker speaks for itself and they move on with their day. Or sometimes, they add the sticker because "lol ur (this sticker)". After all, that's what they're there for. That's their purpose. To be a representation of your approval or disapproval or just your reaction.

But then you have those who get those negrates and are desperate in wanting someone to come at them with a rebuttal to their viewpoints or whatnot. But they grow increasingly dissatisfied with the idea that LOL IT'S JUST STICKERS. Well obviously, the person using those ratings rated the person's response with the sticker, the sticker being the thing that represents their beliefs on a situation. The person rated with that sticker wants to hear more from that person beyond the sticker shitposting to see if their arguments have weight. So if you don't give any sort of rebuttal and just leave it at a sticker, the person becomes increasingly angry at you or whatnot, irrationally. This is what led to that utterly hilarious thread with @crocodilian sperging out about @snailslime and @zedkissed60. After all, it's a forum where we can say whatever the fuck we want almost as long as it doesn't inconvenience Our Dear Leader.

There's an interesting grasp of psychology to it all. To the way we use the internet, the way we communicate, interactions, and whatnot. How the stickers are so specific in their purpose in response to other people's posts. How one can become obsessed with people's opinions and perspectives and what they meant by just one sticker. They are quite an interesting weapon.
Click to expand...
Isn't the only reason we have stickers in the first place is because Null hates posts that boil down to "I Agree with this post" or "This post is dumb"?
 
SojuDrnkr said:
No idea. All she did was neg rate everybody's comment. I don't know if that's against the rules exactly, but I guess enough people got butthurt and complained about it that the mods decided to ban her.
Click to expand...
DumbDude42 said:
thats fucking retarded
nobody should be banned for inconsequential shit like that, no matter how many people get butthurt and complain about it
Click to expand...
No, its because @Null told people to stop harassing @Twinkie on the supporter forum , and when people ignored him he finally gave into his bloodletting itch and started throwing down ban hammers left and right against people he was already tired of.
 
Sgt. Pinback said:
Oh, no - snailslime got b&? :stress:

But gimmick accounts that never comment and negrate everything are so amusing!
Click to expand...

I would have just taken away his ability to rate, but I'm not surprised. Even if @snailslime did initially post like everyone else, they devolved into "that guy who gives negative ratings to everything", with "everything" eventually boiling down to "whatever they disagreed with, usually politically." It was trolling so weak it made @SIGSEGV appear intelligent.

Either way, I predict an account with the same unpleasant nature as @snailslime will appear in the next week. Nobody will bat an eye.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom