How did snailslime get banned?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
SojuDrnkr said:
No idea. All she did was neg rate everybody's comment. I don't know if that's against the rules exactly, but I guess enough people got butthurt and complained about it that the mods decided to ban her.
Click to expand...
Probably because they actually positive rated someone.
 
Stuck in Corners said:
This is the second time this year that a user who gets mad clout for riling up A&N get btfo'd for reasons that are completely unrelated to it. Quite a wierd phenomenon.
Click to expand...
ConfederateIrishman said:
People who are T&H donors are mad because they started a cult of personality around her as in their eyes she was the chosen one to "own the A&H-tards".
Click to expand...

What clout? I always thought snailslime was generally disliked and never did much of anything but give negrates.
 
Having thought about it some more, I think that the people who get banned like this are just unpleasant individuals in general. I'm somebody who never interacts with the chat, never DM's people, and has zero connection with any Kiwi outside of this forum. However, I think that most people like me just see the gimmick posters on a surface level. They are never as uninvolved as they claim to be.

To be a dedicated gimmick-poster you have to put a lot of time and effort into it. You need to switch mindsets whenever you log in and go to reply to anything. These individuals almost always have much more contact with the community than they let on, because if you didn't have a serious, driving motive to keep up your act... you wouldn't to begin with.

I think Dynastia was the best gimmick-poster on the site because it was obviously not serious. He was fully capable of detailed effort-posts and had plenty of them before just getting bored and deciding to start messing with people in a way that always required them to react to him in order for things to escalate. Other gimmick-posters seem to go out of their way to try and justify the energy and time they put into maintaining their personas, and thus start weighing the opinions of the community far higher than they should. They get angry and judgmental if they're ignored, and start drama whenever it seems like their influence is waning.

As a result, the 'lol it's just a joke bro' types are probably deep in DM's, throwing around long, detailed, multi-paragraph philosophical dissertations on how X is bad mod and should be banned, or the forum is totally dying and Jersh is going to sell it to a Jewish banker any day now or something.

In conclusion, these people are all very sad, lonely, boring individuals who suffer from a need to have attention on them at all times. They can't stand out by posting actual content, so they try to awkwardly insert themselves into 'forum politics' and generally annoy everyone in the process. That's why you should just block them and move on. Or follow them and wait patiently for the inevitable implosion.
 
Terrorist said:
What clout? I always thought snailslime was generally disliked and never did much of anything but give negrates.
Click to expand...

Sorry to say but there’s a lot of gay shit that goes on in private threads and messaging. Occasionally you accidentally get pulled into one of these and you think “what the fuck is this shit?”

Forever Sunrise said:
Having thought about it some more, I think that the people who get banned like this are just unpleasant individuals in general. I'm somebody who never interacts with the chat, never DM's people, and has zero connection with any Kiwi outside of this forum. However, I think that most people like me just see the gimmick posters on a surface level. They are never as uninvolved as they claim to be.

To be a dedicated gimmick-poster you have to put a lot of time and effort into it. You need to switch mindsets whenever you log in and go to reply to anything. These individuals almost always have much more contact with the community than they let on, because if you didn't have a serious, driving motive to keep up your act... you wouldn't to begin with.

I think Dynastia was the best gimmick-poster on the site because it was obviously not serious. He was fully capable of detailed effort-posts and had plenty of them before just getting bored and deciding to start messing with people in a way that always required them to react to him in order for things to escalate. Other gimmick-posters seem to go out of their way to try and justify the energy and time they put into maintaining their personas, and thus start weighing the opinions of the community far higher than they should. They get angry and judgmental if they're ignored, and start drama whenever it seems like their influence is waning.

As a result, the 'lol it's just a joke bro' types are probably deep in DM's, throwing around long, detailed, multi-paragraph philosophical dissertations on how X is bad mod and should be banned, or the forum is totally dying and Jersh is going to sell it to a Jewish banker any day now or something.

In conclusion, these people are all very sad, lonely, boring individuals who suffer from a need to have attention on them at all times. They can't stand out by posting actual content, so they try to awkwardly insert themselves into 'forum politics' and generally annoy everyone in the process. That's why you should just block them and move on. Or follow them and wait patiently for the inevitable implosion.
Click to expand...

In my two decades of shitposting, it’s hard to get riled up at this point by these dime a dozen trolls who pretend they’re Andy Kaufman. Not the first and not the last on here.
 
So, some ordinary user got banned because she annoyed the head of the website that much he decided to act. Why are people so astonished about that?
 
Forever Sunrise said:
Having thought about it some more, I think that the people who get banned like this are just unpleasant individuals in general. I'm somebody who never interacts with the chat, never DM's people, and has zero connection with any Kiwi outside of this forum. However, I think that most people like me just see the gimmick posters on a surface level. They are never as uninvolved as they claim to be.

To be a dedicated gimmick-poster you have to put a lot of time and effort into it. You need to switch mindsets whenever you log in and go to reply to anything. These individuals almost always have much more contact with the community than they let on, because if you didn't have a serious, driving motive to keep up your act... you wouldn't to begin with.

I think Dynastia was the best gimmick-poster on the site because it was obviously not serious. He was fully capable of detailed effort-posts and had plenty of them before just getting bored and deciding to start messing with people in a way that always required them to react to him in order for things to escalate. Other gimmick-posters seem to go out of their way to try and justify the energy and time they put into maintaining their personas, and thus start weighing the opinions of the community far higher than they should. They get angry and judgmental if they're ignored, and start drama whenever it seems like their influence is waning.

As a result, the 'lol it's just a joke bro' types are probably deep in DM's, throwing around long, detailed, multi-paragraph philosophical dissertations on how X is bad mod and should be banned, or the forum is totally dying and Jersh is going to sell it to a Jewish banker any day now or something.

In conclusion, these people are all very sad, lonely, boring individuals who suffer from a need to have attention on them at all times. They can't stand out by posting actual content, so they try to awkwardly insert themselves into 'forum politics' and generally annoy everyone in the process. That's why you should just block them and move on. Or follow them and wait patiently for the inevitable implosion.
Click to expand...
Mostly agree, but I'm entertained by how failtrolls like tuscangarder, who I still believe thought she could change the world with some byzantine forum posts.

I don't think @snailslime was a failed troll, as some people, especially @crocotillian or whatever his name was, got serious buttblasted because she just negrated entire threads. It was a fun little niche for a while, like the crazy old guy in all white that shouts about g4 entering our bones and giving us corona. The repetiviness of the odd behaviour makes it weirdly wholesome.

Ligoskj said:
So, some ordinary user got banned because she annoyed the head of the website that much he decided to act. Why are people so astonished about that?
Click to expand...

I asked why because I wanted to know. Now I know. Some people think its because of negrates and don't read the whole thread.
 
Lemmingwise said:
I asked why because I wanted to know. Now I know. Some people think its because of negrates and don't read the whole thread.
Click to expand...
Good for you. Shall we move on? We don't really need to keep discussing some person who has been spending all her time on negrating people for the sake of her personal enjoyment (or whatever it was).
 
Last edited:
Ligoskj said:
Good for you. Shall we move on? We don't really need to keep discussing some person who has been spending all her time on negrating people for the sake of her personal enjoyment (or whatever it was).
Click to expand...
No you have to stay in this thread and discuss it into eternity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom