US How David Hula grows 600-bushel-plus corn

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Pretty interesting. In time, many of the things Hula does will happen on other farms, increasing yields, if not to 600-plus bushels to the acre, then to more than before. More corn for everyone.

How David Hula grows 600-bushel-plus corn​

Virginia farmer David Hula soared past the 600-bushel-per-acre corn barrier in 2019. Here’s how he did it.
By
Bill Spiegel,

Updated on July 6, 2024


David Hula is no stranger to stratospheric corn yields. His 623.8439 bushels per acre (bpa) yield in 2023 is the fifth time he’s set the world corn yield record, and his 12th time winning the National Corn Yield Contest.

He’s not achieving massive yields on super-fertile, jet-black land. Instead, Hula farms on sandy-loam fields in Charles City County, Virginia, southeast of Richmond.

“Everyone thinks we have a magic piece of dirt, but we don’t. We’ve had success on seven different fields and three different counties,” Hula says. “It takes a team of folks and God’s favor.”

"Everyone thinks we have a magic piece of dirt. We don't." - David Hula

Laying the foundation​


Hula's quest for top yields begins 18 months before harvest, when he's planting the previous year's crop and field testing new technologies and theories. In 2018 he began using Precision Planting's Conceal starter fertilizer system, which places up to two different products on his John Deere 1770NT planter. Using Conceal, Hula places starter fertilizer 3 inches away from the row, 1.25 to 1.5 inches deep.

“I’m adamant about 3 inches away because I’m applying 66 pounds of nitrogen, 33 pounds of phosphorus, and some sulfur, zinc, boron, and Accomplish with the starter,” he says. “When our planter leaves the field, every acre, whether contest or not, is treated the same with the starter, as well as in our furrow system, which includes Relay and Ethos XB.”

He soil-samples each field in 1-acre grids after soybean harvest. Correcting pH is a priority; if necessary, fields receive an application of lime. He applies potash for the entire crop rotation before planting corn, using a Deere 800R spreader and a SoilWarrior strip-tiller. The SoilWarrior strip-tiller allows a farmer to apply a blend of dry products, including nitrogen, sulfur, monoammonium phosphorous (MAP), Titan XC, humic acid, and micronutrients in a 7-inch band, while making an ideal seedbed for corn.

Hula’s conversion to strip-till six years ago is a change from a long-term never-till system. However, strip-till allows nutrients to be placed in a narrow band, six to eight weeks before planting.

By using variable-rate technology for precise fertilizer placement and only applying fertilizer in the field’s tilled area, Hula can feed the crop exactly where it is growing. This doesn’t necessarily mean he uses less fertilizer; it just helps ensure efficiency. This way, every dollar he spends on crop nutrition precisely fuels performance.

Choosing hybrids​

Each year, Hula meets with his Pioneer representatives to study agronomic data for hybrids suited for his environment. Yield is foremost, but he also prioritizes emergence, then plant health (or stay-green ability). He also prefers hybrids that he says flower earlier than relative maturity. For instance, he chooses a 112-day hybrid that pollinates like a 109-day hybrid, which gives a longer grain fill period.

Hula set his 2023 yield record with Pioneer’s P14830VYHR hybrid. This new hybrid, from the company’s freshman class of corn products, is a switch after Hula’s long history of high yields with P1197.

During Pioneer’s research and development process, P14830 showed high yield potential, high test weights, and strong plant health. While some hybrids are best suited for specific regions, P14830 shows potential to be adopted across the country.

“What is unique about this hybrid is its wide fit,” says Adam Theis, corn portfolio lead for Pioneer. “One parent comes from a more Western-focused breeding program; the other parent comes from a more Eastern-focused breeding. By doing that, we’re seeing those wide agronomics available.”

Planting Considerations​

For his contest fields, Hula aims to drop from 38,000 to 54,000 seeds per acre.

His planter has undergone dramatic changes in the last few years. He installed Deere’s Performance Upgrade Kit, which included the ExactEmerge planter units, which have the high-speed bowl meters and brush belt seed tubes; and the ExactRate liquid delivery system for the starter application. Those changes have improved singulation, as well as consistent, even emergence, necessary for high yields.

“If corn comes up within six, seven days and so many growing degree units (GDUs) from the time we plant with even emergence, then we know we have an opportunity to do something special,” he says. “We got that picket-fence-row stand.”

The planter, Hula reckons, is the biggest key to maximizing yield. Every row of the planter needs to be working properly, whether it’s ensuring seed-to-soil contact and accuracy or getting fertilizer to the right location. It may require waiting for the right field conditions and stopping to check planter performance in the field.

Hula uses flag emerging trials on some corn annually to document the success across the entire planter, ensuring every row contributes equally. Hula says planters should be inspected during offseason and at the start of planting. Routine checks throughout the day during planting can catch issues early.

“I only get one time to do it right. And when the planter leaves the field, you’re either blessed with what you did or cursed with what you did, and you get to live with it for the rest of the season,” he says.

Planting speeds on contest fields can range from 4 to 7 mph, depending on seed size and shape, as Hula monitors singulation.

Once, 600 bushels per acre (bpa) was considered the maximum corn yield, assuming perfect conditions. Now, David Hula believes 800 to 900 bpa is attainable.

In-season crop protection​

For years, Hula has pulled leaf tissue samples from his corn every Monday. From those, he’s built a large dataset that guides him as to when the crop is ready for required, specific nutrients. He applies micronutrients, potash, nitrogen, sulfur, and boron in-season, with foliar sprays. Based on crop needs determined from the tissue tests, he sidedresses with EZ-Drops. Later in the season he adds additional nutrients with EZ-Drops or with his center pivot system, a process known as fertigation.

On contest fields, Hula typically applies three fungicide passes, with a goal of keeping plants green as long as possible, maximizing kernel development.

Hula has observed the significant impact kernel weight has on final yields. “Imagine the yield difference if you harvest 56-pound corn versus 65-pound corn,” he says. “Having the same number of kernels per ear but a difference in ear weight — that can be big.”

Putting it into practice​

600 bpa was thought to be the maximum corn yield, assuming perfect conditions. Now, however, Hula believes 800 to 900 bpa is attainable.
“If that’s the case and our average is 170 bushels per acre, we’re nowhere near where the potential is,” he says.

With up to nine passes through the field coupled with relying on irrigation, pushing the average corn acre to Hula’s award-winning yields isn’t realistic. However, the insights he learns from his contest fields can serve as a guide.

“I don’t mind doing things on a few acres to see what works,” Hula says. “In these plots, we’re learning a lot. The things that do work we’ll implement on other acres. When they work there, then it becomes a standard procedure for our operation. And despite all the things we do and think we have control over, it’s important for us to realize that we need God to bless the seeds we sow.”



 
It says in the article that he grows a cover crop of soybeans. Legumes fix nitrogen in the soil.
It also says:
“I’m adamant about 3 inches away because I’m applying 66 pounds of nitrogen, 33 pounds of phosphorus, and some sulfur, zinc, boron, and Accomplish with the starter,”
That would most likely be synthetic nitrogen fertilizers among other things. I don't think soybeans are that good of nitrogen fixers.
 
That would most likely be synthetic nitrogen fertilizers among other things. I don't think soybeans are that good of nitrogen fixers.

Sorry, I was being an autist. You said:
If he's using any nitrogen fixing substance, which the article seems to indicate, he is almost certainly using something synthetic.
Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers are already fixed by their very creation, so when you said "nitrogen fixing substance" I wrongly assumed (see below). But you're correct, since he's adding 66 pounds of nitrogen fertilizer it's likely urea, from synthesized ammonia, or ammonium nitrate, which comes from a process that is too complicated for my tiny, non-chemist, froggy brain, and both are definitely synthesized.

That said, soybeans are a common rotation crop for corn and inoculating the soybeans with a biological nitrogen fixing bacterium helps soybean yields and fixes additional nitrogen in the soil.
 
This entire article is just an ad for John Deere, Pioneer, and a few others. If yield record harvests were televised, this guy would have the entire windshield of his combine covered in stickers like he's Ricky Bobby.

If you buy all this stuff, you too can also achieve 600 bushel corn. Don't ask how you'll pay for any of it @ $3/bu.
No it isn't, this is how actual farmers talk to each other about this stuff. The signs seed companies pit up with the seed numbers are there because that's how you talk to them. That hobo blues singer Seasick Steve has a song pretty much just about Deere tractor models.
A’right, here me drive now
Plow it up
That ol’ model G High Crop
How ‘bout the 4020
2010 High Crop
Model R
Model B
Model BN
 
People get so pissed when Wal-Mart throws out some ugly tomatoes that were going to rot within a few weeks anyway, but they don't mind us destroying huge quantities of grain that could last for years, just so they can pretend a 1.5 hour commute to a job they did remotely is "sustainable."
Blame the ag lobby. You can make ethanol from almost any plant but ag lobbyists paid for a government mandate that the ethanol had to be made from corn.
 
Completely unreservedly. And it's taking food production and literally burning it.
It's not a complete waste thankfully, the spent mash and lees used to make the ethanol are a very good animal feed.

From an energy perspective it is very, very inefficient though. Not a bad idea if you're just using the ethanol as an additive like TEL, but as a fuel itself it makes no economic sense. If you just consider it another subsidy to corn farmers, it makes a lot more sense.
 
This is an article about record setting crop yields. If you thought for even a second he was going to achieve that via organic faggotry you're outright delusional.

Modern agricultural practices exist for a reason.
Remember the Sri Lanka shitshow? Where under WEF pressure/bribery they mandated all their crops must switch to organic farming methods and stop it with the fertilizers that were bad for the environment?

And they immediately saw crop yields fall by 20% and the country had to start importing food at ruinous markups just to eat?

And mobs charged government buildings?

The big push for all-organic got real quiet after that.
 
It is a simple fact that today's population cannot be fed without modern frankenscienced crop yields, regardless of the impact on the environment or our bodies.
 
It is a simple fact that today's population cannot be fed without modern frankenscienced crop yields, regardless of the impact on the environment or our bodies.
Yesterday's population couldn't be fed with them either. Famines and Malthusian catastrophes were a reality almost everywhere prior to the Green Revolution, the only thing keeping it in check in a lot of cases was high child mortality.

That's not to say it isn't important or desirable to encourage sustainable and organic practices and preserve heirloom and landrace varieties of crops. These approaches are complementary and advances in sustainable/organic farming reduce the costs for conventional farming as well (e.g. see the development of dryland farming practices in the past century).
 
If you think farming technology was static until the 1960s, I really don't know what to tell you.

Famines are far less common nowadays than they were because transportation is better. Droughts and floods are local phenomena.

Much worse than synthetic fertilizer and GM crops are landscapes of endless, unbroken tracts of tilled soil. A great hand has tipped the land and spilled all the people into cities. Corporate farming is more efficient at extracting wealth, but not at feeding a nation long-term. The dearth of wilderness areas and windbreaks along roads and fencelines is turning the soil into windborne dust as much as rhe 1920s incentives to grow as much as possible at all times did. There are highways where I have to stay under the speed limit to keep the truck on the pavement, so much of our nation's wealth is blowing across it.

"They're paying farmers NOT to grow crops" is the perennial scandal among the hiveborn, who cannot conceive that there's value to the country as a whole for land to rest, or for anything but corn stalks to grow in entire ecoregion. This suits the rootless just fine, as they exclusively care to strip-mine any resource for their own short-term hedonism.


TLDR shit's fucked.
 
there are unseen hands in everything, and if it wasnt the jooze it would be somebody else oxymoronicaly. we are predators of our own kind. it will never change because we're hardwired for it.
“I hate mankind, for I think myself one of the best of them, and I know how bad I am.”
― Samuel Johnson
 
The average 95 IQ bugman who thinks farmers are all inbred illiterate hicks should be forced to calibrate a spreader for optimal nitrogen coverage for a given soil pH and expected annual rainfall. If they get it wrong, a bunch of hayseeds from flyover country will follow them home playing a banjo and roasting the shit out of them as loudly as possible.
Indeed. Farmers as a group are very comfortable using technology in their work. They use it, innovate with it, and sometimes invent their own technology.

Farmers as a group are also big conservationists. The depth of that topsoil matters a great deal to them, so does that drainage.

If interested, check out 'Successful Farming' magazine. Am a subscriber. Grew up on a farm.
 
Indeed. Farmers as a group are very comfortable using technology in their work. They use it, innovate with it, and sometimes invent their own technology.

Farmers as a group are also big conservationists. The depth of that topsoil matters a great deal to them, so does that drainage.

If interested, check out 'Successful Farming' magazine. Am a subscriber. Grew up on a farm.
A lot of people misinterpret farmer's resistance to trends with a resistance to technology.

For some reason....

They'll gladly embrace new things.

Once you prove it works.

Right now? All this heavily-influenced heavily-advocated heavily-political green ideology? In regards to farming? Is most decisively UNPROVEN.
 
Last edited:
No it isn't, this is how actual farmers talk to each other about this stuff. The signs seed companies pit up with the seed numbers are there because that's how you talk to them. That hobo blues singer Seasick Steve has a song pretty much just about Deere tractor models.
Seed signs are advertisements by and for a seed dealer. Every seed dealer I've ever meet was also a farmer. When there's a whole row of them that's a test plot.
 
FYI Monsanto hasn't existed for 6 years. It was bought by Bayer.

The technology in modern farms is insane. The tractors have gps and custom maps of the field with the results of soil samples and drone surveys. The sprayers can be so fine tuned that they can turn off and on individual sprayer nozzles to increase/decrease the spray because they know that this section of the field doesn't need as much of chemical x as the next section.

Modern synthetic pesticides are usually safer for people and the environment than older "organic*" pesticides that do not break down as well in the environment.

*Yes organic does not mean pesticide free.
 
USDA organic rules are schizophrenic.

You'd think treating an animal with pneumonia with antibiotics was reasonable, but noooope. On the other hand, go ahead and spray fucking nicotine on those carrots. It's teh natural!
One of my personal favorites is copper sulfate and copper octanoate. They're among the most popular fungicides in the organic industry (to be fair, modern farms use them too, just a lot less).
One of the few minerals found in statistically significant higher concentrations in organic produce is copper and it's likely just a result of copper pesticides.
Organic fags tout the higher copper content as "proof" organic is better for you yet they keep quiet about the fact that these copper compounds are toxic to humans.

Realistically, though, the amount present by the time it hits the shelves it pretty irrelevant. You really shouldn't be worried about the pesticides used on any produce in the store. Just don't think you're doing yourself any favors buying organic.
 
Back
Top Bottom