Science How Climate Change Can Supercharge Snowstorms

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

How Climate Change Can Supercharge Snowstorms​

If the globe is warming, shouldn’t there be less snow?

It’s a common question. So last winter, as another intense snowstorm blanketed a large part of the United States, we put it to Kevin Reed, an associate professor at the School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences at Stony Brook University on Long Island.

It is true, he said, that in a warming world, less snow is falling overall, and covering less area.

But higher temperatures also allow the atmosphere to hold more water, which creates more precipitation and makes it more likely to fall quickly.

“That means there are still times and cases where that precipitation increase comes in the form of snow,” Dr. Reed said. “We know that to be true.”

Summers have always been more humid than winters because warmer air absorbs more moisture. As the moisture condenses, warm air rises faster, bringing even more moisture in a feedback loop that can create sudden, fast-falling downpours like the ones that spurred deadly floods in New York and New Jersey in the aftermath of Hurricane Ida last year.

Overall, Dr. Reed said, a few degrees of global warming means that some storms that would have brought snow on a 31-degree day will end up as rain at 33 degrees. But on the other hand, more snow falls when temperatures are just below freezing than during extreme cold.

“So a storm that’s a little warmer but still below freezing, a storm that might’ve been a 25-degree storm but ends up as a 30-degree storm, means it will snow more,” he said.

Flash floods are generally more likely during warm-weather downpours. But freezing temperatures bring their own flooding risks, Dr. Reed said: Ice can block drainage systems, and if rain or warmer temperatures follow snow, the melting can cause flooding.

“That’s the worst-case scenario when we’re right around the freezing line: Rain and snow melt and blockages all at once,” he said.

A Guide to Winter Weather​

A white Christmas may seem magical, but be careful during a winter storm.​


 
The Ozone thing is a Y2K situation. The hole was due to a chemical factories were spewing out called CFC. When factories stopped using that stuff, the hole got better. For those who don't know, Y2K was pretty much nothing because people bothered to fix it.
Global production of CFCs has "grown rapidly" since this bullshit in the 70s, according to EPA's own propaganda:
In the 1970s, concerns about the effects of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) on the stratospheric ozone layer prompted several countries, including the United States, to ban the use of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as aerosol propellants. However, global production of CFCs and other ODS continued to grow rapidly as new uses were found for these chemicals in refrigeration, fire suppression, foam insulation, and other applications.
It's hilarious that they claim to have "solved" this imaginary problem while also simultaneously admitting it would be theoretically impossible. A reminder to everyone that CFCs are propellants used in air conditioners and refrigerators.

NASA retards in 2012:
According to NASA scientist Pawan Bhartia, “The Antarctic hole is stabilizing and may be slowly recovering. Our focus now is to make sure that it is healing as expected.” The amount of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) in the atmosphere has stopped rising in recent years (:lol:), and may actually be decreasing (:lit:). The yearly ozone hole should continue for a while, though, as CFCs and other ODSs can last for decades in the air. Scientists found in a 2009 study that without the Montreal Protocol, global ozone depletion (not just Antarctic) would be at least 10 times worse than current levels by 2050.
Changes in the ozone hole now are not significantly driven by changes in CFCs, but instead driven by year-to-year changes in weather in the stratosphere,” said Bhartia, who in 1985 was the first researcher to present satellite data showing the Antarctic ozone hole. “Like two snowflakes, two ozone holes are never alike. ”
NASA retards today:
Data from Sentinel-5P was used to show that last year’s ozone hole over the Antarctic was one of the largest and deepest in recent years. The hole grew rapidly from mid-August and peaked at around 25 million sq km on 2 October.
 
solar-cycle-update-solar-minimum-mini-ice-age-1024x462.jpg

Remember when Texas froze solid? Pepperidge Farm remembers.
 
Back
Top Bottom