How activists rewrote Indigenous history - Contrary to popular belief, ‘Two-Spirit’ is a recent term, not an ancient Indigenous tradition

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article / Archive

For decades, Indigenous transgender and homosexual people have been called “two-spirited.” It has also been alleged that such people were highly revered in traditional Indigenous culture. In reality, the term “two-spirited” is less than 35 years old and does not reflect the way such people thought of themselves. Moreover, the allegation such people were revered across Indigenous cultures stretches credulity.

The term “two-spirited” was coined in a book following the third annual Native America/First Nations Gay and Lesbian Conference in Winnipeg in 1990. Yet, even here, acceptance of the concept was far from universal. Many did not believe such people had both a male and female spirit.

In 2002, archaeologist Alice Kehoe noted, “At the conferences that produced the book Two-Spirit People, I heard several First Nations people describe themselves as very much unitary, neither ‘male’ nor ‘female,’ much less a pair in one body. Nor did they report an assumption of duality within one body as a common concept within reservation communities; rather, people confided dismay at the Western proclivity for dichotomies.”

In 2016, Ojibwe journalist Mary Annette Pember said the “two-spirited” concept was activist cultural appropriation. In her article, Two Spirit Tradition Far From Ubiquitous Among Tribes, she wrote, “I am troubled by the claims that Native peoples historically described LGBTQ folks as two-spirited and celebrated them as healers and shamans because the claims are mostly unfounded or only partially true. These sort of simplified black-and-white depictions of Native culture and history perpetuate indiscriminate appropriation of Native peoples.”

Pember credits anthropologist Will Roscoe with popularizing the term “two-spirit.” Roscoe and his mentor, Harry Hay, were involved in a hippie counterculture gay men’s group called the Radical Faeries. This non-native community emulated native spirituality. Neither Roscoe nor Hay was Indigenous.

In the 1700s, Jesuit explorer Pierre François Xavier de Charlevoix said the tribes of the Seven Nations, “men were seen to wear the dress of women without a blush” and added, “it was pretended that this custom came from… religion; but this religion had like many others taken its birth in the depravation of the heart… these effeminate persons never marry, and abandon themselves to the most infamous passions, for which cause they are held in the most sovereign contempt.”

The Jesuits used the word berdache for homosexuals and transgenders, but the term is now considered derogatory. Homosexual filmmaker Kristopher Kohl Miner of the Ho-Chunk Nation in Wisconsin told Pember, “Two-spirit is a totally contemporary term. It was brought to the table because anthropologists referred to us as berdache. Native LGBTQ people wanted a term that could give us the opportunity to take back our identities.”

Yet, Miner admitted he could not find a single reference to such people among Ho-Chunk elders or scholars. “So much has been lost,” he said.

“When I brought my husband to a feast, I was told that I was flaunting my sexuality and instructed not to sit with my clan,” Miner added. “I asked my elders what was going on but they just shook their heads. I was so disappointed; I haven’t returned since.”

Regardless, Roscoe claims 24 tribes had male homosexuals or transgenders, including Assiniboines, Blackfoot, Plains Crees, Lakota, Dakota, and Plains Ojibwas. Only the Cheyennes recognized a female equivalent: the henteman. In the early 1800s, Running Eagle of the Piegans wore male clothing in warfare, while Woman Chief of the Crows had four wives.

Ojibwe Anton Treuer, professor of Ojibwe linguistics at Bemidji State University, told Pember, “Sex usually determined one’s gender, and therefore one’s work, but the Ojibwe accepted variation. Men who chose to function as women were called ikwekanaazo, meaning ‘one who endeavours to be like a woman.’ Women who functioned as men were called ininiikaazo.”

Treuer added that such roles were considered “sacred, often because they assumed their roles based on spiritual dreams or visions.” They defied cultural norms because a spirit told them to. In some dreams, men saw themselves doing what was considered women’s work: quilling, beading, and tanning. A Lakota man was exempted from war if a dream told him to live this way.

Roscoe claims, “Other skills attributed to berdaches included the ability to foretell the future and convey luck by bestowing obscene nicknames (Lakota), make love magic (Pawnee), and arrange marriages (Cheyenne). [Painter] George Catlin [1796 to 1872] illustrated a Sauk and Fox dance in which a berdache is the central figure surrounded by… male lovers. Dakota warriors sometimes visited berdaches before joining war parties in the belief that such encounters augmented their masculine ferocity.”

Pember rightly said such examples are not enough to characterize all 130 Indigenous cultures and 503 tribes in the U.S. alone. She says the two-spirit idea owes itself more to “New Age and popular ideals” that paint “an overly wide brush of Native culture, conveniently overlooking distinct cultural and language differences that Native peoples hold crucial to their identity.”

In their efforts to overthrow western society, Cultural Marxists find it convenient to insist that homosexuals and transgenders were exalted in pre-colonial culture. However, the term “two-spirit” and much of its associated narratives are more political than real.

Whether this inconvenient truth prevails depends on how many people find out.
 
Homosexual historical revisionism is incredibly annoying. For one, it puts a modern outlook on the past that didn't exist, and even justifies horrific practices that were normal at the time. You'll have academics excuse pederasty in ancient Greece and Japan as somehow a good thing because it somehow can frame modern homosexual acceptance as a long-standing tradition. This guy did a pretty good video exposing the holes in this logic.
 
Last edited:
They are like the Grinch. They sneak around you and while you are not looking they try to steal your culture.

Deviants have been a thing since the dawn of man, you have representation, too much I'd argue. Especially in AIDS statistics.
 
I'm pretty sure this shit being historical revisionism is well documented at this point. There's also a difference between people using the term to refer to shamans/handymen in general and gay people but like that's the result of the two spirit thing being lumped in as it is where they make the jump from "oh well some people did jobs both the men and women would normally do" to "THAT MEANNS THEY WERE NONCONFORMING TO GENDER AND TRAAAAAAAANS" like every fucking "media literacy" hack shit the last few decades. This of course, results n people calling themselves two spirt that do NOT do "jack of all trades" stuff and using people with actual talent as a diversty tickbox because they can now retroactively be called gay and trans.


They are like the Grinch. They sneak around you and while you are not looking they try to steal your culture.
I get the analogy but the grinch stole shit with the intent of destroying it because his neighbors spent 53 years every fucking christmas season smashing extremely loud instruments when he was just trying to fucking sleep and live normally. I mean as normally as a green guy who lives in a fucking cave north of town can. His was much more personal, not some vague top down cultural rebranding of some culture he wasn't part of.
 
Last edited:
The troon "way" has always been to rewrite everything in sight to prop up their bogus claims.
It makes no difference if it's history, literature, biology, psychology, genetics or medicine - they'll grab it and subvert it.
Factual evidence has no value.

By doing that and screeching about it to all and sundry, they pretty much succeeded in silencing any criticism or questioning of their cult.
 
Homosexual historical revisionism is incredibly annoying. For one, it puts a modern outlook on the past that didn't exist, and even justifies horrific practices that were normal at the time. You'll have academics excuse pederasty in ancient Greece and Japan as somehow a good thing because it somehow can frame modern homosexual acceptance as a long-standing tradition. This guy did a pretty good video exposing the holes in this logic.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BNAT4ybsz_E
Of course those same people have zero issues shaming past people for actions that were legal and logical in their time, or for not risking their entire communities in pointless rebellions.
 
Not the first time this has happened either.

In the 90's, there was a lot of environmentalism inserted into indigenous history to try and justify the green movement, when Natives weren't conservation minded at all.

They just had low impact due to low population.
 
I asked my elders what was going on but they just shook their heads.

1739036534086.jpeg

Searching for "disappointed indian" didn't produce quite the result I was hoping for.
1739036224250.jpeg
 
This brings back memories...

Back when I was in university, I had to take a cultural issues class and I was looking into Native Americans. It was then that I found some interesting info on the treatment of captured Native American warriors:

RICHARD TREXLER proposes in his
forthcoming book Europe on Top: Male Homo-
sexuality and the Conquests of America, 1400-
1700, that in the Old World and in the New,
there was a rather universal gender represen-
tation of conquest: victors on vanquishing
their enemies asserted their virility by trans-
forming losers into effeminates. Enemies had
to perform women's work and to wear
women's clothes as a sign of vanquishment.

We certainly know that heterosexual rape was
a common habit of war. What we are only
now starting to admit is that losing men were
similarly treated and were forced to perform
what were considered demeaning forms of
sexual service. Thus, it does not matter much
whether we examine male prisoners of war
among the Zurn and the Arawaks, Aztec and
Inca male temple slaves, or those figures on
pre-Columbian Moche pottery jars from
northern Peru depicting male slaves in
women's clothes being passively penetrated
in homosexual intercourse, to see the status
inversion marked through gender symbols
that were so frequently associated with
defeated men.s

The above is from a Stanford academic not some right wing Christian nut.

Now I got an A+ on the paper but was told very kindly and very gently to refocus my area of inquiry.
 
I do like how most of the gay guy's examples of tribes with something like two-spirit are just guys that want to tan hides. They're not even saying they were gay or wanted to be women, just "dream spirit told me to make heap many baskets."
It's insane how regressive these people are while trying to be progressive.
 
Back
Top Bottom