US Hollow Point USA - "BOOM: Today, Botswana decriminalized homosexuality"

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article Archive
1758181804270.webp

Nothing ever happ-
CNN:
Charlie Kirk, a conservative political activist and co-founder of Turning Point USA, was killed Wednesday after being shot at an event at Utah Valley University, President Donald Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform. He was 31.
Halfway through writing this article this site borked itself. The root cause appears to have been a small, random, and one-off database error that was quickly repaired, and shouldn’t be a recurring issue moving forwards. While this caused me no small amount of headache, I think it may have been a net positive, as it forced my public reaction to Kirk’s assassination to be less immediate and more thought out.

Then again, there’s something to be said for speaking from the heart.
1758181844385.webp
These socialist Hamas Enjoyers don’t understand, Charlie Kirk got the last laugh. He has achieved the ultimate goal of conservatism, to be murdered by your political opposition, thus proving your moral superiority over them. Furthermore, his corpse was in such good condition that Israel will have no problem harvesting his organs, to be put into the inbred body of Hilltop Youth Settlers. In this way, Kirk will outlive the radical, intolerant left, and continue to serve God’s Chosen Race in glorious perpetuity.
1758181871584.webp
A few Woke Rightists might point out that Charlie Kirk’s TPUSA organization had a Black Students Union and a Hispanic Students Union, while driving out any White kid who wanted the most milquetoast of “White identity politics”.
1758181890023.webp

The Woke Rightists might argue that Kirk angrily denounced White nationalism with as much furor as he supported Jew nationalism.
1758181898637.webp

They might point out that Kirk channeled anger at immigration into support for Israel, or that he channeled anger at boy hungry pedophiles into support for pressuring Botswana to legalize sodomy in the middle of a low level AIDS crisis.
1758181908603.webp

"Today, Botswana decriminalized homosexuality"
They might point out that Kirk welcomed a tranny named “Lady MAGA” into the very same movement he kicked (non-Jew) ethno-nationalists out of.
1758181935863.webp

Or that he partnered with a blacktivist homosexual during his “culture war” tour, or that he’s been an outspoken supporter of the Orwellian-ly labeled “LGBT rights.”
1758181952879.webp
But I would remind you that Kirk demanded preteens carry negro rape babies to term, and recognized the grave threat to Western Civilization posed by the evil brown Islamofascists in the Middle East who are trying not to be ethnically cleansed by Jews and sent to your neighbourhood. This man was the physical embodiment of true, blue, right wing conservatism, and even if you support socialist healthcare, oppose oligarchs debanking and censoring you, oppose foreign wars, and don’t want to destroy the environment, you also have to identify as right wing. Therefore, Charlie Kirk and you were fighting on the same team and it’s time to be big mad.
1758181970744.webp

The best way of dealing with a conservative, just point out that they’ll never do shit.

Unfortunately, many disgusting LefTiSTs such as Warren Balogh have renounced the Judeo-Christian values that our civilization was built upon, even “Wow, just WOWing” at Kirk’s theologically correct assertion that a Rabbi is sitting on the throne of heaven. It’s very important that young people believe this, or else they might not be quite as inclined to sacrifice their bodies for Greater Israel. And if that happens, say bye bye to Western Civilization.
1758181992909.webp
That same leftoid compiled a montage of Kirk’s performative seething against White identity politics, and on behalf of Jew identity politics. Watch as he righteously denounces Hamas for killing babies, before turning around and justifying Israel murdering babies because “this is war, war is not nice.” You can watch the opening theatrics against White nationalism, or skip ahead about two minutes to get to the particular about face mentioned earlier.
Perhaps that CNN article can tell us more about this great man?
As Trump remade the Republican Party, Kirk embodied the party’s newfound populist conservatism in the social media age. Trump has credited Kirk with galvanizing and mobilizing the youth vote for him.

“No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie,” the president wrote. “He was loved and admired by ALL, especially me, and now, he is no longer with us.”
What are the odds that the shooter aimed for his face, and just whiffed?
1758182057092.webp
It’s easy to make fun of Charlie Kirk and downplay his effectiveness. Sure, Kirk was astro-turfed, had neither an overly large or overly zealous audience, and was correctly seen by the general public as a Republican shill. However, considering that his job was to sell young White People a bag of dogshit, anyone at all buying it was a testament to his ability and value to ZOG.
1758182077453.webp
As one of many examples, I remember some online rightoids falling hook, line, and sinker for Kirk’s “based” rhetoric during the BLM riots. Kirk said something that might have passed muster in WN circles, so we must vote Republican harder.
1758182109075.webp
Kirk’s entire career was in the industry of “sheepdogging.” His spurts of quasi-based rhetoric were eminently predictable. He was the political version of an OnlyFans whore who separates chumps from their money through vague insinuations of affection and non-specific promises of future action. Kirk’s performative whining about Black crime is no different from an e-thot claiming to get really wet thinking about you.
1758182128666.webp
Kirk’s job was neither to set nor influence policy. His statements on the anti-White Waukesha terrorist attack meant nothing and amounted to nothing. Likewise, his recent pivot to economic populism was a cynical response to Republicans losing Gen Z due to being (correctly) seen as finance shills who have nothing to offer them. Kirk’s “solution” was a largely aesthetic rebrand of conservatism, accompanied by insignificant policy changes. The impetus, and he said as much himself, was to stop young people from voting for an actual socialist who would threaten his oligarch owners.
1758182145258.webp
It might seem contradictory to political newbs that the guy who seethed to no end about “White identity politics” also spread plenty of White identitarian talking points. The purpose was to corral young White People back to the party that rewards their vote by bragging about a reduction in sentencing for Black career criminals, such as the one who stabbed Irina Zarutska in the neck just a few days ago.
0:30

Trump: A lot of the most conservative people in congress got involved. Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, and many others, many others. Chuck Grassley.
The most conservative people in congress are also the most eager to sign “racial justice” legislation letting the criminals out.
1758182210546.webp

But surely Charlie Kirk didn’t sup-
1758182248104.webp
I screencapped a few sub-tweets from the very same true blue conservatives that e-dissidents insist you ally with, instead of socialists or anti-war activists who are “brown-coded.”
1758182269081.webp

If you want rightoids to support a certain policy, tell them it’s a right-wing policy, and that’s pretty much it. Problem solved. They’re not political, they’re just cheerleaders who’ve found a political sportsball team to uncritically cheer for. For anyone who does want policy, the only difference between an anti-White Dindu Nuffin with a mile-long rap sheet and Charlie Kirk, is that there is a chance, however small, that the Black career criminal won’t stab you in the back.
1758182282070.webp

Less than 72 hours before Charlie Kirk’s neck got blown out, a White woman riding a train in Charlotte, North Carolina, was fatally stabbed in the neck by Decarlos Brown, who loudly proclaimed “I got that White girl.” There was no prior relation between the two of them, and she was sitting down in the seat in front of him looking at her phone. Other than anti-White animus, there was no motivating factor.

UPDATE: As commenter “Firelight” pointed out, Zarutska was murdered on August 22nd. The story broke much later due to the nons in the Charlotte Municipal Government sitting on the disturbing footage.
1758182301938.webp

People were rightly outraged that this schizophrenic repeat offender with 14 prior arrest was allowed to menace the streets until he murdered an innocent White woman explicitly out of racial hatred. So much so that the brave (((people))) defending Western Civilization from the evil Kremlin were outraged at the level of uppityness on display.
1758182315543.webp
And for good reason.
1758182337088.webp

1758182369139.webp
So sick of the subversives who spread FUD any time a White woman is attacked/murdered by Blacks.

Based Charlie Kirk went a step further, demanding that we politicize Iryna Zarutska’s murder. He wants White People to start racial lobbying groups, just like he supports for Jews. He demands hate crime charges. He even went so far as to say that we need a real political party that looks after our interests, and implicitly called for vigilante justice.
1758182400893.webp
Just kidding. What he actually meant is that it is crucially important to spend blood, sweat, tears, and money making sure that Republicans sweep the midterm elections so that they can OwN dA LiBZ and be first to pass the latest “let Black criminals out of jail” legislation, when they’re not harassing teenage White girls who hurt the feelings of brave IDF soldiers and ignoring Israeli child rapists.
1758182422394.webp

Get that heckin’ White identity politics outta here!
1758182434774.webp

Sounds like fascism to me, Goy.
1758182469253.webp
I’ve been told by more than a few people that we need to be nicer to Charlie Kirk. That he was a well-meaning, true believer, who wasn’t maliciously pushing dogshit to young people. One must therefore conclude that it was a pure stroke of luck that Charlie’s deeply held political beliefs just so happened to perfectly coincide with that of the billionaires dispensing big bags of money.
1758182498893.webp
Public estimations of celebrity net worth should usually be taken with a grain of salt. However, we know for a fact that Kirk, who started TPUSA at age 18 and was never employed as anything other than a shill, purchased his most luxurious mansion for almost $5 million, and owned two other high end homes. His salary with TPUSA, over $400k per year starting in 2021, was also a matter of public record, and the funding came almost entirely from (((donors))). Despite this, a significant amount of rightoids are calling for Kirk to be recognized as a martyr.
1758182515197.webp
We’ll circle back to that in a second, as another accidental benefit of this article being delayed is that the FBI appears to have caught the killer.
1758182533711.webp
Whoops! FBI Director Kash “retard” Patel erroneously tweeted not once, but twice, that they had apprehended the killer. That could easily have lead to someone else being killed by the still at large shooter, but that was a risk Patel was willing to take in exchange for Twitter clout.
1758182554260.webp
After catching the guy, probably for real this time, Patel has continued to act with the panache and dignity expected out of a retarded entertainer dutiful public servant.

The Hill:
FBI Director Kash Patel ended his update Friday on the arrest of Tyler Robinson, the suspect accused in the fatal shooting of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk, with a curious message to Kirk: “Rest now, brother. We have the watch, and I’ll see you in Valhalla.”
1758182579265.webp

Kash Patel’s extremely competent FBI would have been shit out of luck had the probable shooter, Tyler Robinson, not spilled the beans to his tattle tail dad.
1758182593356.webp
Despite some reports of antifa messages on the gun paraphernalia, rightoids are not missing any opportunity to whine about “white privilege.”
1758182611399.webp
These are the people with whom we must come together to defeat the radical leftist menace. The civil war has kicked off, borther. We’re going to the mattresses.
1758182651391.webp
I especially liked this one.
1758182676221.webp
“I’m above praising Palestinians for fighting back against the very same Jews who have turned me into a fifth class citizen, and who are sending Arabs to my neighbourhood against my will. Some deranged troon with a Palestine flag was a big meanie to me online, so I’m forced to adopt a geopolitically retarded position that only serves the interest of my oppressors.”

If you can get trolled by leftoids into supporting the most effective Antifa operation of all time, (((conservatism))), why stop with Charlie Kirk? A lot of these same leftists opposed the Iraq War. Guess you and George W. Bush are on a team now. Time to support the very same Patriot Act that was used to lock up so many Jan 6th protesters.
1758182700376.webp
Charlie Kirk, rightoid martyr, spent the morning of his last day on Earth peddling softball questions to help Ben Shapiro cover up Israel’s ongoing genocide and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. For all we know, the people telling “Gentile News Network” to fuck off have relatives who were murdered in the “war” that Kirk is shilling for, but because they were impolite after his eulogy to the mass murder propagandist GNN is forced to stop speaking out against the very same regime that simultaneously demands open borders for White countries, and taxpayer funded ethnic cleansing for the ever expanding borders of the Jew Ethnostate.

Okay, bud.
1758182749789.webp
Obnoxiously wealthy Charlie Kirk spent his days suntanning while his people overdosed on opiates. Personally, I’d like my martyrs to suffer a bit more, and not die in service of Greater Israel and Mitch McConnell’s latest re-election campaign. Luckily for us, Kirk’s martyr status is pretty much non-extant anyway, in large part thanks to the bewilderingly callous behaviour of Donald Trump.
1758182768049.webp

Watch him dancing for yourself.

Uh, everyone grieves in their own way, right?
1758182787609.webp
The above tweet doesn’t even do Trump justice. I’ve transcribed the full video.
Reporter: My condolences on the loss of your friend Charlie Kirk. How are you holding up?

Donald Trump: I think very good. And by the way, you see all the trucks? They just started construction of the new ballroom for the White House, which is something they’ve been trying to get for, you know, like a hundred and fifty years, and it’s going to be a beauty. It’s going to be an absolutely magnificent construction.

And I just see all the trucks – we just started. So it’ll get done, uh, very nicely and it’ll be one of the best anywhere in the world actually.
Charlie Kirk worked his balls off to get Donald Trump elected, and the guy brushes off his death like someone told him that someone he had never met had their pet gerbil die. Meanwhile, the White identarians who Kirk openly worked against, day and night, are building shrines to his corpse.
1758182811807.webp
Jaime, do we have the Groyper response to the Kirk shooting?
1758182843456.webp
Nick Fuentes gleefully celebrated the death of Yahweh Sinwar.
1758182859707.webp
Surely, the guy who lead the charge to get totally owned by Kirk over and over ask Charlie Kirk about the USS Liberty 40 times is going to be downright ghoulish about –
1758182887748.webp
Am I mis-remembering Charlie Kirk as the focal point of that Groyper War thing? Wasn’t the entire premise that these Con Inc Grifters were subversive agents standing in between the people and policy? Wasn’t this supposed to mean something?
1758182906442.webp

Speaking of the “Groyper War,” contrary to Catboi Respector claims, Fuentes didn’t start the attacks on Charlie Kirk and other Zio-right “influencers.” That was started by two TRS fans in Murdoch Murdoch shirts going up to Charlie Kirk and asking him why he supported the easily debunked and blatantly anti-White attack on Nick Sandman. The contribution of the Alt-Republicans to get owned over and over again by Kirk and Shapiro, driving the whole thing into the ground.
1758182920011.webp

If anyone can find me the video of that confrontation, please send it to me and I’ll include it in the article.

Nick Fuentes is so willing to sell out that he pimps his 15 year old fans to mystery meat homosexual pedophiles in exchange for the phone number of random Republican Party apparatchiks, so he’ll happily read whatever script zionists put in front of him in exchange for a catboi date or two. Who better to inherit part of Kirk’s online sheepdog operation than the guy who lead a different sheepdog op, “the optics wars,” against genuine nationalists for years. Somehow, someway, there are even retards who find Fuentes a credible populist, and still think of the thirty year old manchild as an inexperienced kid who deserves the benefit of the doubt, time and time again.
1758182934938.webp

I do have to touch on the baseless speculation that the Mossad took Charlie out. As Striker points out below, this makes little sense. Shilling for Israel’s genocide, malicious oligarchs, mass “high skill” migration (plus farm worker amnesties), based trannies, and everything else the Republicans stand for must remain a cushy sinecure. If not, only racially motivated Jews like Ben Shapiro will do the job. The Glenn Beck’s of the world are not risking their lives to shill for lower taxes on billionaires.
1758182948271.webp
I’ve railed against Both Sides Guys in the past, however, when the very same conservatives who consider us evil “woke rightists” that deserve a bullet get got by deranged antifas, it’s hard to play favourites.
1758182966282.webp
Anyway, I hope his kids are fine.

UPDATE: A commentor found this gem for me.
1758182984105.webp

Charlie Kirk sold his people out so that he could live in a gated community, and never have to take the kind of dangerous public transit that Iryna Zarutska was murdered on. Iryna is a martyr, Kirk is a shill, and fuck anyone who dares put him next to her like that.
 
Shit like this makes me wonder how much of the far right nowadays is Controlled Opposition.

The right finally has political momentum, rather than spend it to reverse decades of rot and harmful laws, those retards go on massive tangent about muh Jews and purity spirals, while spitting in the face of someone who actually died for his beliefs rather than slacktivism that does more harm than good.

It's either RINOS talking about "losing gracefully" or people like this schitzos wanting to lose if it's not his own pet causes being supported. Removing illegals, cutting on government overreach and removing sources of political violence is good for everyone in the USA and are enough of a massive task.
 
This is a pretty bold article to make and release considering the events of the past few days. At the very least the author put in some effort to find Kirk's past statements and words to back up their claims.

White identitarians and nationalists in the United States, as well as Canada, seem conflicted on how to respond to Kirk's death. Was he too pro-Israel? Was he gradually changing his beliefs to be more like their own? Should his death be looked at in a somewhat indifferent or apathetic sense or is it important to use him as a symbol and martyr regardless of what his personal beliefs were?
 
Last edited:
Shit like this makes me wonder how much of the far right nowadays is Controlled Opposition.

The right finally has political momentum, rather than spend it to reverse decades of rot and harmful laws, those retards go on massive tangent about muh Jews and purity spirals, while spitting in the face of someone who actually died for his beliefs rather than slacktivism that does more harm than good.

It's either RINOS talking about "losing gracefully" or people like this schitzos wanting to lose if it's not his own pet causes being supported. Removing illegals, cutting on government overreach and removing sources of political violence is good for everyone in the USA and are enough of a massive task.
It's really more likely just abject paranoia and/or retardation. "White solidarity" is especially hilarious because these types usually have some pretty arbitrary classification(s) on who is or isn't White, anyway. E.g. Slavs, Poles, all Italians, Irish, Spaniards, etc. Not Actually White^TM. Somehow.
 
It's really more likely just abject paranoia and/or retardation. "White solidarity" is especially hilarious because these types usually have some pretty arbitrary classification(s) on who is or isn't White, anyway. E.g. Slavs, Poles, all Italians, Irish, Spaniards, etc. Not Actually White^TM. Somehow.
You do realize you're replying to a jew, not a White human, right?
This is a pretty bold article to make and release considering the events of the past few days. At the very least the author put in some effort to find Kirk's past statements and words to back up their claims.

White identitarians and nationalists in the United States, as well as Canada, seem conflicted on how to respond to Kirk's death. Was he too pro-Israel? Was he changing gradually his beliefs to be more like their own? Should his death be looked at in a somewhat indifferent or apathetic sense or is it important to use him as a symbol and martyr regardless of what his personal beliefs were?
Personally, I wouldn't boast about spreading worldwide faggotry. as Kirk did. It's hardly surprising that 'white nationalists' of the Nick Fuentes calibre are praising him after he talked shit (shit all over your dick after you put it in a man's ass) and got hit. Obviously, anyone who is human would not go along with that.
 
Shit like this makes me wonder how much of the far right nowadays is Controlled Opposition.

The right finally has political momentum, rather than spend it to reverse decades of rot and harmful laws, those retards go on massive tangent about muh Jews and purity spirals, while spitting in the face of someone who actually died for his beliefs rather than slacktivism that does more harm than good.

It's either RINOS talking about "losing gracefully" or people like this schitzos wanting to lose if it's not his own pet causes being supported. Removing illegals, cutting on government overreach and removing sources of political violence is good for everyone in the USA and are enough of a massive task.
White nationalist faggots (like OP and the author of this article) are a liability to the Right.

If you want your ideas to catch on, you have to make them palatable to normies. Wignats have this retarded idea that we should all just blindly do as they say because " duhhhh, me is racially sooperior an' sheeit!"
Personally, I wouldn't boast about spreading worldwide faggotry. as Kirk did.
I never cared much for Kirk, but seeing the reaction to his murder has shown how much he and TPUSA contributed to course-correcting the country and bringing us out of the darkness of Clown World.

That's more good (especially for the white race) than Mike Enoch and William Luther Pierce will ever have accomplished.
It's hardly surprising that 'white nationalists' of the Nick Fuentes calibre
There is no other type. Your ideology has all the popular appeal of childhood leukemia, and all of its public standard-bearers have threads on Kiwi Farms, stashes of tranny porn, and nonwhite girlfriends.

You are fair-weather allies who doom when the going gets rough, and take credit for other people's efforts when the Right starts winning. Sit the fuck down.
 
Last edited:
White identitarians and nationalists in the United States, as well as Canada, seem conflicted on how to respond to Kirk's death. Was he too pro-Israel? Was he gradually changing his beliefs to be more like their own? Should his death be looked at in a somewhat indifferent or apathetic sense or is it important to use him as a symbol and martyr regardless of what his personal beliefs were?
Fact is, Charlie Kirk was in correspondence with a Rabbi on the best talking points to defend Israel. That he was a dedicated Zionist is a matter of public record. This attempt to retcon him as supposedly turning on Israel requires much more evidence than allegations from people who knew him privately because, by every public measure, he is on record defending Israel and only making measured concessions.

I agreed with next to nothing Charlie Kirk said in life. I resented everything he represented about mainstream conservatism and his role in American politics. Until perhaps two years ago, he did everything in his power to keep the American right from reaching a racial consciousness and shifting towards White identitarianism, and even then, his tactical shifts towards such ideas were entirely in service of keeping White men voting Republican while doing little for them in terms of policy.

That being said, Charlie Kirk was a gifted public speaker who died doing what he believed in most.
 
i didn't wanna read this person's big heckin blogpost, so i asked Google to summarize it, but it failed:
1000009750.webp
(:_(
 
Wignats are so retarded. "This guy just died and we could be using his assassination to advance our goals but instead here's 30,000 words about how he wasn't enough of a Nazi as if any of that matters now that he's dead."
Imagine thinking that Nazis support banning all criticism of 'israel' (your 'goal').
 
Back
Top Bottom