US Hillary Clinton’s 2024 Election Comeback - Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have become unpopular. It may be time for a change candidate.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1641956544835.png

A perfect storm in the Democratic Party is making a once-unfathomable scenario plausible: a political comeback for Hillary Clinton in 2024.
Several circumstances—President Biden’s low approval rating, doubts over his capacity to run for re-election at 82, Vice President Kamala Harris’s unpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket in 2024—have created a leadership vacuum in the party, which Mrs. Clinton viably could fill.

She is already in an advantageous position to become the 2024 Democratic nominee. She is an experienced national figure who is younger than Mr. Biden and can offer a different approach from the disorganized and unpopular one the party is currently taking.

If Democrats lose control of Congress in 2022, Mrs. Clinton can use the party’s loss as a basis to run for president again, enabling her to claim the title of “change candidate.”

Based on her latest public statements, it’s clear that Mrs. Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to help her decide whether or not to run for president again. She recently warned of the electoral consequences in the 2022 midterms if the Democratic Party continues to align itself with its progressive wing and urged Democrats to reject far-left positions that isolate key segments of the electorate.

In a recent MSNBC interview, Mrs. Clinton called on Democrats to engage in “careful thinking about what wins elections, and not just in deep-blue districts where a Democrat and a liberal Democrat, or so-called progressive Democrat, is going to win.” She also noted that party’s House majority “comes from people who win in much more difficult districts.”

Mrs. Clinton also took a veiled jab at the Biden administration and congressional Democrats in an effort to create distance: “It means nothing if we don’t have a Congress that will get things done, and we don’t have a White House that we can count on to be sane and sober and stable and productive.”

Even Bill Clinton recently set the stage for his wife’s potential 2024 candidacy, referring to her in an interview with People magazine as “the most qualified person to run for office in my lifetime, including me,” adding that not electing her in 2016 was “one of the most profound mistakes we ever made.”

We can infer based on these recent remarks that Mrs. Clinton would seize the opportunity to run for president again if an opening presents itself. But what are the odds that an opportunity will arise?

The Democrats’ domestic agenda is in disarray given the failure of Mr. Biden’s Build Back Better plan in Congress. Senate Democrats’ latest desperate push to repeal the legislative filibuster to pass their secondary legislative priority, voting-rights reform, will likely weaken their agenda further.
Mr. Biden’s overall approval rating is low (40%), as is his rating on issues including the economy and jobs (38%) and taxes and government spending (33%), according to a recent Economist/YouGov poll. Nearly two-thirds of independent voters disapprove of the president.

Barring a major course correction, we can anticipate that some Democrats will lose important House and Senate races in 2022—in part for the reasons Mrs. Clinton identified—giving Republicans control of both chambers of Congress.

Polls generally show the GOP with a solid lead of at least 2 or 3 points in the 2022 generic congressional vote—a margin that likely would be enough to take back the House, given the narrow Democratic majority and the anticipated outcomes of redistricting in several states that could affect key races.

Given the likelihood that Democrats will lose control of Congress in 2022, we can anticipate that Mrs. Clinton will begin shortly after the midterms to position herself as an experienced candidate capable of leading Democrats on a new and more successful path.

Mrs. Clinton can spend the time between now and midterms doing what the Clinton administration did after the Democrats’ blowout defeat in the 1994 midterms: crafting a moderate agenda on both domestic and foreign policy. This agenda could show that Mrs. Clinton is the only credible alternative to Mr. Biden, Ms. Harris, and the entire Democratic Party establishment.

Hillary Clinton remains ambitious, outspoken and convinced that if not for Federal Bureau of Investigation Director James Comey’s intervention and Russian interference that she would have won the 2016 election—and she may be right.

If Democrats want a fighting chance at winning the presidency in 2024, Mrs. Clinton is likely their best option.


 
View attachment 2881514
Say it with me now. Coughing fits, pants full of shit.

Seriously, this will be the third time the Democrats run someone who publicly soiled themselves. What the fuck?

The democratic leaders are all ancient. One of the reasons Obama was elected (besides race baiting) was because he was considered a "younger" voice within them but we seem to have gone right back at electing the oldest democratic president yet.

The weakness of the democratic party is their lack of young voices, Obama was able to pull through with the race baiting "cool president" character but I doubt that will work again, especially nowadays.

Now of course, thats not a democratic only issue but I just tend to see that more with them.
 
All of the potential PotUS candidates are salivating over Biden. Every gasp, every cough and they're ambitions shoot ever higher.

So why is anyone surprised that Hillary is testing the waters for a comeback?

Every Democrat with even the slightest above room temperature IQ knows that Biden won't make it to 2024 and Harris has less then zero chance of succeeding him. So they're all jockeying to be the next DNC approved appointee. As, they feel, the next election is a gimme for the Democrats. Even creeps so far out to left field like Abrams and Whitmer are thinking they have a honest shot.

The GoP has the opposite issue. They have several possible candidates but everyone is waiting for what Trump is going to do. None of them can risk pissing off Trump or his base, just look how fast the Zodiac Killer bent the knee. Trump will play king maker in 2024, whether its him or whomever he chooses.
 
Trump will play king maker in 2024, whether its him or whomever he chooses.

He's 75 right now. Odds are very good he'll be dead by 2024, and that's okay.

I do hope he's still alive though, hopefully with a stroke so he sounds like Dick Clark in his last years. That would be the funniest option, and we are in clown world, after all.
 
Had a conversation with an American which seemed odd to me. I said I blamed Hillary for "Libya" and she thought I was referring to some embassy bombing which to her was the big political problem. I had to explain that no, I meant how Hillary is one of the people chiefly responsible for destroying the country with a bombing campaign and backing a group of militants from Benghazi who ethnically cleansed their way across the country and turned it from one of the most successful countries in North Africa (or all of Africa) to a failed state with catastrophic debt, multiple competing governments and an endless, murderous state of war. It had the highest literacy rates in North Africa, the highest number of doctors per capita, very little debt and a nationalized oil industry that actually funded major public works and social programs. Now it's one giant terrorist factory and it's because Hillary pushed and pushed for it to be bombed.

Is the destruction of a country really so small in American public awareness?

The media makes sure nobody remembers stuff like that too easily, you know that.
 
The democratic leaders are all ancient. One of the reasons Obama was elected (besides race baiting) was because he was considered a "younger" voice within them but we seem to have gone right back at electing the oldest democratic president yet.

The weakness of the democratic party is their lack of young voices, Obama was able to pull through with the race baiting "cool president" character but I doubt that will work again, especially nowadays.

Now of course, thats not a democratic only issue but I just tend to see that more with them.
With that, I feel the Republican Party is embracing the older vote with family values.
 
Sometimes I wonder if America would have been better off if Hillary won, because, hear me, shit would be so bad in those years that people would have already gotten the message and that other "trump guy" would have been preferable. So the "orange man bad" narrative wouldnt have stuck as strongly as it did.
The way I see it right now, Trump may have been the best thing to happen to America, even if he wasn't a "good" President.

Trump was a FUCK YOU to the establishment. First to the do-nothing Republican establishment, then to the deep state corporate media establishment.

If Hillary won, we would just have the slow boil from Obama's term, and the Republicans would think he was just an aberration and to be ignored.

If the Great Reset is real, Hillary would just let it slowly happen, and the Republicans would too so Jimmy Kimmel won't make fun of them.

Trump winning broke everything. That's why they had to "fortify" 2020. The wrong person won.

Was Covid a true accident, or a deliberate attempt to force through the Great Reset? Regardless, Democrats are in panic mode.

What is hilarious is if Hillary swoops in and steals the nomination from the first BLACK WOMAN and try to explain why an old white woman from Arkansas that has defended rapists and laughed about it, called a segregationist politician her mentor, has a sex pest and literal pedo as a husband, plus all this:

and that still somehow is okay, man they are going to need a lot of fortifying .
 
The democratic leaders are all ancient. One of the reasons Obama was elected (besides race baiting) was because he was considered a "younger" voice within them but we seem to have gone right back at electing the oldest democratic president yet.

The weakness of the democratic party is their lack of young voices, Obama was able to pull through with the race baiting "cool president" character but I doubt that will work again, especially nowadays.

Now of course, thats not a democratic only issue but I just tend to see that more with them.
No surprise given how they've jerked around their loyal "youth" base by dangling Bernie in front of them and then pulling him back at the last second, TWICE.

Kids are just another group of votes the Dems have taken for granted for so long, they never noticed the slow bleeding of support. Nor do they seem to understand the problems a lack of engagement with them will cause. If anything, they're scared of them-there-kids! Look at the way Trump connected with young republicans and how the party has become the default refuge for just-right-of-center kids like Nick Sandman who got tarred and feathered as neo-Hitlerjugen for standing too close to an anti-white protest and having the absolute GALL to not flagellate himself on demand? The Democrats have fully adopted the idea that any kid today not lining up for a dick-snip and free gibs is somehow an irredeemable Naht-Zheee. To them, if you aren't a beta, a soy-guzzling neckbeard or an excited consoomer with no ability to buy your Tendies and Funko Pops without government assistance? Well you best be moving on then....... toxic male. We don't want YOUR KIND.

By courting the kind of people that tried to throw two white kids out of ASU for being guilty of being white males in a designated victims-only space, they're driving away anyone under 40 who literally doesn't remember what 90's - era Clintonian politics were, because they were either in diapers or just a statistical probability, and have nothing to gauge a legacy "D" politician on except the craziness they've indulged in these last 8 years.....
 
Last edited:
Honestly, I'm worried she just might be able to pull it off should she be chosen as the nominee for 2028 (or 2024 if Biden and Harris both croak in office).

Just think about what might very well happen if she or someone like her gets elected:
>internet will be China-tier and every single liberal treats Trump presidency as a holocaust which "must never occur again" which justifies suppressing any opposition thinking and furthering online censorship / deplatforming / demonetization
>another neocon war to avenge her ego for losing the election
>liberals will get even smugger
>endless redefinition of hate crime
>possible hate speech laws
>prison sentences for shitposting
>blacks and other "minorities" still in poverty yet blaming Whitey
>borders effectively removed
 
The only mistake I see with Hillary Clinton is marrying BILL Clinton. Guy is a perpetuator and disloyal hound.


What is hilarious is if Hillary swoops in and steals the nomination from the first BLACK WOMAN and try to explain why an old white woman from Arkansas
She was born in Chicago. Before Chicago turned to shit. Wish she would have gave love to her birth town.
 
The only mistake I see with Hillary Clinton is marrying BILL Clinton. Guy is a perpetuator and disloyal hound.



She was born in Chicago. Before Chicago turned to shit. Wish she would have gave love to her birth town.
I suspect she knew exactly what she was getting into with Bill. He got a good politicians wife, and she got a rising star to hitch her own ambitions to. I have no doubt that she's had plenty of her own affairs, she just hasn't been caught.
 
He's 75 right now. Odds are very good he'll be dead by 2024, and that's okay.

I do hope he's still alive though, hopefully with a stroke so he sounds like Dick Clark in his last years. That would be the funniest option, and we are in clown world, after all.
I hope he gets elected and is in great shape just to piss everyone like you off. If nothing else, Trump exposes the hypocrisy of our overlords. They give somber eulogies to American DEMOCRACY™ with one hand while the other robs the Treasury blind so fuck them, I hope Trump runs and wins so I can watch the meltdowns.
 
Last edited:
I hope he gets elected and is in great shape just to piss everyone like you off. If nothing else, Trump exposes the hypocrisy of out overlords. They give somber eulogies to American DEMOCRACY™ with one hand while the other robs the Treasury blind so fuck them, I hope Trump runs and wins so I can watch the meltdowns.
Part of me hopes it gets stolen from Trump. After all, what is Trump but the American public showing an olive branch to the deep state? If he gets cheated openly again, they'll wish the person getting elected after that cheat had anywhere near the same level of restraint that Trump did.
 
Are you suggesting that Biden will commit voter fraud in the democratic primaries?

Boy would that be a hoot.
Are you saying he didn't the first time?

Assuming Trump won't be at 2024 (which I doubt because he will run again) I would rather vote for Satan himself. Satan could burst out of the ground in the middle of Times Square, incinerate millions of people, have Hitler and Stalin and chairman Mao as his team, and openly rape and devour a newborn baby and would STILL vote for Satan over Hillary.
I am pretty sure that you would still have someone else to vote for..because Hillary vs Satan would be a DNC primary not the General.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom