Hazbin Hotel / Helluva Boss Thread - Now a Griefing Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Do you believe that this series will turn to shit?


  • Total voters
    3,162
Liiiike so bad it's good type deal
Not really. More like I really liked the idea of this show and the first few episodes, and now I am mad because it could have been really good, so I am mad that it was really bad instead of really good. Wtf Vivz, you had all the makings of an awesome show and then you made this bullshit instead, much like you did with Zoophobia.
 
1767289599464.png

oh yeah. its vivziepop time.

for new years eve i watched both seasons of HH and drank a lot. NGL I enjoyed the show more the second time. Season 3 cant come soon enough
 
Maybe they should give Vaggie more songs that solely revolve around her wanting to scissor Charlie. I think currently only 90% of her lyrics revolve around it. We need to pump those numbers up.
Her name should have been changed to "Vibrator" to really show that she is nothing but an object to please Charlie.

But seriously, if you don't include the ensemble numbers, this girl only has three songs (which are duets btw) about how wonderful Charlie is, and how she needs and wants ti be with her always.
 
Last edited:
But seriously, if you don't include the ensemble numbers, this girl only has three songs (which are duets btw) about how wonderful Charlie is, and how she needs and wants ti be with her always.
Her single line in "When I Think About the Future" is her simping over Charlie, and she spends half her time in "Hazbin Guarantee" making "Fuck me" eyes while spinning Charlie around.
I'd almost call it homophobic how one-note she is.
 
Her single line in "When I Think About the Future" is her simping over Charlie, and she spends half her time in "Hazbin Guarantee" making "Fuck me" eyes while spinning Charlie around.
I'd almost call it homophobic how one-note she is.
vaggie's line in that song is so retarded. basically all her lines now are just "muh charlie". NIGGA UR A FALLEN ANGEL GET NEW MATERIAL

viv just sucks at writing women. She only writes good femboys.

patacake2.webp

edit 2: i have breached containment and am making loops for my phone wallpaper now.

I need to setup a VM so i can use wallpaper engine to make even better phone wallpapers since by default animated wallpapers arent always supported.

emily is currently waving at me on my lock screen.
 
Last edited:
Constructed for large Sub-Saharan members.
And before anyone says "Post hands", here.
View attachment 8363315
lute was NOT built for such disgusting things. shame!



also... NEW EXCLUSIVE LUTE LOOP JUST DROPPED

FRESH OFF THE PRESSES!!!! MADE JUST FOR THE KIWIFARMS BY ME FOR ALL OF YOU!

reddit is in tears rn not having a skilled loop maker such as myself posting on there.


lute cry.webp

i wonder if any of my loops have made their way outside the farms yet
 
Last edited:
Her single line in "When I Think About the Future" is her simping over Charlie, and she spends half her time in "Hazbin Guarantee" making "Fuck me" eyes while spinning Charlie around.
I'd almost call it homophobic how one-note she is.
If Charlie was a man, people would call this misogyny.
 
I see a lot of people excuse some of the show flaws because it has 8 episodes, but those 8 episodes are 20-30 minutes long, the only reason the pacing seems off its purely a writer issue, the show has too many characters and half of them are useless and could benefit the story by not existinģ, but the show wants to give them songs and a bit of backstory when its not necessary.
Late as fuck I know but this has always boiled my piss about no talent TV show writers, they have all the time in the world. Even if you only have 8 episodes and each episode clocks in at 25 minutes that's still a grand total of 200 minutes of screen time, that's three hours and twenty minutes.

Compare this to movies and you'll see why it's such a total cop-out thing to say: Star Wars: Revenge of The Sith is 2hr 20min, The Godfather Part III (Director's Cut) is 2hr 50min.

The only movies I can think of that are both mainstream and commercially successful that approach the 3hr 20min mark are Titanic at 3hr 14min, and the Extended Cut editions of Peter Jackson's Lord of The Rings movies which are 3hr 28min for Fellowship of The Ring, 3hr 43min for The Two Towers and 4hr 11min for Return of The King. But those cuts of the film are often criticized for being too long by normies, the theatrical cuts of those three films are all less than 3hr 30min with the theatrical cut of Return of The King ironically being exactly 3hr 20min, the same length as our theoretical "short" TV season.

So the next time you see TV show writers striking for better wages just keep in mind how much they don't deserve them.
 
Yes you are hearing this. Congrats on having shit movie tastes I guess
Two things:

First of all I never said whether I liked or disliked any of those films I posted, the post was about long movies.

Second of all I wish you luck on curing your erectile disfunction, asexual isn't a real thing, you have a medical condition.
 
First of all I never said whether I liked or disliked any of those films I posted, the post was about long movies.
An yet you picked two shitty movies? That kinda nukes your point entirely.
Second of all I wish you luck on curing your erectile disfunction, asexual isn't a real thing, you have a medical condition
Sorry, I aint sad incels and gooner.
 
An yet you picked two shitty movies? That kinda nukes your point entirely.
No, it does not. The point is that TV show writers have an absurd amount of runtime to work with and any complaints they make about "not having enough runtime" is purely a problem of their own creation due to their wasteful time management, I used examples of what is considered "long" in a different form of visual media in order to draw a comparison with what would be considered a "short" amount of time in a TV show to demonstrate this point by contrasting how much more efficient cinema is at telling a story. The perceived quality or lack thereof of a film has no bearing on that argument and does not undermine the point in any way.

And if you think it does then simply replace those "bad" movies with a movie you think is "good" and the point does not change, although I doubt you're intelligent enough to do that even with me putting the idea in your head.
 
Back
Top Bottom