💰 Grifter Hasan Piker / HasanAbi - Young Turk, Twitch Streamer, Stunlocked Brogressive, Cenk's Nephew, only a socialist for the money, abuses his dog by shocking it, Rutgers sex pest

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Hasans opinion on animal abuse (2019)


Pay attention to the dolphin part, he seem to think confining a dolphin to a small place just for the entertainment of others as animal abuse.

I will post some videos of hasan reactions to his previous dog(fish) condition and death, i want expert opinion (catboy ranch and the dude with a sociopath lying brother) on whether hasan is a sociopath or not



hamas learning about his dog(fish) condition and ending the stream


hasan announcement of fishes death(fish died mar 20 2020)


hasans reaction to a video in tribute of fish(the dog is named fish)






Plus anybody knows whats this reddit user talking bout?
1000000539.png
 

Attachments

  • Screen_Recording_20251016_041707_Brave.mp4
    30.7 MB
Why are shock collars even for sale in the US and Canada? I would figure people would deem these fucking devices as animal abuse.

Anyone who says otherwise should wear one and feel the shock collar themselves. Literally cruelty in a collar.
 
Why are shock collars even for sale in the US and Canada? I would figure people would deem these fucking devices as animal abuse.

Anyone who says otherwise should wear one and feel the shock collar themselves. Literally cruelty in a collar.

If you are zapping your dog because it stood up in its bed, that's pointless and therefore cruel. It just hurts and confuses the dog and isn't any sort of punishment for dangerous behavior. If you use a collar to keep your dog, for example, contained within an invisible fence because they might run up to a strange dog and get mangled by it, that's like slapping a kid's hand when they're reaching for a pot on the stove. A little bit of pain to teach them not to do something that could cause a lot of pain. I personally prefer and use actual fences but not everyone has that luxury.

They're also used in training. When using punishment to mold behavior, you need to use a primary aversive stimulus to start the process - something that is in itself unpleasant. Then you associate this with a secondary aversive stimulus. An example would be a dog that bites, attacks other dogs, or runs up to cars. The proper way to do this using a shock collar would be to yell 'no' or some other command. If the behavior happens anyway, then you use the collar. The dog quickly learns to respond to the word 'no' and you don't need to use the collar anymore. These collars also have a 'vibrate' setting that, for many dogs, works without you ever having to use the shock option - you just have the shock option as an 'oh shit' option if your dog is doing something that could severely injure them or another animal or person.

Is the collar misused by shitty people? Yeah. Would I prefer that bad dog owners use a collar if the alternative is their shitbulls fatally wounding other people or their pets? Yeah. Until we can stop retards from owning animals, especially breeds with known behavioral problems, it's a temporary solution.
 
Last edited:
hamas learning about his dog(fish) condition and ending the stream

Screen_Recording_20251016_042303_Brave.mp4
hasan announcement of fishes death(fish died mar 20 2020)

Screen_Recording_20251016_040745_Brave.mp4
hasans reaction to a video in tribute of fish(the dog is named fish)



Screen_Recording_20251016_051512_Brave.mp4
The crying clip is too short to conclude anything, but back after October 7th on Ethan and Hasan's podcast, Hasan very performatively cried over some random woman who was killed by the israelis. I believe this was after Ethan had cried on an earlier episode just after the attack.

Point being that Hasan certainly isn't beyond faking something like this.
 
Hasan saying Kaya wasn't even wearing a collar has to be some kind of social experiment to see how far you can get away with gaslighting your own audience. This would be like piratesoftware saying there was never any mana gem for him to click. Not even he would be try something THAT dumb.

Even his defenders can't keep up with his lies. QT said it was a shock collar with the prongs removed set to vibrate. Caroline said it wasn't a shock collar. Taylor lorenz is saying Hasan was hiding his phone number with the tape (??????) and it's "impossible to remove prongs from shock collar so it's not a shock collar". These people can attack and cancel others so easily but defending each other is so hard and uncoordinated.

In a few days we'll probably see Hasan say he never had a dog in the first place and kaya was hacked into his livestreams by the jews.
 
When does the apology/redemption run with other popular livestreamers tour start? I want to buy tickets.

I would've suggested he'd buy a cute animal to distract people like Maldavius Nigtree and other faggots have done when the flames are set at the Burger King flame grilled setting but he already has a dog - that he electrocutes.

Maybe he could get that dog trainer who had a famous reality tv show about training dogs on to explain why electrocuting your dog is a reddit upvote kind of situation - that would probably help a lot. Or alternatively find a black or disabled or if he's going for gold a tranny dog trainer to validate his electrocution strategy.
 
My hatred for hasan grows every day. This fucking demon gets off to dogs fighting. He finds it funny. I want this fucker to get beaten black and blue, he needs to suffer.
 
The crying clip is too short to conclude anything, but back after October 7th on Ethan and Hasan's podcast, Hasan very performatively cried over some random woman who was killed by the israelis. I believe this was after Ethan had cried on an earlier episode just after the attack.

Point being that Hasan certainly isn't beyond faking something like this.
If anyone's wondering how Hasan looks like when he tries to seem like he's emotional:


Max cringe alert.
 
  • There never was a war on Palestine.

  • Ok, there was a military operation on Palestine but it wasn't THAT bad.

  • And if the war military operation on Palestine was bad, it's not really a big deal.

  • And if it is a big deal, it's not my fault. All the other country's have been spoiling Palestine lately and they're being a big baby.

  • Oh my God, how can you besmirch my character by accusing me of Genocide on Palestine when there's active anti semitism happening?

  • Are you seriously still going on about us conducting genocide on Palestine? What, are you totally obsessed with me or something? Stop stalking me.

  • Look, Palestine never actually existed. But if it did, genocide is actually fine.
 
Forgive me if something like this was already brought up in the past hundred pages or so (I only skimmed highlights because I normally give zero shits about this turkroach), but I was musing a bit about the ballwashers' defense of "why do you care so much, don't you know there's a heckin' genocide going on???" Aside from the fact that yes, I do in fact care more about an innocent dog than the latest stupid sandnigger slapfight, I thought more about why a normie might feel the same way even if they do care somewhat about the slapfight.

Human minds don't work well with abstractions; we prefer things that are tangible and easily understood. There's a reason "keep it simple, stupid" is timeless advice, after all. With that in mind, a religious conflict taking place half a world away, with roots going back over a millennium, spurred on by the various political upheavals of the last century, and neither side is really all that likable? Hell no, the average person's brain is going to shut down any thought on that shit entirely. It's so far removed from anything we experience or deal with, we simply won't be able to care. Even the fags that are screeching about the poor innocent Palestinians don't really care that much, it's just a performance in support of the Current Thing™.

But a man very clearly and obviously mistreating his dog on camera and then denying he did anything wrong? That triggers so many alarm bells in a normal person's mind. Instead of a nebulous conflict that we can't fully grasp, it's a simple case of wrongdoing, with video evidence that anyone can watch and understand easily, and that's before getting into all the other evidence of the turkroach's animal abuse. It's only exacerbated by the fact that normal people know that pets depend on us for their well-being, and anyone who chooses to betray the trust of an innocent animal is an absolute scumfuck, to say nothing of treating a pet as a glorified prop so he looks more heckin' relatable to his simps.

It is no moral failing on the part of the average person to care more about Kaya's health and safety than that of the retards spazzing out in Israel for the umpteenth time. Fuck the turkroach and fuck all his ballwashers.
 
It is no moral failing on the part of the average person to care more about Kaya's health and safety than that of the retards spazzing out in Israel for the umpteenth time. Fuck the turkroach and fuck all his ballwashers.
It can be summed up even simpler.

Normal people don't like seeing other people abusing animals.

That's it. Even if you want to include all of the palestinian bullshit... palestine is not a measure of how we determine if shit is wrong and has nothing to do with anything else. Just because other shit might be worse elsewhere in the world, than a retard streaming his abuse of animals on the internet, that doesn't excuse it.
 
You just know Piker is only a leftist because he started his career by stealing fans from his uncles TYT. If Pikers uncle was Dennis Prager and he started his career by stealing Prager U viewers he would be the most Israel-First Republican ballwasher you have ever seen.
 
Back
Top Bottom