Hachette Employees Protest New Conservative Imprint - So let them start their own publisher NO NOT LIKE THAT

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Hachette Employees Protest New Conservative Imprint​

Source / Archive

A group of employees at Hachette Book Group have penned a letter to management condemning the announced launch of a new conservative imprint, Basic Liberty, and hiring of Thomas Spence, former president and publisher of Regnery, to helm it.

On November 7, two days after the presidential election, HBG and Hachette UK CEO David Shelley announced that the Basic Books Group would be adding to its portfolio the Basic Liberty imprint, described as "a new conservative imprint that will publish serious works of cultural, social, and political analysis by conservative writers of original thought." He also announced that Spence—currently a visiting fellow at the conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation—had been hired to lead the imprint as executive editor.

Spence worked at Regnery for more than 11 years, and led the company for nearly four years after the retirement of longtime president and publisher Marji Ross in 2019. Earlier this year, following Skyhorse’s acquisition of Regnery in late 2023, he joined the Heritage Foundation as a senior advisor.

Among the books acquired by Regnery during Spence’s tenure are Unwoke: How to Defeat Cultural Marxism in America by Ted Cruz; Tearing Us Apart: How Abortion Harms Everything and Solves Nothing by Ryan T. Anderson and Alexandra DeSanctis; and Abigail Shrier's controversial book Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters. He also acquired Senator Josh Hawley's book, The Tyranny of Big Tech, after it was dropped by Simon & Schuster following the January 6 riot at the Capitol, which many saw Hawley as being partly responsible for inciting.

The letter from employees, posted to the Instagram account xoxopublishingg, states: "As employees of HBG, we stand together in firm disapprobation of the Heritage Foundation, Project 2025, and any conservative movement or thought that strips away sacred rights and the humanity of people. We disavow David Shelley's unsympathetic and insensitive remarks,"—delivered, the letter notes, "shortly after many friends, colleagues, and loved ones were left reeling from election results"—"and maintain that the dignity, rights, and freedoms of all people should be upheld by everyone, especially those in positions of power."

It continues: "We condemn HBG's decision to put profit before its own people, to let the promise of financial gain overtake morality and conscience, and to platform a person who contributes to the advancement of the Heritage Foundation's vision for America. We are calling on HBG to recognize the responsibility it has as one of the world's leading publishers, to act with empathy and compassion for all people, and to reevaluate its decision to move forward with the creation of Basic Liberty and the hiring of Thomas Spence."

Following the announcement, at least one Hachette employee—Alex DiFrancesco, an editor at the Hachette UK imprint Jessica Kingsley Publishers—has resigned.

"Hachette Book Group's mission is to reach a broad spectrum of readers by making it easier for everyone to discover new worlds of ideas, learning, entertainment, and opportunity," said an HBG spokesperson in a statement to PW. "We publish books from all sides of the political debate."

The statement continued: "Since 1950, Basic Books' award-winning titles have helped shape public debate through the academic expertise of their authors, the serious approach to how subject matter is treated, and the rigor of its editorial process. Basic Books continues to build on HBG’s legacy of reaching readers of all backgrounds and beliefs."

As per the Basic Liberty webpage on Hachette's website, the imprint aims to publish "conservative writers who meet the same high standards of original and penetrating thought for which Basic Books is famous," and its "list reflects a wide range of conservative perspectives, the only requirements being intellectual rigor and clarity."

Basic Liberty is not HBG's first conservative imprint. Center Street, an imprint of HBG's Grand Central Publishing division, publishes "the top conservative voices for politics, business, and military," per its Instagram bio. In 2021, Center Street editorial director Kate Hartson—who published Donald Trump Jr.'s Triggered, Corey Lewandowski's Trump: America First, and books by Jeanine Pirro and Newt Gingrich—was let go. Per the New York Times, in the wake of January 6 HBG execs "made clear to both editors and agents that they're shifting back toward think tank conservatives, and away from fire-breathing politicians."

The Hachette employees behind the letter had yet to respond to PW’s request for comment by press time.
 
A publishing company should publish books, not agendas. If right leaning literature is selling bigly, then they should publish it, if left wing literature is selling poorly, they should still publish it but in smaller quantities to supply to niche distribution channels. It's not rocket science.
 
Is a company finally realizing how much money they're leaving on the table by focusing overmuch on wokeness? I'll believe it when they actually follow through.
 
A publishing company should publish books, not agendas. If right leaning literature is selling bigly, then they should publish it, if left wing literature is selling poorly, they should still publish it but in smaller quantities to supply to niche distribution channels. It's not rocket science.
I think these employees doesn't give a rat about rocket science. They're more closed-minded than Archie Bunker.
 
Every one of these employees can be replaced 1000 times over by a Starbucks barista who has a Masters in Literature and is dying for an office job. In fact, any job in the declining book industry is highly desirable to broke English majors, even if it pays 12/hr.
 
A publishing company should publish books, not agendas. If right leaning literature is selling bigly, then they should publish it, if left wing literature is selling poorly, they should still publish it but in smaller quantities to supply to niche distribution channels. It's not rocket science.
Well, these people are marxist cultists. They think everything is political. so to them, that equals politics is everything.

They've held the spotlight for the last 10 years and people are finally getting sick of them.
 
Retards surprised to learn that they work for a company that actually has to make money and not a church that pushes their morals.
 
Retards surprised to learn that they work for a company that actually has to make money and not a church that pushes their morals.
Churches still need to make money, and they provide value to their attendees.
 
Can't you just print books on demand?

Why dont bookstores have a book making machine like a photobooth?
In some cases, books are printed on demand, normally those printed in small numbers, those out of print for a while, or those on specialized topics. Most mass-market books need to have stockpiles of varying sizes, because often the best sales come just before and just after the book comes out. Sellers want those books out NOW to get the money, can't afford to wait.

E-books are an alternative for some, delivered in seconds if you like that kind of book.
 
Can't you just print books on demand?

Why dont bookstores have a book making machine like a photobooth?
Profit margins are extremely thin on books as it is, and the literacy required to be a customer keeps going down. Even if you were a bililonaire to start with everything and anything you'd need like Elon or Bezos, surviving on books would be tough, which is why Amazon diversified into other goods. Having a printer would be nice? But prohibitively expensive to get in the first place, operate and maintain, and I have no idea how you'd handle copyright and licensing. It would probably only work for the lowest common denominator of indie books, which are black fiction(a mix of crime fiction and romance) and weird erotica.
 
Can't you just print books on demand?

Why dont bookstores have a book making machine like a photobooth?
From the technical side, print on demand books are expensive, not very good, uneven quality, can't have custom features.
(Very small publishers reprint some of their books on demand and sell on the online.)

From the financial side, when the publisher pays to write/acquire, edit, typeset, market and distribute the book, they expect X sales, they order a print run, it's cheap. The cost of making and then pulping the unsold books (Bing says a paperback is 50c, to POD's $4.5, after setup) is negligible compared to what they already spent.

If you're already in the bookstore, they want you to look at and touch the books, not pick an e-book from a catalog and have it printed, because a book you pick from a catalog can also be sent by mail.

E-readers and phones exist.

The first US company that tried making a book-making machine for bookstores folded last year despite Xerox and Google backing. They were woke groomers.

Well, these people are marxist cultists.
Well, you're a pedophile.
 
Back
Top Bottom