Science Greta Thunberg Megathread - Dax Herrera says he wouldn't have a day ago (I somewhat doubt that)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1609745385800.png

Why is Greta Thunberg so triggering? How can a 16-year-old girl in plaits, who has dedicated herself to the not-exactly sinister, authoritarian plot of trying to save the planet from extinction, inspire such incandescent rage?

Last week, she tweeted that she had arrived into New York after her two week transatlantic voyage: “Finally here. Thank you everyone who came to see me off in Plymouth, and everyone who welcomed me in New York! Now I’m going to rest for a few days, and on Friday I’m going to participate in the strike outside the UN”, before promptly giving a press conference in English. Yes, her second language.

Her remarks were immediately greeted with a barrage of jibes about virtue signalling, and snide remarks about the three crew members who will have to fly out to take the yacht home.

This shouldn’t need to be spelled out, but as some people don’t seem to have grasped it yet, we’ll give it a lash: Thunberg’s trip was an act of protest, not a sacred commandment or an instruction manual for the rest of us. Like all acts of protest, it was designed to be symbolic and provocative. For those who missed the point – and oh, how they missed the point – she retweeted someone else’s “friendly reminder” that: “You don’t need to spend two weeks on a boat to do your part to avert our climate emergency. You just need to do everything you can, with everyone you can, to change everything you can.”

Part of the reason she inspires such rage, of course, is blindingly obvious. Climate change is terrifying. The Amazon is burning. So too is the Savannah. Parts of the Arctic are on fire. Sea levels are rising. There are more vicious storms and wildfires and droughts and floods. Denial is easier than confronting the terrifying truth.

Then there’s the fact that we don’t like being made to feel bad about our life choices. That’s human nature. It’s why we sneer at vegans. It’s why we’re suspicious of sober people at parties. And if anything is likely to make you feel bad about your life choices -- as you jet back home after your third Ryanair European minibreak this season – it’ll be the sight of small-boned child subjecting herself to a fortnight being tossed about on the Atlantic, with only a bucket bearing a “Poo Only Please” sign by way of luxury, in order to make a point about climate change.

But that’s not virtue signalling, which anyone can indulge in. As Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, and their-four-private-jets-in-11-days found recently, virtue practising is a lot harder.

Even for someone who spends a lot of time on Twitter, some of the criticism levelled at Thunberg is astonishing. It is, simultaneously, the most vicious and the most fatuous kind of playground bullying. The Australian conservative climate change denier Andrew Bolt called her “deeply disturbed” and “freakishly influential” (the use of “freakish”, we can assume, was not incidental.) The former UKIP funder, Arron Banks, tweeted “Freaking yacht accidents do happen in August” (as above.) Brendan O’Neill of Spiked called her a “millenarian weirdo” (nope, still not incidental) in a piece that referred nastily to her “monotone voice” and “the look of apocalyptic dread in her eyes”.

But who’s the real freak – the activist whose determination has single-handedly started a powerful global movement for change, or the middle-aged man taunting a child with Asperger syndrome from behind the safety of their computer screens?

And that, of course, is the real reason why Greta Thunberg is so triggering. They can’t admit it even to themselves, so they ridicule her instead. But the truth is that they’re afraid of her. The poor dears are terrified of her as an individual, and of what she stands for – youth, determination, change.

She is part of a generation who won’t be cowed. She isn’t about to be shamed into submission by trolls. That’s not actually a look of apocalyptic dread in her eyes. It’s a look that says “you’re not relevant”.

The reason they taunt her with childish insults is because that’s all they’ve got. They’re out of ideas. They can’t dismantle her arguments, because she has science – and David Attenborough – on her side. They can’t win the debate with the persuasive force of their arguments, because these bargain bin cranks trade in jaded cynicism, not youthful passion. They can harangue her with snide tweets and hot take blogposts, but they won’t get a reaction because, frankly, she has bigger worries on her mind.

That’s not to say that we should accept everything Thunberg says without question. She is an idealist who is young enough to see the world in black and white. We need voices like hers. We should listen to what she has to say, without tuning the more moderate voices of dissent out.

Why is Greta Thunberg so triggering? Because of what she represents. In an age when democracy is under assault, she hints at the emergency of new kind of power, a convergence of youth, popular protest and irrefutable science. And for her loudest detractors, she also represents something else: the sight of their impending obsolescence hurtling towards them.

joconnell@irishtimes.com
https://twitter.com/jenoconnell
https://web.archive.org/web/2019090...certain-men-1.4002264?localLinksEnabled=false
Found this thought-provoking indeed.
1658867339488.png
 

Attachments

  • 1567905639950.png
    1567905639950.png
    201.7 KB · Views: 1,172
  • 1569527044335.png
    1569527044335.png
    450.1 KB · Views: 709
  • 1571204359689.png
    1571204359689.png
    2.7 MB · Views: 542
  • 1572839098505.png
    1572839098505.png
    2 MB · Views: 270
  • greta_108356458_gretaday5.jpg
    greta_108356458_gretaday5.jpg
    89.6 KB · Views: 1,079
  • 1580368884936.png
    1580368884936.png
    270.8 KB · Views: 318
  • 1582430340019.png
    1582430340019.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 1,085
  • 1609745217700.png
    1609745217700.png
    1.7 MB · Views: 638
  • 1616904732000.png
    1616904732000.png
    1.3 MB · Views: 1,306
  • 1658867385840.png
    1658867385840.png
    1 MB · Views: 75
Last edited:

Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World release date

The young activist has embarked on a year-long mission to change the world.
By Grace Henry. Pblished: Monday, 12th April 2021 at 1:03 pm
View attachment 2084052

Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World is the BBC’s new documentary following 18-year-old Greta as she travels around the world campaigning for awareness. The three-part series will land on BBC One this April, and will see the climate activist explore the science of global warming and challenge world leaders, as she calls for action on climate change.

Including appearances from natural historians, such as Sir David Attenborough himself, the documentary is set to open our eyes about the environment we live in.

Here’s everything you need to know about the upcoming docu-series: The BBC documentary will start on BBC One on Monday, 12th April at 9pm. Episodes will then air weekly on the network. If you miss an episode, you can always catch up on BBC iPlayer.

Who is Greta Thunberg?

Thunberg is an 18-year-old Swedish climate activist. She is probably best known for her “How Dare You” speech, in which she addressed world leaders about the ecosystem. In 2018, at just 15-years-old, she began striking from school over climate change, sitting outside the Swedish parliament to demand action on global warming.

What is Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World about?

The Swedish teen took a year off school to travel around the world to film the new documentary, in which she meets with some of the world’s leading scientists to explore the consequences of global warming and climate change on future generations. Thunberg visits places where climate change is being sped up, including Canada’s growing oil industry and coal mines in Europe.

Speaking about her new documentary, she said: “It was an incredible experience and I’m so grateful to have experienced all of this and to have seen this from so many different perspectives. Everything from visiting and standing on a glacier which they say can no longer be saved. Things that you don’t really get to experience. It makes you feel like it’s real in a different way.”

View attachment 2084055

Episode one:
Greta travels through North America with her father, Svante, to attend a climate conference in Chile. The 18-year-old schoolgirl is also seen pleading with viewers and politicians to heed her warnings.

Episode two:
Greta sets off to the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, which will be attended by US president Donald Trump and other world leaders, to call for action on climate change. Greta also travels to the UK, where she meets with a figure who’s been an inspiration to her, Sir David Attenborough.

Episode three:
Details haven’t been confirmed for episode three just yet, but we will keep you informed as soon as we know.

Is there a trailer to Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World

There is! In the clip, Thunberg says: “People say a lot of things about me. People listen when I talk. But I don’t want you to listen to me. I want you to listen to the science!” You can watch the official trailer below:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=PMfLC7Seunc

The #DefundTheBBC campaign just got stronger, and Jed Mercurio is laughing even harder knowing he can now get away with slagging the BBC off even harder on their own channel as the sole writer of quality left there.
 
Starting to think that Peppa Pig's slowly losing her mind screeching at everyone about "muh climate change". Give it a few years, she'll have a mental breakdown over a burger.
 
Sometimes I wonder if famous people way back when were propped up fakes as well.
At least the mental health issues seem to be a consistent theme with all those young heroines. Also the emphasis on their youth and innocence. Honestly, Greta only works, because she looks twelve and is a sped. Nobody would have given a single fuck about the typical 15 year old sitting in front of the Swedish parliament, documentary crew or not.
 

Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World release date

The young activist has embarked on a year-long mission to change the world.
By Grace Henry. Pblished: Monday, 12th April 2021 at 1:03 pm
View attachment 2084052

Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World is the BBC’s new documentary following 18-year-old Greta as she travels around the world campaigning for awareness. The three-part series will land on BBC One this April, and will see the climate activist explore the science of global warming and challenge world leaders, as she calls for action on climate change.

Including appearances from natural historians, such as Sir David Attenborough himself, the documentary is set to open our eyes about the environment we live in.

Here’s everything you need to know about the upcoming docu-series: The BBC documentary will start on BBC One on Monday, 12th April at 9pm. Episodes will then air weekly on the network. If you miss an episode, you can always catch up on BBC iPlayer.

Who is Greta Thunberg?

Thunberg is an 18-year-old Swedish climate activist. She is probably best known for her “How Dare You” speech, in which she addressed world leaders about the ecosystem. In 2018, at just 15-years-old, she began striking from school over climate change, sitting outside the Swedish parliament to demand action on global warming.

What is Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World about?

The Swedish teen took a year off school to travel around the world to film the new documentary, in which she meets with some of the world’s leading scientists to explore the consequences of global warming and climate change on future generations. Thunberg visits places where climate change is being sped up, including Canada’s growing oil industry and coal mines in Europe.

Speaking about her new documentary, she said: “It was an incredible experience and I’m so grateful to have experienced all of this and to have seen this from so many different perspectives. Everything from visiting and standing on a glacier which they say can no longer be saved. Things that you don’t really get to experience. It makes you feel like it’s real in a different way.”

View attachment 2084055

Episode one:
Greta travels through North America with her father, Svante, to attend a climate conference in Chile. The 18-year-old schoolgirl is also seen pleading with viewers and politicians to heed her warnings.

Episode two:
Greta sets off to the annual World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, which will be attended by US president Donald Trump and other world leaders, to call for action on climate change. Greta also travels to the UK, where she meets with a figure who’s been an inspiration to her, Sir David Attenborough.

Episode three:
Details haven’t been confirmed for episode three just yet, but we will keep you informed as soon as we know.

Is there a trailer to Greta Thunberg: A Year to Change the World

There is! In the clip, Thunberg says: “People say a lot of things about me. People listen when I talk. But I don’t want you to listen to me. I want you to listen to the science!” You can watch the official trailer below:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=PMfLC7Seunc
Obviously designed to either be a swansong to the fact they can't use the child excuse anymore, or a desperate attempt for cry for attention with slimy rapey help from the BBC.
 
Obviously designed to either be a swansong to the fact they can't use the child excuse anymore, or a desperate attempt for cry for attention with slimy rapey help from the BBC.
The first episode already aired, didn't it? Has anyone here seen it (I know I am asking for a lot)?
I have only watched the trailer, but Jesus tap dancing Christ are the adults sucking her dick. No wonder she thinks temper tantrums are a valid method to get one's point across.
Edit to add: I think it is the latter. The BBC doesn't want to loose their pet doomsday siren before she completely looses it. And Greta can say "muh privacy" all she wants, she is going to miss the attention and praise for nothing. Especially if she wants to get a degree and has to put in the same amount of work and actually show up.
 
Last edited:
Goblin.png
‘You need to laugh sometimes’

Greta Thunberg’s impassioned speeches have inspired young and old, including David Attenborough. So why does she think the climate crisis is so hilarious?

Interview by Rebecca Nicholson

IN GRETA THUNBERG’S BBC1 series, A Year to Change the World, there is a moment where it feels as though a baton is being passed: the first in-person meeting between the now 18-year-old environmental campaigner and Sir David Attenborough, 94. The veteran broadcaster tells the young Swedish activist that, while his generation has not done enough for the climate crisis, she has brought real hope, and real change. It is an emotional exchange. “It was,” says Thunberg, warmly. “He’s such a genuinely nice and down-to-earth person. Much more than you can imagine.”

Thunberg is at home in her family’s apartment in Stockholm. After a year of travelling the world, she is back at school, where she is studying social science. She has a piece of embroidery with her as she talks, and is sewing a pretty green border. She prefers to do something with her hands, she explains, or else she starts to fidget. Though Attenborough insists that she has “done such a lot” for the planet, she’s not so sure. “Of course, I don’t agree with that,” she says. She starts many of her sentences with “of course”. “I mean, compared to him, I have done nothing. He is a person who is loved by everyone, and he is using that platform to communicate these things that are very uncomfortable. And I’ve only done this together with the millions of others in the Fridays for Future movement, so it’s not something that I have accomplished, really.”The FFF movement began one day in August 2018. Thunberg, then 15, decided not to go to school, but to sit in front of the Swedish parliament building to protest against the government’s inaction on the climate crisis. Her protest not only went viral, it galvanised a new generation of activists and played a huge part in forcing governments to address the reality of environmental decline.

At 16, SHE BECAME Time’s youngest ever Person of the Year. She only turned 18 in January, but has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize three times. She’s spoken to and in front of many world leaders. Does she really believe she has done nothing?“I mean, it’s just the truth,” she says. “All I’ve done is to write and give speeches and to travel around, and it feels like anyone else could have done the same thing. It’s not that I’m unique in this sense. So that’s just how it is. And yes, I’ve won many prizes, and been nominated for prizes, but that doesn’t really mean anything. That’s not a sign of accomplishment. I don’t think you should measure success in the amount of awards you’ve been given or the amount of money you have made or the amount of followers you have on social media, but rather if you have actually succeeded in shifting the discourse or changing people’s mindsets.”

Her latest step towards accomplishing that goal sees Thunberg taking her persuasive skills to television and fronting A Year to Change the World. The past seven years have been the warmest on record, and the effect of rising temperatures on the planet is increasingly plain. We are seeing more natural disasters, more extreme weather, more food and water insecurity, and greater economic and political disruption. Oceans are acidifying, the Arctic is melting and, after a drop in the early stages of the pandemic, CO2 emissions are increasing. According to the International Energy Agency, global emissions were two percent higher in December 2020 than they were in December 2019. “You can’t fit the whole picture in just three hours,” says Thunberg, but the sense of urgency in the series is unmistakeable.

Before the pandemic took hold, Thunberg wanted to travel, to see some of the devastating effects of the climate crisis for herself and meet the people trying to find solutions. She got around by train, mostly, as she refuses to fly, and travelled to the US and back by boat. For the return leg, this meant crossing the Atlantic on a catamaran, in November, during severe storms. It did make her seasick, she admits, but only for a day.

G2.png

She was supposed to take the Trans-Siberian railway to China, but the trip was cancelled as the pandemic spread. By the time she got back to Stockholm, she and her father Svante, who was travelling with her, both fell sick with what she believes was probably Covid. “It wasn’t that serious,” she says. “We got a bit ill. I wasn’t allowed to test myself because I was a minor at the time, but he did it and he had antibodies.” The pandemic has shown the world what it means to confront a crisis, she says, and that has made it clear that the climate crisis has never actually been treated as a crisis. “It shows that we can change social norms very quickly. If I were to go up to someone and shake their hand today, that would be completely socially unacceptable. But if I would have done it a bit over a year ago, that would have been the normal thing to do. So it really shows how these kinds of things can change, which is very hopeful.”

When Thunberg was younger, she wanted to be a scientist working in a lab, but now she believes she is more useful as a political activist. After her school strike became famous and her tactics adopted by children around the world, Thunberg went on to make powerful speeches to the UN and at the World Economic Forum at Davos in Switzerland. But the paradox of her new and vast fame meant that sometimes, the science she wanted to spotlight would be underreported in favour of a photograph, for example, of her glaring at Donald Trump.

Was this series a way to put the science, and scientists, at the front? “I think that is the reason why I chose to start this project. This was mainly to give science a voice and to really go more in depth. So that people don’t just see the surface, but focus a bit on the content, as well.”

Against a bleak backdrop of melting glaciers, forest fires and starving animals, Thunberg meets coal miners in Poland who fully accept the need to move away from fossil fuels. She visits an “air capture facility” in Switzerland, which removes carbon dioxide from the air, though the scale is still small. She hears that every country has the means to create renewable energy.

Everyone wants to know if Thunberg is hopeful. “One thing I think is hopeful is the fact that nothing is happening and we are still in the same place, or even moving in the wrong direc-tion,” she says, acknowledging that this might surprise people. “Because right now, the science is becoming more and more clear. A few years ago, you could still say, ‘Well, according to this, we are moving in the right direction.’ You can’t do that today. The gap between what we are saying and what needs to be done is growing. You can still ignore it by focusing on other things, but you can’t deny it any more. And that, I think, is hopeful.”

G3.png

(ATLANTIC CROSSING with her father Svante Thunberg aboard the catamaran La Vagabonde)

People often assume that Thunberg has the answers. “Of course, I don’t have all the solutions. No one has. But when we ask that question, we need to think about: solutions to what? Solutions to the climate crisis, or solutions that allow us to go on like today? Because right now, we are looking for solutions that allow us to go on like today.”

She’s impatient with targets and pledges because they are abstract promises of future action, rather than action itself. She says that, ultimately, change won’t come from summits or conferences or governments. “The changes necessary will come from the streets. They will come from breakfast tables, they will come from schools. They will come from the people. Because in a democracy, which is the only way forward, the people are the ones who have the power. If people become aware, then we can create change. If people don’t put pressure on our elected officials, then of course they won’t do anything. So that is the solution, to make people become aware and to create these social norms, this critical mass that will be impossible for people to ignore.”
Thunberg has needled plenty of politicians.

She has been criticised by Putin, by Bolsonaro, by Trump, yet they seem incapable of getting to her in return. How? “Because I know that it’s a political game and they’re using me to gain popularity.” This, she acknowledges, applies to both those politicians supportive of her agenda and her most vocal detractors. “Whether it is by whether it is by calling me…” – she pauses, then settles for the higher ground – “things, or criticising me. I mean, both these teams are using me for different purposes and in different ways, but they are still using me to gain popularity.”

In last year’s feature-length documentary, I Am Greta (currently available on BBC iPlayer) and in the new BBC series, it becomes clear just how often Thunberg is stopped and asked for selfies. Does she mind it? “I would maybe be happy if they didn’t do that,” she says, sweetly. “But of course, I also recognise that the fact that they are doing it is a proof that the message is getting across, that I am reaching people. You have to see it from the bright side.” Besides, at home in Sweden, it doesn’t happen much, owing to the cultural phenomenon of Jantelagen. “The Law of Jante, you will translate it to. It’s like, ‘OK, so what, you’re famous, I don’t really care.’ Which is quite nice.”

Thunberg was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome when she was 12. On Autism Awareness Day, on 2 April, she wrote a Twitter thread calling for more awareness of autism and support for those with the condition, and said how proud she is that she is different. When she became famous, she frequently found herself in big, noisy crowds, jostled, pushed and shouted at. These sorts of envi-ronments did become easier for her to handle over time, she says. “That’s also a very beautiful and important part of the story itself. Before, I wasn’t able to speak to anyone. Going outside was hard. I was in a class of five people in school, because I couldn’t be around too many people and I couldn’t handle the noise.”

When she became a climate activist, everything changed. “All that basically disappeared and a purpose. And that just made me feel much better. I had more resistance to with-stand the situation, which is a very good thing. But then again, I’m still very different. I am not like everyone else. It’s still much harder for me than for others to be in these environments. But I just think that, OK, this is for a good cause. And then it doesn’t really bother me that much.”

Anyone who follows Thunberg on Twitter will know she can be funny. In person, she is much lighter than you might expect, if you had only heard snippets of those fierce speeches. “People think that I’m angry or that I’m sad or scared or worried, but that’s a misunderstanding that people have. I just laugh at everything all the time.”

Is humour a useful tool? “Of course, it could be, and even if not, I don’t care. You need to be able to laugh sometimes. The climate crisis is actually hilarious, if you think of it. It’s just the absurdity of the situation. Someone recently asked me, if I could describe the climate crisis with an emoji, what emoji would I use? And the first thing that came to my mind was the laugh-ing emoji with tears in the eyes. That’s the way I see it. I mean, if you’re doing everything you and say, OK, there’s nothing more I can do, so then you just have to laugh at it.”

In one recent tweet, she reposted a report that penis sizes may be shrinking due to pollution. “See you all at the next climate strike,” she wrote, with a smile emoji. When Trump raged about losing the presidential election, she turned what he had said about her back on him, urging him to “Chill, Donald, chill”. Does she enjoy joking around? “That is nothing,” she says. “If I were to write however I wanted to, then people would not take me seriously any more because I would just joke [about] everything and be sarcastic all the time.”

The University of Winchester recently erected a bronze statue of Thunberg to celebrate her as a role model, though students there have complained that the money could have been better spent. Has she seen it? “I have seen pictures.” What does she make of it? “I mean, I don’t really care,” she says, politely. “I try to stay out of these things as much as possible. Of course, it’s very strange. But I try not to soak those things in or to really grasp those kinds of things. If you would do that, and if you would actually believe those things that people say about you, then you would develop some kind of ego that would not be very healthy.” And not very popular in Sweden, by the sound of things. “Ha! No,” she says – with a laugh.
 
View attachment 2085839
‘You need to laugh sometimes’

Greta Thunberg’s impassioned speeches have inspired young and old, including David Attenborough. So why does she think the climate crisis is so hilarious?

Interview by Rebecca Nicholson

IN GRETA THUNBERG’S BBC1 series, A Year to Change the World, there is a moment where it feels as though a baton is being passed: the first in-person meeting between the now 18-year-old environmental campaigner and Sir David Attenborough, 94. The veteran broadcaster tells the young Swedish activist that, while his generation has not done enough for the climate crisis, she has brought real hope, and real change. It is an emotional exchange. “It was,” says Thunberg, warmly. “He’s such a genuinely nice and down-to-earth person. Much more than you can imagine.”

Thunberg is at home in her family’s apartment in Stockholm. After a year of travelling the world, she is back at school, where she is studying social science. She has a piece of embroidery with her as she talks, and is sewing a pretty green border. She prefers to do something with her hands, she explains, or else she starts to fidget. Though Attenborough insists that she has “done such a lot” for the planet, she’s not so sure. “Of course, I don’t agree with that,” she says. She starts many of her sentences with “of course”. “I mean, compared to him, I have done nothing. He is a person who is loved by everyone, and he is using that platform to communicate these things that are very uncomfortable. And I’ve only done this together with the millions of others in the Fridays for Future movement, so it’s not something that I have accomplished, really.”The FFF movement began one day in August 2018. Thunberg, then 15, decided not to go to school, but to sit in front of the Swedish parliament building to protest against the government’s inaction on the climate crisis. Her protest not only went viral, it galvanised a new generation of activists and played a huge part in forcing governments to address the reality of environmental decline.

At 16, SHE BECAME Time’s youngest ever Person of the Year. She only turned 18 in January, but has been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize three times. She’s spoken to and in front of many world leaders. Does she really believe she has done nothing?“I mean, it’s just the truth,” she says. “All I’ve done is to write and give speeches and to travel around, and it feels like anyone else could have done the same thing. It’s not that I’m unique in this sense. So that’s just how it is. And yes, I’ve won many prizes, and been nominated for prizes, but that doesn’t really mean anything. That’s not a sign of accomplishment. I don’t think you should measure success in the amount of awards you’ve been given or the amount of money you have made or the amount of followers you have on social media, but rather if you have actually succeeded in shifting the discourse or changing people’s mindsets.”

Her latest step towards accomplishing that goal sees Thunberg taking her persuasive skills to television and fronting A Year to Change the World. The past seven years have been the warmest on record, and the effect of rising temperatures on the planet is increasingly plain. We are seeing more natural disasters, more extreme weather, more food and water insecurity, and greater economic and political disruption. Oceans are acidifying, the Arctic is melting and, after a drop in the early stages of the pandemic, CO2 emissions are increasing. According to the International Energy Agency, global emissions were two percent higher in December 2020 than they were in December 2019. “You can’t fit the whole picture in just three hours,” says Thunberg, but the sense of urgency in the series is unmistakeable.

Before the pandemic took hold, Thunberg wanted to travel, to see some of the devastating effects of the climate crisis for herself and meet the people trying to find solutions. She got around by train, mostly, as she refuses to fly, and travelled to the US and back by boat. For the return leg, this meant crossing the Atlantic on a catamaran, in November, during severe storms. It did make her seasick, she admits, but only for a day.

View attachment 2085845

She was supposed to take the Trans-Siberian railway to China, but the trip was cancelled as the pandemic spread. By the time she got back to Stockholm, she and her father Svante, who was travelling with her, both fell sick with what she believes was probably Covid. “It wasn’t that serious,” she says. “We got a bit ill. I wasn’t allowed to test myself because I was a minor at the time, but he did it and he had antibodies.” The pandemic has shown the world what it means to confront a crisis, she says, and that has made it clear that the climate crisis has never actually been treated as a crisis. “It shows that we can change social norms very quickly. If I were to go up to someone and shake their hand today, that would be completely socially unacceptable. But if I would have done it a bit over a year ago, that would have been the normal thing to do. So it really shows how these kinds of things can change, which is very hopeful.”

When Thunberg was younger, she wanted to be a scientist working in a lab, but now she believes she is more useful as a political activist. After her school strike became famous and her tactics adopted by children around the world, Thunberg went on to make powerful speeches to the UN and at the World Economic Forum at Davos in Switzerland. But the paradox of her new and vast fame meant that sometimes, the science she wanted to spotlight would be underreported in favour of a photograph, for example, of her glaring at Donald Trump.

Was this series a way to put the science, and scientists, at the front? “I think that is the reason why I chose to start this project. This was mainly to give science a voice and to really go more in depth. So that people don’t just see the surface, but focus a bit on the content, as well.”

Against a bleak backdrop of melting glaciers, forest fires and starving animals, Thunberg meets coal miners in Poland who fully accept the need to move away from fossil fuels. She visits an “air capture facility” in Switzerland, which removes carbon dioxide from the air, though the scale is still small. She hears that every country has the means to create renewable energy.

Everyone wants to know if Thunberg is hopeful. “One thing I think is hopeful is the fact that nothing is happening and we are still in the same place, or even moving in the wrong direc-tion,” she says, acknowledging that this might surprise people. “Because right now, the science is becoming more and more clear. A few years ago, you could still say, ‘Well, according to this, we are moving in the right direction.’ You can’t do that today. The gap between what we are saying and what needs to be done is growing. You can still ignore it by focusing on other things, but you can’t deny it any more. And that, I think, is hopeful.”

View attachment 2085855
(ATLANTIC CROSSING with her father Svante Thunberg aboard the catamaran La Vagabonde)

People often assume that Thunberg has the answers. “Of course, I don’t have all the solutions. No one has. But when we ask that question, we need to think about: solutions to what? Solutions to the climate crisis, or solutions that allow us to go on like today? Because right now, we are looking for solutions that allow us to go on like today.”

She’s impatient with targets and pledges because they are abstract promises of future action, rather than action itself. She says that, ultimately, change won’t come from summits or conferences or governments. “The changes necessary will come from the streets. They will come from breakfast tables, they will come from schools. They will come from the people. Because in a democracy, which is the only way forward, the people are the ones who have the power. If people become aware, then we can create change. If people don’t put pressure on our elected officials, then of course they won’t do anything. So that is the solution, to make people become aware and to create these social norms, this critical mass that will be impossible for people to ignore.”
Thunberg has needled plenty of politicians.

She has been criticised by Putin, by Bolsonaro, by Trump, yet they seem incapable of getting to her in return. How? “Because I know that it’s a political game and they’re using me to gain popularity.” This, she acknowledges, applies to both those politicians supportive of her agenda and her most vocal detractors. “Whether it is by whether it is by calling me…” – she pauses, then settles for the higher ground – “things, or criticising me. I mean, both these teams are using me for different purposes and in different ways, but they are still using me to gain popularity.”

In last year’s feature-length documentary, I Am Greta (currently available on BBC iPlayer) and in the new BBC series, it becomes clear just how often Thunberg is stopped and asked for selfies. Does she mind it? “I would maybe be happy if they didn’t do that,” she says, sweetly. “But of course, I also recognise that the fact that they are doing it is a proof that the message is getting across, that I am reaching people. You have to see it from the bright side.” Besides, at home in Sweden, it doesn’t happen much, owing to the cultural phenomenon of Jantelagen. “The Law of Jante, you will translate it to. It’s like, ‘OK, so what, you’re famous, I don’t really care.’ Which is quite nice.”

Thunberg was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome when she was 12. On Autism Awareness Day, on 2 April, she wrote a Twitter thread calling for more awareness of autism and support for those with the condition, and said how proud she is that she is different. When she became famous, she frequently found herself in big, noisy crowds, jostled, pushed and shouted at. These sorts of envi-ronments did become easier for her to handle over time, she says. “That’s also a very beautiful and important part of the story itself. Before, I wasn’t able to speak to anyone. Going outside was hard. I was in a class of five people in school, because I couldn’t be around too many people and I couldn’t handle the noise.”

When she became a climate activist, everything changed. “All that basically disappeared and a purpose. And that just made me feel much better. I had more resistance to with-stand the situation, which is a very good thing. But then again, I’m still very different. I am not like everyone else. It’s still much harder for me than for others to be in these environments. But I just think that, OK, this is for a good cause. And then it doesn’t really bother me that much.”

Anyone who follows Thunberg on Twitter will know she can be funny. In person, she is much lighter than you might expect, if you had only heard snippets of those fierce speeches. “People think that I’m angry or that I’m sad or scared or worried, but that’s a misunderstanding that people have. I just laugh at everything all the time.”

Is humour a useful tool? “Of course, it could be, and even if not, I don’t care. You need to be able to laugh sometimes. The climate crisis is actually hilarious, if you think of it. It’s just the absurdity of the situation. Someone recently asked me, if I could describe the climate crisis with an emoji, what emoji would I use? And the first thing that came to my mind was the laugh-ing emoji with tears in the eyes. That’s the way I see it. I mean, if you’re doing everything you and say, OK, there’s nothing more I can do, so then you just have to laugh at it.”

In one recent tweet, she reposted a report that penis sizes may be shrinking due to pollution. “See you all at the next climate strike,” she wrote, with a smile emoji. When Trump raged about losing the presidential election, she turned what he had said about her back on him, urging him to “Chill, Donald, chill”. Does she enjoy joking around? “That is nothing,” she says. “If I were to write however I wanted to, then people would not take me seriously any more because I would just joke [about] everything and be sarcastic all the time.”

The University of Winchester recently erected a bronze statue of Thunberg to celebrate her as a role model, though students there have complained that the money could have been better spent. Has she seen it? “I have seen pictures.” What does she make of it? “I mean, I don’t really care,” she says, politely. “I try to stay out of these things as much as possible. Of course, it’s very strange. But I try not to soak those things in or to really grasp those kinds of things. If you would do that, and if you would actually believe those things that people say about you, then you would develop some kind of ego that would not be very healthy.” And not very popular in Sweden, by the sound of things. “Ha! No,” she says – with a laugh.
Man, they're really trying to force her as a celebrity and it's obvious they're trying to rebrand after chimping didn't work.

I guess this is her parents trying to change the brand label now with Rapey BBC advice now that the Creepy Indian Man is focused on that Indian child he found as his new human shield.
 
Sometimes I wonder if famous people way back when were propped up fakes as well.
Hell, we had a US president who was crippled with polio and sat in a wheelchair, yet he was flaunted in the media as an invincible larger than life figure then died in office before his last term ended.

EDIT: And to show I'm not being biased in owning the libs, fine, let's go with Ronnie Raygun, too -- the dude was old as dirt and suffered with Alzheimer's in his 2ns term, and the media filled his mouth with jellybeans to make him look human.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 2134811View attachment 2134812

These pictures don’t instill humor or happiness.

It makes it look like she’s confronting me as if I did something wrong, and I don’t remember what I did.
"Autism and fame"

kekw-emote.jpg


Actually, she looks like she's about to perform cock & ball torture with that face. And is it just me, or does anyone else find it disturbing how she doesn't change facial expression? She's worse than a PS2 character.
 
View attachment 2134811View attachment 2134812

These pictures don’t instill humor or happiness.

It makes it look like she’s confronting me as if I did something wrong, and I don’t remember what I did.
I saw this face in teachers', administrators', and counselors' offices frequently when I was 15-18. I also knew that if I was old enough to drive a shitty truck I shouldn't be surprised to be buttfucked for smoking weed in it in the school parking lot, or whatever. I was never under the impression that being a teen would protect me from people casting judgement on my retard behavior.
I don't know if the parallel I'm trying to draw here works but my point is I was similarly retarded but would have loved to have gotten myself autistically high, gone and glared at world leaders, and have nobody call me out for being a fucking mong.
 
Greta is a perfect microcosm of SocJus. She's unhappy with the way of the world, so the world needs to shape up to suit her desires--and only hers. If you refuse her, she'll throw an autistic tantrum, and it will be your fault, because you are doing evil in making her throw a tantrum. And of course, like all SJWs, she's happy to trade whatever credibility or integrity she has for e-fame or money.
 
Saw this on Facebook. Puts a whole new meaning to "Greta on the BBC"!

View attachment 2136886
View attachment 2134811View attachment 2134812

These pictures don’t instill humor or happiness.

It makes it look like she’s confronting me as if I did something wrong, and I don’t remember what I did.
Maybe I'm overthinking this too much, but why are her pupils so dilated in these particular photos -- especially in that large one shared by Ron Jeremy Stan? Do you think her handlers are pumping her with amphetamines?
 
"Autism and fame"

View attachment 2134963

Actually, she looks like she's about to perform cock & ball torture with that face. And is it just me, or does anyone else find it disturbing how she doesn't change facial expression? She's worse than a PS2 character.
She looks like an Oblivion NPC
 
Back
Top Bottom