Culture Grayson Perry: when crossdressing crosses the line - How did the cross-dressing artist get away with flashing a prosthetic penis at a children’s charity fundraiser?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Grayson Perry: when crossdressing crosses the line​

Spiked / Archive
pecker-960x540.jpg

An image of Grayson Perry resurfaced on social media last week. The Turner Prize-winning artist had been snapped at a 2007 charity-fundraising ball wearing a characteristically flamboyant outfit, featuring a girlish smock and bunny ears. Most notably, a blue prosthetic penis can be seen protruding from his pantaloons.

01.jpg

Of course, Perry is a well-known crossdresser and provocateur. His sartorial selection wouldn’t normally be worth commenting on, but for the fact that the charity event was for children with cancer. The photo itself shows Perry, his prosthetic penis on full display, posing in front of a CLIC Sargent banner, which was adorned with the super-sized smiling face of a child. Even more striking is that this seemed to go completely unremarked upon until last week.

Perhaps, in his defence, Perry accepted the invitation and chose his clothes without checking what the event was for. But it is far from the only public event where Perry has worn what amounts to fetish gear, although always with a colourful and creative take.

02.jpg

Perry has been upfront about his motivations for this. Writing in Sketchbooks in 2016, he revealed that much of his art, designs and style are driven by ‘an erotic impulse to humiliate myself’. ‘My ideas come from historical costume, folk culture, children’s clothes and the BDSM world’, he wrote. Many of the images in Sketchbooks make references to pornography and what might be euphemistically called the ‘dark side’ of male sexuality. Similarly, in an interview with the Guardian in 2015, he made clear that ‘humiliation’ that often comes with crossdressing ‘is a massive turn-on’.

Arguably, Perry is as famous for his crossdressing as he is for his art. When he was knighted in 2023, he attended the ceremony dressed as his feminine alter-ego, Claire. As an artist, he produces accessible and insightful work that comments on everything from the vanity of British class divides to his personal reflections on sexuality. Whether he chooses to make an exhibition of himself or not, his art certainly deserves to be seen and taken seriously.

03.jpg

To give Perry his due, unlike other public transvestites of his age, like comedian and wannabe MP Eddie Izzard, Perry has never claimed to be anything other than a bloke in a frock. And in the art world there ought to be room for the unconventional – for those who show us where the edges of acceptability are.

Nevertheless, there is something undeniably creepy about an adult man wearing fetish wear at a children’s charity event. So why did it escape the media’s notice? Were they too blinded by his national-treasure status to see his fake crown jewels on display? Or did they simply not realise that he might have been casting those around him as players in a sexual fantasy?

04.jpg

One blogger, who uses the moniker Sarah Stuart, recently attended a show by Perry at London’s Theatre Royal on the importance of identity. His performance included predictable digs about the culture war and the supposed bigotry of those who oppose Drag Queen Story Hour, alongside feel-good platitudes about the importance of self-expression. Stuart concluded that, ultimately, Perry ‘didn’t want people to criticise the aberrant behaviour of men like himself’.

The fault is not Perry’s alone. Nowadays, the great and the good are desperate to heap praise on men in dresses, from non-entity models like trans activist Munroe Bergdorf, now a UN Women ‘UK Champion’, to the ‘nonbinary’ crossdressing banker Philip (aka ‘Pips’) Bunce, who was named as one of the Financial Times’s Top 100 Women in Business.

It used to be the case that men who displayed their fetishes in public were shunned. They were deemed a bit grubby and naff. Yet just as the seedy swingers of the 1970s have been rebranded as ‘polyamorous’, transvestites are today considered brave and pioneering. Some are even dubbed ‘transwomen’. Fetishes like crossdressing are treated as expressions of a man’s ‘true’ inner identity. And what was once kept behind the bedroom door is now foisted on the public.

These men are free to do as they please in their own time. But the rest of us really shouldn’t be expected to play along with it.
 
Hello Germany? I would like to order one gas chamber. Yes, I would like expedited shipping.

Literally rule number 1: DON'T SHOW RANDOM PEOPLE YOUR DICK.
 
Jesus, these assholes are running us ragged today.

I'm flying left seat and warming up the helicopter. Kira, please fly right seat. Will and Milton, please assist Jerry, the crew chief, after the rest of us have completed the special processing.
 
The Turner Prize-winning artist

Of course, Perry is a well-known crossdresser and provocateur

far from the only public event where Perry has worn what amounts to fetish gear, although always with a colourful and creative take

his art certainly deserves to be seen and taken seriously.

his national-treasure status

transvestites are today considered brave and pioneering.

You spend the entire article jerking off his fake dick...

But the rest of us really shouldn’t be expected to play along with it.
Then say that?
 
You spend the entire article jerking off his fake dick...


Then say that?
Spiked is kind of schizo. They seem to be run by people who were liberals fifteen years ago but think things have gone too far. So you see this back-and-forth logic of "I should support provocative art!" "But dildos in public are gross!"
 
I'm still surprised this freak was knighted, then again the UK seems like the most cucked country for girl dick. If California was a country it would be right up there with the UK for woke mind virus, I kinda wonder what one would be worse the UK or California
 
I'd say it would be a shame if some fed-up onlooker rammed it down his throat, but then again he'd probably like that ...
 
Hold on. They knighted him for just being a faggot???

Hahahaha hahaha just sink into the Atlantic, Great Britain hahahah
 
Spiked is kind of schizo. They seem to be run by people who were liberals fifteen years ago but think things have gone too far. So you see this back-and-forth logic of "I should support provocative art!" "But dildos in public are gross!"
Very much so. Spiked's earliest incarnation was called Living Marxism. Now it's more or less conservative.
 
When he was knighted in 2023, he attended the ceremony dressed as his feminine alter-ego, Claire.
As if we needed any more proof that all this "ye olde" shit the Britbongs do is a farce.

Accepting a knighthood while dressed in drag. Just like Sir Galahad. Real knightly behavior.

Sink into the ocean already, perfidious Albion.
 
JFC... I'm all for freedom and everything but there is a limit when it comes to overt sexual fetishism in public.

Ever notice how these sorts of people go out of their way to offend, to push beyond the limits and go over the top for no other reason than to piss people off.. All while screeching about their freedoms to be their self.. but the moment someone else dares to do the same, by commenting on such nonsense, they and their defenders start screeching loudly. Inclusiveness is the last thing progressives, perverts and letter people mean when they use the word. For them it's all about the freedom to do what they want and stop other people from doing the same. Silence, agreement or exclusion.
 
He admits it's because he gets off on the humiliation, and the part that should really piss people off is that he thinks it's very fun to make other people at parties his sex partners without any type of assent from them.

If drag queens are getting off on being humiliated by us all viewing them, then they shouldn't be in public view, they should only exhibit themselves in front of people who have opted in to the humiliation ritual. I want no part of it, and I certainly don't think children should be anywhere near someone who finds the confusion or mockery of children erotic.
 
Back
Top Bottom