- Joined
- Dec 18, 2020
It's downright impossible to support Rockstar and Take Two at this point.
Saints Row needs to come back in a big way.
Saints Row needs to come back in a big way.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I like the choice of font. Looks too similar to the GTA V map.https://youtube.com/watch?v=4owFUAg9EpQ
Another supposed GTA VI Vice City map leak, if anyone cares.
He's a businessman operating outside his circle of competence. He gives himself bonuses based on how well microtransactions sell. He sits in his office all day behind a monitor which constantly shows the stock ticker.Zelnick lost his fucking mind
It's a testament to Rockstar's writing when Big Smoke is so likable in the early game after playing it multiple times.Quick reminder that in GTA: San Andreas, Rockstar made the right choice having Big Smoke fix up the back of his car while listening to Biz Markie’s “Vapors”.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GN2_t7Tb7u0
Really does remind me of C.J.’s life story on trying to get out of Grove Street. Thanks for the memories, Biz.
Too bad the song also spoke of Big Smoke’s demise and betrayal.
More likable than Sweet, CJ's brother.It's a testament to Rockstar's writing when Big Smoke is so likable in the early game after playing it multiple times.
The clues were there, and we didn't see them. That scene where he calls Sweet "naïve" was Smoke giving himself permission to murder a best friend.It's a testament to Rockstar's writing when Big Smoke is so likable in the early game after playing it multiple times.
Even after all that, Smoke is a classic. That's how well-written he is.The clues were there, and we didn't see them. That scene where he calls Sweet "naïve" was Smoke giving himself permission to murder a best friend.
Same, notably CJ never mentions Ryder when he realizes him and Smoke are there. The part where you kill him is anti climactic from a story perspective too. You just blow him up in game without a cutscene. Obviously corners were cut or they had a falling out with his VA or something.More likable than Sweet, CJ's brother.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GWafusdOL_s
Honorable mention goes to Ryder. I loved Ryder. I wish R* had more time to flesh out the Grove Street betrayal.
Him moving away from the hood and mysteriously having tons of cash from an "aunt" passing were key signs too.The clues were there, and we didn't see them. That scene where he calls Sweet "naïve" was Smoke giving himself permission to murder a best friend.
That famous Drive-Thru mission as well.Him moving away from the hood and mysteriously having tons of cash from an "aunt" passing were key signs too.
"All warfare is based on deception." -Sun TzuSmoke's a fatass, but he's a tactical fat-ass.
IDK what Rockstar's obsession is with having the moral of the story be "go back to the hood". V did it too, especially since the theme of Franklin's story in the first half was "we gotta escape from the hood and leave banging behind".More likable than Sweet, CJ's brother.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=GWafusdOL_s
Honorable mention goes to Ryder. I loved Ryder. I wish R* had more time to flesh out the Grove Street betrayal.
SA never resolved the argument. Sweet is swearing up and down that he's going to die on the street where he was born. (And haunt it ever after?) CJ still has his wanderlust; he's a citizen of the world, and so forth.IDK what Rockstar's obsession is with having the moral of the story be "go back to the hood".
It could be a case of the dreaded ludonarrative dissonance where every mission in GTA involves murdering like 50 guys, which in reality would be more than enough to prove your loyalty to anyone, but also because of the game's structure you have to do like 5 missions between major plot points.I think Dan Houser just isn't that good of a writer. I could get behind Sweets self righteousness about CJ not helping the hood if he didn't immediately try to become a crack fiend right after giving him the speech. If the idea was not to abandon your home, they fucked it up because all I took from it was that Sweet was ghetto trash to the bone and trying to be self righteous about it.
Similar to V. I feel like the idea is supposed to be that Franklin shouldn't have abandoned his friends or how friends/family are greater than money or something. But like, the dude does nothing but bend over backwards for Mike, Trevor and Lamar throughout the whole damn story.
I mean it works for a video game, but it's nothing profound or anything. Dan Housers only decent written work was RDR2 IMO, and I feel like that probably had a lot to do with where he was at in his career on top of having a ton of help.
I understand the argument of not forgetting where you came from. Sweet did want to preserve the hood by forbidding drug usage in Grove Street. All the OGs grew up on Grove Street; his mother was still there until her death.SA never resolved the argument. Maybe because there is no answer yet. Which is aspirational? Escape the hood or remain behind to improve it?
Better than Kojima.I think Dan Houser just isn't that good of a writer.
For all his faults, Kojima is good at relationships. I think his talents are wasted now. There's no time to form bonds with anybody, plus everyone is a snake (no pun intended) who's out to betray you. There's a reason spies don't have friends: they killed them all.Better than Kojima.
Fuck no.Would you want the GTA V character switch mechanic to come back in VI?