Google's new PC OS - How do you feel about its name?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Curry Teafag

Gray paws 🐾 type these posts
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 19, 2019
Google are reportedly working on a new OS for PCs; an evolved ChromeOS, if you will.

They gonna call it Aluminium OS. That's right. Alloo-minyum-Oh-Es not A-Loo-Minnum-Oh-Es.

Amerifags, how does that make you feel? Are you feeling jeeted yet?
 
americans.png
 
Looks like they're repeating all the mistakes of ChromeOS. They didn't learn anything. lol, lmao

This confirms that Google isn’t just aiming for the budget classroom laptop; they are targeting the high-end market to compete directly with premium Windows laptops and MacBooks.

Idiots. ChromeOS originally launched on 2 full sized laptops (Samsung & Acer), at a price barely below a median laptop of the time. Nobody wanted gimped hardware with less functionality than Windows, for just a $50-$100 discount. The modern "high end" Chromebooks aren't even a rounding error in the market, basically they're toys for executives and their kids, because they still aren't competitively priced against median laptops.

The roadmap also includes a wide range of form factors: laptops, detachables, tablets, and even “boxes” (likely Chromebox-style mini-PCs).

Google has been trying this literally since the ChromeOS launch. Their concept was the same as Valve's original Steam Machine concept: put out hardware specs, then drop their software onto many 3rd party devices across the spectrum. In reality, every form factor failed except for budget Chromebooks (which cannibalized the Netbook and non-iPad tablet markets), and the Chromecast (which doesn't even run ChromeOS, it's Android).

So they're trying again, a decade after all these markets matured, after the top manufacturers established audience lock-in? They really haven't learned anything.

The job listing confirms that Aluminium OS is being built with “Artificial Intelligence (AI) at the core”. This aligns with everything we’ve heard about Google’s desire to bring its full AI stack, including Gemini models and assistants, deeply into the desktop environment.

Leaving aside the AI bubble rant, this is a terrible attempt at a marketing edge or killer app. Anyone who cares about AI wants to use multiple AI options, and the freedom to configure their own.

Nobody wants a Gemini-only operating system. The AI devs want a fully free dev environment. Power users want to pick and choose their AI tools. Normie consumers might like the convenience, but they aren't buying an OS just for AI. People who distrust AI will avoid this like the plague. People who distrust Google will avoid it even harder.

Even if you convinced a significant market segment that AI OS is A-OK, they wouldn't pick Gemini as their helper of choice. Google is lagging behind multiple companies at this point. Their Gemini usage numbers are entirely boosted by shoe-horning it into their existing popular products, like search, Gmail, and Docs.

Obviously Aluminium will have those products too, but why would people who already have access to them on Windows switch over? They'd lose the built-in software ecosystem of Windows, for no gain. Aluminium would have to slay the compatibility problem out of box, and you can ask the Linux desktop cheerleaders how easy that's been over the last 30 years. Jeets and vibe coders starting off with the COS codebase don't have a prayer of even starting.

This effectively confirms the long-term goal: ChromeOS as we know it will likely one day be replaced by Aluminium OS.

ChromeOS was already being replaced by Android, to zero effect. You can run Android apps in COS, or spin up a raw Linux machine and run software there. The performance is terrible, because of the unnecessary COS layer, but that tells you the kind of brilliant roadmap they're coming from.

ChromeOS was a dead project once Google locked down the functionality on the Chrome browser itself, killing off the tiny number of native apps that could be developed for it. Now everything is expected to be a normal browser extension, or a remote website login with SPA and HTML5 doing the heavy lifting.

They should've enabled true browser-based, native app writing, but they lacked the engineering chops to make it secure. Or gone in a radically opposite direction and created a mini OS that's easy to develop native apps for, without relying on the web. But that would have cut out their true revenue stream--locking you into existing Google services and harvesting your data.

This is an idea that half a dozen Google executives think is cool, and nobody has the guts to tell them they're morons. They'll launch it, and half their userbase will just be their own employees.

The entire notion of a Google OS is dead in the water because it is tied to the perogatives of Google, the company. There is no unique engineering idea here. There is no compelling spark or innovation. There is just another attempt to extend Google's flagging profitability centers into yet another product line.
 
In all seriousness I just ordered two more Windows 10 laptops from ebay in case something happens to my current one. When Windows 10 becomes unusable I'll either switch to linux or stop using the internet altogether. I switched to Graphene after Google telegraphed their intention to micromanage what I can and can't do on my phone and I'm thinking about getting a Librem 5 as well just in case.

I could not give less of a fuck what Jewgle intends to do moving forward, I am literally never going to use anything they make ever again. There's nothing they could offer me that would make it worth putting up with their bullshit. I don't even use their search engine anymore.
 
Back
Top Bottom