Business Google admits the open web is in ‘rapid decline’

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
For months, Google has maintained that the web is “thriving,” AI isn’t tanking traffic, and its search engine is sending people to a wider variety of websites than ever. But in a court filing from last week, Google admitted that “the open web is already in rapid decline,” as spotted earlier by Jason Kint and reported on by Search Engine Roundtable.

Google submitted the filing ahead of another trial that will determine how it will address its monopoly in the advertising technology business. The US Department of Justice recommends that Google break up its advertising business, but the company argues in the filing that this isn’t ideal because it would “only accelerate” the decline of the open web, “harming publishers who currently rely on open-web display advertising revenue.”

Google:

Finally, while Plaintiffs continue to advance essentially the same divestiture remedies they noticed in their complaint filed in January 2023, the world has continued to turn. Plaintiffs put forth remedies as if trial, the Court’s liability decision, and remedies discovery never happened—and also as if the incredibly dynamic ad tech ecosystem had stood still while these judicial proceedings continued.

But the changes have been many: AI is reshaping ad tech at every level; non-open web display ad formats like Connected TV and retail media are exploding in popularity; and Google’s competitors are directing their investments to these new growth areas. The fact is that today, the open web is already in rapid decline and Plaintiffs’ divestiture proposal would only accelerate that decline, harming publishers who currently rely on open-web display advertising revenue. As the law makes clear, the last thing a court should do is intervene to reshape an industry that is already in the midst of being reshaped by market forces.


The statement sharply contrasts Google’s recent narrative about the health of search on the web. Google has a clear incentive to make itself appear weaker or less monopolistic in the courtroom, but its admission reflects a reality many publishers are going through. Several digital publishers and independent website owners have reported experiencing a decline in traffic following changes to Google Search’s algorithm and the rise of AI chatbots.

In an emailed statement to The Verge, Google spokesperson Jackie Berté said the statement is “one cherry-picked line that misrepresents” the company’s legal filing. “It’s clear from the preceding sentence that we’re referring to ‘open-web display advertising’ and not the open web as a whole,” Berté said. “We are pointing out the obvious: that investments in non-open web display advertising like connected TV and retail media are growing at the expense of those in open web display advertising.”

When asked about changes to web traffic during an episode of Decoder in May, Google CEO Sundar Pichai said the company is “definitely sending traffic to a wider range of sources and publishers” following the rollout of AI search tools.

Nick Fox, Google’s senior vice president of knowledge, similarly defended Google against claims that changes to search are impacting web traffic. “From our point of view, the web is thriving,” Fox said on an episode of the AI Inside podcast. In the wake of a report from Pew Research, which said people are “less likely” to click on links when presented with Google’s AI Overview, Google Search head Liz Reid claimed that click volume has remained “relatively stable” when compared to the same time last year, adding that Google continues to “send billions of clicks to websites every day.”

Article: https://www.theverge.com/news/773928/google-open-web-rapid-decline

Archive: https://archive.ph/Dz8gK
 
This is a rare Google W. I appreciate how Google's AI summary prevents me from having to go through tons of clickbait ad-filled websites to find information. The so-called "open web" that is dying is really a closed ad network; search engines' death and replacement by AI is well welcomed.
 
This is a rare Google W. I appreciate how Google's AI summary prevents me from having to go through tons of clickbait ad-filled websites to find information. The so-called "open web" that is dying is really a closed ad network; search engines' death and replacement by AI is well welcomed.
That’s also Google’s fault because they decided in 2016 to hide small websites and promote MSM and other corporate sites instead because they blamed independent sites for Trump’s victory.
 
The walled gardens are slowly but surely decaying. People realize how pozzed the superstate is and want alternatives. Its not a coincidence that Zoomies yearn for the old Wild West Internet as seen in games and media.

Here's to hoping that creative freedom is back on the table eventually.
 
That’s also Google’s fault because they decided in 2016 to hide small websites and promote MSM and other corporate sites instead because they blamed independent sites for Trump’s victory.
let's see how they blame Trump for this one, eh?
 
Like I said, corporations clearly want those days before internets -- when they almost exclusively controlled mass media -- to return.
 
Personally I am skeptical that search engines factually exist. I think that, similar to AI, search engines are actually warehouses full of Indians which, when prompted, reply to each individual query.
 
Its not a coincidence that Zoomies yearn for the old Wild West Internet as seen in games and media.
Zoomers yearn for a highly curated simulacrum of the old wild west Internet. They would have a nervous breakdown if they actually read forum posts from 2003.

They don't want to destroy the walled garden. They just want the walled garden to feel slightly edgy.
 
People realize how pozzed the superstate is and want alternatives
The "so-called" alternatives:
>Bluesky (censorious shithole run by the same libshit tranny faggots "leaving" xitter)
>Newgrounds (raped and pillaged by trannies)
>Deviantart (fetish EPI hellscape)
>Voat (DEAD)
>8chan, zzzchan, Sharty, other altchans (either dead AF or literally ran and inhabited by pedoes and other deplorables).
>Matrix and other Discord alts (even brighter honeypot than Discord alone).
>Oldschool Roblox/Club Penguin/kiddie MMO clones (Drama, trannies, grooming, and other assorted faggotry that comes with reviving old games)

Wow guys, I heckking LOVE these wholesome chungus alternatives made for and by people who clearly care so much about the old Internet and how it was run! I hope we get more of these alts up and running and encouraged by people to use more! :D (To the autists in the back, I hope both groups eat a bullet for enshittifying the web as a whole).
 
It's all talk. They just want the pressure off of them so they can keep being vile without oversight.
 
The internet used to be so cool. I remember sites like Xanga and LiveJournal.

urbKhn9kZfIOzv587Do5D_Mbl3laB9R_4nadG9-QBLE.webp


Coming home from school to go on AIM and being all about buddy icons and chat rooms.

043nlcuq1x161.webp


Sissyfight 2000 and Little Fighter.

sissyfight.webp


Napster, Kazaa, and Limewire.

51pj8an3f9m81.webp


Downloading and installing custom Sims content.

unnamed (4).webp


Everything was just so much sweeter and innocent before everyone grew up and started having kids and shit. There were so many more niche interests and activities before it all became about monetization and revenue and being hidden behind a paywall. Way more creative as well. I miss all the people I used to talk to as well.

Even later internet was cool with Turntable.fm and Plug.dj.

turntable-fm-screengrab-a-p.webp


news-15-09-plugdj.webp


I also remember VampireFreaks.
 
Last edited:
The "so-called" alternatives:
The real alternative is going outside. The Internet is just the 21st century version of leaded gasoline.

You can also always build your own lowercase I internet and rvtrvn to 9600 baud Ham radio
 
One of the fatal flaws of the 'open' internet has always been the presumption that discoverability was some else's problem. Huge swathes of the internet just put themselves on someone elses site and infrastructure, made being shown around fairly that sites problem, bitched when they didn't get that, and never put forth the effort to engage in the attention gaining systems that existed because they usually expected to be paid for putting in the work to promote someone - and nobody wants to do that. So those systems closed down their interests towards the people who would pay, and the sites burdened with being the promotors of everyone else tried to keep alive with mass swathes of deadweight bullshit that they took on because it was the 'right' thing to do. Youtubes usual fights are a perfect example of people placing expectations - Its never "My audience stopped coming to look at my videos", its always "Youtube stopped promoting my videos". Its never "My marketing material is struggling to impact my target audience" its always "Googles not showing my stuff on the keywords I think I should own because I used them once". Whenever they succeed, its always that their content is the best and they obviously beat the system, and whenever they fail, its obviously the content being fine and only ever the system beating them down.

Don't get me wrong, Google, Adsense, and the advertising internet as a whole is cancerous and I want it killed, but the entire thing was never sustainable as it started, and only persisted as long as it has because the idea of "spend money to acquire thing now, figure out how to monetize it later" became an entire business model rather than some dudes hobby. And its not like being part of those systems is mandatory. Kiwifarms is suppressed in every sense of the word, to the point that its a verboten name even in open discussion between individuals, yet it spreads and grows by the merits of who and what is on it, not because some entity was beholden for promoting it.
 
"Youtube stopped promoting my videos". Its never "My marketing material is struggling to impact my target audience" its always "Googles not showing my stuff on the keywords I think I should own because I used them once". Whenever they succeed, its always that their content is the best and they obviously beat the system, and whenever they fail, its obviously the content being fine and only ever the system beating them down.
100% Search Engine Optimization is the worst thing to happen to the internet. You got Jeets and other retarded nons just putting every word as a tag literally shitting up search to promote their scams
 
Back
Top Bottom