💼 Careercow Glinner / Graham Linehan - Disgraced Comedian, Mentally Ill to the point of worrying his Family, Hypocritical Misogynist, TERF ANTIFA Quasimodo Doppelganger w/ One Ball & Hateboner for GAMERS/Trump/Brexit/Count Dankula; #ThanksGraham

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
3119967d0c said:
Spinster is explicitly intended for broads. I suppose Glindr is male allies.. etc? Not sure what the etc is.
Click to expand...
Spinster allows men, and at least one of the admin is a man (read: massive soyboy). From what I know, Glinner left Spinster "out of respect" for those who do wish the men weren't on there.
archive.is

Twitter

archived 16 Aug 2019 20:34:29 UTC
archive.is archive.is
 
LetterlandMafia said:
Graham’s managed to get a few retweets for this:

View attachment 1090362

It always comes back to men and how awful they are with Graham and his type. Also, if this dude is mediocre for exploiting woke shitheads for his own personal gain then what’s the guy who spends all day screeching at troons on twitter?
Click to expand...

A mediocre man beat all the best women, you say?
 
Cure Milquetoast said:
Spinster allows men, and at least one of the admin is a man (read: massive soyboy). From what I know, Glinner left Spinster "out of respect" for those who do wish the men weren't on there.
Click to expand...
I'm willing to bet he left after someone treated him with less than cowed diffidence. Spinster is actually a nice little platform. I think it's a cleaner interface to the Fedeverse than even kiwifarms.cc. People should have a look.
 
So... this is happening right now. A7BCF557-2F05-4534-AFEE-41BDF590D663.jpeg
 
sevenproxies said:
So... this is happening right now. View attachment 1095025
Click to expand...

It’s almost comical that Graham being an infantile piece of shit for years on end gets cheered on by people, yet the moment everyone turns on him is when he starts stating biological facts. I have no sympathy for the guy whatsoever, just in awe at how shameless and overzealous all these twitter cunts are.
 
I never paid much attention to this clown before, but apparently he contacted Benjamin Boyce now that he's getting his own tactics turned against him and requested an interview.
Trapitalism said:
Imagine having an image of himself as a white knight
Click to expand...
The first 15 minutes of this interview is literally him spelling out how much of a white knight he is. This guy is fucking insufferable, even if you are only going by his own description of himself.
 
This is something I haven't seen from Linehan before, he talks about his own participation in cancel culture, Gamergate, he doesn't mention Dankula by name but I think he references him indirectly.

Also Boyce pushes him a little on Gamergate, and Linehan seems to be at the very least less strident in his views. It's really worth watching, whatever you think about him, he's a smart man that's burnt his own career on a point of principle.


lemmiwinks said:
I never paid much attention to this clown before, but apparently he contacted Benjamin Boyce now that he's getting his own tactics turned against him and requested an interview.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Hw41BsV1lLw
Click to expand...

In case you're interested this is the link to Boyce's first interview with Linehan In January of last year.

 
Trig.Point said:
In case you're interested this is the link to Boyce's first interview with Linehan In January of last year.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=NESP0JGH4W0
Click to expand...
Yes, I am interested thanks. I only watched the first 15 minutes of the interview from today before I realized he must have a KF thread. I never paid much attention to GG until it was basically over, so I was basically unaware of his role in it (I guess I still am, really). I just read the OP then posted the video, then I had to go outside and shovel so I didn't finish watching until after.

When I came back in I watched the remainder and it was pretty interesting. Particularly around the part that you mentioned in your post when Ben kinda tried to kind of pin him down on his GG bullshit. You're right in that he is pretty sharp and well-spoken but despite that, he doesn't seem to be able to make a connection between his own behaviour regarding GG, and that very likely the same people he was allied with are now calling him a TERF. Although I would disagree with the characterization of it being "on principle", I would opine that "on ego" is probably a more apt description.

Thanks for pointing out this earlier video, I'll check it out later.
 
I got around to watching this earlier interview this morning. I wanted to come back and edit my earlier post with an addendum. It's now locked so I am just going to quote it and insert my more recent and more informed opinion on this asshole:

lemmiwinks said:
You're right in that he is pretty sharp and well-spoken but despite that Graham Linehan is an intellectually dishonest cocksucker and a hypocrite. [H]e doesn't seem to be able to make a connection between his own behaviour regarding GG, and that very likely the same people he was allied with are now calling him a TERF.
Click to expand...
He definitely came off a lot better in the more recent interview. Basically his point of view on free speech is "if I agree with it, then it's okay" and when challenged on that he just sputters some bullshit about Dankula's GFM.

Obviously I am late to the party and don't really know anything about this guy outside the OP and these two interviews. So any commentary I may have has probably already been discussed ad nauseam in the preceding 45 pages.

The only thing I have to add is - How long before his inevitable "Male Feminist" Domestic Violence, Sexual Harassment, and/or Assault accusation appears?
 
Last edited:
lemmiwinks said:
Obviously I am late to the party and don't really know anything about this guy outside the OP and these two interviews. So any commentary I may have has probably already been discussed ad nauseam in the preceding 45 pages.
Click to expand...

So it's important to put his career in context, he was the co creator of Father Ted, Black Books, The IT crowd, those were massive shows in the UK in the 90's and early 2000's. He also wrote for Brass Eye, Harry Enfield, The Day today. He was for a long period of a time a huge figure in British TV.

It's not even the case that he had some sort of fall from grace and then started getting political, he was still influential right up until he got involved in world of Terf politics.

I think he literally doesn't give a shit, he's made his money and like JK Rowling he's pretty much insulated from the negative feedback.
 
Trig.Point said:
I think he literally doesn't give a shit, he's made his money and like JK Rowling he's pretty much insulated from the negative feedback.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I think you're probably right about that. What made me start disliking him off the hop is that he thinks it is reasonable behaviour to lob a grenade out into Twitter and turn off the ability for anyone he doesn't like to reply to it (using his blue checkmark super-powers).

He fancies himself some sort of hero for women, protecting them on Twitter? Twitter is just words, he's not putting himself in any danger. Women are just as capable to reply in kind when the only weapon being wielded is words. Probably much more capable than men, in this field of battle. How is this not "misogynist", when going by their own rhetoric?

It's just more of the same "rules for thee, not for me" that permeates modern "progressives" and their PC culture. Radfems would tear this guy a new asshole if he didn't happen to be marching to the beat of their drum, and to me, he seems to be emblematic of this whole performative Social Media bullshit. Only in this case, the ass-pats he's looking for are coming from himself (rather than the crowd) so that he can fancy himself a "Protector" without leaving the comfort of his own home, and in fact, as you pointed out he really has nothing to lose.

His behaviour kind of reminds me of "The SheepDog - Ron Soye".
 
Last edited:
Cancel culture is something that requires you to be active on social media. Old school comedians like Cleese and Atkinson don’t give two shits about retweets and likes so they’ve just continued with their lives and rolled their eyes at crybullies and the perpetually offended getting high on the rush of feeling indignant.

I still love a lot of stuff Lineham has had a hand in but watching him get eaten by his own ideals gives me a great satisfaction. The more people like us with the wrong ideals have been banned or just started not engaging these insane people the more they’ve turned on their own.
 
So.....guess who wrote an article solely about how much of a poor innocent persecuted victim of censorship and PC culture he is, and how he is hated and abused by hateful SJWs just for bravely standing up for traditional femininity and got it published today?

Today I am one of the most loathed figures on the internet. My speaking events have been cancelled. I have been sued. The police have visited my home and former friends have turned their backs on me.

Yet I’m the man who wrote the much-loved Father Ted! Why is it that I’ve become so suddenly unpopular? The thought crime for which I have been tried and found guilty is that I believe biological reality exists.

I believe women are females. I believe everyone should be able to present themselves as they wish but that women’s hard-won rights must not be compromised for the benefit of men suffering body dysphoria – which is to say men who feel they are stuck in the wrong body.

Most of all, I believe that gender ideology, in its currently fashionable form, is dangerous, incoherent nonsense.

I believe trans people –those unfortunate enough to suffer body dysphoria – are having their condition exploited and trivialised by abusive, controlling and authoritarian trans rights activists. And I think women and children are suffering because of it.

Worst of all, I say so, loudly. This makes me Public Enemy No 1.

I make my arguments forcefully because I’m concerned, sometimes with humour because I’m a comedy writer and often while cursing, because I’m Irish. It’s the humour they hate most. It’s kryptonite to these activists.

I’m 51 and I’ve never seen anything like the authoritarianism on display, the desperate desire to shut down the conversation. No genuine civil-rights movement advances in secret but this one has as one of its mantras ‘NO DEBATE’.

So, while we are in a world where male sexual offenders in bad wigs assault female prisoners, where rape crisis centres are defunded because they won’t admit men and where a bloke in a full beard tells schoolchildren that he’s a lesbian, we’re informed with venomous aggression that we may not talk about any of it.

No debate? Oh, there’s going to be a debate all right.

The popular opinion among my detractors is that I’m cherry-picking negative stories to mask a hatred of trans people. In fact, I first came to this debate because I saw women being bullied, losing their jobs and suffering the most intense online harassment I’d ever seen, and I wanted to stand beside them.

Also, as a writer, I couldn’t watch as one of the most important words in the English language, the word ‘woman’, was being changed against the will of those whom it defined.

Suddenly, everywhere you looked, women were being erased, insulted or endangered. Amnesty referring to pregnant women as ‘pregnant people’. Productions of The Vagina Monologues closing because they excluded ‘women who don’t have vaginas’. Women’s toilets disappearing from public life – even though they were introduced to ensure that women could have a public life.

Worst of all, I saw the lack of compassion or empathy for the vulnerable women who are often at the sharp end of the new Gender Theocracy.

The four women attacked in prison by a male sex offender in 2018 (who everyone had to call ‘Karen’ or they were committing a hate crime) are four women too many.

Women in prison often have a history of abuse at the hands of men. Whatever they’ve done, they are entitled to safety from the type of men who helped put them there.

Rational people – and that includes rational trans people – are dismayed by those who have now taken over trans activism.

Body dysphoria is no longer seen as central or even necessary for those who decide to adopt a so-called trans identity.

To see just how elastic and meaningless the word ‘trans’ has become, one only has to look at the definition adopted by the Stonewall lobby group: ‘Trans people may describe themselves using one or more of a wide variety of terms, including (but not limited to) transgender, transsexual, gender-queer (GQ), gender-fluid, non-binary, gender-variant, crossdresser, genderless, agender, nongender, third gender, bi-gender, trans man, trans woman, trans masculine, trans feminine and neutrois.’

Neutrois, I discovered, literally just means ‘androgynous’. So androgynous people are trans. That’ll be news to Bake Off presenter Noel Fielding.

Under Stonewall’s definition, everyone is trans, and no one is. A cross-dresser such as banker Philip Bunce, who adopts the female persona ‘Pippa’ for only a few days every week, nevertheless receives the honour of being named by the Financial Times as one of its top 100 women in business.

This was seen as progress, a step forward for women. In fact, it is an insult to women and to those suffering from body dysphoria.

In order to maintain the fantasy that our sex is unconnected to our bodies, the truth must be bent and beaten in the fire of academic language. That is why trans activists talk about sex being ‘assigned at birth’ – an abuse of language, if ever I heard one.

Is the sex of a newborn ‘assigned’ by a capricious midwife? Of course not. Rather it is observed and recorded as a matter of fact.

‘Assigned’ is one of the more successful hijackings of English achieved by gender ideologues, yet you will hear it parroted across many organisations from the NHS to the BBC – the sort of institution where you really would expect people to know better.

Before I knew how toxic trans rights activism was, I wrote an episode of my Channel 4 sitcom The IT Crowd with a trans character. The response was more venomous than I was used to, but as bad as it was, at least I was allowed to write it. That was in 2013.

In 2020, such an episode would never air. And that is because the first generation who didn’t go out to play have grown up to become clones of Mary Whitehouse. The new puritans.

I am not new to outrage. There was fury on the part of some when we first released Father Ted but the executives we had were made of strong stuff and ignored the attacks. The same goes for The IT Crowd, Brass Eye, Black Books, and I guess a few comedies I haven’t worked on.

I’m worried we’re entering an era of pre-chewed, prissy art that offends no one. But it’s not comedy writers who are the victims of all this: it is women who are the real casualties.

Gender ideology is a disaster for women. They are expected to make room for men in their changing rooms and their safe spaces.

They are being robbed of the language to describe their reality by unintelligible academic ‘gender experts’, by teenagers encouraging each other online, by parents who are profoundly mistaken, and by well-meaning people who, confused by the ever-changing terminology, still believe they are defending what used to be called transsexuals.

All these forces working together are, whether they know it or not, providing a smokescreen for fetishists, conmen and misogynists to pursue their own agenda.

In years to come, we will look back at this scandal, at the ruined bodies, the confused crime statistics, the weakening of safeguarding and the rollback of women’s rights and wonder how it was left to go on for so long.
Click to expand...

Better yet, it was published in his favouritest of all newspapers......
lol glinner.png
Click to expand...


I know I repeat myself with this particular specimen but what a stunningly sanctimonious, hypocritical, and pathetic little toad this man is.

No matter what troon horseshit he claims to be righteously flailing against, he is and will always be nothing but a spineless opportunist who reacts to any dissent or disagreement by throwing years long tantrums about how all his enemies are evil subhuman nazi terrorists, and then the moment that becomes inconvenient he quietly tries to sidle his way over to the side of those he was shrieking about as being evil subhuman nazi terrorists and brush his previous behavior under the carpet while claiming to be a "moderate opponant of the evil SJW menace"

Seriously. Read this quote and go back to earlier in the thread to see his conduct against whatever the woke media boogieman was back in 2014-2018 and you will see why I find him so uniquely contemptible
In 2020, such an episode would never air. And that is because the first generation who didn’t go out to play have grown up to become clones of Mary Whitehouse. The new puritans.

I am not new to outrage. There was fury on the part of some when we first released Father Ted but the executives we had were made of strong stuff and ignored the attacks. The same goes for The IT Crowd, Brass Eye, Black Books, and I guess a few comedies I haven’t worked on.

I’m worried we’re entering an era of pre-chewed, prissy art that offends no one.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
The funny part is the Daily mail is one of the biggest right wing tabloids in the UK and are complete pieces of shit even from a right wing perspective. It's also interesting how Graham downplays how unpleasent he is online and deliberatly avoids discussing transmen because he knowns no one percieves them as a threat. His writting styles actually remarkably differant in the article from his online bullshit.
Writting for the nazi sympethizing daily mail to one-up for transtrenders on twitter, what new low will he hit next?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom