Law Ghislaine Maxwell Trial

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1642057844574.png

Jeffrey was "a sick pedophile" but Ghislaine was the mastermind - [a]​
Ghislaine Maxwell [born 25 December 1961 in Maisons-Laffitte, France] is a British socialite known mostly for her association with Jeffrey Epstein who committed suicide under mysterious circumstances while in federal custody August 10, 2019 .[former Attorney General William Barr described Epstein's death as "a perfect storm of screw-ups."] The courts dismissed all charges against Epstein on August 29, 2019.As a result, the sex-trafficking investigations and media attention shifted attention to his alleged associates, like Brunel, Prince Andrew, and Ghislaine Maxwell. At this point it was known she recruited young girls for Epstein and his associates and even partook in some of the abuse of the girls in question.
Because of her connections in London's elite and Epstein's confidant she was frequently seen with people holding positions of power or prominence , some who frequented the "Lolita express'' or Little St. James island
1625705820118.png 5.png 4.png
Prince Andrew,Donald trump,Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein,
Bill Clinton, Elon Musk, Jean-Luc Brunel
1625706259487.png 1625706374329.png 1625718433010.png
When Jeffrey met Ghislaine
when sally met harry.PNG
The pair were first introduced in 1989 by her father [British newspaper magnate Robert Maxwell, who embezzled hundreds of millions of dollars from the pension funds of his employees, and then drowned, in 1991, under murky circumstances, off the coast of the Canary Islands] Jeffrey and Robert had a long business relationship by then, Epstein appreciated that it gave him some legitimacy among the English upper class being seen with Ghislaine, as he was unknown at the time. After the death of her father, Maxwell flees to New York, where she falls in love with Epstein becoming his girlfriend, employee, partner and alleged madame in his sex trafficking scheme. ‘Chasing Ghislaine’ doc reveals Maxwell’s daddy issues with Jeffrey Epstein. When former boyfriend Epstein once walked into his East Side office at the posh Villard Houses with a young woman and the two ducked into a separate room, Maxwell looked the other way.
House of Cards
She leaves Epstein in order to separate herself from his crimes In her unsealed deposition, Giuffre said that Maxwell: “Trained me as a sex slave.” [a]
1625729821831.png
1625729455576.png
On July 2, 2020, almost a year after Epstein was arrested, the FBI arrest Ghislaine
When F.B.I. agents went to arrest Ghislaine Maxwell on the morning of July 2 on a remote property in New Hampshire, they broke through her locked gate, approached the front door and announced themselves, telling her to open the door, federal prosecutors said in newly filed court papers on Monday. Through a window, the agents saw her ignore their order and flee to another room in the house, quickly shutting the door behind her, the prosecutors wrote. [a]
She is charged for her alleged role in the sexual exploitation and abuse of young girls by Epstein.

Pre-Trial
QAnon disrupts the January 2021 court hearing by streaming it live on Youtube [a]
“Whoever is doing it, you are operating against the law,” Preska [presiding judge] said of this stream, which attracted 14,000 listeners. “I suspect there is a way to find out. So I will ask you, most respectfully, to stop doing it.”
The stream was shut down shortly thereafter.
During a hearing in April, she enters her plea to sex trafficking conspiracy and an additional sex trafficking charge that were added in a rewritten indictment released in March by a Manhattan federal court grand jury.
In July she has pleaded not guilty and has not been convicted, her trial is set for November 2021, she has been unsuccessfully trying to bail out since .
1625716577415.png

[a]
courtroom sketches [cameras are not allowed in federal courts]​
Ghislaine filed two subsequent unsuccessful bail requests, in which she indicated that she is married — which was not previously known — and offered more details on her finances. She proposed a bail package worth $28.5 million in assets belonging to her and her family and friends — and proposed that she would stay in a New York residence. She also offered to renounce her foreign citizenship. The prosecutors denied her offers, she is currently in custody at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, New York, where her lawyers have complained that she is being held under "uniquely onerous conditions" and subjected to round-the-clock surveillance and body scans , [perhaps they worry she might Epstein herself as well.]
Verdict
cbsn-fusion-ghislaine-maxwell-jeffrey-epstein-confidante-arrested-thumbnail-508484-640x360.jpg
1642036992456.png
Guilty on 5 of 6 counts
1642055603225.png
Jeffrey Epstein Suicide
Jean-Luc Brunel Suicide
Prince Andrew Civil Case
 
Last edited:
People do some weird shit when getting arrested. I've listened to the police scanner and heard people barking like dogs while being detained. Not sure wtf they think they're doing but it happens.
probably some lizard brain last ditch effort intimidation shit. Getting backed into a corner makes people do some really retarded shit out of pure desperation.
 
They could even go in on Andrew being tricked and blackmailed.
i want them to go that with angle.
because it opens up in a court of law that Ghislaine and Epstein were in fact blackmailing rich and powerful people with underage prostitutes and thats how they got their billions.
 
probably some lizard brain last ditch effort intimidation shit. Getting backed into a corner makes people do some really retarded shit out of pure desperation.
Remember the Succulent Chinese Meal guy?


Turns out that was an act he put on to try and convince the cops to send him to a psych ward instead of the watch house. It didn't work.

So yeah... people can do some weird shit when under arrest to try and convince the arresting officers that they're mental.
 
Remember the Succulent Chinese Meal guy?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=BRaa1js92Hk
Turns out that was an act he put on to try and convince the cops to send him to a psych ward instead of the watch house. It didn't work.

So yeah... people can do some weird shit when under arrest to try and convince the arresting officers that they're mental.
Also this classic series of videos.
 

Retrial arguments must be public, prosecutors tell judge

1644344182195.png


Materials must be ‘publicly docketed’, judge told, after Maxwell’s lawyers filed detailed arguments for a new trial under seal , Judge Nathan said it must be filed publicly.

Maxwell’s lawyers did so on 1 February, saying that unsealing these detailed arguments “will provide a roadmap of the defense’s examination of Juror 50 and will allow him to plan out and tailor his responses, or even potentially spoliate evidence,” giving him an “improper preview” of their position.They also said that Maxwell “does not seek to seal the motion indefinitely” and “seeks only a temporary sealing to protect the integrity of any fact-finding process ordered by the court”. Prosecutors said Maxwell’s concerns about an “improper preview” were unfounded, contending that her arguments contain “some of the relevant case law and information about statements reportedly made by Juror 50 in the news media”.Maxwell’s lawyers could always redact sensitive material, they also noted.“There can be no need to hide from public view a discussion of public materials,” prosecutors said. [a]
 

Retrial arguments must be public, prosecutors tell judge

View attachment 2968095

Materials must be ‘publicly docketed’, judge told, after Maxwell’s lawyers filed detailed arguments for a new trial under seal , Judge Nathan said it must be filed publicly.

Maxwell’s lawyers did so on 1 February, saying that unsealing these detailed arguments “will provide a roadmap of the defense’s examination of Juror 50 and will allow him to plan out and tailor his responses, or even potentially spoliate evidence,” giving him an “improper preview” of their position.They also said that Maxwell “does not seek to seal the motion indefinitely” and “seeks only a temporary sealing to protect the integrity of any fact-finding process ordered by the court”. Prosecutors said Maxwell’s concerns about an “improper preview” were unfounded, contending that her arguments contain “some of the relevant case law and information about statements reportedly made by Juror 50 in the news media”.Maxwell’s lawyers could always redact sensitive material, they also noted.“There can be no need to hide from public view a discussion of public materials,” prosecutors said. [a]
"Your Honor, we weren't able to weasel out the first time and we deserve a second try."
 
I'm too lazy to post a screencap
1644961776421.png
We covered it in his thread.
"Prince Andrew settles US civil sex assault case" archive

Prince Andrew has settled a civil sexual assault case brought against him in the US by Virginia Giuffre, court documents show.

Ms Giuffre had been suing the Duke of York, claiming he sexually assaulted her on three occasions when she was 17, allegations he has repeatedly denied.

A document submitted to a US court on Tuesday said the duke and Ms Giuffre had reached an out-of-court settlement.

It said he would make a "substantial donation to Ms Giuffre's charity".


The actions of an innocent bloke eh.
I guess he wanted to save what little dignity he had left

settlement document
e2f7a55c98b2417d94b45d35523caaef-0001.jpg
second pic wont load.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:

A Ghislaine Maxwell juror says he regrets not disclosing his sex abuse history

1646946490968.png

Juror No. 50, right, from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial, leaves federal court, in New York on Tuesday. The juror told a judge Tuesday that failing to disclose his child abuse history during jury selection at the trial of the British socialite was one of the "biggest mistakes" of his life, as a judge and lawyers try to decide whether the revelations will spoil Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction.
A juror told a judge Tuesday that failing to disclose his child abuse history during jury selection at the trial of British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell was one of the biggest mistakes of his life — but an unintentional one.


"I didn't lie in order to get on this jury," the juror said.


A U.S. judge questioned the juror extensively as part of an effort to decide whether the revelation about his personal history as a sex abuse survivor will spoil the verdict in the sex trafficking trial.


Lawyers for Maxwell — who was present in the courtroom, clad in a dark blue jail smock — say the verdict should be thrown out. Maxwell's lawyers potentially could have objected to the man's presence on the jury on the grounds that he might not be fair to a person accused of a similar crime.


Maxwell, 60, was convicted in late December of helping financier Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse multiple teenage girls from 1994 to 2004.


Sitting in a courtroom witness box, the juror repeatedly expressed regret as U.S. District Judge Alison J. Nathan asked him dozens of questions about why he didn't reveal repeated incidents of sexual abuse at age 9 and 10 by two people on a questionnaire during the jury selection process.




The juror said he "skimmed way too fast" through the questionnaire.


"This is one of the biggest mistakes I've ever made in my life," the juror identified only as Juror No. 50 said as he looked directly at the judge.


"I flew through the questions," he said, adding that he was "super distracted" by nearby conversations and movements of prospective jurors who dropped off their completed questionnaires just a few feet from him. "I honestly never thought I'd be chosen for this jury."


The juror said he also incorrectly answered a question asking if he'd ever been a crime victim, in part because the sex abuse he endured "doesn't define me."


"I do not feel I am a victim of a crime," he said. "It's not something I think about. It happened so long ago and it's not part of who I am."


The judge gave lawyers in the case until March 15 to submit legal briefs on whether the verdict should be set aside. Maxwell's sentencing is scheduled for June.


The juror did several media interviews after the trial in which he revealed he'd been abused. He described persuading some fellow jurors during deliberations that a victim's imperfect memory of abuse doesn't mean it didn't happen.


All potential jurors in the case had been asked to fill out a screening form in early November that asked: "Have you or a friend or family member ever been the victim of sexual harassment, sexual abuse, or sexual assault? (This includes actual or attempted sexual assault or other unwanted sexual advance, including by a stranger, acquaintance, supervisor, teacher, or family member.)"


The juror checked "No." The juror said in the interviews he didn't remember being asked that question, which was No. 48 on the form.


The judge granted the juror immunity before he answered questions for about an hour. He said he would invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege without it.


Maxwell lawyers in January asked the judge to immediately order a new trial after the juror's public statements, but Nathan said she could not do so without questioning the juror.


Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking and other charges after a monthlong trial that featured testimony from four
Maxwell still says she's innocent.
 
Ghislaine Maxwell’s Bid For Retrial Denied By Judge
Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell will not be granted a new trial after a federal judge in New York City refused to throw out Maxwell’s sex trafficking conviction. Maxwell bid for a new trial due to a juror’s failure to disclose in advance that he’d been a victim of childhood sexual abuse.

sucks to be her.
 
I do wonder what Nadia is doing now. This article was from 2 years ago. I wonder if she is the new boss?

A bombshell blond pilot who allegedly started out as Jeffrey Epstein’s underage sex slave before morphing into an abuser herself is presumably named in newly subpoenaed flight logs involving his lavish air fleet.

Nadia Marcinkova, who Epstein was accused of bringing to the US around 2001 at age 15 — calling her his “Yugoslavian sex slave’’ — spent years by the late pedophile’s side, according to alleged victims, photos and reports.

She is believed to have jetted around with Epstein, including on his plane nicknamed “The Lolita Express’’ because of all the young girls he flew aboard it.
4GILB2_0XIOegy200.jpg 33271512-0-image-a-2_1600288852977.jpg

Nadia Marcinko, also known as Nada Marcinkova (Slovak: Naďa Marcinková) (born 1986), is a Slovakian-born pilot, flight instructor, and the CEO of Aviloop, an aviation website.
As of 2019, she remained CEO of her aviation business, Aviloop, described by Wired as a "supremely odd aviation branding business, whose website features flawless shots of her with Gulfstreams."[5][3] The business is based at an address in New York, that is in a property controlled by Mark Epstein, brother of Jeffrey Epstein.[13][1]

 
Maxwell bid for a new trial due to a juror’s failure to disclose in advance that he’d been a victim of childhood sexual abuse.
I don't see the point of pre-trial questionnaires or voir dire anymore, if a potential juror can lie or conceal material facts that are later used to influence deliberations and the response is...nothing. It's an obvious violation of the defendant's right to a fair trial before an unbiased panel and this judge's refusal to protect the rights of an (unpopular) person are a travesty before justice and an affront to the impartiality of the system. Which is, by the way, the only foundation on which the legal system has any authority.

Undermining the actual or perceived fairness of the process erodes the motar that holds a peaceful society together. What happens when nobody trusts the courts? It'll be very unpleasant, you can be sure.
 
I don't see the point of pre-trial questionnaires or voir dire anymore, if a potential juror can lie or conceal material facts that are later used to influence deliberations and the response is...nothing. It's an obvious violation of the defendant's right to a fair trial before an unbiased panel and this judge's refusal to protect the rights of an (unpopular) person are a travesty before justice and an affront to the impartiality of the system. Which is, by the way, the only foundation on which the legal system has any authority.

Undermining the actual or perceived fairness of the process erodes the motar that holds a peaceful society together. What happens when nobody trusts the courts? It'll be very unpleasant, you can be sure.
Imagine having faith in the court system. That's only for people who have fuck you money and aren't persona non grata.
 
This entire debacle is a laughable public show to quell the people into forgetting that our government and ultra elites are sadistic pedophiles and sex creeps. This is the Franklin scandal all over again but with Internet 2.0!
 
Back
Top Bottom