Why can't you be a feminine male on HRT? Why are you suturing gender identity politics to morphological autonomy like the TRAs? You are positing a false dichotomy between delusional AGPs who take estrogen and sober gender dysphoric repressors. Put it that way it obviously sounds unreasonable, but this narrative is important to your proposal, namely that we should adopt less rigid gender norms to remedy this. Of course, by the time such a freedom is permitted, it is senseless why a man shouldn't get boobs if he really wants to. Part of this position's intelligibility also rests on an etiological claim which isn't a necessary true. Why does desire to align with a particular sign (that of womanhood or manhood) precede the desire for morphological attributes? It's unfounded.
I personally find this section bizarre, and irrationally detached from genuine criticisms of gender ideology. "masculine disregard" as well as "feminine graces and nuances" just sounds strange. It just sounds like a purely aesthetic evaluation of the issue at hand which I don't believe is a good foundation for sober criticism. You should probably have this part of yourself pertaining to disgust checked out.
Yeah, uncle TiMs irk me, though I am coming from a completely different perspective as to why. To me it seems to be an unhealthy and unproductive way to deal with one's self-hatred.
This is a good point, and I think it is probably symptomatic of a larger issue related to (anti-)SJWism. You can't enforce how people should treat you, and legal means are off the table. You can only affect them via psychological operations. This might be effective, but quite a bit of work. That's also why it's much more important to focus on securing material things. Social acceptance is a completely different ballpark, and is really most important when it comes to securing jobs.