Guts Gets Some
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2018
Majority =/= Those who whine and cry the loudest
Last edited:
General transgender discussion thread - Take the tranny related debates here.
- Thread starter 💗Freddie Freaker💗
- Start date
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2020
I'm not so sure you can lay the blame at the feet of Google alone. I think universities and broken families are more to blame than one giant company.
Absolutely in agreement there, fuck Google
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Someone with a thread here who is 35 and acts like that 15 year old.
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2019
Silicon Valley tech companies being run by old faggots and thinking people hated them because they were gay instead they were just individually assholes or annoying. Now, they think troons are hated by the "bigots" instead of so many just being shitty people.
Sunday School Dropout
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Anyone whose pathetic enough to want to be a reddit jannie, is usually pathetic enough to also want to be a trannie.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2015
But does he have a bunch of scripts from a quack doctor saying he can? That's the important thing, according to some people ITT.
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2017
Autism. The answer is always autism. No really, big forums like Reddit and forums on niche interests in general are going to attract a large number of autists. Autism and trooning out are comorbid with each other, usually related to the autist thinking how easy everything would be if he were a woman, or combinations with cluster B personality disorders (i.e. narcissism) or the autist's fetishes (crossdressing and autogynophilia). A group of 100 autists will have far more troons among them than a group of 100 normal people. The autist is capable of sinking endless amount of time into their specialty interests and spending the time on the forum necessary to get to know the userbase and administration enough to become a mod.
And troons form cliques. Once you have one troon mod, the troon will try and get "her" friends promoted to modship as well, or otherwise pay far more heed to their complaints than the general populations. By this method, troons are able to effectively take over websites even if the admins/site owners aren't troons.
And troons form cliques. Once you have one troon mod, the troon will try and get "her" friends promoted to modship as well, or otherwise pay far more heed to their complaints than the general populations. By this method, troons are able to effectively take over websites even if the admins/site owners aren't troons.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
It used to take more than "all my friends on tumblr call me an egg."
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
The transgender movement likes to rewrite history to suit its purposes. Posting a list of historical revisionism by transpeople on any other site would likely result in censorship, so here we go.
Let's start with one of the most egregious examples. People often say stonewall riot was started by transwomen of color and that the black transwoman Marsha P. Johnson threw the first brick.
archive.is
archive.is
First of all, here's a good article explaining what's wrong with the modern narrative. Check it out if you want more info on how stonewall is getting transwashed.
archive.is
Malcolm Michaels Jr. (drag queen name: Marsha P. Johnson) described himself as a homosexual drag queen and didn't get to the riot until after it had already started. The argument goes that he didn't call himself trans because the term didn't exist at the time, but he died in 1992.
Sylvia Rivera said he didn't like labels and openly stated his dislike of being called transgender.
The first brick was likely thrown by cis gay white male Jackie Hormona or cis gay black male Zazu Nova. The crowd appears to have been comprised primarily of middle class cis gay white males.
In conclusion: trannies and people of color played a very small part in stonewall. If we must applaud a group for the riot, it should be gay white men.
Let's start with one of the most egregious examples. People often say stonewall riot was started by transwomen of color and that the black transwoman Marsha P. Johnson threw the first brick.
Pride Month: We owe it to black trans women like Marsha P. Johnson
archived 18 Apr 2020 21:41:13 UTC
Stonewall at 50: Transgender activists Marsha P. Johnson and Sylvia R…
archived 18 Apr 2020 21:45:06 UTC
First of all, here's a good article explaining what's wrong with the modern narrative. Check it out if you want more info on how stonewall is getting transwashed.
Transgendering Stonewall: Gay Rights Join the Victimhood Olympics - T…
archived 18 Apr 2020 22:36:21 UTC
Malcolm Michaels Jr. (drag queen name: Marsha P. Johnson) described himself as a homosexual drag queen and didn't get to the riot until after it had already started. The argument goes that he didn't call himself trans because the term didn't exist at the time, but he died in 1992.
Sylvia Rivera said he didn't like labels and openly stated his dislike of being called transgender.
It's also likely he wasn't there at all on the first night of the riots.
The first brick was likely thrown by cis gay white male Jackie Hormona or cis gay black male Zazu Nova. The crowd appears to have been comprised primarily of middle class cis gay white males.
In conclusion: trannies and people of color played a very small part in stonewall. If we must applaud a group for the riot, it should be gay white men.
Last edited:
orelpuppington
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2020
Many trans activists like to claim joan of arc was a trans man, unfortunately. Same with Hatshepsut.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
Because heavens forbid it was 'just' a woman who did something of significance historically. No, no it had to be a tranny instead!
They need to leave history alone and stop trying to claim anyone they consider a convenient addition to their narrative.
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2020
This hurts my brain. Why would that even be a thing? Why, in their minds, would someone wanting to lead a political charge against a vicious foreign occupation actively choose to cripple their chances by pretending to be a woman in a medieval society? Jeanne D'Arc is remarkable because she overcame such a handicap and accomplished great things despite it- Inspiring men to follow a woman in a time when that was not allowed to frequently happen. But if that same character were to have *faked* their position the entire time, the whole context and value of the legend is diminished.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2019
I'm not sure if this counts but Casimir Pulaski.
Pulaski was a Polish cavalryman who came to America to fight the British during the Revolutionary War. Pulaski, and the Hungarian Michael Fabriczy, are regarded as "The Fathers of American Cavalry". Pulaski died in the Battle of Savannah and the fate of his remains was always a debated thing. Some said he was buried at sea, while others alleged he was buried at different places. In 1996 some team excavated human remains from one such location and did all kinds of tests on it. They said the hip of the skeleton looked feminine so now, Casimir Fucking Pulaski, is alleged to be intersex and if you go to his wiki page it says he was LGBT.
I only include this because trans acolytes like to talk about intersex people and shit and Casimir Pulaski doesn't deserve this kind of character assassination.
www.nytimes.com
Pulaski was a Polish cavalryman who came to America to fight the British during the Revolutionary War. Pulaski, and the Hungarian Michael Fabriczy, are regarded as "The Fathers of American Cavalry". Pulaski died in the Battle of Savannah and the fate of his remains was always a debated thing. Some said he was buried at sea, while others alleged he was buried at different places. In 1996 some team excavated human remains from one such location and did all kinds of tests on it. They said the hip of the skeleton looked feminine so now, Casimir Fucking Pulaski, is alleged to be intersex and if you go to his wiki page it says he was LGBT.
I only include this because trans acolytes like to talk about intersex people and shit and Casimir Pulaski doesn't deserve this kind of character assassination.
Casimir Pulaski, Polish Hero of the Revolutionary War, Was Most Likely Intersex, Researchers Say
Disputed remains were the right height and age and showed injuries consistent with the general’s life. There was just one catch: “The skeleton looked very female.”
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2016
Pretty much. Check out this art someone made of Joan with a binder:
And check out this blog post about Hatseptut possibly being queer:
Thankfully, it's mostly tards on twitter and reddit spreading these ideas. The mainstream media isn't transwashing these two yet as far as I know.
The truth is that nothing suggests Joan was trans. She crossdressed because she was very devout and believed Catholic saints had told her she should do so. As for Hatshepsut, it's likely she dressed like a man because that's what she had to do to be taken seriously as Pharaoh. Gender identity is a modern concept, these women wouldn't have known anything about it.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2018
It would explain why they set fire to her, though.
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2019
Sure would. If anything I take that as proof that Joan definitely was a troon. She was French, heard crazy voices, tried to kill cis-englishmen, and got burned at the stake. Certainly fits the profile of a medieval troon.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
Try telling this to a Chicago Polack and see what happens.I'm not sure if this counts but Casimir Pulaski.
Pulaski was a Polish cavalryman who came to America to fight the British during the Revolutionary War. Pulaski, and the Hungarian Michael Fabriczy, are regarded as "The Fathers of American Cavalry". Pulaski died in the Battle of Savannah and the fate of his remains was always a debated thing. Some said he was buried at sea, while others alleged he was buried at different places. In 1996 some team excavated human remains from one such location and did all kinds of tests on it. They said the hip of the skeleton looked feminine so now, Casimir Fucking Pulaski, is alleged to be intersex and if you go to his wiki page it says he was LGBT.
View attachment 1240015
I only include this because trans acolytes like to talk about intersex people and shit and Casimir Pulaski doesn't deserve this kind of character assassination.
Casimir Pulaski, Polish Hero of the Revolutionary War, Was Most Likely Intersex, Researchers Say
Disputed remains were the right height and age and showed injuries consistent with the general’s life. There was just one catch: “The skeleton looked very female.”
orelpuppington
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2020
in the past, whenever a woman did something historically significant, she was either able to do so because she either
- came from a rich family
- was able to do so with support from her husband, OR
-cross dressed, so she could have more opportunities by disguising herself as a male.
of course, the concept of crossdressing for non fetishistic purposes is lost on troons, so there is only one option left, obviously. TRANSMAN!
the name escapes me, but there was a doctor who disguised herself as male so she could go to medical school. when she passed away they discovered she was female, and of course they call her a transman as well. (women can't be intelligent doctors, thats a male thing, adoy.)
- came from a rich family
- was able to do so with support from her husband, OR
-cross dressed, so she could have more opportunities by disguising herself as a male.
of course, the concept of crossdressing for non fetishistic purposes is lost on troons, so there is only one option left, obviously. TRANSMAN!
the name escapes me, but there was a doctor who disguised herself as male so she could go to medical school. when she passed away they discovered she was female, and of course they call her a transman as well. (women can't be intelligent doctors, thats a male thing, adoy.)
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
They are willing to look past all facts or understanding of what the world was like before they were alive, but they need heroes and can't be bothered to be the hero. So they latch onto already famous or historically renowned people and using a tiny bit of evidence that may support the theory they were a dickless abomination or arm skin made weiner lady PROWD TRANS ICON!!!!1!!!! because they wore a dress/wore a suit, even if they had a husband/wife and thirty kids, but they WERE REPRESSING THEIR TRANS IDENTITY FOR CULTURAL NORMS!
Look, I get that they can't find anybody to actually point to as a real icon because most of their kind were put in homes or died trying to get their ding dong removed, but stop fucking up actual important peoples history. Actually now that I think about it, how many Wiki editors are part of the 41 tribe and are editing this shit in to fit their warped narrative?
Look, I get that they can't find anybody to actually point to as a real icon because most of their kind were put in homes or died trying to get their ding dong removed, but stop fucking up actual important peoples history. Actually now that I think about it, how many Wiki editors are part of the 41 tribe and are editing this shit in to fit their warped narrative?
Last edited: