We called you a fat fuck quite a few times before you showed up, but you seem to have taken it in stride. Hell, you look like you lost some weight recently.
Objectively I am fat, so as far as insults go it doesn’t really phase me if that’s all people have. I have been working less and thus able to exercise more. Weight staying the same but transferring more to muscle.
If you took the effort you spend white knighting Karl, and put it into properly dieting and exercising, you could actually lose the gunt and not look like you're about to have a coronary every time you waddle run around during a comp.
But nah, better to spend all the time and effort instead defending your satanic polygamous friend and your shitty plastic lower in an obscure thread where a bunch of gun boomers just shitpost with each other. Savvy
I work on average 12-14 hours a day.
I live with a constant amount of stress that would break weaker people. Despite my waddling, I consistently defeat more physically fit people at matches that require physicality.
Here’s the latest.
My waddling certainly hurt me here while carrying heavy shit, dragging weighted sleds, throwing kettlebells and running a few hundred yards on some of the stages.
I respond to this thread while doing things like taking a shit or waiting for a meeting, so really it’s not detracting from my time to be healthy. But I do appreciate your concern.
My shitty plastic lower shipped around 30,000 units and has thousands of happy customers.
Are you some sort of devout Christian that Karls edgey atheism offends? Did you marry your high school virgin sweet heart and you’ve been in trad-con bliss for decades? if you are then maybe you’re actually in a position to cast some kind of moral judgment on Karl’s personal life (that he’s never brought up on his channel). I think it’s more likely you’re just another seething hypocrite angry at someone’s else’s success.
On on a different note, as many of you know I was banned from Somethingawful for supporting Rittenhouse’s right to self defense last year. Upon his acquittal I emailed the admin that banned me.
Cyrano,
The Rittenhouse trial has proven out that everything I said over a year ago was accurate.
Your reason for banning me:
“Placing the shooter as the legal and moral center of the Kenosha shooting while treating legal protestors as the problem is wrong on so many levels. From a purely legal, constitutional level - which you seem to value - the shooting of protestors by vigilantes is not remotely justifiable. On a moral level it is completely beyond the pale.
You don’t need to be in this community.”
Indisputable facts after the trial
1) Rittenhouse only shot people attacking him.
a) Rosenbaum said he would kill him and lunged for his gun.
b) Huber repeatedly struck Rittenhouse in the head and neck with a skateboard.
c) Grosskreutz knew Rittenhouse was running towards the police and nonetheless pulled a gun on him, pointed it at him and was then shot.
2) he did not shoot any “peaceful protestors”
The prosecution’s own witnesses backed this up during the trial.
These are facts that were plainly visible in the video evidence available in 2020.
Your reason for banning me is objectively wrong.
I would also note that your handling of this situation left a number of members disenchanted with the forum. Tens of posters across the political spectrum contacted me to tell me that whether they agreed or disagreed with my logic that your handling of the situation was unethical and wrong.
If you have any sense of honesty and fairness you will unban me.
Regards,
His response:
Russel,
I'm not longer an admin. You're going to have to go through the admins to talk about getting the ban reversed. The ban was a decision made by the admin staff as a whole at that time, I wasn't the only voice in that conversation. Bans on that level are done as part of a process that includes all the admins, not any single person. Reversing that decision will likewise take a decision by the current admin staff.
I have CC'd the current admins on this message. I would expect one or more of them to reach out to you in the coming days with some resolution.
On another note, the larger issue - and the one that the community as a whole took offense at - was the notion that it was responsible in any way, shape or form for someone to strap up and drive across town to inject himself in that situation. That was the main point that the thread back then was swirling about, and that was the point that you didn't seem to grasp. Whether or not the shooting was justified in the moment from a purely legal and tactical standpoint, it was morally indefensible for him to arm himself and inject himself into a bad situation. It was irresponsible when he did it, and it was equally irresponsible when that Antifa protester in Seattle took a pistol and shot that other guy.
I will leave whether or not to unban your account to the admins.
--Cyrano
Fluffy’s response:
No.
My response;
Cyrano,
Your argument applies as much to the 3 people Rittenhouse shot as it does to himself. Yet I don’t see any censorship for people supporting those bad actors that engaged in violent conduct.
I see Fluff has said no. So I’ll leave it at that. Enjoy your echo chamber. It will be as dead as Lowtax himself if it continues along it’s self destructive path of silencing dissent.
Regards,