Bespoke translation by yours truly. Original article [A] by Danisch
Current news from the Marxist kiln.
The humbug university of Berlin:
It's not so impossible or difficult in this case, it happens to be something like an online course. Or even several online units.
And that is really stupid stuff. At the beginning, there is a brief look at a formula so that everyone who doesn't know what math is has seen what it looks like. It's not about mathematics - or what of it is supposed to be gender - at all, but it's about the biographies of female mathematicians. It is about female mathematicians being "forgotten" and not being visible enough. It is - as far as I was able to tell - not about mathematics at any point.
Not only is that completely crazy and brainless - it's also counterproductive. To mathematically gifted kids - including girls - this nonsense must act like a deterrent. Who wants to "identify" with some random old silly geese in grandma dresses on ancient black and white photos? If you are forced to look at such pitiful crap, you immediately lose any desire for learning mathematics.
I am - again - noticing something there: The key word is "brainless".
These are herd mechanics.
They have no idea what mathematics is actually about - even though a [female] professor of mathematics is involved, but there are so many [female] professors of computer science who have no idea and shouldn't even be allowed to have a Bachelor's degree in computer science, so why shouldn't there be incompetent [female] professors of the mathematics too? They are looking at it, and also every other discipline, like a social system, like a village community.
This is precisely what I keep describing: They lack something in the brain. Organically or functionally. Abstract rational thinking. They can only think in social mechanics, in herd mechanics (and they can't even do it well or correctly). They can't help but consider MINT subjects to be a social matter because the brain is not capable of anything above that. The problem that I have been describing for years.
There is a figure of speech: If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
And if you only have social functions in the brain, everything looks like a social matter to you.
Gender studies are a brain defect.
That crap is the outcome of trying to learn about the world with a malfunctioning brain that is only good for social mechanics, only herd mechanics. They are blind to everything in mathematics, what math is about. They believe it's a social community dance, because that's all they can know and register.
Gender studies are being conducted almost exclusively by women, and the overwhelming majority of women are pure social machines.
But it would be a mistake to stop there. Because gender studies are just one variant, one special discipline of Marxism borne from corruption, and Marxism is a man's work.
So I'm currently wondering whether this entire leftism, all of Marxism, all this class logic, this capitalist and exploitation thing is generally based on a brain defect and many people who do it can't think rationally, but only in terms of herd mechanics, and whether those things are the attempt to understand the world with a three-fourths brain. Whether Marxists ultimately are a kind of "hole in the brain" self-help group. Whether this entire leftist matter is a mere perception problem.
One key in understanding it could be that leftists aren't, but right-wingers are "conservative". And that it is a known item that [political] leanings are hereditary.
But we know from observing animals, especially apes, that cooperation and solving complex problems are an adjustment to cold and Winter. There are animals - squirrels, crows etc. - who bury food supplies for Winter. They are looking ahead and planning, so they are "conservative" (key word: can of tinned food [German: Konservendose, literally "can of conserved things"]). They studied whether that was just a dumb behavioral mechanism, but they are smarter, they know what they are doing. Crows and ravens notice when they are being watched while burying, that is, risking that the competitor steals their food. But they don't cancel it, but keep pretending like everything is normal, keep burying, and leave - and wait from a distance until the competitor is gone. Then they come back, unearth it, and bury it somewhere else.
The other way around, it is known about animals in countries in which there are no distinct seasons that they just live day by day without any plan. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the heat, because elephants follow the leading cow - the one who knows where watering holes are. Planning, intelligence, reason, planned behavior seem to be a - biologically and energetically expensive - trait for adjusting to environments with difficult seasons. Rational, conservative, and cooperative thinking are three different things - but they seem to be based on the same environmental conditions: Winter or dry seasons. Times in which water, food, energy are less abundant and which you can only survive with two strategies: Hibernation or brain.
A central element of leftist thought is others providing for you without you doing any work This paradise, this cophrophagist thought.
I am wondering if all this leftist, Marxist thinking, Marx's theory complex, is based on people who functionally lack certain functions of the brain, and are therefore neither able to think rationally nor possess the ability to plan ahead for Winter or times of hunger, trying to understand the successful model of "conservative in a tough environment", and expect that they are being fed and provided for in a way as if we were in an environment without times of hunger, as if they want the people who work or have supplies to get them into the position as if they lived in a country in which there is new food hanging from the trees every day.
I have written a lot about the Communists' expectation of paradise.
Is this paradise ultimately nothing but the subconscious urge in the brain to return to a life environment in which their own genetic behavior is fitting, namely an area in which you have no need to conserve, to plan, to make supplies, but can simply live into the day because there are fruits hanging from the tree every day, like many species of ape do? And is the hate on capitalists and the society of merit ultimately just the rejection of a genetic otherness, herd alienation, because there are people who think rationally and act conservatively, thus have other behaviors, and that is joined by envy and resentment because they presuppose equality, that is, the equal distribution of daily product even without contributing?
Is the fight of "left" against "conservative" ultimately nothing but the fight of those who are adjusted to a paradise situation in a country with permanent warmth and constant food, against those who are adjusted to cold and Winter and therefore think rationally, cooperatively, and conservatively - and, for instance, have developed mathematics and engineering?
Gender & Mathematics
Current news from the Marxist kiln.
The humbug university of Berlin:
"Gender & Mathematics"
Gender & Mathematics
This learning unit provides insights into the various possibilities, perspectives, and methods for engaging with the topic of gender in mathematics. It represents an open discourse aimed at inviting a rethinking of mathematics as a cultural practice in our history and contemporary world. The learning unit is divided into three chapters. Each chapter contains suggestions and prompts for reflection and self-reflection on mathematical actions and practices from a gender perspective, intended to engage both students and teachers.
The chapters are not sequential, so they can be worked through in any order or even individually. However, we recommend completing a started chapter along with the included reflection exercises and tasks. Plan approximately 90-120 minutes for each chapter or exercise.
@Arnd_Diringer https://x.com/Arnd_Diringer/status/1883082328668611043
[I translated the text of the image directly instead of showing you the German text]By the way, I guess it's gonna be impossible to obtain recordings of such events. I think @Hadmut has got experience in the matter.
— NetReaper (@NetReap3r) January 25, 2025
It's not so impossible or difficult in this case, it happens to be something like an online course. Or even several online units.
And that is really stupid stuff. At the beginning, there is a brief look at a formula so that everyone who doesn't know what math is has seen what it looks like. It's not about mathematics - or what of it is supposed to be gender - at all, but it's about the biographies of female mathematicians. It is about female mathematicians being "forgotten" and not being visible enough. It is - as far as I was able to tell - not about mathematics at any point.
Not only is that completely crazy and brainless - it's also counterproductive. To mathematically gifted kids - including girls - this nonsense must act like a deterrent. Who wants to "identify" with some random old silly geese in grandma dresses on ancient black and white photos? If you are forced to look at such pitiful crap, you immediately lose any desire for learning mathematics.
I am - again - noticing something there: The key word is "brainless".
These are herd mechanics.
They have no idea what mathematics is actually about - even though a [female] professor of mathematics is involved, but there are so many [female] professors of computer science who have no idea and shouldn't even be allowed to have a Bachelor's degree in computer science, so why shouldn't there be incompetent [female] professors of the mathematics too? They are looking at it, and also every other discipline, like a social system, like a village community.
This is precisely what I keep describing: They lack something in the brain. Organically or functionally. Abstract rational thinking. They can only think in social mechanics, in herd mechanics (and they can't even do it well or correctly). They can't help but consider MINT subjects to be a social matter because the brain is not capable of anything above that. The problem that I have been describing for years.
There is a figure of speech: If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
And if you only have social functions in the brain, everything looks like a social matter to you.
Gender studies are a brain defect.
That crap is the outcome of trying to learn about the world with a malfunctioning brain that is only good for social mechanics, only herd mechanics. They are blind to everything in mathematics, what math is about. They believe it's a social community dance, because that's all they can know and register.
Gender studies are being conducted almost exclusively by women, and the overwhelming majority of women are pure social machines.
But it would be a mistake to stop there. Because gender studies are just one variant, one special discipline of Marxism borne from corruption, and Marxism is a man's work.
So I'm currently wondering whether this entire leftism, all of Marxism, all this class logic, this capitalist and exploitation thing is generally based on a brain defect and many people who do it can't think rationally, but only in terms of herd mechanics, and whether those things are the attempt to understand the world with a three-fourths brain. Whether Marxists ultimately are a kind of "hole in the brain" self-help group. Whether this entire leftist matter is a mere perception problem.
One key in understanding it could be that leftists aren't, but right-wingers are "conservative". And that it is a known item that [political] leanings are hereditary.
But we know from observing animals, especially apes, that cooperation and solving complex problems are an adjustment to cold and Winter. There are animals - squirrels, crows etc. - who bury food supplies for Winter. They are looking ahead and planning, so they are "conservative" (key word: can of tinned food [German: Konservendose, literally "can of conserved things"]). They studied whether that was just a dumb behavioral mechanism, but they are smarter, they know what they are doing. Crows and ravens notice when they are being watched while burying, that is, risking that the competitor steals their food. But they don't cancel it, but keep pretending like everything is normal, keep burying, and leave - and wait from a distance until the competitor is gone. Then they come back, unearth it, and bury it somewhere else.
The other way around, it is known about animals in countries in which there are no distinct seasons that they just live day by day without any plan. That doesn't necessarily have anything to do with the heat, because elephants follow the leading cow - the one who knows where watering holes are. Planning, intelligence, reason, planned behavior seem to be a - biologically and energetically expensive - trait for adjusting to environments with difficult seasons. Rational, conservative, and cooperative thinking are three different things - but they seem to be based on the same environmental conditions: Winter or dry seasons. Times in which water, food, energy are less abundant and which you can only survive with two strategies: Hibernation or brain.
A central element of leftist thought is others providing for you without you doing any work This paradise, this cophrophagist thought.
I am wondering if all this leftist, Marxist thinking, Marx's theory complex, is based on people who functionally lack certain functions of the brain, and are therefore neither able to think rationally nor possess the ability to plan ahead for Winter or times of hunger, trying to understand the successful model of "conservative in a tough environment", and expect that they are being fed and provided for in a way as if we were in an environment without times of hunger, as if they want the people who work or have supplies to get them into the position as if they lived in a country in which there is new food hanging from the trees every day.
"Yes, you are always speaking of equality and the sharing of goods, but I propose this: suppose we have shared, and I, I save my portion, while you squander yours, what then?"
"Quite simple! Then we shall share again!"
(Kaspar Braun, "The Communists," Fliegende Blätter, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 16, 1845)
I have written a lot about the Communists' expectation of paradise.
Is this paradise ultimately nothing but the subconscious urge in the brain to return to a life environment in which their own genetic behavior is fitting, namely an area in which you have no need to conserve, to plan, to make supplies, but can simply live into the day because there are fruits hanging from the tree every day, like many species of ape do? And is the hate on capitalists and the society of merit ultimately just the rejection of a genetic otherness, herd alienation, because there are people who think rationally and act conservatively, thus have other behaviors, and that is joined by envy and resentment because they presuppose equality, that is, the equal distribution of daily product even without contributing?
Is the fight of "left" against "conservative" ultimately nothing but the fight of those who are adjusted to a paradise situation in a country with permanent warmth and constant food, against those who are adjusted to cold and Winter and therefore think rationally, cooperatively, and conservatively - and, for instance, have developed mathematics and engineering?
