GamerGate - Autistic MRA manchildren and the twitter feminists who love them

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Fulda's Gap said:
It'd be pretty cool if feminists actually got video games taken away.

Obesity epidemic destroyed and MovieBob would find himself without purpose.
Click to expand...

Especially Mario for the toxic masculinity of the franchise and its problematic portrayal of women.
 
Beardfish said:
What would you say if your daughter looked you dead in the eye and asked "daddy, why can't I play as the princess?"

What would you say to the police I mean.
Click to expand...

I'd tell the cop my daughter was a gender-conforming shitlord who doesn't realize that if she was a princess she'd be used as a bargaining chip to further my bloodline and expand my realm. So that's why I sold her.
 
Beardfish said:
What would you say if your daughter looked you dead in the eye and asked "daddy, why can't I play as the princess?"
Click to expand...

Get her a copy of Super Princess Peach or any of the Mario-themed sports games with playable characters.
 
AnOminous said:
Get her a copy of Super Princess Peach or any of the Mario-themed sports games with playable characters.
Click to expand...
To be fair, didn't Super Princess Peach get a bunch of flak because the core gameplay mechanic was all about Peach crying like a weak woman?
 
Fulda's Gap said:
It'd be pretty cool if feminists actually got video games taken away.

Obesity epidemic destroyed and MovieBob would find himself without purpose.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately, there will still be online hugboxes for them to congregate to. Then again, we would have delicious salt.
 
Alec Benson Leary said:
Because they were counting on their followers to care more about their own team scoring a goal than about any actual cause or ideology. And given the number of people who spent 20 years laughing with us at people like Jack Thompson for demonizing video games as misogynist murder tutorials but suddenly developed instant amnesia as soon as Anita took up the role of moral guardian, their gamble wasn't without merit.
Click to expand...

I will never stop mocking Bob Chipman over fucking extolling Anita for the exact same shit he condemned Thompson over.

c-no said:
Unfortunately, there will still be online hugboxes for them to congregate to. Then again, we would have delicious salt.
Click to expand...

We will breach the hugboxes. The salt must flow.
 
Jaimas said:
I don't know, he has a history of fucking himself.
Click to expand...
You know that he is a useless fuck by his constant use of Twitter. This is how you know he isn't doing anything worth a damn. Because if he was, his tweets would've been a lot more sporadic.

This is a common factor with most gaming SJWs btw.
 
Screen Shot 2017-10-10 at 1.49.36 PM.png


OH GOD!

Now we combine two things that shouldn't mix together and has become a future school shooter.

Screencap this comment in case it came to fruition.

I wish I was wrong about these things? But weird things have happened before.

So? Seven years bad luck.....
 
Alec Benson Leary said:
To be fair, didn't Super Princess Peach get a bunch of flak because the core gameplay mechanic was all about Peach crying like a weak woman?
Click to expand...

I have a theory about it that'd Id' like you to share your thoughts on, I might be completely wrong but I'd like input.

I think Feminists.... actually most people, in general, don't view Womens strengths, as strengths. Let me elaborate. Masculine traits are typically measureable and objective, power, speed, reaction times, accuracy. Feminine traits are typically not measureable, more intangible and subjective, beauty, patience, caring, social awareness and manipulation. It's why some of the greatest spies in history were Women. They would be able to get in and out of a Fortress guarded by a thousand men that no man alone could match. Women being viewed as weak, as not physically threatening, is one of their strengths in a way.

Princess Peach crying as an ability in a videogame is like a crude representation of the power of femininity, just as Mario jumping on someones head is a crude representation of masculinity. Both will defeat an enemy, the end result is the same.

But for some reason, people in general don't view that as effective, and many Women and most Feminists, don't view their own strengths as strengths, they are effectively comparing women to men, but at the same time pretending they are men.

You look around and see things Men have typically built or invented, tangible things, houses, cars, weapons, etc. But you try to look for the things Women have power over? They are there, but they are invisible, intangible, in the fabric of society. Sex appeal, trends, networking, tradition, deciding how the next generation should be raised. The old saying "The power behind the throne" is a good descriptor. The Queen could artfully orchestrate and discover things that the King would never be able to do or discover, due to his visiblity overt power and prominence. Like the Queen on a Chess Board. Men hold many of the most powerful positions in the world, yet it is mostly Women who decide how the wealth of the world is spent.

I think a lot of people, including Women themselves, don't realize the power they have over society and civilization, not overt and tangible like Men, but subtle and invisible.

This turned into a kind of philosophical rant, sorry. But does anyone get where I'm coming from? Does the theory make sense? Or am I just talking out my ass over here?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom