GamerGate - Autistic MRA manchildren and the twitter feminists who love them

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
After all these years I'm still not sure if Thunderf00t/Thunderfoot was ever part of Gamergate, I searched this thread and found a single tweet that might be supportive, but might be sarcastic as well. Someone I asked off-site said he was briefly, but but I don't know what that means and his memory was fuzzy. Any thoughts?
 
After all these years I'm still not sure if Thunderf00t/Thunderfoot was ever part of Gamergate, I searched this thread and found a single tweet that might be supportive, but might be sarcastic as well. Someone I asked off-site said he was briefly, but but I don't know what that means and his memory was fuzzy. Any thoughts?
I think he criticized Anita Sarkeesian, which depending on how you defined GamerGate made him a part of it.

People that considered GamerGate to just be people talking about a funny story of how dishonest game journos were would think Thunder was essentially pro-GamerGate, but if they thought of it as the start of a political movement to destroy the libtards then Thunder had nothing to do with it.
 
Anyone who thinks goobergrape was anything other than an autistic spat at this point is literally retarded. The kind of people who still bring it up in the fake news literally mark themselves as retarded when they blame everything from Trump getting elected to Putin invading the Ukraine as somehow proof of goobergrape controlling everything even more than the Jews control Hollywood.
 
View attachment 3736333
Twitter / https://archive.ph/QChRh

The consensus of the replies is... "nope."
I'm pretty sure I've mentioned this elsewhere in the thread, but I think GG did achieve something for a decent number of people, including myself; it opened their eyes to just how casually and effortlessly the media will repeat obvious lies from bad actors or just make up baldfaced lies itself. It forced me to become a lot more critical of the media, because if they could lie in such great volume about me and my hobby, who and what else is it lying about?
 
Journoscum briefly lost control of the narrative eight years ago, and shat their pants right before their supposed audience. They are still seething almost a decade later about being found out, even though they could make the story go away by just not touching it. Instead, they just doubled down, and have done additional damage to their own credibility. It is a rash that still itches. Not bad for an autistic Internet spat.
 
This seems to be getting no press mentions of any kind that I can see. TBH I didn't even know what the hell Nebula TV was until I saw this. $4.99 a month for educational programming. Including Queen Anita, apparently.

edit: Twitter / https://archive.ph/RLAmT

1666050138606.png

Local version:
 
This seems to be getting no press mentions of any kind that I can see. TBH I didn't even know what the hell Nebula TV was until I saw this. $4.99 a month for educational programming. Including Queen Anita, apparently.

edit: Twitter / https://archive.ph/RLAmT

View attachment 3745608

Local version:
View attachment 3745610
>all that stuff normal people heard of and forgot about
> OH AND GAMERGATE!!11

besides, it doesn't even fit the format because "that time when" is right now because journos and twittertards still can't fucking shut up about it
 
"I want my twitters followers to know I have been jacked-off to, thank you very much".
View attachment 3755782

Man, if this doesn't reek of desperate attention-whoring, then what does?

Anyone who still actively cares about GamerGate in any way, shape, or form in 2022 is either an idiot, a grifter, or some mix of the two.
 
"I want my twitters followers to know I have been jacked-off to, thank you very much".
There's nothing new about that, it goes all the way back to early 4chan and probably earlier than that. I think 4chan invented the name. Yes it's gross, no it's not new.
 
Wired / Archive
Anita Sarkeesian Hates Talking About Gamergate—But She Has To

A decade ago, she was the target of a harassment campaign for her feminist critiques of video games. With That Time When, she can put it behind her.

1668115474617.png
If you’d like to debate Anita Sarkeesian about whether or not male privilege exists, we’ll make this easy for you: She’s not interested. It’s been a decade since her groundbreaking web series, Tropes vs. Women in Video Games, kicked off a firestorm of discussion and criticism around the treatment of female characters. It’s been almost as long since Sarkeesian found herself in the eye of the Gamergate storm, where she faced an onslaught of harassment for her efforts.

If it were up to her, she’d never speak about any of it again. Problem is, she has to.
That’s because, for Sarkeesian, historical context is important. She hears echoes of Gamergate in modern online harassment and disinformation campaigns, and to not point out those similarities would be remiss. Her new series, That Time When, is a map to the crossroads between pop culture and politics. Over its nine episodes she covers everything from Star Trek to the Satanic Panic of the 1980s, which she investigates in this week’s episode. But it culminates with Gamergate, even if it’s a period Sarkeesian would like to never revisit. “I didn’t just live through this history, I was part of this history,” she says. “I’m really tired of talking about it.”

Hollywood, video games, TV—lots of industries have evolved in the past decade. So have the politics of the day. People now understand media representation better than they did before. But there has also been fallout, like when Obi-Wan Kenobi star Moses Ingram started receiving racist messages on social media following the show’s launch, or when Kiki Farms users organized stalking campaigns. These things have precedents. “Moments when pop culture and politics collide are about regressive, puritanical control over women’s bodies, over culture, over challenges to the status quo or perceived progressive shifts,” Sarkeesian says. That Time When, like Tropes—like all of her work—aims to make those connections.
Much of That Time When, which is currently running on streaming service Nebula, focuses on the past few decades, but one episode goes back to the early 1900s and the movies of filmmaker Lois Weber. There’s an episode dedicated to the Chicks (formerly the Dixie Chicks) getting canceled, one on racial politics and the impact of Star Trek on Black public figures. There’s even one on another famous “-gate”—Nipplegate, when Janet Jackson’s breast was temporarily exposed during a Super Bowl halftime performance.


One installment, about the panic that ensued when Ellen DeGeneres came out on her primetime TV show, features rhetoric that is eerily reminiscent of what’s going around in the debate over trans rights. Same goes for the talking points around “traditional” family values and reproductive rights that surfaced when TV character Murphy Brown became a single mother in the early ’90s.
Even so-called cancel culture isn’t new, but rather a tactic long weaponized by the right, Sarkeesian notes. She points to the episode in her series focused on the Chicks. In 2003, at a show in London, lead singer Natalie Maines voiced her opposition to the Iraq War, a statement that got the band blacklisted for years. What makes that episode important, Sarkeesian says, is the recognition that the term “cancel culture” is itself “manufactured and perpetuated by the right” to discredit progress on the left.

The point is to show that while these cultural moments remain different, they’re also cyclical. Knowing that can help people anticipate the next wave, although Sarkeesian warns those tides are more rapid now because of the speed of social media and internet discourse. That the series closes with Gamergate—a culture war that shaped the modern playbook for harassment and online disinformation campaigns, and even paved the way for political figures pivotal to Donald Trump’s presidency—feels inevitable.

The episode was challenging for Sarkeesian, but also proves her point about history repeating itself. “The strategies that they used to attack us got integrated into a political campaign and have become a kind of baseline for how online attacks happen,” she says. “I think Gamergate is an incredibly notable thing on its own. It’s a part of our understanding of how internet culture exists, how communities form and what they form around.”

Unlike the other episodes in the series, the Gamergate episode is one Sarkeesian has personal experience with. After her Kickstarter campaign to fund Tropes launched in 2012, her examination of the treatment of women characters in games made her a lightning rod, a feminist bogeyman “ruining” video games with her pesky critiques.

When Gamergate was at its peak a couple years later, Sarkeesian was a constant target of threats and harassment. It’s easy to understand why she doesn’t want to relive it. But she also hopes doing so can give a chapter in her life an ending. “This feels a little bit like a wrap-up of all the work I’ve been doing into this package for people, so I can say, ‘Here is my take on this, this is what you get. Stop asking me about it,’” she says. A true season finale.
 
I'm sure she totally hates talking about the only reason anyone even gives a shit that she exists.
 
Ancient skeletonized bitch is not only still on goobergrape but even uses way out of date SJW may-may "unpack." Get with the times granny!
Thanks to Anita Sarkeesian bringing up GamerGate and the woke Netflix Witcher staff smearing Henry Cavill as a GamerGater, it got even worse. GamerGate is now trending on Twitter!
1671323694256.png
 
Back
Top Bottom