🎭 Dramacow Gamergate / Depression Quest Shitstorm

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
This event is going to be something that people are going to look back on and go:

 
God, we may well be living in a moment of internet history if this truly does go "biblical" as promised last week

How is it that after 14 FCKING YEARS of this sort of internet shit happening, do people still think they can "shame" or "bully" a group into shutting up?!
 
God, we may well be living in a moment of internet history if this truly does go "biblical" as promised last week

How is it that after 14 FCKING YEARS of this sort of internet shit happening, do people still think they can "shame" or "bully" a group into shutting up?!

Because every group of tweens that come up think they're the most smrtest people in the universe and because slimy journos thought they were invulnerable.
 
God, we may well be living in a moment of internet history if this truly does go "biblical" as promised last week

How is it that after 14 FCKING YEARS of this sort of internet shit happening, do people still think they can "shame" or "bully" a group into shutting up?!

Because historically, it's what they've always done. They think it'll still work now, as the card house is crumbling.

They're wrong.
 
Oh very shitty, to use a dead man to generalise a whole movement with a legit concern just because they don't agree with you is quite possibly the lowest thing I've seen so far in this whole debacle.
you clearly havnt seen "tweetlikenotyourshield" where anti gamergate decided to fully embrace misogyny and racism to attack female and minority gamergate folk

that said what todd did was ultra sickening.
 
1zzCEAJ.png
I learned that Wu gets her graphs from a site called Keyhole.co, and they only take a small sample - 500 or so - of the hashtag you enter. If you want a larger sample, you have to pay $50+.

I made a graph too.

graphs.png


So if all PC users are bots...
 
Well hes a shitty excuse for a reviewer

Still, I would say TGWTG having a policy of "Just dont talk about it till its over" is a pretty sane policy, and one which would have been far better at keeping GamerGate from growing so fast than the current policy many have of "drown the fire in gasoline"

Seems to be what guys like Phelous are doing, to my knowlege, just pretending nothing's going on. Didn't see anything one way or the other with Spoony either (though given he's still got "gamer" as a label on twitter, we can take a guess) which really is the best decision business-wise.
 
Actually it proves Pac Man is the source of all gaming misogyny.
Goddamn it, Lord of Fire Giants, I should not have laughed at that as hard as I did.

Seems to be what guys like Phelous are doing, to my knowlege, just pretending nothing's going on. Didn't see anything one way or the other with Spoony either (though given he's still got "gamer" as a label on twitter, we can take a guess) which really is the best decision business-wise.

That actually reminds me: a friend of me asked why so many gaming critics and the like are either silent on or turning against Gamergate, including a lot of critics normally known for being die-hard consumer activists. Having done some research, I've come to the conclusion that a lot of them have little choice. Game devs, ironically, are innocent in this, but such is not the case for PR personnel and those responsible for bookings. A lot of people who would otherwise be on Gamergate's side can't afford to take sides, or, if they do, will side with the opposition because they essentially have to in order to keep their career going.

If this sounds familiar, it's because that's what happened with Boogie.

Bear in mind that someone as non-biased as Boogie has taken an inordinate amount of so-called SJW flak for merely hinting that GG might not be great Satan. You'd better believe that a lot of so-called SJW-allied PR firms, blogrings, and more are wringing their hands trying to find ways to force more and more people to parrot their attack lines, and they've gotten a great deal of them down through threats and coersion, if not outright blackmail. Remember that thread to DailyKos I linked earlier? Even when people punched holes a mile wide in the talking points, they kept marching forward, screaming how any damage done to themselves was irrelevant so long as the objective was done.

One must also bear in mind that there's a lot of people there who either aren't informed or mis-informed. For these people, just give it time - the true colors of all involved will inevitably shine through, and then, we'll know where the true loyalties lie. I just saw it happen on DailyKos with someone who got my back and was previously anti-GG until the vitriol caused him to leave their side in disgust.
 
Last edited:
Found this while lurking

Here's another image of a goon gloating in a thread that had been gas about how they go Anita on NYT


Now there has been talk since the early days of this that FYAD has been behind a lot of this with them raiding 4chan before SJWs took over and were responsible from some of the twitter harassment and from my time on SA I can tell you that it's a cesspit of SJWs and nothing but a massive circle jerk where if you have a dissenting opinion different from the mod's your fucked.
Because the pro-Gamergate side has been nothing but tolerant and willing to listen? SA may be full of cunts but it's not like everyone pro-Gamergate voice has been super cool.
 
Because the pro-Gamergate side has been nothing but tolerant and willing to listen? SA may be full of cunts but it's not like everyone pro-Gamergate voice has been super cool.

And yet I've haven't seen anyone banned simply for being anti-GG.
 
That actually reminds me: a friend of me asked why so many gaming critics and the like are either silent on or turning against Gamergate, including a lot of critics normally known for being die-hard consumer activists. Having done some research, I've come to the conclusion that a lot of them have little choice. Game devs, ironically, are innocent in this, but such is not the case for PR personnel and those responsible for bookings. A lot of people who would otherwise be on Gamergate's side can't afford to take sides, or, if they do, will side with the opposition because they essentially have to in order to keep their career going.

It's funny you mention that, because I just read the most interesting of articles.

http://blogjob.com/oneangrygamer/20...ay-we-are-journalists-says-destructoid-owner/

According to this journalist, people in high up positions on gaming websites colluded to blackball a writer who supported gamergate from being able to be hired. Now, this heavily involves Destructoid who are trying to claim that none of that is true because they are innocent bloggers run out of some guys kitchen and anyway that's just an industry trade forum where professionals network.

The writer who was fired resided in Florida, where this is considered "conspiring" and is legally a very bad thing.

So there you go, journalists are illegally being blackballed from their industry for speaking against the wishes of their conspiring masters.
 
So I just saw an 8Chan thread about a Christian review site that ACTUALLY SEPARATES THE OBJECTIVE FROM THE SUBJECTIVE.
https://www.christcenteredgamer.com/index.php/reviews/18-computer/5587-gone-home
https://www.christcenteredgamer.com/index.php/reviews/47-handhelds/vita/5582-dragon-s-crown-vita
THEY'RE BETTER THAN MOST GAME JOURNALISTS.
THEY'RE CHRISTIANS THAT AREN'T DECRYING GAMES FOR BEING MORALLY WRONG IN THEIR EYES.
THEY ACTUALLY ENGAGED WITH THIS GUY IN CONVERSATION INSTEAD OF BANNING HIM.

WHAT THE FUCK.
I read both those links and I must say, they are better than game journos and they don't really let their beliefs get in the way (i.e. Gone Home reviewer says the game is pretty much like those cliched high-school romances). Is it wrong if I said these people are what these game journo's should be like in terms of reviewing a game, especially when it comes to engaging those who don't agree??

How deeper is the rabbit hole? Did they get a visit from any anti-GG?

Actually it proves Pac Man is the source of all gaming misogyny.
Would she also try to prove Mrs. Pacman is submission to the Patriarchy?
 
So a pro-GG guy got doxxed, but he was able to figure out that a 16 year-old girl did it so he phoned her.

UBnJSkL.png

http://hokuto-ju-no-ken.tumblr.com/post/99774092444/well-that-was-a-surprisingly-real-phonecall

This breaks my heart. She's just a misguided girl that wants to fit in, and the SJW crowd is making her think that to be a "good feminist" she needs to hurt people. It's horrifying that so many young people are being taught that this is okay. Social Justice is truly toxic. I really hope that the talk she had with the pro-GG guy helps to set her straight.

I read both those links and I must say, they are better than game journos and they don't really let their beliefs get in the way (i.e. Gone Home reviewer says the game is pretty much like those cliched high-school romances). Is it wrong if I said these people are what these game journo's should be like in terms of reviewing a game, especially when it comes to engaging those who don't agree??
How is that wrong at all? Everyone's thinking it.

How deeper is the rabbit hole? Did they get a visit from any anti-GG?
No, but they found the 8chan thread talking about them and actually started posting in it. It went better than you'd probably expect.
I'm guessing the anti-GGs will find them soon enough though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom