🎭 Dramacow Gamergate / Depression Quest Shitstorm

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jaimas said:
And now for more stupid, starring another asshole who missed the point so hard that it flew off the set, burrowed through a wall, and signed onto a Mel Brooks movie.

From Cracked, which has become increasingly shit, we have this lovely article of "Seven Ways Gamergate Proves Humanity is Doomed."

So right out the gate, we're going into the realm of open clickbaiting, but to provide you all with the faggotry-free version, his "arguments" are summed up thus, and an immediate counter-argument, because Luke McKinney's a fucking toolbox. Enjoy!
7. He dismisses the entire affair as "An Ex-Boyfriend's Revenge."
Those familiar with this bit of flaming stupid know that Zoe Quinn and whom she may or may not have fucked hasn't been relevant to Gamergate itself in a while.
6. He whines that there's gamergate porn, citing the porn of Vivian James.
Rule 34 says you're a fucking moron, Luke. He also chooses to ignore that there's porn of Zoe Quinn, Maya Kramer, et al.

5. He brings up that a Gamergate attempt to help push for actual coverage in journalism got screwed because of a corrupt lawyer that took the money and ran.
Yes, because that totes was the fault of Gamergate itself and not the actions of one dickmongler of a legal professional. How fortunate for the internets that keen-eyed eagles like Luke McKinney stand vigil over her tubes.

4. He dismisses the entire movement as a bunch of childish dicks and claims that most arguments for gamergate are sockpuppetry.
Yes, because we're totally the ones that have been trying to actively silence any and all discussion on this issue.

3. He bitches because one of the sides is predominantly made up of So-called SJWs, and thus everyone opposing them is wrong by default.
So hey, how are you enjoying the movement that's already doxxed kids, got some guy who stood up for not being used as the internet equivalent of a human shield fired, and have tried to do that to several others, asshole? How many times have they compared people who dared to fucking have an opinion contrary to their own as terrorists, racists, misogynists, and worse before the utter lack of similarity between your average so-called SJW and actual legitimate social justice is discussed?

2. He claims no corruption ever happened, and to shut the fuck up about it.
This one is unusual - he gives no evidence, links, or information to support this claim - just some pictures of unicorns. He claims that a corrupt game review for a game he never specifies for a reason he never specifies never happened, and seemingly seems to want us to just accept that with no information given whatsoever. He then, appropos of nothing, spews out this bit of utter lunacy.



We've investigated fucking lolcows with more coherent logic than this motherfucker.

1. He claims that Gamergate's the wrong banner for the movement, and then likens everyone under it to followers of Sauron.
.....I really have nothing to add here. He seriously says this.

And throws more insults, with the good taste and respect we've come to expect from Luke by now:



In conclusion, Cracked has gone off the fucking deep end harder than that asshole that mainlined Bath Salts and wrecked a Wal-Mart a few months back.
Click to expand...
The guy who wrote it, Luke McKinney, is a long time SJW. He's the same guy who wrote the "sexist superhero costumes" article.
 
spaps said:
Since when have SJWs ever given half a a flying fuck about equality?
Click to expand...

When people complain about (insert movement here) just being a thinly vieled hate movement. They'll scream "IT'S FOR EQUALITY LOOK AT THE DICTIONARY SHITLORD".

Basically they care about equality only when it can derail them being called out on not caring about equality.
 
Yeah, I know I am late on this but when it comes to ZQ posting about how she totally had nothing to do with doxing TFYC and how she even supports the movement, its her stirring shit again. Trying to be relevent. Theres a reason why its no longer called the Quinnspiracy in anything but jest - It has surpassed Quinn. Its no longer about her. Her input was lighting the powder keg.

Wait hold on son I aint done yet! I also want to note how incredibly immature these people are. It kinda pisses me off to be honest. Quinns avatar was for the longest time Myspace Tom. Why? Because its IRRRONIC!1 and sure to piss off THE EVIL MYSOGONERDS into harrassing her. Or how about her totally-not-PR-Agent who she totally did not sleep with having the name Legobutts? Because like, butts are funny, amirite?

As for TVTropes locking down gamergate discussion? Honestly, I am not surprised. A few IRC Channels I fequent ban discussion on it not because they are wrapped up in the evil SJW parasitic virus (oh no!) but because they dont want to talk about it and would gladly reffer you to places that do talk about it! So have no idea if TVtropes banned discussion because they are part of the SJW conspiracy o noes or if they dont want to talk about it because (like all volitile subjects) it has the tendancy to slip into places where it really doesnt belong... And I really dont care.
 
TV Tropes likes to maintain an illusion of nerd-utopia, where everyone is friendly towards everyone else and criticism never exists. Discussion on any contentious issues is not going to last there.
 
Mechanism Eight said:
This is more than likely.

In essence, they've wormed their ways into a whole bunch of sites like completely unaware sleeper agents, and now, their time is at hand.
Click to expand...

I was actually thinking that Fast Eddie and/or Frieghter were long-time SJWs before the Gamergate explosion even existed. Hence why there's no more fan fiction page on the "So Bad, It's Horrible" section of the site and that damned "No Negativity" rule.

Also, apologies for the off-topicness of this discussion. It's just I'm kinda surprised they cracked down on this considering that the horrible shit they talk about on a daily basis.
 
Last edited:
Jewelsmakerguy said:
I was actually thinking that Fast Eddie and/or Frieghter were long-time SJWs before the Gamergate explosion even existed.
Click to expand...

Fast Eddie and Fighteers are douchebags, but they are hardly SJWs at all; indeed SJWs are doomed to have very short lifespans in TV Tropes because 1) the mods hate drama whores and 2) the mods associate SJW types with Something Awful (and here I think they are quite justified), which they have a seething hatred against. The only type of SJW-like animals that survive in TV Tropes are weeaboos who think everything from Glorious Nippon are beyond judgment. It is not that the mods gave them special leeway; it is just that during their long history in TV Tropes, they have learned to game the system so that the mods ban their opponents instead of them.

As for the kibosh on "So Bad It's Horrible", it is just Fast Eddie's adversion to criticism, nothing more.
 
Last edited:
Positron said:
Fast Eddie and Fighteers are douchebags, but they are hardly SJWs at all; indeed SJWs are doomed to have very short lifespans in TV Tropes because 1) the mods hate drama whores and 2) the mod associate SJW types with Something Awful (and I think they are probably justified), which they have a seething hatred against.

The only type of SJW-like animals that survive in TV Tropes are weeaboos who thinks everything from Glorious Nippon are beyond judgment.
Click to expand...
But aren't FE and the mods themselves drama whores? Didn't Eddie get pissed at the lack of ad revenue once and went on the whole "No negativity because it hurts my feels" crusade all because of that?

Or was that due to the pages talking about the loli and shota shit?
 
Jewelsmakerguy said:
But aren't FE and the mods themselves drama whores?
Click to expand...

Fighteer, yes (and he is completely unaware of that); Fast Eddie, not so sure. He is more a dictator type who just clamp down on shit and does as little talking as possible.

Jewelsmakerguy said:
Didn't Eddie get pissed at the lack of ad revenue once and went on the whole "No negativity because it hurts my feels" crusade all because of that?

Or was that due to the pages talking about the loli and shota shit?
Click to expand...

The "no negativity" thing is purely Fast Eddie's own obsession; it has nothing to do with any social issues. The ad revenue is an altogether separate issue (Google does not like to send ads to pages that contain porn or worse, FE did what he had to and weeded out the offending pages, site-wise uproar). Although the instigators of what they called "The Google Incident" were SJWs from Something Awful, the site-purge itself had little to do with SJW issues (except the removal of rape-related tropes: TV Tropes subsequently got flakes from feminist circles for removing rape tropes, because feminists think rapes in media should be openly discussed)
 
Positron said:
Fighteer, yes (and he is completely unaware of that); Fast Eddie, not so sure. He is more a dictator type who just clamp down on shit and does as little talking as possible.



The "no negativity" thing is purely Fast Eddie's own obsession; it has nothing to do with any social issues. The ad revenue is an altogether separate issue (Google does not like to send ads to pages that contain porn or worse, FE did what he had to and weeded out the offending pages, site-wise uproar). Although the instigators of what they called "The Google Incident" were SJWs from Something Awful, the site-purge itself had little to do with SJW issues (except the removal of rape-related tropes: TV Tropes subsequently got flakes from feminist circles for removing rape tropes, because feminists think rapes in media should be openly discussed)
Click to expand...
Yeah, I never really followed that shit (since the forums are scummy, SJW influence of not). But I did read about it on ED. But I seriously doubt Google would pull their advertising if the negative stuff were to remain.
 

DiGRA stuff.

SYNOPSIS: Basically, DiGRA had few members openly feminist, and most of them were legitimate academics. This changed as every few years more feminists were voted in and in positions with more power, to the point where we currently have a 7-4 ratio of feminists/academics [who may agree with their views]. The newer feminists have more radical points of view, including a study of 'gendered semiotics in food'.

That's shorthand for 'how is food sexist'.
 
Last edited:
A Random said:
Basically, DiGRA had few members openly feminist, and most of them were legitimate academics. This changed as every few years more feminists were voted in and in positions with more power, to the point where we currently have a 7-4 ratio of feminists/academics [who may agree with their views]. The newer feminists have more radical points of view, including a study of 'gendered semiotics in food'.

That's shorthand for 'how is food sexist'.
Click to expand...

I knew they'd worm their way in and destroy everything from the inside out. That's what these people do. Hell, I'd be legitimately surprised if they actually do anything other than work their way into things and turn them to shit at this point.

Burn everything. Burn everything to the fucking ground. That's the only way to get rid of these filthy worms...
 
A Random said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=28D6_8KuIpc
DiGRA stuff.

SYNOPSIS: Basically, DiGRA had few members openly feminist, and most of them were legitimate academics. This changed as every few years more feminists were voted in and in positions with more power, to the point where we currently have a 7-4 ratio of feminists/academics [who may agree with their views]. The newer feminists have more radical points of view, including a study of 'gendered semiotics in food'.

That's shorthand for 'how is food sexist'.
Click to expand...

Wait. I've heard of DiGRA before from work. Aren't these the idiots arguing for less peer review in scientific journals? The fuck are they doing with any of this?
 
Got connected thanks to Zoe Quinn, what else?

CORRECTION: they seem to be more connected to the Mailing List. I just confused them with Maya Kramer's group.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom