🦊 Furry Furry Convention Drama - Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
KrabFish said:
He might not have a government job for long, it's only a matter of time before his HR or some co worker he pisses off comes across all this

There was unconfirmed reports he's mostly living off of trust funds, true or not, he seems to set himself up for so much expensive legal repercussion
Click to expand...

if you're waiting for them to fire him because he retweets things about antifa then you're going to keep waiting for a long ass time

And he's not going to piss off a coworker because he's not stupid. He blends in like every other number crunching autist engineer that needs extreme taboo fetishes to feel like they exist because they're too broken to form normal fucking attachments.

Edit: I just don't care about his activist role playing on twitter. He has skeletons in his closet just like every other lifestyler and that's what he should be nailed on, if those skeletons happen to be dogs, kids, or anything else fucked up abusive or enabling those things.
 
Last edited:
Chipfoxx is good at skirting the law and playing innocent, but the reality is;

His ANTIFA posts, affiliations, and extremist views are documented
His zoo-pedo acts are documented
His racebaiting and blacklisting / blackmailing are documented
His employment history, face, residences are doxxed
His incessant labeling of anyone he doesnt like as "racest" posted online every day are archived

If he tries to play normie, he's doing a bad job at it online. One slip up at work and the government will know , if not already.

He allegidly lost his clearance at his prior job for being associated with antifa, I think it was at the space engineering job he boasts a lot online all the time. He doesn't seem to be someone who learns from his mistakes, or his emotions get the better of him all too often
 
KrabFish said:
Chipfoxx is good at skirting the law and playing innocent, but the reality is;

His ANTIFA posts, affiliations, and extremist views are documented
His zoo-pedo acts are documented
His racebaiting and blacklisting / blackmailing are documented
His employment history, face, residences are doxxed
His incessant labeling of anyone he doesnt like as "racest" posted online every day are archived

If he tries to play normie, he's doing a bad job at it online. One slip up at work and the government will know , if not already.

He allegidly lost his clearance at his prior job for being associated with antifa, I think it was at the space engineering job he boasts a lot online all the time. He doesn't seem to be someone who learns from his mistakes, or his emotions get the better of him all too often
Click to expand...

The government or whoever he's working for now (I've never heard he was fired from his air/space systems contract) do not care he posts antifa shit (You probably do, tho)
Zoo? Probably. Probably the "non offender" camp. Pedo? Wouldn't surprise me, but I haven't seen anything concrete.
Racebaiting?
I don't care about his dox
and, yeah, he's a garden variety performative neolib who speaks to an already agreeing crowd while they lift him up for his perceived success and access to a lifestyle they wish they had. Ask him how he engages offline or which communities/institutions he works with on those views and you're not going to get an answer. "Oh we raised money for an animal shelter at the last convention I RAN"

He's a bad actor and with his platform he creates space in a niche subculture that's more prone to abuse, personality cults, grooming and...just unhealthy shit that gets hyperfocused on by socially and emotionally limited people. And if he really is into abusive, evil shit in private like it seems, he'll probably fucking get away with it.

It's wrestling pigs in mud.
 
Yeah, anyone who thinks Chipfoxx is going to get nailed for anything he's said/done in social media is being extremely :optimistic:.

There has to be some sort of leak of concrete evidence of seriously illegal actions. Since that hasn't happened yet, any commentary about the guy is unfortunately just wishful thinking.
 
I haven't seen much concrete on Chipfoxx 's zoo/ pedo either, much of it is circumstantial or heresay.

The ANTIFA and doxxing, along with blackmailing cons is documented.

(Warning, long read)

He seems to target organizations and the rapsheet is massive. Government job positions are cozy and any co worker who wants his position can easilly find this.

He's probably doing all he can to hide amd protect it but at the same time his "defense force" of austsie troonies is probably working against him.
 
KrabFish said:
I haven't seen much concrete on Chipfoxx 's zoo/ pedo either, much of it is circumstantial or heresay.

The ANTIFA and doxxing, along with blackmailing cons is documented.

(Warning, long read)

He seems to target organizations and the rapsheet is massive. Government job positions are cozy and any co worker who wants his position can easilly find this.

He's probably doing all he can to hide amd protect it but at the same time his "defense force" of austsie troonies is probably working against him.
Click to expand...
You're starting to sound like that gigantic sped Athena who's been bouncing up and down on Chip's cock for the last month or so. Why don't you go back to Twitter and stay there? Your tactics are annoying and don't do shit aside from making anyone with valid criticism against Chip look bad.
 
Circumstantial evidence includes documented evidence, but its connection is not as direct. It's still legally admissible.


Other people claimed they witnessed (eg) Chipfoxx zoo pedo shit.

They documented it, its not direct, but circumstantial.

Further reading

Circumstantial vs Direct Evidence

Simple explanation of circumstantial and direct evidence, and their differences. Are they equally reliable?
www.criminallawconsulting.com

 
KrabFish said:
Circumstantial evidence includes documented evidence, but its connection is not as direct. It's still legally admissible.


Other people claimed they witnessed (eg) Chipfoxx zoo pedo shit.

They documented it, its not direct, but circumstantial.

Further reading

Circumstantial vs Direct Evidence

Simple explanation of circumstantial and direct evidence, and their differences. Are they equally reliable?
www.criminallawconsulting.com

Click to expand...
Then why not post screenshots of the people claiming he did that shit you fucking sped? No one gives a shit about legality. We just want to see the sauce.
 
KrabFish said:
Circumstantial evidence includes documented evidence, but its connection is not as direct. It's still legally admissible.


Other people claimed they witnessed (eg) Chipfoxx zoo pedo shit.

They documented it, its not direct, but circumstantial.
Click to expand...

I knew it was you. Hi Athena! I'm your biggest fan!

So, around here, one of the rules is that you don't do gay ops by going off site to fuck with a cow. Didn't expect the cow to come here and do gay ops though.

You probably should have tried to hide a little bit better though. The fact that you showed up here and went balls out with going after Chipfoxx was kind of suspicious. Then the fact that you couldn't resist showing up in the Moms Demand Action thread was a dead fucking giveaway. Just take a look at your posting history: https://kiwifarms.net/search/3826529/

Then of course, there's the Twitter corroboration that you just LOVE trying to harass them:

And I know you used that Legal Dictionary link on your @thefoxygoddess Twitter account, but boohoo...Twitter suspended that account so I can't provide the evidence.

You're not fooling anyone. Get the fuck out of here and run back to Twitter so you can keep tweeting the same inane bullshit to your 6 followers.
 
KrabFish said:
Circumstantial evidence includes documented evidence, but its connection is not as direct. It's still legally admissible.


Other people claimed they witnessed (eg) Chipfoxx zoo pedo shit.

They documented it, its not direct, but circumstantial.

Further reading

Circumstantial vs Direct Evidence

Simple explanation of circumstantial and direct evidence, and their differences. Are they equally reliable?
www.criminallawconsulting.com

Click to expand...
Fucking kill yourself you stupid nigger.
 
KrabFish said:
What justice? I don't give a fuck, I'm just here to watch the paranoia shit show.
Click to expand...

I want you to realize that this is about in covering actual wrongdoing, abusive behavior, grooming, and anything else that poses a threat of harm to kids, animals, or adults.

Rumormongering based on conjecture and not hard facts muddies the water and helps abusers get away with it.

This isn't about destroying his social media rep, it's about exposing him if he's an abuser.

You need to reevaluate your approach. I've had to in the past as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom