For real. I remember people saying some dude had it as a tattoo or something and then immediately forgot about it afterwards. Though I don't think the artist was making that as a joke. I think he intended some sort of scathing satire by saying that with harmless outlets for their sexual desires, pedos will be less likely to diddle kids. While I can't really disagree with that, I've already said why his comic doesn't work in that in-universe, child sex crimes go down because child sex crimes were committed, recorded, and distributed, which in and of itself is a crime. He thinks he's on the level of master satirists like the Dead Kennedys when his argument doesn't even make sense within the laws of the world he's presented. He should have had them drawing or animating shota or loli porn or something and then say that child sex crime rates went down similarly to how sexual assault rates went down as regular pornography became legal. That's how you construct an argument on something as controversial as that. You don't say that irl cp will make child sex crimes go down because irl cp is a sex crime itself. If he was arguing why fake, drawn stuff shouldn't be illegal, I can understand the argument, but the way it's presented seems like he's saying that without irl cp being legal kids are gonna get raped more often without their consent. If he actually means this and not the more optimistic alternative interpretation that he botched, that he doesn't seem to understand why children cannot consent to sex with adults.
Glad to hear that she continues to live a fruitful life. Is she still performing songs about pissing herself?