Ford Taurus SHO (Super High Output)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Owned a second-generation SHO. Ran like a wet dream. Women liked it, too. In 1994 220 horsepower was pretty good. Later generations not that great.



The Ford Taurus SHO: History, Generations, Differences
All things Ford Taurus SHO on Automobile.

Fourth Gen Ford Taurus SHO 4
Fourth Gen Ford Taurus SHO 4

SEE ALL 29 PHOTOS

Conner GoldenWriter

May 19, 2020
1590005820607.jpeg

Ford Taurus SHO Essential History
Today, telling someone you own a Ford Taurus is a bit like forcing someone to slip on a pair of cold, wet socks. The past three generations of Ford's now-discontinued bread-and-butter mid-to-full-size sedan have been anything but cool, so it's easy to forget that when the Taurus launched in the 1986 model year, the smooth, form-fitting design proved both revolutionary and extremely popular, eventually moving over one million units in just three years.

Ford Taurus SHO: Yamaha V-6 Collaboration
Ford couldn't make enough of them to meet demand. Riding this success, Ford saw opportunity to position a performance variant of the Taurus at the top of model hierarchy, and subsequently cut a deal with Yamaha to develop an upgraded version of its staid Vulcan V-6 for the new performance Taurus called the Super High Output—or SHO. The resulting 3.0-liter V-6 was impressively stout and advanced for the era, with an iron block and aluminum heads, 24 valves, dual overhead cams, and a fascinating variable-length intake manifold that looks like a cluster of loosely organized snakes sitting atop the engine.

Ford Taurus SHO Power & Performance
First Gen Ford Taurus SHO 4
First Gen Ford Taurus SHO 4

SEE ALL 29 PHOTOS

Power was contemporaneously strong, with 220 hp and 200 lb-ft of torque on tap through a Mazda-designed five-speed manual transmission. During testing, the engine proved capable and durable enough for an 8,000 rpm redline, but driveline accessories reportedly couldn't handle this extra engine speed, so the redline was capped at 7,000 rpm. Performance was strong, with zero-60 mph taking 6.6 seconds and topping out at 143 mph.

Ford Taurus SHO Suspension Upgrades
To help the Taurus' working-class chassis keep up with this exotic speed, firmer dampers, stiffer springs, thicker anti-roll bars and harder bushings were fitted to the existing fully independent suspension, along with bespoke mesh wheels and slightly grippier tires. Inside, sport seats prevented passengers from slipping around as much with all this extra go.


Its pricey $20,000 tag and manual transmission kept it from being a sales superstar like the rest of the Taurus lineup, but the more than 15,000 sold between 1989 and 1991 convinced Ford a second-gen SHO was worth the effort.


Ford Taurus SHO: Second Generation
Second Gen Ford Taurus SHO 2
Second Gen Ford Taurus SHO 2

SEE ALL 29 PHOTOS

For the 1992 model year and the second generation of Taurus, the new SHO carried the same Yamaha-designed 3.0-liter V-6 with the same power, torque, and transmission. Starting in 1993, the SHO was available for the first time with an automatic transmission—a four-speed Ford AX4S box. All automatic transmission SHOs came equipped with a larger 3.2-liter version of the Yamaha engine, and while power remained the same 220 hp, torque creeped to 215 lb-ft to compensate for parasitic loss through the drivetrain. As was the case with the prior generation, the SHO was visually differentiated from the rest of the Taurus lineup with unique body cladding, bumpers, badging, and wheels.

Ford Taurus SHO: Third Generation, Yamaha V-8 Collaboration
Third Gen Ford Taurus SHO 3
Third Gen Ford Taurus SHO 3

SEE ALL 29 PHOTOS

The ovaloid soap-bar third generation that arrived for 1996 marked a significant departure for both Taurus and the SHO. Gone was the sweet, sweet V-6, supplanted by a 3.4-liter transverse V-8 co-developed by Ford and Yamaha; everything from the top of the block down was manufactured and designed by Ford, while Yamaha still handled the heads and valvetrain. Despite an exotic soundtrack and two extra cylinders, the result of this mishmash proved less compelling than the two prior generations: Power only hopped up to 234 hp, and torque to 230 lb-ft. Gone was the slick-shifting Mazda five-speed manual; the only option remained the four-speed automatic.

Even with a semi-active suspension and dynamic steering weight, the third-gen SHO was a bit of a dog, especially as significant mechanical woes surfaced with the V-8's camshaft sprocket that occasionally led to destroyed engines and outrageously expensive repair bills. Only 3,300 were sold in 1999, the final year of Taurus SHO production.

Ford Taurus SHO: Sixth-Generation Resurrection

The SHO nameplate remained dormant for a decade before resurrection on the sixth-generation Taurus for the 2010 model year. The new Taurus was a size larger than the mid-size sedan it began life as in the late 1990s, now occupying the full-size segment. It was heavier, cushier, and more technologically complex than ever before, so the new SHO needed to reflect that. No more high-revving naturally aspirated engines; Ford's 3.5-liter EcoBoost twin-turbo V-6 provided a strong 365 hp and 350 lb-ft of torque through a six-speed automatic, an all-wheel drive was standard equipment. For a two-ton behemoth, the fourth-gen SHO can hustle, with zero-to-60 taking a relatively scant 5.2 seconds onto a measly top speed of 133 mph.

Each sixth-generation Taurus SHO packed SHO-specific shock absorbers, springs, stabilizer bars, and strut mount bushings, and an optional Performance Package crammed better brake pads, revised steering, a sport setting for the stability control, oil cooler, transmission cooler, PTU cooler, a shorter final drive ratio, summer tires, an inflate-a-flat kit instead of the full-size spare, and an Alcantara-wrapped steering wheel.
First Gen Ford Taurus SHO 3
First Gen Ford Taurus SHO 3

SEE ALL 29 PHOTOS

Ford Taurus SHO: End Of Production
The SHO nameplate stuck around right up until the Taurus line was discontinued in 2019, putting an end to Ford's fan-friendly sport sedan. If you're hoping for a new SHO in the future, don't hold your breath—it looks like the ST badge has replaced the SHO as Ford's go-to non-Mustang performance line.

Ford Taurus SHO Highlights

When the SHO debuted for the first time in the late 1980s, there really wasn't anything quite like it from other American automakers. If you wanted a high-revving, low-attention Q ship, you had to turn to the more expensive and more complex Germans. This was an out-of-character car for Ford, and it developed quite the cult following as the years went on. Many proclaim this to be one of the greatest sport sedans of all time; we're not sure if we'd go that far, but it's a damn fine example of what happens when one of the Big Three takes risks.

Nowadays, outside of established SHO fans, the SHO can be a bit of a hard sell to nascent enthusiasts. Every single generation of the SHO is rooted squarely in the era it's from, especially the first three generations. Unless you have a healthy dose of period-correct nostalgia coursing through your veins, it's unlikely a strange smooth-edged Ford Taurus with body cladding from the early 1990s will get your blood pumping.

However, if you're willing to make concessions for styling, a first-or-second generation SHO makes one hell of a first car. It's not too fast to upset overprotective parents, and it's unassuming enough to slip under most people's visual radar. Clean ones are dirt cheap compared to what other 1980s sports sedans go for, so get shopping.

Ford Taurus SHO Buying Tips
Considering these were hardly the type of car to be hermetically sealed in a garage, you're going to have a tough time finding an SHO from the first three generations without some wear and tear. For the most part, the majority of SHOs have odometers spun past the six-figure mark, so buy as low and clean as you can if you want as few problems as possible. As always, a pre-purchase inspection from a trusted mechanic is key.
Fourth Gen Ford Taurus SHO 10
Fourth Gen Ford Taurus SHO 10

SEE ALL 29 PHOTOS

Things get a little more problematic with the third-generation SHO. That 3.4-liter sounds good, but it suffers from a worrying amount of mechanical issues, the most significant of which is the detachment of the camshaft from the cam sprocket, causing the interference engine to grenade itself around the 50,000-mile mark. If you're dead-set on the V-8 SHO, make sure the camshaft is welded to the sprocket as a somewhat crude fix.
If the meaty fourth-gen is your goal, our advice is to buy the nicest, cleanest example with the Performance Pack that you can find. We wouldn't be surprised if there's a good number of 2019 SHOs still floating around with near-delivery miles. Snap 'em up before they go to a high-mileage home.
Here's a quick tip on that sixth-gen SHO—if pure straightline speed is what you're after in a Taurus, snoop around police auctions or surplus sales for decommissioned Taurus Police Interceptors. If you find one of the many outfitted with the EcoBoost engine and all-wheel drive, it puts down identical power figures to the SHO. It will be much more beat and less equipped, but hey—SHO-lite on the cheap.

A Ford Taurus of any ilk isn't exactly the type of four-wheeled wonder changing hands at high-end auction houses, so we went with the limited SHO history on Bring a Trailer. If these prices seem amenable, take your time and look around for the right car. Don't worry about missing the boat—for the most part, prices aren't going anywhere.
 
The SHO gets trotted out now and again by the lamest sorts of carfags, and it's because of them that Ford made another "SHO" package, which was such an absolute pig that sequential turbos, AWD, and mid-300's hp/tq couldn't make it fun to drive. Like dude, just make it lighter haha how is a "performance" car with greater than 10:1 power/weight ratio even real? Speaking of, bloat is what's really killed sports cars. When the smallest, lightest mainstream sports car you can get already pushes 3000lbs, you know something went wrong somewhere.

Love my '15 SHO. I test-drove a few sedans that were around the same price range, including the Charger R/T, the IS 350, and the Q50, and just kept coming back to the SHO. Far more comfortable than the Charger or the IS, and felt more aggressive than the Q50. Bit of a sleeper---its low-end throttle response is more "mom" than "muscle," but at my age the thrill of chirping the tires at a stop light is gone. The AWD makes weather almost a nonissue, and the trunk is ridiculous. It's still a Ford, so there are some very weird cost-cutting measures and design decisions here and there. Overall, I'd give it thumbs up.

God damn do I love big sedans.
 
Up to 2000 was OK. OBDII was easy to work with and the airbag systems were fairly simple. 90s was the sweet spot because you had electronic injection instead of hellish vacuum systems and carburetors
Were they any easier to repair, though? Not a car guy, so I don't know. I just miss the Model T and the Volkswagen Beetle/Minibus 'cause they could be easily repaired by the end user or tuned (hot rods and such). Model Ts being used as farm equipment/generators, etc. Simpler times.
 
Were they any easier to repair, though? Not a car guy, so I don't know. I just miss the Model T and the Volkswagen Beetle/Minibus 'cause they could be easily repaired by the end user or tuned (hot rods and such). Model Ts being used as farm equipment/generators, etc. Simpler times.
You wouldn't be able to pull one apart with a wrench and a screwdriver and do a roadside piston ring replacement like in Grapes of Wrath, but I pulled apart a Ranger and a Miata (motor pulls on both, clutch replacement on both, headgasket on the ranger) with a relatively minor investment in tools and did both without a lift.

OBDII theres honestly like 12 maybe 15 plugs in the engine bay and everything else is just fasteners.
 
Love my '15 SHO....Charger R/T, the IS 350, and the Q50
yeah dude you're definitely not changing my mind about SHO fags here

The Lexus is the best car of that group (by far) but the only model that had plenty engine was the IS F. The 3.5L wasn't too bad, just unexciting. Hypothetically one of the big Chargers with like 500 horse could be ok as long as the chassis was stiffened up a la the Hellcat, but I never drove a high trim one and they're lol expensive for what they are (junk)

Say what you will about Mercedes Bendz and Bavarian MotorWanks but their big modern tourers have always been available with plenny of engine and are extreme pleasureable to drive
 
yeah dude you're definitely not changing my mind about SHO fags here

The Lexus is the best car of that group (by far) but the only model that had plenty engine was the IS F. The 3.5L wasn't too bad, just unexciting. Hypothetically one of the big Chargers with like 500 horse could be ok as long as the chassis was stiffened up a la the Hellcat, but I never drove a high trim one and they're lol expensive for what they are (junk)

Say what you will about Mercedes Bendz and Bavarian MotorWanks but their big modern tourers have always been available with plenny of engine and are extreme pleasureable to drive
Those are all pretty big cars when compared to the IS. I think the GS would make for a better comparison among that bunch.
 
yeah dude you're definitely not changing my mind about SHO fags here

The Lexus is the best car of that group (by far) but the only model that had plenty engine was the IS F. The 3.5L wasn't too bad, just unexciting. Hypothetically one of the big Chargers with like 500 horse could be ok as long as the chassis was stiffened up a la the Hellcat, but I never drove a high trim one and they're lol expensive for what they are (junk)

Say what you will about Mercedes Bendz and Bavarian MotorWanks but their big modern tourers have always been available with plenny of engine and are extreme pleasureable to drive

You just listed off a bunch of cars that cost anywhere from $15K to $80K more than a SHO and nothing in the same price band. Which of these cars do you own?
 
Up to 2000 was OK. OBDII was easy to work with and the airbag systems were fairly simple. 90s was the sweet spot because you had electronic injection instead of hellish vacuum systems and carburetors
Some family had a 1999 Explorer for over a decade after they bought it fresh off the lot. Thing was damn near indestructible. Needed a new rear end after 150k thanks to hauling a few too many cement bags for home improvement, and the engine had to get some work done at the same time, but aside from that kept on going, even with electrical shorts in the audio system that kept frying the radio's LCD. Had to sell it as part of a move, but the new owners had a few other Fords of similar age they kept running, so I consider it a good home.

Never had a Taurus, but I bought an 03 Mustang (the V6 sadly, but still a damn good engine) several years ago I wound up regretfully selling a few years later, but the thing ran wonderfully despite being over a decade old.
 
I have an 07 GT Premium.
Those are all pretty big cars when compared to the IS. I think the GS would make for a better comparison among that bunch.
I didn't really look at the GS. The IS-350 was already not exciting enough to justify the cramped interior and low ride, and the GS had the same engine, so I didn't bother. I also test-drove a used Hennessey SHO (boosted to 445 hp), but it reeked of cigar smoke, which is why it was so cheap.
 
I have an 07 GT Premium.

I didn't really look at the GS. The IS-350 was already not exciting enough to justify the cramped interior and low ride, and the GS had the same engine, so I didn't bother. I also test-drove a used Hennessey SHO (boosted to 445 hp), but it reeked of cigar smoke, which is why it was so cheap.
There's always the GSF, but that's a lot more dough. However, the SHO is still mostly front wheel drive biased where the IS and GS are both rear wheel drive for the non awd models so there's that big drivetrain difference.
 
I see Cadillac's V cars are being forgotten in this discussion.

"Handles like an M3 but faster" was the general consensus with those. They just ended production and then came back with the Blackwing V
 
N54 also needs turbos if they're still oem along with all the TSBs addressed like the fuel injectors, HPFP, and front crank seal guard so the serpentine belt doesn't get sucked into the engine. The torque it makes is godlike for BMW's first turbo engine.
Mine needed nothing aside from the caps in the msd80, and basic maintenance. Factory turbos with 140k miles, spool just fine, no oil consumption anywhere.

The oil and turbo seal issues are from people not letting them warm up and gunning them right after cold start. I bought my car from a soccer mom.
 
Mine needed nothing aside from the caps in the msd80, and basic maintenance. Factory turbos with 140k miles, spool just fine, no oil consumption anywhere.

The oil and turbo seal issues are from people not letting them warm up and gunning them right after cold start. I bought my car from a soccer mom.
No wastegate rattle?
 
No wastegate rattle?
Nope. Just needed valve cover gasket and oil filter housing gasket changed, spark plugs, coil packs (for peace of mind), and engine degreaser from the slow leak coming from those two gaskets. One leaked, and one was more bald than others.

The worst part about the var was the rear interior from the kids. Everything sticky and dirty as hell.
 
Nope. Just needed valve cover gasket and oil filter housing gasket changed, spark plugs, coil packs (for peace of mind), and engine degreaser from the slow leak coming from those two gaskets. One leaked, and one was more bald than others.

The worst part about the var was the rear interior from the kids. Everything sticky and dirty as hell.
Sick man, clean examples of any N54 BMW fetch a pretty premium these days even if it's auto. Gone are the days when a nice 335i with a stick could be had for under 10k.
 
Sick man, clean examples of any N54 BMW fetch a pretty premium these days even if it's auto. Gone are the days when a nice 335i with a stick could be had for under 10k.
This time last year, i found another one like mine, but AWD, same miles. I paid 9k three years ago for my first one, for this one, i paid $1800. I needed money badly after an injury and not working a few months and sold it for 5k within days of listing it.
 
American Car Problems
Hey. Radio still worked. You just had to be careful and not go off the presets since the frequency display didn't show. The clock part of the display worked though, oddly enough. All things considered a single non-essential LCD not working is better than you get with anything modern these days, or foreign imports half the time at best. I still don't know why the Brits keep drilling those tiny holes in the engine blocks...
 
Back
Top Bottom