🐟 Fishtank Fishtank.Live General - Jet Neptune's Pisces Aquarium Internet Reality Show w/ Host Bam Margera

[Clarence Boddicker]

What is she gonna say we don't already know though?

It's not that we'll get anything new, it's how Jet will respond. Jet's attitude towards life can be directly reflected in how he handles Fishtank. This can only be good for content.

 

[Dumbledore's Onlyfans]

What is she gonna say we don't already know though?

Maybe she can tell us whether or not he's been working on Season 5, or if he's just been huffing Galaxy Gas until his eyes point in different directions for the past 6 months.

I'd also be interested in anything she knows about the Bloodgames 2 disaster, because I was really looking forward to it and now we'll never get it. Bloodgames was the best season they ever made imho, it was just fun.

 

[Polyboros2]

After getting pumped and dumped by Jet, Ellie has begun to contact Jin a lot. Jin said he likes to shit-talk Jet to her and that she always contacts him whenever she feels horny. Elliebros, not like this...

Assuming Jin is believable here, which is a big stretch, and considering what a weird deviant he is...

It's still a step up for Ellie.

 

[Agares]

Assuming Jin is believable here, which is a big stretch, and considering what a weird deviant he is...

It's still a step up for Ellie.

Jet’s brain has been fried by galaxy gas and daddy issues. Jin’s brain, on the other hand, has been fried by hentai gooner brainrot.

 

[joker jimmy]

yes I know this is two weeks old but I don't want to rerun the scraper until some time around December 15th. I've been sitting on this for some time waiting for a reason to do a post

Subs active as of 11/25/2025:
seasonPass 3813 11.8% $38,130
seasonPassXL 457 1.4% $15995
seasonPassGift 3 0.0%
Total Income $54125

Active community:
View attachment 8262238

This is what the active community looks like as of Season4 -> End of Battlechat, the "join date" and "last seen" charts are almost identical and our scraping runs S3 and S4 so this is a good yardstick for how many those two seasons brought in as new accounts on the site. This is S1 and S2 after a year and a half or two years attrition. S3 had the least amount of accounts join during its season and we'll see how many S4 are retained at the end of S5 which will likely dominate the next chart.

Season 4 account creation timeline:
View attachment 8262262

Obvious spike at the beginning and a followup bump the day Bam and Ricky Berwick showed up.

Loose change:
6642279 tokens in the collective wallets of all 32k accounts we track, this is $664,227 in unspent tokens.

Interesting. What’s generally hailed as their best achievement here, Bloodgames, was pulled almost entirely from the existing community and didn’t generate many new accounts. Not sure what the lesson is here. Maybe they don’t need growth, but to focus on keeping who they have.

 

[Agares]

I ran out of credits before I could generate the true, canon ending of Gregga's Neggas and the Power of Agartha last night so here it is:

And a bonus:

 

[Ryuk5]

I'm happy to announce that I've fully revised and completed the first part of my Fishtank writing. A pdf of it will be attached to this post.

Officially titled "The Fishtank Treatise Part I" (credit to @mister fireworks for the name idea) the work is basically a micro exploration of what content is and how it can be identified. It is 92 pages and ~40k words, representing a small portion of what I have written up for the past two years.

Under the framework I've written up, the work treats content as an object with definable properties. I attempt to separate mundane actions from discernable pieces of content. From there, content is split into three major criteria depending on the properties it has and how it derives its entertainment value. Lots of new terms and definitions I make in order to get the point across.

I should say that this work is analytical and theory-dense. I'm not commenting on the show or writing a review, this is a full-fledged theoretical framework. Kind of like economic analysis but for something as useless as Fishtank. Editing was a pain in the ass, and I went through like three different revisions in the past month alone so sorry it took so long. Part I does not focus on any specific season, it is almost entirely about what content is since content is the foundational axiom of the framework that's been built.

I hope it's enjoyable or at least coherent. I'm going to take a long nap now.

This should be like a college thing. Why are you make college level essays about what's content in fishtank in your free time?

What is she gonna say we don't already know though?

Jet's whole Teenage girl trafficking thing. More details on that would be good. All we have is some text confirmation that he asked people to help bring girls for his freinds, but we don't really know how, why, when, or even if that happend.

 

[Queesechake]

Charls has been on a roll

 

[Ancient Pioneer]

Interesting. What’s generally hailed as their best achievement here, Bloodgames, was pulled almost entirely from the existing community and didn’t generate many new accounts. Not sure what the lesson is here. Maybe they don’t need growth, but to focus on keeping who they have.

Keep in mind that it was a mere two week season and we're tracking 400 accounts from that season being retained. That season is punching way above its weight class when it comes to retention.

 

[Mörkö]

I'm happy to announce that I've fully revised and completed the first part of my Fishtank writing. A pdf of it will be attached to this post.

Officially titled "The Fishtank Treatise Part I" (credit to @mister fireworks for the name idea) the work is basically a micro exploration of what content is and how it can be identified. It is 92 pages and ~40k words, representing a small portion of what I have written up for the past two years.

Under the framework I've written up, the work treats content as an object with definable properties. I attempt to separate mundane actions from discernable pieces of content. From there, content is split into three major criteria depending on the properties it has and how it derives its entertainment value. Lots of new terms and definitions I make in order to get the point across.

I should say that this work is analytical and theory-dense. I'm not commenting on the show or writing a review, this is a full-fledged theoretical framework. Kind of like economic analysis but for something as useless as Fishtank. Editing was a pain in the ass, and I went through like three different revisions in the past month alone so sorry it took so long. Part I does not focus on any specific season, it is almost entirely about what content is since content is the foundational axiom of the framework that's been built.

I hope it's enjoyable or at least coherent. I'm going to take a long nap now.

Godspeed you beautiful retard I’ll reserve judgement until the whole thing is out but please keep this going.

 

[else_letter]

Godspeed you beautiful retard I’ll reserve judgement until the whole thing is out but please keep this going.

I feel the same for now @Lowercase I internet . I am waiting for the big season breakdown drops. Reserving judgement until then.

 

[Lowercase I internet]

Thanks for the support guys, I promise more analysis to come

 

[un-needed dreamer]

I'm happy to announce that I've fully revised and completed the first part of my Fishtank writing. A pdf of it will be attached to this post.

Officially titled "The Fishtank Treatise Part I" (credit to @mister fireworks for the name idea) the work is basically a micro exploration of what content is and how it can be identified. It is 92 pages and ~40k words, representing a small portion of what I have written up for the past two years.

Under the framework I've written up, the work treats content as an object with definable properties. I attempt to separate mundane actions from discernable pieces of content. From there, content is split into three major criteria depending on the properties it has and how it derives its entertainment value. Lots of new terms and definitions I make in order to get the point across.

I should say that this work is analytical and theory-dense. I'm not commenting on the show or writing a review, this is a full-fledged theoretical framework. Kind of like economic analysis but for something as useless as Fishtank. Editing was a pain in the ass, and I went through like three different revisions in the past month alone so sorry it took so long. Part I does not focus on any specific season, it is almost entirely about what content is since content is the foundational axiom of the framework that's been built.

I hope it's enjoyable or at least coherent. I'm going to take a long nap now.

9

 

[>-Ack!]

I'm happy to announce that I've fully revised and completed the first part of my Fishtank writing. A pdf of it will be attached to this post.

Officially titled "The Fishtank Treatise Part I" (credit to @mister fireworks for the name idea) the work is basically a micro exploration of what content is and how it can be identified. It is 92 pages and ~40k words, representing a small portion of what I have written up for the past two years.

Under the framework I've written up, the work treats content as an object with definable properties. I attempt to separate mundane actions from discernable pieces of content. From there, content is split into three major criteria depending on the properties it has and how it derives its entertainment value. Lots of new terms and definitions I make in order to get the point across.

I should say that this work is analytical and theory-dense. I'm not commenting on the show or writing a review, this is a full-fledged theoretical framework. Kind of like economic analysis but for something as useless as Fishtank. Editing was a pain in the ass, and I went through like three different revisions in the past month alone so sorry it took so long. Part I does not focus on any specific season, it is almost entirely about what content is since content is the foundational axiom of the framework that's been built.

I hope it's enjoyable or at least coherent. I'm going to take a long nap now.

thats some crazy autism, i thought this was gonna be some sort of meme analysis pretending to be a serious report, but no, you genuinely tried to develop an entire philosophical and sociological article on why fishtank is what it is, i don't known if i should be impressed or scared, but this is definitely not the website i expected to produce this, lol

 

[Raw Onion Enjoyer]

Also expect another 4fun collab with Burt soon. He's travelling for it tommorow and the video might take a week or two to release.

 

[Monkeymanbob]

Burt is on the phone with Little Bro Bill. I missed some crucial info drops. It may of been something about Burt sucking him off?

Not sure. Burt has said things about not being able to trust Bill about details of the past and relying on his sister instead. Hasan was kind enough to donate $20 for a N Word Pass as Bill & Burt were talking

 

[Raw Onion Enjoyer]

Hmm interesting

 

[Fully Eshay Skits Bruh V4]

Hmm interesting
burtclip2.mp4

Based.

 

[bookers]

in the Fishtank site chat.

do people even use this when the shows not on
lol

Hmm interesting
burtclip2.mp4

NEXT

 

[ATPH]

Anyone else see the fishtank digest channel on YouTube is premiering some thing with binx and aryeh later today?