Fighter pilot ejects in bizarre runway crash, video shows

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
A U.S. pilot ejected from a fighter jet after a bizarre slow-moving crash in Texas on Thursday, video shows.

The aircraft, an F-35B, descended toward the ground at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth. The landing gear touched the ground, then bounced back into the air before the aircraft crashed nose-first and entered a spin, which appeared driven by the system that provides its vertical thrust.

The pilot, who officials have not publicly identified, then ejected into the air for a seven-second descent to the ground. The pilot was taken to a hospital as a precaution, with no initial reports of serious injuries, said Matthew Montgomery, a spokesperson for the Defense Department’s Contract Management Agency said late Thursday.

Brig. Gen. Patrick Ryder, a Pentagon spokesman, said the jet is owned by Lockheed Martin but flown by a “U.S. government pilot,” without specifying whether the individual is military or civilian personnel.

Lockheed Martin said in a statement that the company is aware of the crash and that the pilot “ejected successfully.”

“Safety is our priority, and we will follow appropriate investigation protocol,” Lockheed Martin said.

It is also unclear how the crash occurred. Other videos of similar aircraft show small bounces that occur once their landing gear hits the ground, though those are absorbed by shock struts. In the incident Thursday, the aircraft bounced as if it were landing on the moon.

The F-35B is the Marine Corps variant of the advanced fighter jet capable of short takeoff and vertical landing. That capability helps aircraft fly in and out of places where space is limited, such as assault ships.

Candateshia Pafford, a spokesperson for the naval air station, said Lockheed is a tenant there and shares a runway. The company builds the jet in a neighboring facility, according to NBC DFW.



--- Article end ---

article
arcive

I always thought runway ejections were going to be really bad news for the pilot but the article says no report of serious injuries.
 
Well, no gigantic fireball, no casualties, so mission success?

And one of the main reasons that runway ejections are bad news is that you are usually descending into a gigantic hell mire of burning fuel, and super hot toxic chemicals from the plane that you just crashed.
 
Plane had a problem and pilot ejected = bizarre.

Motherfucker you can't even start a fighter jet, let alone land one. And neither can this guy. (it's a woman)
 
It's pretty amazing that the parachute deployed at a low enough altitude. Usually you would need like a thousand feet's worth of distance from the ground for a chute to deploy fully, otherwise you'd end up as paste.
 
I always thought runway ejections were going to be really bad news for the pilot but the article says no report of serious injuries.

Depends on the ejection seat. The F-35 has a "zero-zero" seat, meaning it's designed to be able to work at zero altitude and zero airspeed. If the seat wasn't a zero-zero seat, it likely would have ended badly for the pilot. Hell, it still looks like it barely had time to work. I'm betting his legs still got a bit beat up on that landing.

This was a new jet likely being tested out before delivery. What surprises me is why he ejected at all. It was just about over, and then he ejected. Maybe he thought it wasn't about to stop and just punched out while it was till upright.
 
Almost looked like it came down a touch too fast and then after the bounce they either throttled the main engine up or cut the central VTOL engine.
It looks like the elevators pitched down right after he touched down, which is a common reaction when landing a regular aircraft. I don't know if that's allowed by the flight computer in vtol mode, or whether it would adjust the thrust in either engine.
 
Depends on the ejection seat. The F-35 has a "zero-zero" seat, meaning it's designed to be able to work at zero altitude and zero airspeed. If the seat wasn't a zero-zero seat, it likely would have ended badly for the pilot. Hell, it still looks like it barely had time to work. I'm betting his legs still got a bit beat up on that landing.
I think zero-zero seats are the standard and have been since the 50's and the service branches won't accept an aircraft, fixed wing or rotor, that doesn't have one.... as some of the early jets of the era had seats that ejected DOWNWARDS meaning they were just a quick way to commit suicide below a given altitude.

This was a new jet likely being tested out before delivery. What surprises me is why he ejected at all. It was just about over, and then he ejected. Maybe he thought it wasn't about to stop and just punched out while it was till upright.
With every imaginable alarm probably going off in the cockpit, I can see why someone might assume the best course of action is to get out, fast.

Also, it's drilled into pilots in training that you should never attempt to stay in a plane that's beyond saving for fear of being blamed for wrecking a billion-dollar airframe - they can get you a new plane, they can't put you back together once you're assimilated into the tarmac.

Yes, TRY to save it, but, also have a "decision" point in mind and if you can't regain full control by then? Punch out.

And for all that, the plane might be fixable. Like the Cornfield Bomber.
 
Last edited:
What surprises me is why he ejected at all. It was just about over, and then he ejected. Maybe he thought it wasn't about to stop and just punched out while it was till upright.
Almost looked like it came down a touch too fast and then after the bounce they either throttled the main engine up or cut the central VTOL engine. Wonder if they fucked something up coming down too hard.
Hard touchdowns fuck with avionics really badly, I doubt this has changed too much even with the F-35.

I image that a combination of fucked up avionics and the tilting skid that was taking place was enough to warrant sufficient concern. On top of that, VTOLs are notorious for being on the knife-edge of controllability at the best of times (Harriers were/are notorious for shit like this).

This doesn't even factor the mental state of the pilot.
 
I wonder if this is caused by human error or technical issue with the plane.

This is 250 million dollars plane we're talking about.
 
This was a new jet likely being tested out before delivery. What surprises me is why he ejected at all. It was just about over, and then he ejected. Maybe he thought it wasn't about to stop and just punched out while it was till upright.

It's actually surprising it didn't auto eject as soon as the front gear was fucked, laying flat on the ground with gravel being sucked into the intakes, which also didn't auto shut-off for some reason, is likely to cause catastrophic engine failure.

If that had happened while on the ground like that he would have been truly fucked.

This is 250 million dollars plane we're talking about.

If this was one fresh of the line undergoing trials it was probably more like around 80 million. That higher cost is projected through an aircrafts service life.
 
as some of the early jets of the era had seats that ejected DOWNWARDS meaning they were just a quick way to commit suicide below a given altitude.
Yeah, like the lower two seats on the B-52.
And for all that, the plane might be fixable. Like the Cornfield Bomber.
Oh yeah, it doesn't look like it sustained enough damage to be a hull loss. Even commercial aircraft have sustained much worse damage and been repaired to keep flying.
 
It's pretty amazing that the parachute deployed at a low enough altitude. Usually you would need like a thousand feet's worth of distance from the ground for a chute to deploy fully, otherwise you'd end up as paste.
Consider that a testament to the tech these people have developed.

Question: how often do you hear about how successful this system has been?
Answer: you never do. A military with overwhelming superiority has no need to brag about it accomplishments. Don't let the detractors fool you. Rival nations wish they has half of this tech. Even with a retard like Joe Biden in charge.
 
If this was one fresh of the line undergoing trials it was probably more like around 80 million. That higher cost is projected through an aircrafts service life.

So the Marines get the most expensive version, at 100ish million. But yeah, for an actual 5th generation aircraft, the F-35 is inexpensive, especially the F-35As the Air Force gets.
 
Wild speculation, but I am going to assume that the engine was not responding to throttle input which would explain why the fan "failed" which caused the crash and it would also explain the choice of a delayed ejection. I'm sure the pilot weighed the option of a lifetime of chronic back pain while troubleshooting the obvious problem and chose that as the solution.

I hope the F-35 has an analog fire suppression system because that would have killed the engine on the spot, but maybe he didn't think of that.
 
Depends on the ejection seat. The F-35 has a "zero-zero" seat, meaning it's designed to be able to work at zero altitude and zero airspeed. If the seat wasn't a zero-zero seat, it likely would have ended badly for the pilot. Hell, it still looks like it barely had time to work. I'm betting his legs still got a bit beat up on that landing.

This was a new jet likely being tested out before delivery. What surprises me is why he ejected at all. It was just about over, and then he ejected. Maybe he thought it wasn't about to stop and just punched out while it was till upright.
As someone said somewhere, the pilot probably pulled the ejection earlier but the on-board computer probably said "no" until it was relatively level. If you look at when you would first pull the ejection the plane would be at an attitude where you'd turn into a /DBT/ statistic rather than be stuck upside down. I don't know how strong the canopy of those planes are but I feel, again, they'd be better off upside down than being scraped on the ground at a hundred miles per hour.
 
And is supposedly the "lo" in the hi-lo mix.
That was Lockheed marketing pitch in the 90ies in conjunction with F-22. Before Lockheed and F-35 fanbois memory hole that in the early 00ies and done the bait and switch claiming the F-35 is the best thing ever to fly.

Edit: Lockheed hated the F-22 from the beginning as the only customer it can be sold to is Uncle Sam as legally and enforced by arms decree by the U.S. government.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom