- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Well i mean at its height you could of traded one of those fancy rare tulips for a thousand pounds of cheese. Which is a lot for the 1600's. A month ago you could of traded one bitcoin for 20k usd. Thats the comparison i was trying to make...that wild mass speculation drastically overinflated the thing that was being traded.
Other than volatility, though, the analogy completely breaks. Anyone who started an industrial scale farm pumping out tulip bulbs could have obliterated that market instantly. There is no similar method to flood the market with a well designed cryptocurrency. There's no central authority that can deflate its value by simply printing more of it.
It also lacks the vulnerability of commodities like gold or other material substances, because similarly, the market can't suddenly be flooded by a glut of it, and almost more importantly, it's "useless" so there is no alternative use, like an industrial use, that can suddenly compete for the limited supply and influence its value that way.
Its volatility and blockchain delays make it less than optimal as a currency for spending, though. (Ironically, the meme shitcoin known as Dogecoin is a lot better for the kind of microtransactions and instant transactions than BTC because of the speed of its blockchain.)