favorite economist?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
>no one is name Hjalmar Schacht

dat nigga be making money out of the thin air for years and years
literally financial con artist on the global scale, based as fuck, intentionally balancing the whole country on the brink of banking collapse the whoel time
without him Hitler would've never had anything to wage the war with
 
Fastest Hand In The East said:
>no one is name Hjalmar Schacht

dat nigga be making money out of the thin air for years and years
literally financial con artist on the global scale, based as fuck, intentionally balancing the whole country on the brink of banking collapse the whoel time
without him Hitler would've never had anything to wage the war with
Click to expand...
Yikes sweatie this ain't it chief. Schacht was a kike plant like Canaris, he stole all the good ideas from GOTTFRIED FEDER, but removed all the stuff that would be too based because he didn't want the Reich to become too powerful. The real author of the economic success of national socialism was GOTTFRIED FEDER, hjalmar schacht more like gaymal shathimself lol

Btw lmao at kike-lovers sucking the uncircumcised dicks of niggas like (((friedman))), (((von hayek))), (((von mises))), (((rothbard))) etc
 
Carlos Weston Chantor said:
Yikes sweatie this ain't it chief. Schacht was a kike plant like Canaris, he stole all the good ideas from GOTTFRIED FEDER, but removed all the stuff that would be too based because he didn't want the Reich to become too powerful. The real author of the economic success of national socialism was GOTTFRIED FEDER, hjalmar schacht more like gaymal shathimself lol

Btw lmao at kike-lovers sucking the uncircumcised dicks of niggas like (((friedman))), (((von hayek))), (((von mises))), (((rothbard))) etc
Click to expand...
My precious dude, Feder was an old-school party member- barely educated underclass member. He wanted to nationalize banks and abolish an interest- this is basically communism.
 
Thomas Sowell (reading Basic Economics saved my life)
Robert Kiyosaki (Rich Dad, Poor Dad taught me the difference between assets and liabilities)
 
shovethispencilupyourass.jpg
 
Nathan Higgers said:
View attachment 2321026
Click to expand...
This guy is actually pretty cool. He tried to help
dismantle the welfare state through experiments where poverty stricken families are given a lump sum as opposed to the typical weekly or monthly payout. this made them scared shitless so they had to ration money and learn how to make more back through work or starting businesses.
 
Last edited:
Jabroni said:
This guy is actually pretty cool. He tried to help
dismantle the welfare state through experiments where poverty stricken families are given a lump sum as opposed to the typical weekly or monthly payout. this made them scared shitless so they had to ration money and learn how to make more back through work or starting businesses.
Click to expand...
I guess you could say Guy Standing is a stand-up guy who stands for something.
 
I will chime in here, with my professional (I'll spare a power level) view.

Seriously, and no meming, Mother fucking Adam Smith. He IS modern economics, anything is based off him, he is the corner stone of the field still. Many of the things he wrote about are outdated unrelated but the core is still there, were we get the splits of the schools come from him, it's all based on his understanding of the market it self.

While I love love LOVE people like Sowell, and have a signed Hans Herman Hoppe on my work desk, Smith founded my field period and you need to have a serious education, to understand how to still grasp something from him. Not to say, you can't read him green or unversed. But imho you read Smith because "he's the guy who started it" then go on to other people and kinda ignore him and think well who cares about 1700s grain price and how does that matter? Then you start thinking back and re read Smith educated and damn.. he was THAT good.

Also Paul Krugman is a faggot and literally wrong on everything always, I hope suffering upon him everlasting.
 
John Maynard Keynes. No, not a joke.

Besides instantly being better than most Austrians by simply not buying into praxeology and "Muh axioms of human activity", he wasn't delusional like many neoclassical economists think he was about rationality in the markets. He perfectly understood that subjective perceptions of the market matter much more than whatever abstract equilibrium between supply and demand you can create with a flawed conception of how people operate.

Plus, he was actually ahead of his time by being behind in the times. He was critical of free-trade and the theory of comparative advantage; as a result, advocated for protectist policies like immigration control, tariffs, and internal industry, which China and Japan would use to grow into dominating economies. He also pointed out how ridiculous the Labor Theory of Value was--both Ricardo's and Marx's iterations.

His big problem was having intellectual descendents completely butcher his original theories. You can thank them for why Stagflation occured in the 70s, and why idiots like Krugman still have a job.
 
Lodoss Warrior said:
John Maynard Keynes. No, not a joke.

Besides instantly being better than most Austrians by simply not buying into praxeology and "Muh axioms of human activity", he wasn't delusional like many neoclassical economists think he was about rationality in the markets. He perfectly understood that subjective perceptions of the market matter much more than whatever abstract equilibrium between supply and demand you can create with a flawed conception of how people operate.

Plus, he was actually ahead of his time by being behind in the times. He was critical of free-trade and the theory of comparative advantage; as a result, advocated for protectist policies like immigration control, tariffs, and internal industry, which China and Japan would use to grow into dominating economies. He also pointed out how ridiculous the Labor Theory of Value was--both Ricardo's and Marx's iterations.

His big problem was having intellectual descendents completely butcher his original theories. You can thank them for why Stagflation occured in the 70s, and why idiots like Krugman still have a job.
Click to expand...
Imma hit you with a winner fren, not because Keynes is a good school. But youre 100% correct on people mis using his shit (in fact one of his tarrif things was told as a "what if" then brit gov went and enacted it)

Keynes, was a lot better than most give credit for and while I still don't go too deep in his way he is a MUST read and props to him.

You legit understand econ better than 95% of the world to grasp what you did.

His denial of said axioms is a sticking point where I don't root for him too much, soicoeconmics is it's own field for a reason (and again much like Keynes butchered ideals)
 
Its fun to dunk on Keynes, but he is still Lord Keynes and we are still nobodies.

Edit: Hoppe is literally useless and only appeals to the cripplingly autistic and/or psychopaths.
 
Being I am an economist, by default am tismo af. Aside my leanings, I'll disagree because if you don't like Hoppe, you can still learn a ton from him and see faults flaws etc, much like say someone sees err in Marx etc.

Clearly Dr. Hoppe, is an extremist, I don't pretend to think what he wants isn't real or happening soon. Now if you are against this stuff, he should stand as a lynch pin of someone to study to see his "faults"

I won't side track too much on my anti gov shit but, HHH really plans what it would be like with no gov, privatized everything and really aside that spin, he very well explains the simple, supply demand ideas. Sadly, no other even people like Friedman, expanded on the concept, what goes away will come back privately. I fully thing this is true again see Axioms.

Either way, I'm super happy to see people here grasp and talk about the concept of the field.
 
Bassomatic said:
Being I am an economist, by default am tismo af. Aside my leanings, I'll disagree because if you don't like Hoppe, you can still learn a ton from him and see faults flaws etc, much like say someone sees err in Marx etc.

Clearly Dr. Hoppe, is an extremist, I don't pretend to think what he wants isn't real or happening soon. Now if you are against this stuff, he should stand as a lynch pin of someone to study to see his "faults"

I won't side track too much on my anti gov shit but, HHH really plans what it would be like with no gov, privatized everything and really aside that spin, he very well explains the simple, supply demand ideas. Sadly, no other even people like Friedman, expanded on the concept, what goes away will come back privately. I fully thing this is true again see Axioms.

Either way, I'm super happy to see people here grasp and talk about the concept of the field
Click to expand...
Hahahaha. Sweatie, reading Rothbard during your Mcdonalds lunch break doesn't make you an economist.

Shitty "economists" whose thoughts should never be read:
Mises
Hayek
Sowell
Rothbard
All the rest of Austrian retards
Ha-Joon Chang
Richard Wolf
Stephanie Kelton
All the rest of the MMT retards

If you have ever read an "economics" book that isn't a textbook, please go out and become an hero.

Go out on the beach, read some classic Lucas, enjoy a nice Romer paper, and have a laugh with Christiano.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom