Registration
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 14, 2021
I can't trust anyone who likes S.I.N. tbh.Tbh, I'm glad I got out of the hell that is fgo. To this day I'm not entirely sure how I managed to slog through all the way to Camelot, where the story became actually decent.
And hey it seemed to be going all uphill from there! You had Babylonia, Solomon, Seraph, Shinjuku all back to back chapters ranging from good to fantastic I'm terms of writing.
And then out came Agartha, Shimousa and Salem with first one being on par with Septem except without the mercy of being short, and the other two being ok at the absolute most.
Then part 2 came out and the opening is great! Anastasia is great! And then Göttermandung comes and is a massive step down from the quality of the first chapter.
Then S.I.N comes out and that's pretty good! Then India comes out and is a big nothingburger.
Point being, I couldn't take this schizophrenic writing style anymore. Lostbelt 6 and 7 were the only good sequential chapters and even then not if you count the main interlude.
And when paper moon came out and showed signs of being the same downard dip in writing I just said fuck it and left.
I LITERALLY Like Agartha more than China here. It is the lostbelt I dislike the most and it isn't even genuine hate, I dont even have force to hate it, since it is nothing to write about.
I was reading the section of it in the raid and there were lots of characters that I even forgot were on that chapter.
>I couldn't take this schizophrenic writing style anymore
Do you know that every chapter has a different writer, right? The writers have their particularities, in OC1 you had lots of internal dialogue of servants, something quite rare on other chapters because it was by a different writer.