Far Cry 6 confirmed - Giancarlo Esposito is the villian.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Since this is a Far Cry thread and I don't want to double post, what difficulty is best for 2? Normal feels too easy but from what I've heard of Infamous it just does that shitty thing where it gives everything a ton of health while lowering yours.
 
I looked into Far Cry 6 some more and remembered what my big problem with it was. One, it has RPG AIDS, I DO NOT want to shoot a dude, in a singleplayer game, in the head, and have him not die. I'm sick enough of it in multiplayer after joining the tactical shooter train.

Second, it is a visual and thematic clusterfuck. It's supposed to basically be the Cuban Revolution, but it has gay zoomer shit in it, it has a bunch of lolsorandom animals (which Far Cry 5 also had, but at least it was just a dog and a bear named Cheeseburger, and it matched the cheesy tasteless "America fuck yeah" tone it was going for), it has an artillery jetpack (that's actually a little cool, but Far Cry is not the setting for that). The setting is a bizarre mishmash of different pieces that don't belong together.

What are we looking at? We're looking at the SaintsRowification of Far Cry.
 
I looked into Far Cry 6 some more and remembered what my big problem with it was. One, it has RPG AIDS, I DO NOT want to shoot a dude, in a singleplayer game, in the head, and have him not die. I'm sick enough of it in multiplayer after joining the tactical shooter train.

Second, it is a visual and thematic clusterfuck. It's supposed to basically be the Cuban Revolution, but it has gay zoomer shit in it, it has a bunch of lolsorandom animals (which Far Cry 5 also had, but at least it was just a dog and a bear named Cheeseburger, and it matched the cheesy tasteless "America fuck yeah" tone it was going for), it has an artillery jetpack (that's actually a little cool, but Far Cry is not the setting for that). The setting is a bizarre mishmash of different pieces that don't belong together.

What are we looking at? We're looking at the SaintsRowification of Far Cry.
Instead of making a Far Cry game they've made a [current year] Just Cause.
As for the animals, I agree, it's cringe. I prefer FC5 because you could either use the roster of characters or hire random NPCs to go with you on exploration.
 
Instead of making a Far Cry game they've made a [current year] Just Cause.
As for the animals, I agree, it's cringe. I prefer FC5 because you could either use the roster of characters or hire random NPCs to go with you on exploration.
Right, that's actually the one thing that would make me consider pirating it (FPS Just Cause, different setting, not interested in the slightest in JC3 or JC4), but the thing just reeks. The Far Cry 5 animal companions were over-the-top but at least they fit its absurd cartoon version of living in the West. And Far Cry Primal making you beastmaster makes sense because what else can you possibly do with a Paleolithic setting? But there's nothing about the modern Caribbean that screams "dangerous wild animals" like the Mountain West or Africa or other settings do.

I do like the punk chicken and the little cripple weiner dog.

This is hilarious. It's such a shame, it looks like they had a brilliant setting for this and then they blew it through Current Year (lack of) taste.
 
Back
Top Bottom