Fanon Wikis

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
smurfing hell people make oc smurfs i thought goanimate was the bottom of the barrel

Of course they do. One of them even got into the second Smurfs movie!

2cxjfq9.jpg
 
Wait, so if I'm reading that right, is that fanon for... fanon?

Is there literally... a fanonverse for established fanonverses? Is this fanonceptible? I... I don't even...

(:_(

This is some Once-ler fandom level shit.
 
Challenge; with no context, figure out a way in which this page could be even vaguely linked to Supernanny
yeah dont get it at lest most of the post i have seen on that wiki are kinda related to supernanny but those two look like someone rejected fan fic
 
Usagi Yojimbo by Stan Sakai?
I'm kind of surprised that I've never seen much sperging over that, honestly. I mean, it's a furry comic set in a really, really well researched Feudal Japan. You'd think furries and weebs would e all over it. Hell, I don't see many furries even talk about it- it's mostly comic (and TMNT) fans that do.

Maybe the fact it's actually really good counter acts something.
 
I'm kind of surprised that I've never seen much sperging over that, honestly. I mean, it's a furry comic set in a really, really well researched Feudal Japan. You'd think furries and weebs would e all over it. Hell, I don't see many furries even talk about it- it's mostly comic (and TMNT) fans that do.

Maybe the fact it's actually really good counter acts something.
it's old, and the main character isn't a dog.
if there isn't a protagonist dog, no one cares
 
I'm kind of surprised that I've never seen much sperging over that, honestly. I mean, it's a furry comic set in a really, really well researched Feudal Japan. You'd think furries and weebs would e all over it. Hell, I don't see many furries even talk about it- it's mostly comic (and TMNT) fans that do.

Good point. Similarly, I haven't seen much sperging about Steve Gallacci's Albedo even though it's a) furry, b) has a very well researched hard SF background, c) has standard furry fetish fuel, and d) practically started the furry fandom.

It may just be that this early stuff wasn't terribly pandering and the fandom hadn't erupted into outright degeneracy at that time.

There was also contemporaneous stuff like the Fantagraphics compilation comic book Critters, which collected what would be called furry comics now. It was just one title Fantagraphics published, though. Fantagraphics was just generally known for high editorial standards, quality printing, and republishing classic works.
 
Good point. Similarly, I haven't seen much sperging about Steve Gallacci's Albedo even though it's a) furry, b) has a very well researched hard SF background, c) has standard furry fetish fuel, and d) practically started the furry fandom.

It may just be that this early stuff wasn't terribly pandering and the fandom hadn't erupted into outright degeneracy at that time.

There was also contemporaneous stuff like the Fantagraphics compilation comic book Critters, which collected what would be called furry comics now. It was just one title Fantagraphics published, though. Fantagraphics was just generally known for high editorial standards, quality printing, and republishing classic works.
Furries don't go for anything of some quality.
"Hey guys, I made a comic for all of my furry friends!"
"Sounds interesting. What's it about?"
"Well, a whole bunch of anthros go back to ancient Japan,"
"OOH! DO THEY MEET MIKU AND NARUTO FOR SOME TRAINING?!"
"Wha-what? No, no. They learn about the ways of the samurai and..."
"BOOOOORRRRIIIINNNG! Add some diapers and vore, and then we'll talk."
 
Back
Top Bottom