Facebook megathread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/30/18203551/apple-facebook-blocked-internal-ios-apps
Apple has shut down Facebook’s ability to distribute internal iOS apps, from early releases of the Facebook app to basic tools like a lunch menu. A person familiar with the situation tells The Verge that early versions of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and other pre-release “dogfood” (beta) apps have stopped working, as have other employee apps, like one for transportation. Facebook is treating this as a critical problem internally, we’re told, as the affected apps simply don’t launch on employees’ phones anymore.

The shutdown comes in response to news that Facebook has been using Apple’s program for internal app distribution to track teenage customers with a “research” app.

That app, revealed yesterday by TechCrunch, was distributed outside of the App Store using Apple’s enterprise program, which allows developers to use special certificates to install more powerful apps onto iPhones. Those apps are only supposed to be used by a company’s employees, however, and Facebook had been distributing its tracking app to customers. Facebook later said it would shut down the app.

This poses a huge issue for Facebook. While Apple provides other tools a company can use to install apps internally, Apple’s enterprise program is the main solution for widely distributing internal apps and services. In an email, a Facebook spokesperson said “I can confirm that this affects our internal apps.”

In a statement given to Recode, Apple said that Facebook was in “clear breach of their agreement with Apple.” Any developer that breaches that agreement, Apple said, has their distribution certificates revoked, “which is what we did in this case to protect our users and their data.” Apple declined to comment on shutting down all of Facebook’s internal apps in an email to The Verge.

Revoking a certificate not only stops apps from being distributed on iOS, but it also stops apps from working. And because internal apps by the same organization or developer may be connected to a single certificate, it can lead to immense headaches like the one Facebook now finds itself in where a multitude of internal apps have been shut down.

Apple and Facebook have already been bickering over privacy, but this is the first instance of Apple taking an action that directly shuts down some of Facebook’s activities. Last March, Apple CEO Tim Cook criticized Facebook’s handling of the Cambridge Analytica data sharing scandal, saying, “I wouldn’t be in this situation” if he were running the company. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg later said the comments were “extremely glib” and spoke of Apple as a company that “work hard to charge you more.”
 
- Facebook is now going to moderate posts that would confuse people about voting or tell people not to vote.
This is still bullshit. Reason, a perfectly respectable news magazine, has at least one article every 2 years (every national election in the US) telling people they just shouldn't vote if they don't want to, since both parties are shitty and statistically, individual votes don't matter. (It should be noted that Reason is openly Libertarian leaning.) This is a perfectly reasonable viewpoint, even if I don't agree with it, and you shouldn't censor it.
 
This is still bullshit. Reason, a perfectly respectable news magazine, has at least one article every 2 years (every national election in the US) telling people they just shouldn't vote if they don't want to, since both parties are shitty and statistically, individual votes don't matter. (It should be noted that Reason is openly Libertarian leaning.) This is a perfectly reasonable viewpoint, even if I don't agree with it, and you shouldn't censor it.
They mean explicitly telling people not to vote, in a threatening manner.
 
I hate the phrase nothing burger....it just irritates me and makes me want a burger. *interjects personal note*
As a member of this web forum, I condemn such talk of so-called interjection. I condemn it in the strongest sense. This is not who we are or what we stand for. If some employee of some large internet company is interjected with unknown, possibly dangerous verbiage in the next few days, it will not be because we stood by and allowed it. I hope that you (Agent Mills) and all of the other members of the glownigger community accept this for what it is worth.
 
As a member of this web forum, I condemn such talk of so-called interjection. I condemn it in the strongest sense. This is not who we are or what we stand for. If some employee of some large internet company is interjected with unknown, possibly dangerous verbiage in the next few days, it will not be because we stood by and allowed it. I hope that you (Agent Mills) and all of the other members of the glownigger community accept this for what it is worth.


Of course you would, Cochise.
 
Facebook has issued a new policy update saying it’s acceptable to post death threats and incite violence against me, despite this being a crime in the United Kingdom.
No, I’m not joking.
A Community Standards updatepublished by Facebook states (emphasis mine); “Do not post: Threats that could lead to death (and other forms of high-severity violence) of any target(s) where threat is defined as any of the following:
Statements of intent to commit high-severity violence; or
Calls for high-severity violence (unless the target is an organization or individual covered in the Dangerous Individuals and Organizations policy)….”

Two months ago, via my lawyers, I filed a Subject Access Request demanding Facebook turn over all information relating to me. Facebook has yet to respond to this request, despite it being a legal requirement to respond within 30 days.
If and when Facebook ever responds to this legal demand, the next step will be to begin litigation proceedings.
The fact that Facebook has literally said it’s OK to incite violence against me is going to be a very interesting potential addition to those proceedings.
 
At first I thought this was fake news because no way this could be real, right? Welp:
833830

"market knowledge of news event"
lmao what the fuck does this even mean
 
Pretty sure this is a crime in America too. You just violated your own country's laws, Zucc.
 
Christ, if you are going to make exceptions like that you are asking for trouble when some triggered cow decides whoever hurt their feelings is a "dangerous indiviual".
 
Dangerous individuals and organisations:

Hate organisations and their leaders and prominent members
A hate organisation is defined as:
Any association of three or more people that is organised under a name, sign or symbol and that has an ideology, statements or physical actions that attack individuals based on characteristics, including race, religious affiliation, nationality, ethnicity, gender, sex, sexual orientation, serious disease or disability.


So anybody on the right?
 
Really, Zuckerberg? They are so fucking blatant about their bias it's astounding. They really are so high on their on farts that they think they're untouchable.
Weird to see PJW not overhyping something.
 
That Vice writer that threatened to kill Mr. Peanut is probably preparing about 10 more articles.
 
Back
Top Bottom