Facebook megathread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/30/18203551/apple-facebook-blocked-internal-ios-apps
Apple has shut down Facebook’s ability to distribute internal iOS apps, from early releases of the Facebook app to basic tools like a lunch menu. A person familiar with the situation tells The Verge that early versions of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and other pre-release “dogfood” (beta) apps have stopped working, as have other employee apps, like one for transportation. Facebook is treating this as a critical problem internally, we’re told, as the affected apps simply don’t launch on employees’ phones anymore.

The shutdown comes in response to news that Facebook has been using Apple’s program for internal app distribution to track teenage customers with a “research” app.

That app, revealed yesterday by TechCrunch, was distributed outside of the App Store using Apple’s enterprise program, which allows developers to use special certificates to install more powerful apps onto iPhones. Those apps are only supposed to be used by a company’s employees, however, and Facebook had been distributing its tracking app to customers. Facebook later said it would shut down the app.

This poses a huge issue for Facebook. While Apple provides other tools a company can use to install apps internally, Apple’s enterprise program is the main solution for widely distributing internal apps and services. In an email, a Facebook spokesperson said “I can confirm that this affects our internal apps.”

In a statement given to Recode, Apple said that Facebook was in “clear breach of their agreement with Apple.” Any developer that breaches that agreement, Apple said, has their distribution certificates revoked, “which is what we did in this case to protect our users and their data.” Apple declined to comment on shutting down all of Facebook’s internal apps in an email to The Verge.

Revoking a certificate not only stops apps from being distributed on iOS, but it also stops apps from working. And because internal apps by the same organization or developer may be connected to a single certificate, it can lead to immense headaches like the one Facebook now finds itself in where a multitude of internal apps have been shut down.

Apple and Facebook have already been bickering over privacy, but this is the first instance of Apple taking an action that directly shuts down some of Facebook’s activities. Last March, Apple CEO Tim Cook criticized Facebook’s handling of the Cambridge Analytica data sharing scandal, saying, “I wouldn’t be in this situation” if he were running the company. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg later said the comments were “extremely glib” and spoke of Apple as a company that “work hard to charge you more.”
 
deviantART still exists though, right? I mean, why post there with all of you other exceptional friends instead of posting your saggy ass onto Facebook and then have to force your parents to explain to their Facebook friends why you ended up such a loser?
But can you get your 14 year old nephew to see your photos and give you a like as easy?
 
We are all subjected to the infamous man boobs, I've seen My 600 pound life enough to stomach it. But back to the topic. I think its because we sexualize the female breast way too much looking at it more as a sex symbol than a part of the human body. The banning of the female nipple is ridiculous in my view, it is just another law to oppress woman. If a woman can tolerate her man walking around shirtless for all the world to see. Then a man can do the same, when she does it.
 
We are all subjected to the infamous man boobs, I've seen My 600 pound life enough to stomach it. But back to the topic. I think its because we sexualize the female breast way too much looking at it more as a sex symbol than a part of the human body. The banning of the female nipple is ridiculous in my view, it is just another law to oppress woman. If a woman can tolerate her man walking around shirtless for all the world to see. Then a man can do the same, when she does it.
People lust over the body. It's what humans do.

I for one find it uncomfortable whenever there's a shirtless man out in public, and others do too.

Not everyone enjoys seeing a naked person out in public, you know.
 
But they aren't full body naked just topless. If a Man has too poor self control to grope a topless woman as she walks by, she isn't the problem. Woman have long suffered discrimination because some guys didn't know how to keep their hands to themselves.

A man can post a topless photo on facebook or Twitter and no one bats an eye. But if a woman did the same she would get flagged. I'm not asking for full nudity but toplessness should be permitted for both genders.
 
We are all subjected to the infamous man boobs, I've seen My 600 pound life enough to stomach it. But back to the topic. I think its because we sexualize the female breast way too much looking at it more as a sex symbol than a part of the human body. The banning of the female nipple is ridiculous in my view, it is just another law to oppress woman. If a woman can tolerate her man walking around shirtless for all the world to see. Then a man can do the same, when she does it.

I found this argument interesting because I ran into the Breast Feeding Moms community recently. They swear up and down the videos they post are educational and how breast feeding is simply natural and not sexual, and then they uploaded videos of the themselves naked and orgasming during breastfeeding. So is the breast sexual or not?

arrest.jpg


bnazi.jpg


Most of her stuff has been taken down, but her tamer videos are still out there.

 
The Breast is not sexual, people can orgasm in many different ways, even brushing the fingers across the skin in the right way can induce a feel of sexual gratification. Men can also sexually stimulated from their nipples too,
 
Only Boomers use Facebook. The youngsters are hooked on PornHub. I can't tell who the bigger faggots are, Facebook and the people who think they're protecting children or the protesters... All blissfully unaware that the entire internet was basically designed for porn, and Facebook is irrelevant in the matter.
 


A network of tens of thousands of online volunteers is fighting hate speech on Facebook. They organise under the slogan "#IAmHere".

It's 7:30 in Berlin, and Nina's alarm clock is going off. Before getting up and making breakfast for her 13-month-old daughter, who is sleeping in the next room, she reaches for her phone.

Unlike many of us, Nina's not checking her emails, the news, or looking at gossip sites or posting photos. Instead, every day Nina opens up Facebook and heads straight to the closed group #IchBinHier ("#IAmHere").

Nina is part of an international movement working to find and combat hate speech on the platform. She and her fellow #IAmHere members spend their spare time scanning Facebook for conversations happening on big pages, often run by mainstream media organisations, which are overwhelmed with racist, misogynistic or homophobic comments.

They don't attempt to change the minds of people posting hate or argue directly with extremists. Instead they collectively inject discussions with facts and straightforwardly argued reasonable viewpoints. The idea is to provide balance so that other social media users see that there are alternative perspectives beyond the ones offered up by the trolls.

The volunteers also say they don't target conservative views or any other mainstream opinions. Instead #IAmHere activists - there are tens of thousands of them in groups across Europe and around the world - say their mission is to change the overall tone of online debate, counteract hate storms and make Facebook a nicer place overall.

And the social media giant has picked up on the phenomenon. Facebook has provided #IAmHere groups with free advertising credits and helps them organise meet-ups as part of its Online Civil Courage Initiative.

Why do they do it?
Nina, 39, says she spends around three hours a day moderating comments on top of her full-time job as director of an NGO. But she has very personal reasons for devoting a large chunk of her busy schedule to the campaign.

Her husband is from Uganda, and she says they both have felt angry and scared by what they perceive as a rise in racist, anti-immigrant rhetoric on social media over the past few years.

"As a couple in this still very white Germany, we are exposed in a way," she says. "I think our feeling that we have to change something got stronger.

"I cannot imagine [my daughter] growing up and reading all these things. I do not want this culture."

Nina posted her first comment on behalf of the group in February 2017 after #IchBinHier was endorsed by a popular German TV presenter. "My heart was beating a lot the first time I used the hashtag… It felt amazing to finally have a group behind me."

In Germany, Nina says articles about asylum seekers or climate change protests tend to attract a lot of anger. User comments include racial or ethnic slurs, or include violent images of guns or guillotines. Some comments and pictures can be much worse.

Where did it start?
#IAmHere was founded in Sweden, where it is called #JaGarHar, by Iranian-born journalist Mina Dennert. Around three years ago she says she noticed social media becoming, as she describes it, "flooded with hatred", so she began trying to counter misogynistic and racist comments "in a calm, non-aggressive way".

"I've experienced so much racism throughout my life, I wasn't scared to do this," she adds.

After a while working mainly on her own, Dennert figured she could make more impact with a group behind her: "I reached out to get other people involved. A lot of them were like, 'This is fantastic, I've been feeling so alone with this.'"

Media attention soon followed and the Swedish group grew to 75,000 members. As word spread, similar groups began popping up in other countries including Italy, France, Slovakia, Poland and the UK. Today, there are 14 different #IAmHere groups working towards the same goals in their respective languages.

The groups stick to fighting hate speech, which Facebook defines as a "direct attack on people based on protected characteristics - race, ethnicity, national origin, religious affiliation, sexual orientation, caste, sex, gender, gender identity, and serious disease or disability."

The German group, #IchBinHier, was founded by marketing consultant Hannes Ley. It currently has 45,000 members.

"I had some Swedish friends come to stay in December 2016," he explains. "I came into the kitchen one morning and one of them was posting comments on Facebook. I asked what he was doing."

Ley says he had "a really positive gut feeling" the minute his friend explained the concept. "I was reading comments for many years and I felt rather helpless because of the quantity of hate speech. I thought, OK, we can try to make another majority to confront the hate speech crowd."

Ley says the group is welcoming of diverse political views. "The majority of our members are left and liberal and we have some conservative members," he says. "We have to tolerate different opinions in a democracy. But if it becomes aggressive, if it becomes violent, this is where #IchBinHier interrupts."

As the German group grew, some members became curious about the commenters they were interacting with. "I was very astonished by the number of likes some comments were getting, ones that would really vilify migrants," says Philip Kreissel, a 23-year-old political science student and #IchBinHier volunteer.

Intrigued to see whether he could find some kind of organised activity taking place, he began doing data analysis.

"I found that some of these accounts were really [very] active and were 'liking' all day, and this created a bias in social media."

Dealing with the backlash
Further digging made it clear that many users creating and liking hateful comments were just as organised and targeted as #IAmHere. Researcher Jacob Davey, an expert on the far right at the London-based Institute of Strategic Dialogue (ISD), says: "Troll armies bring themselves together in almost semi-military style hierarchies.

"You can see these groups coming together and engaging in harassment on Facebook, which appears to be both silencing moderate discussion and dominating certain discussion points."

Going up against these troll armies does not come without risks. "2018 was an election year in Sweden and they started making up the craziest stuff about us, that we were weapons dealers or supporting terrorists," says Dennert.

Members of the Swedish group were doxxed - they had their personal information posted online. Dennert, her husband and two children requested police protection after the threats got particularly vicious.

In Berlin, Nina has also been subject to intimidation. "One troll mentioned my child, as he saw on my work's website I was on parental leave. That really creeped me out, and I thought for a moment 'Should I be doing this?'"

She admits that being confronted with hateful comments on a daily basis can take a toll on members' mental health. "It depends on my daily mood," she says. "Some days I can take so much I amaze myself. Others, I feel my skin is very thin."

Should Facebook do more?
Facebook has provided the volunteers with free ad credits and support in organising meet-ups. Despite being grateful for the help, many #IAmHere members believe the platform should do more to combat hate speech. Ley says Facebook needs to "live up to its own community standards" and be quicker at deleting comments.

In a statement, Facebook says it uses a mix of proactive technology and human moderation, and that its efforts to tackle hate speech have improved. For instance, the company says it has banned more than 200 white supremacist organisations.

Starting in 2018, Germany's NetzDG law required social media sites to remove hate speech within a day of it being reported, and analysis shows that explicitly racist posts have decreased on Facebook since then. A study of #IchBinHier activity by researchers at the University of Dusseldorf also found that its commenters are often successful at changing the tone of online debates.

On the other hand, research carried out by Kreissel and the ISD found that coordinated right-wing extremist online hate campaigns have increased three-fold since December 2017.

"I don't see it getting better, I see it getting worse," says Nina. She says she often feels "hopeless" when confronted with the daily barrage of hate, and she believes "what we say online will affect our offline actions eventually".

But this is another reason she keeps going. "I think it's made me more courageous in offline situations," she says. "Recently, two men were shouting at each other on the subway and I just got in between them and said, 'What are you doing?'

"It equips me for being with my daughter in this world - if someone makes a comment on how she looks, I'm fast to react.

"It's in me… It's part of my life."
 
Troll armies bring themselves together in almost semi-military style hierarchies.
Amazing, i didn't knew that a bunch of shitbags with a lot of free time and a couple of Facebook accounts could be a real threat to democracy and the well being of thousands of people. And the funniest thing of all is that they believe these are legit gay ops to undermine a country.
 
Back
Top Bottom