Facebook megathread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/30/18203551/apple-facebook-blocked-internal-ios-apps
Apple has shut down Facebook’s ability to distribute internal iOS apps, from early releases of the Facebook app to basic tools like a lunch menu. A person familiar with the situation tells The Verge that early versions of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and other pre-release “dogfood” (beta) apps have stopped working, as have other employee apps, like one for transportation. Facebook is treating this as a critical problem internally, we’re told, as the affected apps simply don’t launch on employees’ phones anymore.

The shutdown comes in response to news that Facebook has been using Apple’s program for internal app distribution to track teenage customers with a “research” app.

That app, revealed yesterday by TechCrunch, was distributed outside of the App Store using Apple’s enterprise program, which allows developers to use special certificates to install more powerful apps onto iPhones. Those apps are only supposed to be used by a company’s employees, however, and Facebook had been distributing its tracking app to customers. Facebook later said it would shut down the app.

This poses a huge issue for Facebook. While Apple provides other tools a company can use to install apps internally, Apple’s enterprise program is the main solution for widely distributing internal apps and services. In an email, a Facebook spokesperson said “I can confirm that this affects our internal apps.”

In a statement given to Recode, Apple said that Facebook was in “clear breach of their agreement with Apple.” Any developer that breaches that agreement, Apple said, has their distribution certificates revoked, “which is what we did in this case to protect our users and their data.” Apple declined to comment on shutting down all of Facebook’s internal apps in an email to The Verge.

Revoking a certificate not only stops apps from being distributed on iOS, but it also stops apps from working. And because internal apps by the same organization or developer may be connected to a single certificate, it can lead to immense headaches like the one Facebook now finds itself in where a multitude of internal apps have been shut down.

Apple and Facebook have already been bickering over privacy, but this is the first instance of Apple taking an action that directly shuts down some of Facebook’s activities. Last March, Apple CEO Tim Cook criticized Facebook’s handling of the Cambridge Analytica data sharing scandal, saying, “I wouldn’t be in this situation” if he were running the company. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg later said the comments were “extremely glib” and spoke of Apple as a company that “work hard to charge you more.”
 
Will they go as hard after him as the entire world went after Assange? Robot lizardman in the Embassy arc when?
 
"canadian subpoena' means about as much to an american as "zimbabwe dollars"
Hey, laugh all you want, but it's not every day the lowly lower- and middle-class plebs can be multi-trillionaires thanks to hyper-inflation:
778157
 
It would be a pity if something embarrassing coming from a powerful Canadian politician gets leaked.

Trudeau's already had multiple scandals, and the assholes in Ontario and Quebec appears to be entirely unfazed by such occurrences.
 
Just out of curiosity, but, how is it legal for a Parliament to demand a citizen of another country appear before them?

If Zuck broke a Canadian law, that can be resolved in a Canadian criminal court, otherwise, it seems to me he has no obligation to appear in any other forum for any other reason.....

I don't like the guy at all, but really, how can another nation demand you show up not for anything you did on their soil, but merely because your presence was, well, demanded?
 
Probably the best article I've seen from CNN in years. A committee wanted Facebook's TOP execs to weigh in on a panel, some alternates were sent in their place, and Canada's politicians literally acted like spoiled little girls on a world stage; "we know we can't handcuff or punish them legally, but we're gonna make you look bad!" They also cited some op-ed piece Zucc wrote and claimed he was being disingenuous, like a middle school love letter taken literally. It's terrific. Bravo you stupid leafs!
778199
 
It would be a pity if something embarrassing coming from a powerful Canadian politician gets leaked.
Trudeau's already had multiple scandals, and the assholes in Ontario and Quebec appears to be entirely unfazed by such occurrences.

You don't even need a leak for Trudeau. He's apparently happy to go around embarrassing himself in public all the time.
 
So basically, a funny video of Nancy Pelosi looking drunk was made, and Canada is so one-sided that they're demanding Zuck come to parliament and then go to his room to think about what he did?
 
I honestly think it would be best if we did that. The liberal Canadians are somehow more insufferable than the American ones.

Good luck digging the real loons out of the mountains; It'll be Afghanistan, all over again.

Just out of curiosity, but, how is it legal for a Parliament to demand a citizen of another country appear before them?

If Zuck broke a Canadian law, that can be resolved in a Canadian criminal court, otherwise, it seems to me he has no obligation to appear in any other forum for any other reason.....

I don't like the guy at all, but really, how can another nation demand you show up not for anything you did on their soil, but merely because your presence was, well, demanded?

Far as I understand, unless Zuck is currently IN Canada (in which case they'd have some high-level RCMP brass cordially request his presence), they'd have to request that the US extradite him, which would look foolish as fuck. I mean, I suppose it's possible they could try him in absentia, and declare that if he at any time enters Canada, he would be denied entry, or some equally exceptional shit, but I can't imagine any other way to accomplish anything.
 
Reminds me of all the BS warrants that were filed against Dubya. I remember Germany being one of them. Yet there he was in Germany, awkwardly giving Merkel a shoulder rub.
 
I know, I know, a bit late but I didn't see a thread on it after a few days and I figured better that I throw it out there than to let you guys miss out on this exceptionalism.


Dozens of naked models gathered outside Facebook's office in New York on Sunday as part of an art installation that protested Facebook's ban on nudity.
The demonstration, known as #WeTheNipple, was organized by the National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC) along with artist Spencer Tunick, who photographed the nude crowd.


Facebook has a strict ban on nudity on its own platform as well as Instagram. Some artists complain that this prevents them from sharing their work online.

"It particularly harms artists whose work focuses on their own bodies, including queer and gender-nonconforming artists, and the bodies of those in their communities. Museums and galleries are constrained when even promoting exhibitions featuring nudes," the NCAC wrote in a press release for the event.

Facebook did not respond to Business Insider's request for comment.

According to CNN, members of women's empowerment group Grab Them By The Ballot also took part in the demonstration.

"We are here to empower women around body positivity and encourage female voter turnout in 2020," Dawn Robertson, founder of the group, said in a statement to the press before the event.
She continued: "This isn't just about shock value and protesting — it's about reclaiming our bodies. Facebook and Instagram have missed this message entirely as they cling to negligent and blatantly misogynist policies that overlook the context of the artistic nudity being posted."
Robertson said Facebook permanently banned the group's ad account after it posted a nude painting with a celebratory poem for Mother's Day. She has also had her own account banned on several occasions.
According to Roberston, Facebook admitted that they were "wrong" to have canceled these accounts after she appealed, but she has since been banned again.
 
Ban people for voicing opinions you don't like, by all means, but let us post porn in public, got damn you all!
 
How come these people never complain about the FCC banning nudity/swearing on network tv and radio? Same principle.
 
Back
Top Bottom