Explanation

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
I'd say your dad needs to take off his belt and whack you across the ass with it a few times, but that's probably how you became so fucked up in the first place.
 
BoingoTango said:
I don't know man, ask all the lolifags around here, I'm sure they can give you a GREAAAT justification for it.
Click to expand...
You see, it’s because otherwise, he would fuck an IRL gang of super genius kindergarteners who fly around in a spaceship.
Lesser of two evils, really.
 
Of course, he draws Sonic ship art. What would an autist be without Sonic the Hedgehog?
www.deviantart.com

Silo Sonic Ship (Sonic Hedgehog Milo Catson) by BrushyelfsBubic on DeviantArt

www.deviantart.com www.deviantart.com
silo_sonic_ship__sonic_hedgehog__milo_catson__by_brushyelfsbubic_daqu8q9.jpg
 
BoingoTango said:
I don't know man, ask all the lolifags around here, I'm sure they can give you a GREAAAT justification for it.
Click to expand...
There is nothing inherently wrong with lolicon. Allow me to explain. Firstly, lolis are not real. They can be drawings, paintings, and animated characters, but they are not real, living, breathing children. Lolicon material is not child pornography because no child is being harmed - or is in anyway present - in the making of it. In fact, not all lolis are even children, some are hundreds of years old. But of coarse, regardless of how old or young any fictional character is supposed to be, their age doesn’t matter since they’re not real.
Now, let’s suppose you like lolis… even though there is nothing wrong with it, people will look down upon you for it. This is because too many people are uneducated on the subject. If you don’t know what a lolicon is and have to use Wikipedia to gain information, then you really don’t have any right to speak for or against it.
Secondly, some may ask “isn’t that for pedophiles?” Here’s my answer. No. While it is true some lolicon may be pedophiles, most are not. Case in point, myself. Ask any lolicon, and they’ll admit they like lolis but they’ll also tell you they have no interest in real children (this could be because of the belief that “2D is superior to 3D” within the anime and manga fanbase). As for those few lolicon who are pedophiles, lolicon material can act as a substitute for child pornography. Don’t you think it’s better for them to have this rather than real child pornography where there are real victims of sexual abuse? You may think, “if they enjoy lolicon material, it’s only a matter of time before they start acting it out in real life,” but that is incorrect. Think about the plethora of violent movies, do you honestly think that when someone watches one they’re immediately going to mimic it in real life? No, of course you don’t, that would be ridiculous! Humans are not sheep that do as they see.
The morality and ethics that go into this is one thing, but law is a whole other beast. In most places, I’m sure lolicon material is illegal or at least in a grey area. I am uncertain of where it is legal, and how much of a grey area it is in law.
 
Eryngium said:
There is nothing inherently wrong with lolicon. Allow me to explain. Firstly, lolis are not real. They can be drawings, paintings, and animated characters, but they are not real, living, breathing children. Lolicon material is not child pornography because no child is being harmed - or is in anyway present - in the making of it. In fact, not all lolis are even children, some are hundreds of years old. But of coarse, regardless of how old or young any fictional character is supposed to be, their age doesn’t matter since they’re not real.
Now, let’s suppose you like lolis… even though there is nothing wrong with it, people will look down upon you for it. This is because too many people are uneducated on the subject. If you don’t know what a lolicon is and have to use Wikipedia to gain information, then you really don’t have any right to speak for or against it.
Secondly, some may ask “isn’t that for pedophiles?” Here’s my answer. No. While it is true some lolicon may be pedophiles, most are not. Case in point, myself. Ask any lolicon, and they’ll admit they like lolis but they’ll also tell you they have no interest in real children (this could be because of the belief that “2D is superior to 3D” within the anime and manga fanbase). As for those few lolicon who are pedophiles, lolicon material can act as a substitute for child pornography. Don’t you think it’s better for them to have this rather than real child pornography where there are real victims of sexual abuse? You may think, “if they enjoy lolicon material, it’s only a matter of time before they start acting it out in real life,” but that is incorrect. Think about the plethora of violent movies, do you honestly think that when someone watches one they’re immediately going to mimic it in real life? No, of course you don’t, that would be ridiculous! Humans are not sheep that do as they see.
The morality and ethics that go into this is one thing, but law is a whole other beast. In most places, I’m sure lolicon material is illegal or at least in a grey area. I am uncertain of where it is legal, and how much of a grey area it is in law.
Click to expand...
Literally every single point you mentioned could be argued in favor of little einstein porn you fucking faggot. It isn't different just because they put an anime artstyle over it. And of COURSE they (you) are going to say they don't like real children.

People, if we are going after child porn, let's go after all of it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom