Business Exclusive: Meta kills DEI programs

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1736531932309.png


Mark Zuckerberg's Meta is terminating major DEI programs, effective immediately — including for hiring, training and picking suppliers, according to a new employee memo obtained by Axios.

Why it matters: The move is a strong signal to Meta employees that the company's push to make inroads with the incoming Trump administration isn't just posturing, but an ethos shift that will impact its business practices.

Context: Meta said it was changing course because the "legal and policy landscape surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States is changing," per a memo by Janelle Gale, vice president of human resources.

  • The moves come just three days after Meta ended many of its efforts to fact-check and police speech on Facebook, Instagram and Threads.
  • The announcement also follows a host of public moves by tech companies and executives to align with the politics and cultural views of President-elect Trump and the MAGA movement.
State of play: Friday's memo by Gale — announcing changes to "our hiring, development and procurement practices" — was posted for Meta employees in Workplace, the company's internal communications tool.

  • "The legal and policy landscape surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States is changing," Gale wrote.
  • "The Supreme Court of the United States has recently made decisions signaling a shift in how courts will approach DEI. … The term 'DEI' has also become charged, in part because it is understood by some as a practice that suggests preferential treatment of some groups over others."
The big picture: Similar moves have been made recently by other major companies, including Walmart in November and McDonald's just this week.

  • Meta last week replaced its president of global affairs, Nick Clegg, with Joel Kaplan, a prominent Republican who is now chief global affairs officer. Meta pledged a $1 million donation to Trump's inauguration — and added UFC president and CEO Dana White, a top Trump ally, to its board Monday.
Zoom in: Citing the "shifting legal and policy landscape," Meta's memo announced five big DEI pullbacks.

  • Cutting Meta's DEI team: Meta will no longer have a team focused on DEI. Maxine Williams, the company's chief diversity officer, is taking on a new role at Meta, focused on accessibility and engagement, Gale wrote.
  • Ending equity and inclusion programs: Meta will instead build programs "that focus on how to apply fair and consistent practices that mitigate bias for all, no matter your background," Gale said.
  • Sunsetting supplier diversity efforts: Meta will end efforts to source business suppliers from diverse-owned businesses. Moving forward, the company will "focus our efforts on supporting small and medium-sized businesses that power much of our economy," Gale wrote.
  • Ending the "Diverse Slate Approach" to hiring: While Meta will continue to source candidates from different backgrounds, it will no longer use the diverse-slate hiring approach, which ensures a diverse pool of candidates is considered for every open position. "We believe there are other ways to build an industry-leading workforce and leverage teams made up of world-class people from all types of backgrounds," Gale wrote.
  • Ending representation goals: Having representation goals, "can create the impression that decisions are being made based on race or gender," Gale wrote. "While this has never been our practice, we want to eliminate any impression of it," she said. She noted the company, "previously ended representation goals for women and ethnic minorities."
Zoom out: Data suggests tech employees tend to be more liberal than their employers. But over the last year, the public sentiment has shifted about corporations taking a stand on major issues like DEI, as well as environmental, social and governance issues.

  • President-elect Trump, buoyed by a growing friendship with Elon Musk, last month endorsed the H-1B visa program for foreign tech workers.
What they're saying: "Meta has the privilege to serve billions of people every day," the memo concludes.

  • "It's important to us that our products are accessible to all, and are useful in promoting economic growth and opportunity around the world. We continue to be focused on serving everyone, and building a multi-talented, industry-leading workforce from all walks of life."
https://www.axios.com/2025/01/10/meta-dei-programs-employees-trump (Archive)
 
The full memo:
Hi all, I wanted to share some changes we're making to our hiring, development and procurement practices. Before getting into the details, there is some important background to lay out:

The legal and policy landscape surrounding diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in the United States is changing. The Supreme Court of the United States has recently made decisions signaling a shift in how courts will approach DEI. It reaffirms longstanding principles that discrimination should not be tolerated or promoted on the basis of inherent characteristics. The term "DEI" has also become charged, in part because it is understood by some as a practice that suggests preferential treatment of some groups over others.

At Meta, we have a principle of serving everyone. This can be achieved through cognitively diverse teams, with differences in knowledge, skills, political views, backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences. Such teams are better at innovating, solving complex problems and identifying new opportunities which ultimately helps us deliver on our ambition to build products that serve everyone. On top of that, we've always believed that no-one should be given - or deprived- of opportunities because of protected characteristics, and that has not changed.

Given the shifting legal and policy landscape, we're making the following changes:


  • On hiring, we will continue to source candidates from different backgrounds, but we will stop using the Diverse Slate Approach. This practice has always been subject to public debate and is currently being challenged. We believe there are other ways to build an industry-leading workforce and leverage teams made up of world-class people from all types of backgrounds to build products that work for everyone.
  • We previously ended representation goals for women and ethnic minorities. Having goals can create the impression that decisions are being made based on race or gender. While this has never been our practice, we want to eliminate any impression of it.
  • We are sunsetting our supplier diversity efforts within our broader supplier strategy. This effort focused on sourcing from diverse-owned businesses; going forward, we will focus our efforts on supporting small and medium sized businesses that power much of our economy. Opportunities will continue to be available to all qualified suppliers, including those who were part of the supplier diversity program.
  • Instead of equity and inclusion training programs, we will build programs that focus on how to apply fair and consistent practices that mitigate bias for all, no matter your background.
  • We will no longer have a team focused on DEI. Maxine Williams is taking on a new role at Meta, focused on accessibility and engagement.
What remains the same are the principles we've used to guide our People practices:

  1. We serve everyone. We are committed to making our products accessible, beneficial and universally impactful for everyone.
  2. We build the best teams with the most talented people. This means sourcing people from a range of candidate pools, but never making hiring decisions based on protected characteristics (e.g. race, gender etc.). We will always evaluate people as individuals.
  3. We drive consistency in employment practices to ensure fairness and objectivity for all. We do not provide preferential treatment, extra opportunities or unjustified credit to anyone based on protected characteristics nor will we devalue impact based on these characteristics.
  4. We build connection and community. We support our employee communities, people who use our products, and those in the communities where we operate. Our employee community groups (MRGs) continue to be open to all.
Meta has the privilege to serve billions of people every day. It's important to us that our products are accessible to all, and are useful in promoting economic growth and opportunity around the world. We continue to be focused on serving everyone, and building a multi-talented, industry-leading workforce from all walks of life.
Source (Archive)
 
  • Ending representation goals: Having representation goals, "can create the impression that decisions are being made based on race or gender," Gale wrote
"We are not making our decisions based off race or gender."
  • She noted the company, "previously ended representation goals for women and ethnic minorities."
"We have hiring targets based off race and gender."

Bless them. They think lots of people actually believe their obvious lies.
 
The announcement also follows a host of public moves by tech companies and executives to align with the politics and cultural views of President-elect Trump and the MAGA movement.
Not that it's bad news, but fuck these people. The "Immutable Principles" they were all going on about are suddenly changeable now they need to suck up to a different president. Reminds me of this:

download.jpg pgl4n41egx561.jpg

If the fucking Scientologists were elected tomorrow, they'd boldly declare that they always believed in compulsory Thetan detection for all employees and anything else is misinformation.
 
Not that it's bad news, but fuck these people. The "Immutable Principles" they were all going on about are suddenly changeable now they need to suck up to a different president. Reminds me of this:

View attachment 6842886View attachment 6842887

If the fucking Scientologists were elected tomorrow, they'd boldly declare that they always believed in compulsory Thetan detection for all employees and anything else is misinformation.
Ideally I don't want corporations to make any political statements whatsoever. It's funny to see the signs of the tides changing but the sad thing for me is how many people take them seriously.
 
If the fucking Scientologists were elected tomorrow, they'd boldly declare that they always believed in compulsory Thetan detection for all employees and anything else is misinformation.
TBF, Scientologists deserve more respect than these witless fucks.
 
Never forget that words are meaningless and Actions are what matter. They are, in action, doing nothing to stem the D.I.E. deluge, it is merely going "underground" so to speak. The rebranding to B.R.I.D.G.E. is already passed out to HR departments and fag brigades the Banana Republic over. And unsurprisingly, B.R.I.D.G.E. is far worse than D.I.E.
The D.I.E. agenda gets an unsubtle edit (Larry Fink ESG being mandated as corporate policy).png

Stay vigilant. Semitic Corporations are not changing their actions one iota. Though they do want you to go back to sleep like it's the 90s again.
 
They didn't just end DEI programs. They killed them. Stabbed right in the eye with a dilator.
 
I'm actually curious what consequences this might have around the world.

Take Britain for instance. One of the reasons I suspect X has managed to avoid being taken through the courts is that while it doesn't actively prevent speech that is illegal in the UK; it isn't exactly inviting people to use racial slurs and call Starmer names.

Meta has gone a step further. They've given specific examples in their guidelines like "It's okay to call trans women mentally ill" which is illegal in the UK. But its also illegal to accept the idea that transgenderism is a mental illness, unless said in an Islamic sermon or a similar very limited context.

Meta is, in effect, telling the British public its okay to commit hate crimes which as far as I can tell is itself a hate crime in the UK for which the author and Meta itself could both be liable in both the civil and criminal systems.

Some very, very interesting things here.
 
T
Never forget that words are meaningless and Actions are what matter. They are, in action, doing nothing to stem the D.I.E. deluge, it is merely going "underground" so to speak. The rebranding to B.R.I.D.G.E. is already passed out to HR departments and fag brigades the Banana Republic over. And unsurprisingly, B.R.I.D.G.E. is far worse than D.I.E.
View attachment 6842966
Stay vigilant. Semitic Corporations are not changing their actions one iota. Though they do want you to go back to sleep like it's the 90s again.
They go underground like diglett to prevent getting eaten by the orange man.
 
I'm watching the Joe Rogan Zucc interview that just dropped and I don't buy for a second that this Jew is just an innocent victim of the Biden Administration and was "forced" to censor people and had nothing to do with it. If Kamala won he'd gladly ban you for talking about DEI or trannies in women's bathrooms.
 
I'm actually curious what consequences this might have around the world.

Take Britain for instance. One of the reasons I suspect X has managed to avoid being taken through the courts is that while it doesn't actively prevent speech that is illegal in the UK; it isn't exactly inviting people to use racial slurs and call Starmer names.

Meta has gone a step further. They've given specific examples in their guidelines like "It's okay to call trans women mentally ill" which is illegal in the UK. But its also illegal to accept the idea that transgenderism is a mental illness, unless said in an Islamic sermon or a similar very limited context.

Meta is, in effect, telling the British public its okay to commit hate crimes which as far as I can tell is itself a hate crime in the UK for which the author and Meta itself could both be liable in both the civil and criminal systems.

Some very, very interesting things here.
These changes don't affect the UK, just the US where free speech is supposed to be a thing.
 
These changes don't affect the UK, just the US where free speech is supposed to be a thing.
I know that. I was thinking more along the lines of the precedent that the UK blocks access to website that promote undertaking illegal activity.

Free speech takes place on X, but X doesn't encourage or reassure users they may undertake speech that is free.

Free Speech now (allegedly) takes place on Meta, but it encourages and reassures users that they can undertake speech that is free.

That's a key difference that in itself is more than enough to block Meta. If they will is another matter, but many websites have been censored for far less. You're explicitly permitted to call people terms some countries deem crimes to type out.

Of course it won't impact US citizens, but it could see Facebook banned as a hate site in the UK if they apply the legislation in this area as is.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom