Evil and Survival

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
AbyssGazer

AbyssGazer

Happiness or death!
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Why is it that evil and physical survival are linked? It's as if you can only choose to save either your spirit or your continuum as a being (your body, to be specific to our type of physical being).

Jesus had to give up his body in order for his spirit to live. On the other end of the spectrum is the Evil that continues in its form perpetually.

High empathy societies are crushed under their own altruism when they encounter savages. Societies built on predictable violence prevails through millenia. Every day you as an individual have to make choices, big or small, on whether you'll keep your spiritual integrity or further your survival.

What path are you choosing? Do you agree with the premise or do you see existence in a different light?
 
Unprecedented and unsustainable prosperity happened. When it comes crashing down, only places like Bharat will remain standing and inherit the earth.
 
If you have a myopic understanding of the world, then yes perhaps evil and survival really do seem inseparable, but they simply are not and never were.

Even at its most basic where you have to fight others for resources, and may need to kill animals for food, there is no evil being done. What will make this evil is harming others for entertainment, which is the basis for cruelty.

When you engage in cruelty you are satisfying your own ego at the expense of another beings dignity, and that is evil.

Now with the examples above we can choose superior options if we really care too, we will always have a need for security for ourselves and our people so we can use diplomacy to work out problems( as best we can) and with more stability we can live without needing to slaughter animals for food out of compassion, yet still raise them and care for dairy animals, or bees for honey which can contribute to our food stores. These are superior alternatives because they reduce (but can never eliminate) suffering. This objective is just one component toward spiritual goals, and genuine goodness, but while it is important is wholly material in nature.
 
Staticness said:
Unprecedented and unsustainable prosperity happened. When it comes crashing down, only places like Bharat will remain standing and inherit the earth.
Click to expand...
Bharat doesn't exist and its current inhabitants are far from it, they’re wholly tamasic and agents of ruination.

You will inherit nothing.
 
Ah ha' said:
Bharat doesn't exist and its current inhabitants are far from it, they’re wholly tamasic and agents of ruination.

You will inherit nothing.
Click to expand...
fuck you, motherfucker, fuck you, I am not Indian, I am white.

The people of Bharat are stubbornly resilient and will simply outlast everyone else in a horribly polluted world, a world polluted as a by-product of these “overly altruistic” societies.
 
Ah ha' said:
If you have a myopic understanding of the world, then yes perhaps evil and survival really do seem inseparable, but they simply are not and never were.

Even at its most basic where you have to fight others for resources, and may need to kill animals for food, there is no evil being done. What will make this evil is harming others for entertainment, which is the basis for cruelty.
Click to expand...
Not really, it depends on the situation.

We can say that it's evil for me to screw you up for my benefit, I can make shit up and maybe put you in a delicate legal situation, or "legally extort" you out of your money or resources, or screw you up at job for me to be promoted/more likely promoted and you get fired or remain at the bottom, or for me to sacrifice you to avoid mild inconveninces for me, etc.

There is a degree of subjectivity here, grey areas and different standards on what evil is, or what's acceptable or not so this topic needs to have its terms well defined.

In general, a thoughtful, well played evil/apathetic action may give you significant advantage over other/others, while at the same time, being empathetic and "good" may do as well, but again, depends on the context.

There's so many variables & situations to consider.
 
We Are The Witches said:
Not really, it depends on the situation.

We can say that it's evil for me to screw you up for my benefit, I can make shit up and maybe put you in a delicate legal situation, or "legally extort" you out of your money or resources, or screw you up at job for me to be promoted/more likely promoted and you get fired or remain at the bottom, or for me to sacrifice you to avoid mild inconveninces for me, etc.

There is a degree of subjectivity here, grey areas and different standards on what evil is, or what's acceptable or not so this topic needs to have its terms well defined.

In general, a thoughtful, well played evil/apathetic action may give you significant advantage over other/others, while at the same time, being empathetic and "good" may do as well, but again, depends on the context.

There's so many variables & situations to consider.
Click to expand...
Thats a lot of words to try and argue that your choice of action is not evil, just because of circumstance.

If you are insistent on choosing to have an advantage over others by screwing them, that is still a choice where you could had ignored or done any number of things differently. But thank you for demonstrating another of the tenets of evil, which is to minimize its harm and obfuscation. Again refer to what I said about making superior choices, being good is a choice, but perhaps you need it simplified more? The basis of goodness is self control, and not over indulging the senses; if you feel the need to screw someone over because of some monetary gain or they annoy you, I would say you are enthralled by your senses.

Also @Staticness if you’re as aryan as you claim and had a clue you would had realized I was right. The only people I’ve known who bring up Bharat are academics, and retard Indians with their unwarranted superiority. Let me just spell it out for you, you are the unwanted population that is spoken against so much in Vedic Canon, Perhaps you will need a direct quote?
 
Ah ha' said:
Also @Staticness if you’re as aryan as you claim and had a clue you would had realized I was right. The only people I’ve known who bring up Bharat are academics, and retard Indians with their unwarranted superiority. Let me just spell it out for you, you are the unwanted population that is spoken against so much in Vedic Canon, Perhaps you will need a direct quote?
Click to expand...

how could you say indians have unwarranted superiority when they are taking over the world?
 
Ah ha' said:
Behind every “successful” Indian there is a Jew with a leash. Learn to play it cool little coolie.
Click to expand...
I AM NOT INDIAN!!!1!! look at this
IMG_1909.webp
 
personally i think one needs a balance of good and evil in their life but finding that balance is where most fail. in terms of survival it becomes more obvious since you often see cases of animals just murdering weak or injured members of their groups or old animals being exiled from the pack since they are a liability.

going too far towards either side can have a negative impact on your survival and the survival of those around you as well in some instances.
 
Ah ha' said:
Thats a lot of words to try and argue that your choice of action is not evil, just because of circumstance.

If you are insistent on choosing to have an advantage over others by screwing them, that is still a choice where you could had ignored or done any number of things differently. But thank you for demonstrating another of the tenets of evil, which is to minimize its harm and obfuscation. Again refer to what I said about making superior choices, being good is a choice, but perhaps you need it simplified more? The basis of goodness is self control, and not over indulging the senses; if you feel the need to screw someone over because of some monetary gain or they annoy you, I would say you are enthralled by your senses.
Click to expand...
As I said, it depends on the context.

What I highlighted is that by committing arguably evil acts, you can get in advantageous positions & not just to satisfy your ego.

An example of the two rich people: one decides to screw over his workers, and make other underhanded decisions, leading a successful compnay and enjoying life in prosperity until his death, versus the one that decides to take the "good" actions, but being screwed over because he wasn't as ruthless as the other, then losing it all and end up dying homeless in the streets.

This is not always the case, it's an example for evil/bad/arguable acts bringing someone to prosperity over the other, in which the "evilness" was the main gear of survivability, in this case specifically, of far greater prosperity & overall happiness.

Meaning: they are not inseparable, but in some cases, they are closely connected and influenced by each other.
 
I think things become a bit more clear if you look at things from a lens of rational, long-term self-interest. Someone who betrays friends or does other kinds of evil will live to see another day and make some other short term gains, but they will not have long-term happiness, and they will be hated by everyone around them. A person who is truly moral and lives long is often someone who is not conventionally "nice", but they have their friends and family they are loyal to in hard times. They may be cold and rude to strangers and not be willing to spend a penny or a second to help them, but they are still assets to the community they live in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom