Everyday Feminism - aka Everyday Autism

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I went there while googling some SJW term a year ago and ended up somehow on their mailing list so now I get it all in my inbox. The hideous one was the guy talking about ways he was going to fight his own sexism, and one was every day he was going to talk to a woman he didn't find attractive, to fight the way he tries to talk to hot women most for the esteem boost, "even though he's married with no desire to cheat". Kind of a reverse PUA with him wandering around looking for buffalo. Mind you the idea of cheating would not get in an article now with their "poly or gtfo" stance.
 
I went there while googling some SJW term a year ago and ended up somehow on their mailing list so now I get it all in my inbox. The hideous one was the guy talking about ways he was going to fight his own sexism, and one was every day he was going to talk to a woman he didn't find attractive, to fight the way he tries to talk to hot women most for the esteem boost, "even though he's married with no desire to cheat". Kind of a reverse PUA with him wandering around looking for buffalo. Mind you the idea of cheating would not get in an article now with their "poly or gtfo" stance.
do you have some screenshot for the 'talking to unattractive women' thing? Not that I doubt it, it sounds like such an obvious 3rd wave SJ stance: be nice to someone not because they're interesting or smart or funny but because they have enough vague oppression points. Which really isn't any better than some superficial fuck only willing to spend time and effort on people who are hot or rich.
 
shit I can't find it again. I remember the writer was Jamie Utt, the male EF writer who has a college degree in "peace"
 
Not only is masculinity toxic, but so is whiteness. Because toxic whiteness also hurts white people as well and prevents true justice from being done. So sign up for this online workshop so you can be "healed". (Anyone want to take one for the team?")

As I've said before, EF follows the Scientology business plan.

Once again, trying to tackle the problem of obesity amongst the poor is oppressive and what ticked me off was the author's disgust towards the neo-liberal idea of personal responsibility.

I wonder if this is another example of narcissistic rage?

Tumblrina: “I am X, but society frowns on X. Therefore, I am bad.”
Online Hugbox: “Oh no, X isn’t bad. You’re great, it’s everyone else that is wrong.”
Tumblrina: “Huzzah, I’m proud to be X now!” (though my self-esteem hasn’t caught up to this statement yet)
Random Person: “Being X is bad.”
Tumblrina: “REEEEEEE!!!
 
Narcissistic rage reads like a SJW playbook:

For Kohut, narcissistic rage is related to narcissists' need for total control of their environment, including "the need for revenge, for righting a wrong, for undoing a hurt by whatever means".[21] It is an attempt by the narcissist to turn from a passive sense of victimization to an active role in giving pain to others, while at the same time attempting to rebuild their own (actually false) sense of self-worth. It may also involve self-protection and preservation, with rage serving to restore a sense of safety and power by destroying that which had threatened the narcissist.[21]

Alternatively, according to Kohut, rages can be seen as a result of the shame at being faced with failure.[22] Narcissistic rage is the uncontrollable and unexpected anger that results from a narcissistic injury – a threat to a narcissist's self-esteem or worth. Rage comes in many forms, but all pertain to the same important thing: revenge. Narcissistic rages are based on fear and will endure even after the threat is gone.[23]

To the narcissist, the rage is directed towards the person that they feel has slighted them; to other people, the rage is incoherent and unjust. This rage impairs their cognition, therefore impairing their judgment. During the rage they are prone to shouting, fact distortion and making groundless accusations.[24] In his book The Analysis of the Self, Kohut explains that expressions caused by a sense of things not going the expected way blossom into rages, and narcissists may even search for conflict to find a way to alleviate pain or suffering.[25]
 
What the hell is toxic whiteness? Is that what happens when you leave a gallon of milk outside for a month?
Here's the site's answer...
"Similar to toxic masculinity, toxic whiteness is something created by white supremacy and not inherent to white people. Toxic whiteness comes from the history of how the white identity was created since people of European descent had been identifying with their home countries and not as 'white' prior to the creation of whiteness. In the early 19th century, wealthy northwestern European landowners who colonized the Americas created the social construct of whiteness to prevent poor Europeans (like the Irish and Italians) from joining with enslaved Africans and indigenous folks against them since they had much more in common with them than with the wealthy Europeans. Now as white people, they got to be in the same social group as the wealthy Europeans! But in return for access to what was once denied to them – like land, education, and jobs – poor Europeans had to disconnect from their cultural heritage and history of why they left oppressive Europe, and how they were exploited in the Americas by wealthy white people. It was a pretty raw deal that exploited poorer white people and manipulated them to act against their own well-being in exchange for white privilege (and it's still happening today!) That's why it's important for white people to free themselves from toxic whiteness by acknowledging and resisting white supremacy, while reconnecting with who their people were before they became beneficiaries of white privilege. These liberating steps provide the building blocks for creating a radical anti-racist white identity – the focus for a future Compassionate Activism program!"
 
Here's the site's answer...
"Similar to toxic masculinity, toxic whiteness is something created by white supremacy and not inherent to white people. Toxic whiteness comes from the history of how the white identity was created since people of European descent had been identifying with their home countries and not as 'white' prior to the creation of whiteness. In the early 19th century, wealthy northwestern European landowners who colonized the Americas created the social construct of whiteness to prevent poor Europeans (like the Irish and Italians) from joining with enslaved Africans and indigenous folks against them since they had much more in common with them than with the wealthy Europeans. Now as white people, they got to be in the same social group as the wealthy Europeans! But in return for access to what was once denied to them – like land, education, and jobs – poor Europeans had to disconnect from their cultural heritage and history of why they left oppressive Europe, and how they were exploited in the Americas by wealthy white people. It was a pretty raw deal that exploited poorer white people and manipulated them to act against their own well-being in exchange for white privilege (and it's still happening today!) That's why it's important for white people to free themselves from toxic whiteness by acknowledging and resisting white supremacy, while reconnecting with who their people were before they became beneficiaries of white privilege. These liberating steps provide the building blocks for creating a radical anti-racist white identity – the focus for a future Compassionate Activism program!"

Uh. What? I still have no clue about what they are trying to say. Plus I think the historical illiteracy on the part of the author is gonna give me AIDS...

also. WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS WORD SALAD HAVE TO DO WITH FEMINISM?
 
Uh. What? I still have no clue about what they are trying to say. Plus I think the historical illiteracy on the part of the author is gonna give me AIDS...

also. WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS WORD SALAD HAVE TO DO WITH FEMINISM?
The place also focuses on racial and disability issues as well. (They also claim its an intersectional feminist issue.)
 
The place also focuses on racial and disability issues as well. (They also claim its an intersectional feminist issue.)
Is it just me, cause I'm getting a "we want to help the disadvantaged, and use them as status symbols and vanity objects" vibe from them?
 
I'd say its more of an extra ammo against the elites by guilting them even more. A number of the people who do the trans, disabled article also are.
 
Uh. What? I still have no clue about what they are trying to say. Plus I think the historical illiteracy on the part of the author is gonna give me AIDS...

also. WHAT THE HELL DOES THIS WORD SALAD HAVE TO DO WITH FEMINISM?
The claim appears to be that the Irish and Italians were niggers. They were offered positions as house niggers but "The Man" kept them in the field. The Irish and Italians are/were too niggerish to realize they had been bamboozled. This is why The Man needs to be taken down and the means of production returned to the people, who will elevate the woke Jezebel tards as their new masters.

And yes, they leave out some rather crucial elements of the history of this country, such as everything dealing with reality.

If there weren't hordes of professional educators in the West spreading intersectionality and collectivism, I would be sure this is simple trolling.
 
I think toxic whiteness is something like this
Harley-Quinn-Origin-New-52-Suicide-Squad.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom