Euro migrant crisis

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The problem is that Europeans these days are just a bunch of pansies. You deserve to be overrun by barbaric hordes when your reaction to immigrants raping your women is holding a protest wearing skirts...

What we see here is evolution. The sons of the vikings aren't worthy of their lands anymore, so they will now be displaced by people who actually have some testosterone left.

569b55dec46188281b8b45a2.jpg
I think these guys are jealous that women are getting all the raping...goodbye white people
 
Also, people will not stop pointing out that Americans should not be salty about immigration because America is a country founded by immigrants. They keep missing the point that
  • America's immigrants have a very long history of keeping their traditions while also successfully integrating into American culture. It's what's made America "the great melting pot," but it would have never worked if immigrants were unwilling to at least try to assimilate.
  • America's immigrants were very willing to earn their keep and build a life for themselves instead of getting handouts. They literally built the country.
  • People fleeing from oppressive regimes were not (and are not) hellbent on establishing said regimes in America; they came to America to get away from them. Like, most people fleeing the Soviet Union during the Cold War didn't come to America with the intention to spread communism.
 
You know how the most obvious statement ever is "I believe our children are future?"

For the first time ever that's wrong. In Europe, Islamic immigrants are the future.
 
Also, people will not stop pointing out that Americans should not be salty about immigration because America is a country founded by immigrants. They keep missing the point that
  • America's immigrants have a very long history of keeping their traditions while also successfully integrating into American culture. It's what's made America "the great melting pot," but it would have never worked if immigrants were unwilling to at least try to assimilate.
  • America's immigrants were very willing to earn their keep and build a life for themselves instead of getting handouts. They literally built the country.
  • People fleeing from oppressive regimes were not (and are not) hellbent on establishing said regimes in America; they came to America to get away from them. Like, most people fleeing the Soviet Union during the Cold War didn't come to America with the intention to spread communism.
Agreed, a condensed version should go something like this though, "America is a country based on good immigrants, but since there are more bad immigrants than good immigrants, it's just not working anymore"

http://www.ijreview.com/2016/01/516985-muslim-employees-quit/
Muslim employees in Wisconsin quit their job because their bosses did not let them keep up with their prayer schedules, now that's the American way.
So, What's Next? Acid and other caustic chemicals to the face because I refuse access to my vagina to a bunch of sand creatures?
Not making light of it, but it's now a possible reality...

PakisaniWomenAcidattack.png
 
I found a translation (yeah, I know it's Pamela Geller) of a post written by a German aid worker chronicling her disillusionment with the refugees flooding Germany.

“‘I can’t take it anymore’ – Hamburger Asylum Worker,” Die Welt, January 17, 2016:

A Hamburg woman works in a reception center for refugees . The mid – 30 -year-old tells how she experienced daily life there – and why she now thinks of quitting . A protocol
The refugee crisis is intensifying . Also in Hamburg accommodations , the situation is obviously extremely difficult – the “Welt am Sonntag ” reported on the daily life of an anonymous employee.

The refugee crisis is intensifying . Also in Hamburg accommodations , the situation is obviously extremely difficult – the “Welt am Sonntag ” reported on the daily life of an anonymous employee.

“Since autumn of 2015 I have been working as a full-time and permanent employee in a Hamburger initial reception center for refugees. I had applied explicitly for this job, that was exactly what I wanted to do. When I finally had the commitment it in my mailbox, I Was madly happy about it. Finally I was able to not only help in theory, but to really do something for the refugees.

Accordingly, I went in high spirits my first day to the initial reception; I was naturally excited, clear, one is always on the first working day of a the new job, but otherwise I was happy to be there. The colleagues were committed and very nice, but with the refugees I had still no direct contact. I greeted the area enthusiastically and found all was great.

“It is certainly super here”, I thought to myself. In the next few days, I then threw myself totally motivated into my work with up to 1,500 refugees who were housed there. I was responsible for their counseling services as the contact for all social problems of refugees, supporting them in their asylum procedure or securing medical appointments when they needed that.

Then the first refugees came to my office, where I wanted to stop the counseling services – After the first few visits I noted that my very positive and idealistic notion of them and their behavior was clearly different from reality. Of course you should not make generalizations about all refugees under any circumstances, there are many of them who are very friendly, grateful, very willingly integrated, very happy here. But if I’m honest, then the collaboration with 90 percent of those whom I meet is rather unpleasant and unfortunately not as I had thought before.

First, many of them are extremely demanding. They come to me and demand that I immediately give them an apartment and a fancy car and most also want me to procure them a really good job, and I am supposed to say yes. I’m sitting there and they are indeed in immediate need. And, if I reject them and instead try to explain to them that these demands are not immediately possible to fulfill, then they are often noisy and sometimes very aggressive. An Afghan has only recently threatened that he would kill himself. And a few Syrians and a group of Afghans have declared that they will go on hunger strike until I help them to move to another place.

To an originally Arab colleague of mine they have at times yelled “We will behead you!”. Because of these and other things the police have to come out several times a week to us.
Second, they often give very unreliable information. They come to me with their papers and then tell a story that may not entirely agree. But they continue to believe and I can then be only sure when I’ve talked with my colleagues about it. Often my colleagues say that the person had already been with them the day before and everything they were told was a little bit different.

There was, for example, a resident who came with his deportation notice and wanted to know what would happen now. I explained it to him and he then went. Soon after he came to my colleague and suddenly showed completely new identity documents with a different name and said he was the man with the different name. He was then no longer recognized, but only moved to another camp.

Third, they rarely stick to agreements. Part of what I am doing also includes setting the doctor’s appointments for the refugees. All of them must have a basic examination, that is an X-ray, a vaccine and a general check-up. But many of them still want to go to other doctors, especially to a dentist or orthopedic surgeon. Then I make appointments for them, but often they just do not show up. This happens so often that doctors now have already asked us not to set as many appointments – but what am I supposed to do? I can not simply reject the request for an appointment, just because I suspect that the petitioner might not appear.

And fourth, and that’s for me the worst: Some of the refugees behave belligerently us towards women. It is well known that it is primarily single men who come to us, about 65 percent or even 70 percent, I would personally vouch that. They are all still young, only around 20, not more than 25 years old.

And part of them do not respect us women. They do not take us seriously at all. If I tell them something or want to give them a statement, then they hardly listen to me. They immediately dismiss us as unimportant and then call for a male colleague. For us women, they often only give us contemptuous or even intrusive glances. Often they whistle aloud afterward, then call out something in a foreign language laughing, which I and most of my colleagues do not understand. This is really very unpleasant. It’s even happened once that they have photographed me with a smartphone. Just like that, without asking, even if one has protested. And finally, As I was going up a steep staircase, the men behind went up the steps behind me and they laughed all the time and – I suspect – talking about me and then shouted at me.

Colleagues have told me that they have similar experiences. But there is nothing that one can do…its part of the job. This happens so often, if you would make a formal complaint the center would be much emptier. So they ignore it and try not to let it get to them- and so I did the same. I proceeded with my view directed forward when those behind followed me or called after me. Did not say anything and did not distort my face, so as not to encourage them or to give them the feeling that they can hurt or affect me.

But that did not help; it has even become worse – frankly, especially in recent weeks, as more and more men from North Africa, from Morocco, Tunisia or Libya have come to the establishment. They were even more aggressive. Since then I can no longer ignore – and have responded in order not to expose myself.

Specifically, this means: I have started to change my appearance. I’m actually someone who likes to sometimes wear form-fitting things – but not anymore. I put on loose-fitting pants and exclusively high-necked tops. Makeup I use very little anyway, most times only a concealer. And not only have I outwardly changed. To protect myself from this harassment, I behave differently. So I avoid, for example, going to those places on our premises where the single men often stay. And if I do need to pass through, then I try to go quickly and smile at no one now, so no one can misunderstand. But usually I stay in my little office, if possible, all during the day. And I no longer take the train to work and back – because recently a colleague was followed by some of the young men to the metro station and even molested in the train. I would like to spare myself and therefore I only drive my car.

I know this all sounds vehemently extreme, to avoid certain spaces and only take the car. And I find it terrible myself that I’m doing all this, and that I should even consider it necessary. But what should I do, what would be the alternative then? Just to endure the staters and come-ons, it can not be. Of the officials I expect no great help. Neither in this case nor in the other problems that exist with us, neither from the Interior Ministry nor the local Federal Office for Migration and Refugees. If you call these offices they often no longer answer the phone.

So I will only have the possibility of quitting. But I have always ruled this out for me; I like my colleagues very much, the refugee children also. And I was previously so convinced of the job and of the whole thing in itself – because it is very difficult to admit that this is all just a little different from what you have imagined. And quitting would of course be an admission of this. Meanwhile, I still think concretely about it. Many colleagues also want to give their notice, because they can’t take it anymore, because they cannot bear to see how wrong it is all going here and that they cannot help it. And if I’m honest: I really do not think I can take it anymore”.

* Name is withheld
Reported to Sophie Lübbert

Note how she's not disparaging all refugees, just the ones who are shitting it up for everyone (native people and refugees alike).
 
Good news, Norway is starting to deport migrants that have valid Russia visas and residence permits and still illegally cross the border into Norway seeking asylum there. Many migrants take advantage of the more circuitous Middle East-Russia-Norway route where the borders control and immigration policies at each step are less strict than the more commonly used migrant routes that run through the Mediterranean and southeastern Europe. In particular, there was this border control loophole that prevented border guards from demanding passports and visas from bicyclists crossing the Norwegian-Russian border, so migrants just bicycled over in droves and applied for asylum in Norway.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35355727
 
Good news, Norway is starting to deport migrants that have valid Russia visas and residence permits and still illegally cross the border into Norway seeking asylum there. Many migrants take advantage of the more circuitous Middle East-Russia-Norway route where the borders control and immigration policies at each step are less strict than the more commonly used migrant routes that run through the Mediterranean and southeastern Europe. In particular, there was this border control loophole that prevented border guards from demanding passports and visas from bicyclists crossing the Norwegian-Russian border, so migrants just bicycled over in droves and applied for asylum in Norway.

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35355727
I dunno, shouldn't they were about the ones inside too.
 
[MEDIA=twitter]688999781193117696[/MEDIA]Wow, I'm fucking shocked.

The stupidity of doing this is staggering, as any fool should have been able to see that any short-term impact of negative stories is going to be dwarfed by the anti-immigrant backlash caused by mass censorship stories like this.

These arrogant idiots and their God complex have caused incalculable harm with their idiocy.
 
Wikipedia's editors tried to delete the article on Taharrush.
http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts/1220374
What's "Taharrush?" Apparently, it's an event in Arabic culture where a group of men sexually assault women. Let's see what the deletion advocacy comes from:


Delete : This is just another name for group assault like the term "Wilding", which had many headlines at the time - but is now a mere mention under "other" on a disambiguation page. --Versageek 06:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

DELETE “Taharrush gamea” is simply Arabic for “collective harrasment”: the term is used very recently in the press about the event in Cologne because the perpetrators seem to be migrants, but no study — sociological or otherwise — talk about it being a specially Arabic phenomenon. When it happens in an English-speaking country, it's called “harrasment”; in French it's “harcèlement”; in German “Belästigung” in Arabic it's “تحرش”: we should not create an article for every language. --Superbenjamin (talk) 09:30, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

ABSOLUTELY DELETE: The concept of collective rape being a uniquely Arab or Muslim phenomenon, or even having some form of casual acceptance in Arab culture specifically, is so obviously a fabrication that I can't comprehend how anyone could even consider for a second that it's factually accurate, let alone objective, neutral, or depoliticized. This article doesn't describe a phenomenon distinct from already-existing concepts of collective rape - unless you happen to be viewing it through a very particular lens. Deadwreck (talk) 11:33, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete as neologism. Article relies entirely on sources from the past few days. Google Trends indicate it's extremely recent,[13] and there's pretty much just a single hit on Google Books.[14] It might be relevant to redirect it to New Year's Eve sexual assaults in Germany, but a standalone article is extreme recentism and sensationalism. Peter Isotalo 17:05, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Strong delete absolutely unnecessary article--Opdire657 (talk) 23:20, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Strong delete The article takes a single event, turns it into a social phenomenon, and presents biased and unproven by the literature explanations of this so-called phenomenon. It compromises the integrity of Wikipedia. 88.105.128.78 (talk) 11:18, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

delete: It's clearly a neologism that's been created in recent days. After an appropriate amount of time if the concept is used more often and frequently, an article should be created about it - otherwise wikipedia can be seen as a method to create new terms instead of being a place to find new terms. If someone can find a reference to the term from before recent events the page should stay otherwise it needs to swiftly be removed. Countered |talk 14:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete: This article lists a few examples of sexual assaults in Egypt and suddenly concludes that is a "phenomenon", and one that is uniquely "Arab". The sources are weak: German police officials are cited as the main proponents of this theory, and there is no indication that any of them is a sociologist or a scholar of any relevant field. Heck, none of them even speaks Arabic, or been into an Arab country. But simply by virtue of being white, OP have turned them into experts on Arab/Muslim society and culture, and their judgements are passed as undisputed truths, and worthy of an article. And by using the literal translation of "mass sexual assaults" in Arabic as the title, that makes it officially an Arab phenomenon!

Furthermore, the body of the article is quite ridiculous. Consider the following sentence: Some parallels have been drawn to Eve teasing and the mob of youngsters that harassed women and couples in a year 2000 New York Parade (Puerto Rican Day Parade attacks).

So basically this article cites earlier examples of mass sexual assaults, as a supporting argument that it is an Arab phenomenon? You'd think editors at this point would stop, and ask themselves whether the cited German officers/other pretentious euro-supremacists are full of crap and perhaps reconsider this phenomenon as one that exhibits in large male crowds, and one that transcends all cultures? This article serves no purpose other than perpetuating the euro-supremacist anti-immigrant narrative that regards Arab and North African individuals as sexual predators. Al-Andalusi (talk) 03:44, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

What the sugar-frosted fuck.
 
Last edited:
Can anyone explain why Wikipedia is so devoted to covering up the crimes of rapists?
 
At this point, I have no logical or reasonable explanation.

I just can't come up with a reasonable explanation. Wikipedia is full of sjw's that think looking at a women longer than five seconds is rape but here they are trying to provide cover for real criminals that have actually committed rape. If this was a Hollywood script it would be rejected for being too implausible.
 
I just can't come up with a reasonable explanation. Wikipedia is full of sjw's that think looking at a women longer than five seconds is rape but here they are trying to provide cover for real criminals that have actually committed rape. If this was a Hollywood script it would be rejected for being too implausible.

I think it may very well be a case of their own ideology (the sliding scale of privilege) blowing up in their face.
 
Wikipedia's editors tried to delete the article on Taharrush.
What's "Taharrush?" Apparently, it's an event in Arabic culture where a group of men sexually assault women. Let's see what the deletion advocacy comes from:


















What the sugar-frosted fuck.
Can anyone explain why Wikipedia is so devoted to covering up the crimes of rapists?

You guys, brown people cannot be held accountable for their crimes. Everyone lived in peace and harmony before white people came along and taught them evil. What's more, whitey's been keeping them down so they're not as developed as us white devils. We cannot possibly expect them to understand the consequences of their actions because of their culture!!!

Seriously, handing Muslims a pass when they gang rape and molest women just because Muslims are at the top of the controversial list is unspeakably disgusting. And do you think this is just about the attacks in Europe, or that people only care because white women were the ones assaulted? Women in the Middle East are lucky to be considered second-class citizens. Men can gang up on them and assault them without fearing repercussion because the police will probably rape them if they try to file a complaint. Either that or they've assaulted plenty of women themselves so they don't consider it a crime. But no, let's censor information and discussion about violence against women because it's politically incorrect and we don't want to hurt any rapists' feelings.

At this point I'm just wondering how long it's gonna be until a feminist or a European official suggests that we stop condemning honor killings because it's a cultural thing and all cultures are equal.
 
Sorry to double post, but the hypocrisy is so huge it deserves its own post.

The article on Taharrush drew parallels to something called Eve teasing, a similar South Asian phenomenon that involves groups of men harassing women. Oddly enough, the talk page is short and seems to contain no controversy.

So it's totally okay to have an article on South Asian group sexual harassment, but having one on Arabs is just too much.
 
Back
Top Bottom