🍗 Deathfat Eugenia Cooney - Youtube's Reigning uwu Cute, Emo ana-chan Supreme, had a child molester for a discord moderator

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Just shooting out ideas but couldn’t she start a channel if she just… wore more clothes? Like what would their grounds to ban her be if she did that? I’m actually surprised she hasn’t tried to come back at all - surely you can’t be banned on grounds that you simply have anorexia?
More clothes often means less attention.
 
Also isn't reliant on social media money like some others might be. She's taken care of either way.
 
To be fair I think this has been happening. A lot of gorlworld lost monetization including ALR and foodie beauty

I'm actually glad for this

With anorexia, when the person can actively be seen showing ED body checking and and doing other anorexic 'showy' behaviors such as dressing in such a way to show off or flaunt as much of their skeketal frame as possible, then it might be considered 'promoting' anorexia. It's not just a 'skinny girl,' it's an emaciated woman dressing in such a way to proudly show off her 'handiwork.'

Fat people get demonitized when they are shown doing muckbangs and pigging out, essentially binge eating on camera. Binge eating is a known ED, so it gets flagged.

Yes it certainly is promotion but she's not saying it out loud. But if some fatties are being demonitized for only doing mukbangs and not talking about fat activism then that would be applied fairly to the vlogging while skeletal.
 
Yes it certainly is promotion but she's not saying it out loud. But if some fatties are being demonitized for only doing mukbangs and not talking about fat activism then that would be applied fairly to the vlogging while skeletal.
True, as my earlier reply is ultimately a guess. Ultimately it just may really boil down to these sites she's on not wanting to get sued or fined at some later date, and have their reputations (and ad revenue) get torpedoed to hell if some media darling teen dies and it can be traced back to the content they 'allowed' on their platform.
 
True, as my earlier reply is ultimately a guess. Ultimately it just may really boil down to these sites she's on not wanting to get sued or fined at some later date, and have their reputations (and ad revenue) get torpedoed to hell if some media darling teen dies and it can be traced back to the content they 'allowed' on their platform.
This. They're probably worried about their bottom line if she dies while streaming after Mother's Day.
 
Sorry if late, gimme those clocks but it looks like her brother was a huge creep towards her and sexualized her....View attachment 8113777View attachment 8113778View attachment 8113779
I personally don’t think this was purposely done as he’s autistic, and has been grown up in an environment where his sister goes out in her underwear daily.
It’s understandable that he’d think she would want to be a porn star as he’s literally grown up with different social norms in a household like that.

Maybe I’m the tard here, but I just don’t think it’s as “deep” as people make it out to be.
 
I personally don’t think this was purposely done as he’s autistic, and has been grown up in an environment where his sister goes out in her underwear daily.
It’s understandable that he’d think she would want to be a porn star as he’s literally grown up with different social norms in a household like that.

Maybe I’m the tard here, but I just don’t think it’s as “deep” as people make it out to be.
You raise an interesting point though: does he realize it's abnormal or is he just autistically replicating her actual wardrobe?
 
I have to say I am absolutely horrified by the lawsuit situation. I normally wouldn't jump in to express concern but this is absolutely absurd.

The fact that an Anorexic woman can now be sued for flaunting her body and disorder on the internet because of her influence on "youth" should be disturbing to every single person on this thread. Not allowing her to make money from her videos and shorts is fine but this is literally crazy.
 
I have to say I am absolutely horrified by the lawsuit situation. I normally wouldn't jump in to express concern but this is absolutely absurd.

The fact that an Anorexic woman can now be sued for flaunting her body and disorder on the internet because of her influence on "youth" should be disturbing to every single person on this thread. Not allowing her to make money from her videos and shorts is fine but this is literally crazy.
I don't think she is being sued directly. I think there's a class action against twitch and yt for platforming her and others like her. Hence the demonetization...they'll still host her/ana chans/gorls but they won't let them profit from it. I think that's the crux of the suit, though I am not remotely a legal fag. And presumably the wave of demonetizations happened so they could show a judge that now their companies weren't making money from the skellies/deathfats either anymore.
 
I hate to say this. Because it's a bit weird but maybe if she took her content over to an adult website like Only Fans or something alone those lines she could still make money. She's getting nowhere now with this new cleaned up and child friendly internet.

She needs to go the route of adult content if she ever wants to see a a cent again. She may not need it but she's a 32 year old woman almost who has been making her own money for years despite being mentally unwell.

Having no income all of a sudden is probably mentally distressing for her.
 
It upsets me that these platforms are bothering unplatforming people because of 'promoting unhealthy bodies' to protect teh kiddos. Fuck that noise. It's well past time for parents to actually, I dunno, parent. These idiots with bones protruding from their bodies or fat rolling around under their skin can be highly useful in teaching a child healthy habits.

NGL, I actually love having our super fatty-boom-booms and our skelly-chans online and visible for all, as well as the Farms. They're great teaching tools for my teen goblin.

Fatty-boom-booms, especially the ones dropping dead or the ones gasping for breath after walking 200 feet, show goblin the dangers of overindulgence and the benefits of not just blindly consuming and keeping a decent activity level going. It allows goblin to see what's in store for some of goblin's school associates, because some of those twerps be FAT.

Skelly content gives me the means to show goblin the other end of the spectrum and grin as horror flashes across goblin's face. This was helpful when said fat fuck kids were making fun of goblin for being 'too skinny'. Eugenia and Ashley (RIP) were my examples to what 'too skinny' actually is, then we opened up the fucking BMI chart and displayed how goblin's perfectly normal in a world of fatasses.

And the Farms? That got goblin entirely off social media and practicing good opsec, because goblin saw how easily a bunch of retarded autists can dox the fuck out of people. Goblin's actually kept nearly all personally identifiable information off the web, and intends to keep it that way. We regularly read side-by-side when someone gets new locations doxed, and I talk with goblin about how it was done. It's incredibly educational.
 
I have to say I am absolutely horrified by the lawsuit situation. I normally wouldn't jump in to express concern but this is absolutely absurd.

The fact that an Anorexic woman can now be sued for flaunting her body and disorder on the internet because of her influence on "youth" should be disturbing to every single person on this thread. Not allowing her to make money from her videos and shorts is fine but this is literally crazy.
Post modern relativism (moral and otherwise) is collapsing under the weight of its own bullshit.

Tolerance for self harm and the exhibitionism of it online is beginning to peak. The idea of adult role models and community needs (and imposing controls on anti social or unhealthy behavior by individuals) are making a comeback too. The needs of the community can't be trampled by the wants of a tiny minority. Or by the hare brained notions of luxury believers who think everyone is equal and entitled to a pony. (Or immune to being influenced, kek.) In the real world, they aren't.

If a man exploits a woman's body for financial gain- that's evil, oppressive patriarchy, right? But when a mentally ill woman does it to herself (and in front of impressionable young girls, affecting their psychological development) that's supposed to be agency, liberation, or power? Her right to do?

No, it's none of those things. A truly moral and compassionate society does not let their mentally ill do whatever they want, or give them more rights than the sane. That's just enabling them to spiral further into their illness. And to spread it.

maybe if she took her content over to an adult website like Only Fans or something alone those lines she could still make money
There are paywalled porno "skinny girl" sites where she could get a gig as one of their "models" in a NY minute. She's probably well aware of them too. But by doing that she would have to acknowledge her appeal to that particular audience and embrace them as her fans. Given the unappealing mirror they'd hold up and the demands they'd make of her, that's unlikely.
 
Any girl looking at a skelly and being jealous as opposed to horrified already has mental illness/anorexia. It's not creating more ana-chans. These girls found thinspo/illness-fuel before the Internet existed and will do so regardless of a social media ban.

That, and always ALWAYS be suspicious of "please think of the children" arguments when it comes to legislation. 99.999999% of the time it's an emotional trojan horse for something that any sane citizen would find objectionable.
 
Any girl looking at a skelly and being jealous as opposed to horrified already has mental illness/anorexia. It's not creating more ana-chans. These girls found thinspo/illness-fuel before the Internet existed and will do so regardless of a social media ban.

That, and always ALWAYS be suspicious of "please think of the children" arguments when it comes to legislation. 99.999999% of the time it's an emotional trojan horse for something that any sane citizen would find objectionable.

Which is a surprise to me. She's out of the age range where she's a major influencer on the youth. She's in her 30's.

When she was a 20 year old anorexic girl who still had a youthful face showing her skinny body on YouTube from various angles I would say, yes, back then she probably did influence young girls negatively. The devastating physical effects of the disorder hadn't caught up with her yet.

Now she's a frail, sick woman who has almost lost consciousness or had some sort of medical event on a live stream more than a few times. She's been discovered to wear adult diapers from incontinence. The candid pictures of her are pathetic. She looks sick, weary and ready to die. I have a very hard time believing she's a role model and a negative influence for all the teen girls on TikTok. It's nonsense.

The lawsuit is incredibly cruel for this reason.
 
Signs of life: she apparently went live on TikTok with Jeffery Star. Here's a summary from Reddit:

Screenshot 2026-01-27 at 4.49.56 AM.png
 
Ignoring everything else for a minute, is Eugenia locked into some sort of exclusivity deal with TikTok, but can't post due to the ongoing legal action? Is that what's going on? Why isn't she active on any of the other platforms she has accounts on? People far more objectionable than her still manage to have a web presence. Is she just completely helpless at this point?
 
Back
Top Bottom